Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #16600
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: What Office to get? |
| Date | 2025-01-28 14:51 +0000 |
| Organization | NOYB |
| Message-ID | <vnaudg.i74.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <urpk5lxna8.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <7d1l5lxlr4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vnaahq$1p1fb$1@dont-email.me> <vnalvp$1ropc$1@dont-email.me> |
Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > On this. I had very weird experience last week with an online form from an > large internationally recognised organisation that refused to accept a docx > created in LO as an upload. Once opened and saved through Word it worked > just fine. > > I can't even think what check the online form would be doing to refuse a > file like that. I know very little about this and hardly use any .doc[x] files, but as far as I know, there's meta-data in such files as to which program and version made the file, file-version information, etc.. I.e. like the EXIF meta-data for JPEG files. Example, not .doc[x] but .xls, (Windows) Explorer says "Microsoft Excel 97-2003 Worksheet" for my latest yearly bank statement. As this is a bank-generated file, the meta-data is probably stripped, because the (Properties -> 'Details' tab) 'Origin' fields such as 'Program name' are empty. You may want to have a look at what the 'Origin' fields of your LO generated file says, versus that of the Word generated one.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What Office to get? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-15 14:30 +0100
Re: What Office to get? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-15 09:27 -0500
Re: What Office to get? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-01-15 08:29 -0600
Re: What Office to get? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-01-15 13:45 -0600
Re: What Office to get? malone <malone@nospam.net.nz> - 2025-01-16 09:28 +1300
Re: What Office to get? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-01-15 15:54 -0600
Re: What Office to get? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-01-15 16:36 -0600
Re: What Office to get? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-15 16:38 +0100
Re: What Office to get? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 10:44 -0700
Re: What Office to get? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-16 15:49 +0100
Re: What Office to get? Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-01-28 21:12 +1100
Re: What Office to get? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 13:27 +0000
Re: What Office to get? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-28 14:51 +0000
Re: What Office to get? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-01-15 17:18 +0100
Re: What Office to get? Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-01-15 12:08 -0600
Re: What Office to get? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-15 16:07 -0500
Re: What Office to get? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 22:35 -0700
Re: What Office to get? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-16 09:05 -0500
Re: What Office to get? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 13:40 -0700
Re: What Office to get? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-16 17:12 -0500
Re: What Office to get? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-16 23:26 +0100
Re: What Office to get? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 21:38 -0700
Re: What Office to get? Drummond <noreply@juhygtfr.com> - 2025-01-16 02:00 +0000
Re: What Office to get? Cameo <cameo@unreal.invalid> - 2025-01-28 21:03 +0000
csiph-web