Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #32816
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 |
| Date | 2026-07-03 14:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <napnt9Five0U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <1124hik$29ldv$1@dont-email.me> <naml6gF46poU1@mid.individual.net> <1125mn1$2jjg4$1@dont-email.me> <nao0g1Fb1jlU1@mid.individual.net> <11284ia$3b8td$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2026-07-03 12:57, Daniel70 wrote:
> On 3/07/2026 6:37 am, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-07-02 14:48, Daniel70 wrote:
>>> On 2/07/2026 6:18 pm, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>> On IPv4 we use dynamic addresses. Our home address is constantly
>>>> changed. On IPv6 you get a fixed address (unless you have a silly
>>>> provider that uses dynamic addresses).
>>>
>>> Sorry. WHAT?? First you type, Carlos, that IPv4 uses dynamic
>>> addressing and then you suggest any IPv6 providers that use dynamic
>>> addressing are silly!!
>>>
>>> WHAT?? Aren't IPv4 providers using dynamic addressing ALSO silly?? Or
>>> can IPv4 providers ONLY provide dynamic addressing??
>>
>> Not bothering to answer, you are trolling. Surely you know the answer.
>>
> No, Carlos, you give me more credit than I deserve. I am merely just
> trying to increase my knowledge.
>
> Sorry.
ISPs use dynamic addressing with IPv4 simply because they don't have
enough addresses to give us static addresses. Counting on a number of
clients to not be connected at all.
ISPs using IPv6 have tons of addresses to give each home. They do not
need to use dynamic addresses, except to destroy the new functionalities
that IPv6 with fixed addresses allow.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
BRAXMAN: IPv6 Anonymous <bounce.me@n2n.oc2mx.net> - 2026-07-01 21:12 +0200
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-01 21:36 +0200
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-01 19:48 -0400
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2026-07-02 00:52 +0000
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-01 22:14 -0400
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Nick Charles <none@none.none> - 2026-07-02 02:31 +0000
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-02 10:18 +0200
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-02 22:48 +1000
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-02 22:37 +0200
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-03 20:57 +1000
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-03 14:23 +0200
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-04 23:45 +1000
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2026-07-02 21:15 +0100
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-07-06 14:28 +0300
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-06 13:39 +0200
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 watching you? IPv4? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-02 18:59 +0800
Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2026-07-02 21:01 +0100
csiph-web