Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #18854

Re: Firefox bad design decisions?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.software.firefox, alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject	Re: Firefox bad design decisions?
Date	Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:00:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization	the-candyden-of-code
Lines	63
Message-ID	<slrn101501c.3cghi.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink)
References	<vusaed$okis$1@news.samoylyk.net>
Injection-Date	Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="d27476a58d0f1f26b196216659144745"; logging-data="1058226"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YHD1PO8u6h6GzSgHC3ZSLTX6BSwNb9SCoB1ZIBu7/vQ=="
User-Agent	slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:kIt8yYO9DGzFgZE83/T2uu6Uim0=
X-Face	b{dPmN&%4\|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q\|QiU/R8\\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >\|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Xref	csiph.com alt.comp.software.firefox:13229 alt.comp.os.windows-11:18854

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote at 04:54 this Wednesday (GMT):
> What is wrong with Firefox developers always making bad design decisions?
>
> Firefox: 
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close multiple tabs
> (3) Left click on close other tabs
>
> A user-friendly efficient browser: {Pale Moon}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> A user-friendly efficient browser: {SRWare Iron}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> A user-friendly efficient browser: {Sea Monkey}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Ice Dragon}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Epic}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Opera}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Chromium}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Brave}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Ice Weasel}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Iridium}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Vivaldi}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Another user-friendly efficient browser: {Microsoft Edge}
> (1) Right click on any tab
> (2) Left click on close other tabs
>
> Is there any way to get Firefox to be more user friendly?


You can hover over "close multiple tabs" for a second to have it open
automatically.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Thread

Firefox bad design decisions? Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> - 2025-04-30 00:54 -0400
  Re: Firefox bad design decisions? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-29 23:48 -0700
    Re: Firefox bad design decisions? Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2025-04-30 09:18 +0200
  Re: Firefox bad design decisions? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-04-30 20:00 +0000
  Re: Firefox “bad” design decisions? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-01 00:04 +0000
    Re: Firefox “bad” design decisions? Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> - 2025-05-01 02:39 -0400
      Re: Firefox “bad” design decisions? Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2025-05-01 09:52 +0200

csiph-web