Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #13289

Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper?

From	Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.software.firefox
Subject	Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper?
Date	2025-05-03 17:26 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vv61j2$dmer$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<vv5mdg$3d02$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/3/2025 2:14 PM, Sailfish wrote:
> REF: 
> https://www.theverge.com/news/660548/firefox-google-search-revenue-share-doj-antitrust-remedies 
> 
> 
> [excerpt quote=\"
> Firefox could be put out of business should a court implement all the 
> Justice Department’s proposals to restrict Google’s search monopoly, an 
> executive for the browser owner Mozilla testified Friday. “It’s very 
> frightening,” Mozilla CFO Eric Muhlheim said.
> 
> ...
> 
> Firefox makes up about 90 percent of Mozilla’s revenue, according to 
> Muhlheim, the finance chief for the organization’s for-profit arm — 
> which in turn helps fund the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation. About 85 
> percent of that revenue comes from its deal with Google, he added.
> \" /]
> 

   I think it'd be great. They'd have to slim down, stop paying the CEO
$7 million, and stop releasing versions every 10 days. As you may recall,
FF survived before Google started with the payouts.

Thread

Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2025-05-03 11:14 -0700
  Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-05-03 17:26 -0400
    Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-05-04 00:24 +0200
    Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2025-05-03 19:27 -0700
      Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-05-04 08:11 -0400
        Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2025-05-04 11:13 -0700
          Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-04 20:28 +0200
            Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2025-05-04 13:16 -0700
              Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-04 23:04 +0200
              Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-05 08:39 +1000
              Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-05-08 03:12 -0400
            Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Rob Nolan <robert@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-04 19:50 +0000
              Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-04 23:01 +0200
            Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-05-04 20:05 -0400
            Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-05-05 09:55 -0500
              Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-05-05 16:12 +0100
                Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-05-05 13:17 -0500
                Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-05-08 03:22 -0400
              Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Nobody <jock@soccer.com> - 2025-05-05 08:47 -0700
              Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-05 23:45 +0200
                Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-05-06 09:43 -0500
              Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-05-08 03:17 -0400
        Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-05-08 03:09 -0400
          Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-05-08 06:58 -0400
  Re: Death of Fx not with a bang but with a whimper? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-05-03 18:56 -0500

csiph-web