Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.microsoft.windows > #1773
| From | Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies? |
| Date | 2022-09-02 09:31 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <tesevd$13eb$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster/slower than USB copies? I explained to some friends that I use webdav servers to mount Android file systems onto Windows as a "drive letter" over Wi-Fi, while they instead use USB cable to connect Android file systems to Windows as a "network drive". a. Drive Letter (over Wi-Fi) b. Network Drive (over USB) They need to make backups of a dozen or more Android phones, where they asked me which is faster - the Wi-Fi drive letter or the USB connection. I don't know. They're both fast enough for me. Is there any inherent reason why one would be faster/slower than the other?
Back to alt.comp.microsoft.windows | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-09-02 09:31 +0100
Re: Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2022-09-02 11:39 +0100
Re: Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies? sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2022-09-02 09:56 -0700
Re: Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-09-06 23:25 +0100
csiph-web