Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies?

From	Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com>
Newsgroups	comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows, alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject	Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies?
Date	2022-09-02 09:31 +0100
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<tesevd$13eb$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster/slower than USB copies?

I explained to some friends that I use webdav servers to mount Android file
systems onto Windows as a "drive letter" over Wi-Fi, while they instead use
USB cable to connect Android file systems to Windows as a "network drive".

a. Drive Letter (over Wi-Fi) 
b. Network Drive (over USB)

They need to make backups of a dozen or more Android phones, where they
asked me which is faster - the Wi-Fi drive letter or the USB connection.

I don't know. 
They're both fast enough for me.

Is there any inherent reason why one would be faster/slower than the other?

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-09-02 09:31 +0100
  Re: Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2022-09-02 11:39 +0100
    Re: Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower than USB copies? sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2022-09-02 09:56 -0700
      Re: Is a Windows Android drive letter inherently faster or slower   than USB copies? Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> - 2022-09-06 23:25 +0100

csiph-web