Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #17998

Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject	Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?
Date	Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:20:00 -0000 (UTC)
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	12
Message-ID	<vs4iug$186dc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Thu, 27 Mar 2025 23:20:00 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="5e3725a960a956e95c3230978fe8baf9"; logging-data="1317292"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ItPsEC9qkESVIZxmh+pfZ"
User-Agent	Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:9F+eYh6tk0SrhoUVr69ciRLG3sI=
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:688258 alt.comp.os.windows-11:17998

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Seems Microsoft is bringing back the option for ordinary Windows users
to format volumes as ReFS
<https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/new-advanced-filesystem-format-option-found-in-windows-11-preview-build-refs-supports-up-to-35-petabytes>.

This filesystem made its first appearance years ago, but then
Microsoft began removing the option for using it from various
non-“Enterprise” versions of Windows where it had been introduced.

NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is
really enough to take Windows forward. It seems a bit lacklustre
compared to the options that have long been available on Linux, for
example.

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-27 22:20 +0000
  Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 18:26 -0400
  Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-27 22:26 +0000
    Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-27 20:25 -0400
      Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 20:00 +1100
        Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ  <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 06:14 -0700
      Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 21:23 +0000
        Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0400
          Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
            Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:18 -0400
              Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:17 +0000
        Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0500
          Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
            Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:21 -0400
              Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:13 +0000
  Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-03-28 10:40 +0000
    Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-28 09:31 -0400
    Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 00:57 +0000

csiph-web