Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #18031
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? |
| Date | 2025-03-29 00:29 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vs7pfe$80tl$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vs4iug$186dc$1@dont-email.me> <m4m1kuFg1o5U2@mid.individual.net> <vs4q9s$1f4r1$1@dont-email.me> <vs73vk$3jepm$3@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Fri, 3/28/2025 5:23 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 20:25:31 -0400, Paul wrote:
>
>> And yeah, I just bought a 35 petabyte hard drive yesterday.
>> What a coincidence :-)
>
> In Linux, we can have volumes spanning multiple physical drives, using
> technologies like LVM (not to be confused with LLVM).
>
> Not sure that Windows has anything like LVM, though.
>
You would need to find a server group, to discover best practice.
There is Storage Spaces. and Veritas Dynamic Disk allows some
virtual volumes to be constructed.
You can't really ask an AI to set up your disks either,
without answering questions about what the end use is. You
can include parity disks in an archival pool, but for write speed
adding parity would be a mistake.
[Picture] < suspect server is under attack by scraping AI bots... >
https://i.postimg.cc/h4bL44cT/storage-spaces-demo.gif
It's more fun unwinding those, than preparing one. As you
would expect, it makes a mess.
Paul
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 18:26 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-27 22:26 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-27 20:25 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 20:00 +1100
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 06:14 -0700
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 21:23 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:18 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:17 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0500
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:21 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:13 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-03-28 10:40 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-28 09:31 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 00:57 +0000
csiph-web