Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #18072
| From | T <T@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered |
| Date | 2025-03-30 05:00 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vsbbpn$2hf7l$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <HR9GP.239153$bYQ4.223458@fx41.iad> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 3/30/25 4:24 AM, CrudeSausage wrote: > <https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/an-even-better- > microsoft-account-bypass-for-windows-11-has-already-been-discovered> > > Earlier this week, Microsoft announced that it was removing a popular > command line that allowed users to bypass connecting to the internet and > signing into a Microsoft Account during the setup phase on Windows 11. > > Since 2022, Windows 11 has required both an internet connection and > Microsoft Account when setting up a new PC. Naturally, not everybody > wants this, and so workarounds and bypasses have been discovered. > > The most popular bypass was "oobe\bypassnro" which, when typed into the > command prompt during the Windows 11 setup experience, would enable a > button that let you skip connecting to the internet, thus bypassing the > Microsoft Account requirement. > > Microsoft has said that it is removing this command to push more users > to connect to the internet and sign in with a Microsoft Account during > the setup phase. Understandably, the internet is outraged. > > While oobe\bypassnro is being removed, the actual registry entry that > enables the button to skip connecting to the internet isn't, at least > not yet. So you can still manually create the registry edit yourself, > but that's a much longer and tedious process. > > But fret not, as a new, perhaps better bypass has already been > discovered that still uses the command prompt (which you can open with > Shift + F10) and makes skipping the Microsoft Account sign-in step a > total breeze. > > Discovered by user @witherornot1337 on X, typing "start ms- > cxh:localonly" into the command prompt during the Windows 11 setup > experience will allow you to create a local account directly without > needing to skip connecting to the internet first. > > The new bypass involves creating a local account via the older Windows > 10 interface. (Image credit: Windows Central) > The command will pop up an older, Windows 10 style interface that lets > you specify a username and password for the local account. Then, > clicking next will take you straight to preparing the desktop, before > being asked to specify your privacy settings. > > We tested this method on the latest Windows 11 preview build 26200 and > can confirm that it works. It's a much more streamlined process compared > to the old oobe\bypassnro method, which required the PC to restart and > to slowly progress through the Windows 11 setup experience before > landing on the desktop. > > This new method doesn't require a restart and skips straight to the end > of the setup experience, landing just at the point where Windows asks > you to configure privacy settings. It's a win all around! > > While this new workaround works for now, something tells me that > Microsoft is likely going to crack down on these bypasses more often > going forward. So, it's unknown how long this new bypass will work, so > use it while you can! It is so, so much easier just to tell the installer that you are on a domain.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-30 07:24 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-30 05:00 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 15:28 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-30 22:42 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-31 08:05 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-03-31 12:46 +0000
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 11:07 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-31 14:59 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 13:00 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-31 11:15 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-03-31 14:56 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 13:03 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-01 05:24 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-01 09:30 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Jack <Jack@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-02 05:39 +0100
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-31 12:12 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 13:10 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-30 13:49 +0000
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-31 09:21 +0000
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-31 07:05 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-31 09:09 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-31 12:57 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-31 13:55 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-03-31 21:50 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-31 22:59 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-01 08:45 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-01 18:00 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-01 20:17 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-06 22:19 -0400
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 11:13 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-31 11:23 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-31 13:23 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-01 01:59 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-04-01 09:01 -0700
Re: A new, potentially better Windows account bypass has been discovered T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-01 20:34 -0700
csiph-web