Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #16305 > unrolled thread

What Office to get?

Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11

Contents

  What Office to get? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-15 14:30 +0100
    Re: What Office to get? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-15 09:27 -0500
    Re: What Office to get? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-01-15 08:29 -0600
      Re: What Office to get? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-01-15 13:45 -0600
        Re: What Office to get? malone <malone@nospam.net.nz> - 2025-01-16 09:28 +1300
          Re: What Office to get? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-01-15 15:54 -0600
          Re: What Office to get? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-01-15 16:36 -0600
    Re: What Office to get? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-15 16:38 +0100
      Re: What Office to get? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ  <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 10:44 -0700
        Re: What Office to get? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-16 15:49 +0100
      Re: What Office to get? Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-01-28 21:12 +1100
        Re: What Office to get? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 13:27 +0000
          Re: What Office to get? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-28 14:51 +0000
    Re: What Office to get? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-01-15 17:18 +0100
    Re: What Office to get? Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-01-15 12:08 -0600
    Re: What Office to get? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-15 16:07 -0500
      Re: What Office to get? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ  <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 22:35 -0700
        Re: What Office to get? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-16 09:05 -0500
          Re: What Office to get? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ  <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 13:40 -0700
            Re: What Office to get? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-16 17:12 -0500
              Re: What Office to get? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-16 23:26 +0100
                Re: What Office to get? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ  <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 21:38 -0700
    Re: What Office to get? Drummond <noreply@juhygtfr.com> - 2025-01-16 02:00 +0000
    Re: What Office to get? Cameo <cameo@unreal.invalid> - 2025-01-28 21:03 +0000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#16353

On 2025-01-16 23:12, Newyana2 wrote:
>    So MSO 365 is a dumb idea to begin with. But it's especially
> a bad idea for anyone running Win10 and sticking with it.

The person I asked for has a new laptop bought with W11.

And anyway, she is going to try LO. She initially thought of getting M$O 
and asked me for advice, but then another friend convinced her not to 
and try LO instead.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#16356

Carlos E.R. wrote on 1/16/25 3:26 PM:
> On 2025-01-16 23:12, Newyana2 wrote:
>>    So MSO 365 is a dumb idea to begin with. But it's especially
>> a bad idea for anyone running Win10 and sticking with it.
> 
> The person I asked for has a new laptop bought with W11.
> 
> And anyway, she is going to try LO. She initially thought of getting M$O 
> and asked me for advice, but then another friend convinced her not to and 
> try LO instead.
> 

Nothing wrong with that approach.
My point was addressing mulitple users in a small business or consumer 
preferring or needing Office, where economics indicate a single sharable 
subscription license even with an annual subscription can be more cost 
effective than multiple users purchasing single license, single use.

M365 Family shared with 5 others(6 total users, anyone anywhere in the 
same country - family, coworkers in the same business) can be more 
economical than 6 people purchasing stand alone versions.

1. For 6 users - 5 yrs of subscription $500 => $83 per person or $17/yr
vs.
2. For 6 users - 6 stand-alone Office Home used for 5 yrs $900 => $150 
per person, $30 per year.

  #1 Never goes out of support, the end of support date increases every 3 
yrs(the release cycle time for M365-Office), stand-alone support ends at 
5 yrs

The lower cost per user break-even point in the above is the 9th yr. At 
that point in time, the perpetual(e.g. stand-alone Office 2024) purchased 
will have been out of support for at least 4 yrs.

Prediction<g> - at time time Newyana2 will still be complaining about 
end-of-support for an earlier soon to be non-supported o/s and 
recommmending to buy an older no longer supported or soon to be no longer 
supported version.

And if Office is needed or desired, online connected is a given for 
installation, retaining activation, and full feature use.

-- 
...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#16325

On 15/01/2025 13:30, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> a friend asks me what M$ Office to get.
> 
> She doesn't like the one that has to renew the license (pay) every year, 
> she rather wants a permanent one, and cheap if possible.
> 
> What options would you recommend? Country is Spain, so offers on shops 
> are not feasible, I'm afraid.
> 
> 
> Of course I suggested LO, but she has to share files with coworkers and 
> will not do. She es not a geek. But what I use is LO, so I am not 
> familiar with M$ Office versions.
> 
> Thanks.
> 


Cheap License:

<https://royalcdkeys.com/products/microsoft-office-2024-professional-plus-ltsc-key>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#16604

Home Office, of course!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.os.windows-11

csiph-web