Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #13349
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> |
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.firefox |
| Subject | Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? |
| Date | Mon, 5 May 2025 16:12:54 +0100 |
| Lines | 15 |
| Message-ID | <m7s2rrFu3doU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <vv5mdg$3d02$1@dont-email.me> <vv61j2$dmer$1@dont-email.me> <vv6j9n$10umt$2@dont-email.me> <vv7lg6$1un1k$1@dont-email.me> <vv8ao8$2hqeg$2@dont-email.me> <e7okelxn36.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <j2kh1klivspafg9auhl00sbp2d1grddck3@4ax.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net iDEmVvRv/f981QsbCgfUBgKkNJj9gpB3BUvltqAJgD3Tkz0408 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:NbiK6TgsnUO7NZCh7KpBUslUUjA= sha256:9Q2koeORTFLXSyDbMVC++lwUApAzlXWK+LOjovpmDwo= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Content-Language | en-GB |
| In-Reply-To | <j2kh1klivspafg9auhl00sbp2d1grddck3@4ax.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.comp.software.firefox:13349 |
Show key headers only | View raw
jetjock wrote: > Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> Curious. I am using Firefox daily (in Linux) and I don't have currently >> sites that do not open in it. > > Check this link and tell me if you get an "Error in Rendering Player" > https://sports.yahoo.com/article/olivia-dunne-breaks-silence-kentucky-021116740.html Plays fine in FF138 under Win11 (no need to disable uBO or Ghostery) Gives a message within the browser console "VIDEOJS: WARN: Using the tech directly can be dangerous. I hope you know what you're doing." <https://github.com/videojs/video.js/issues/2617>
Back to alt.comp.software.firefox | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2025-05-03 11:14 -0700
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-05-03 17:26 -0400
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-05-04 00:24 +0200
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2025-05-03 19:27 -0700
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-05-04 08:11 -0400
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2025-05-04 11:13 -0700
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-04 20:28 +0200
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2025-05-04 13:16 -0700
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-04 23:04 +0200
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-05 08:39 +1000
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-05-08 03:12 -0400
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Rob Nolan <robert@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-04 19:50 +0000
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-04 23:01 +0200
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-05-04 20:05 -0400
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-05-05 09:55 -0500
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-05-05 16:12 +0100
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-05-05 13:17 -0500
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-05-08 03:22 -0400
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Nobody <jock@soccer.com> - 2025-05-05 08:47 -0700
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-05 23:45 +0200
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-05-06 09:43 -0500
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-05-08 03:17 -0400
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-05-08 03:09 -0400
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-05-08 06:58 -0400
Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-05-03 18:56 -0500
csiph-web