Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #277784 > unrolled thread

[SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well

Started by"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
First post2017-03-11 00:32 +0800
Last post2017-03-17 01:30 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 58 — 16 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.freeware


Contents

  [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 00:32 +0800
    Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2017-03-10 22:21 -0500
      Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 20:30 +0800
        Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2017-03-11 12:00 -0500
          Re: Symantec "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 01:05 +0800
            Re: Symantec Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2017-03-12 15:27 -0400
              Re: Symantec Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2017-03-12 15:52 -0400
    Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jason <jason_warren@ieee.DELETE.org> - 2017-03-16 07:33 -0400
      Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 20:18 +0800
        Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-16 09:03 -0400
          Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 22:06 +0800
            Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-03-16 10:59 -0400
              Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 00:59 +0800
            Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2017-03-16 12:41 -0400
              Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 01:00 +0800
                Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 04:15 -0500
                  Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 21:53 +0800
                    Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 16:18 -0500
                      Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:16 +0800
                        Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 11:37 -0500
                          Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 19:07 +0800
                            Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 07:53 -0500
                              Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 18:35 +0800
                                Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 03:58 -0500
                                  Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-03-21 09:17 -0300
                                    Re: [OT] Who's really crazy? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 22:12 +0800
                                      Re: [OT] Who's really crazy? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:48 -0500
                                        Re: [OT] Are we in war? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 19:54 +0800
                                          Re: [OT] Are we in war? Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2017-03-22 15:58 -0400
                                    Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-03-21 08:12 -0700
                                      write your own operating system single-handed? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-03-21 12:09 -0400
                                        Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-21 16:33 +0000
                                          Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-03-21 13:21 -0400
                                          Re: write your own operating system single-handed? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-03-21 17:25 +0000
                                            Re: write your own operating system single-handed? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-03-21 14:19 -0400
                                          Re: write your own operating system single-handed? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-03-21 14:18 -0400
                                            Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-03-21 19:26 +0000
                                    Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:48 -0500
                                      Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-22 10:44 +0100
                                        Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 20:11 -0500
                                      Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 19:56 +0800
                                        Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 20:11 -0500
                                          Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 02:13 +0800
                                      Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 22:25 +0800
                                      Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2017-03-22 11:30 -0400
                                        Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 23:56 +0800
                                  Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-03-21 08:52 -0400
                                    Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 22:08 +0800
                                    Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:49 -0500
                                      Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 19:57 +0800
              Re: 33 years to write Windows 10? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 01:04 +0800
            Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2017-03-17 13:58 +0000
              Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 00:43 +0800
                Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 16:17 -0500
                  Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:07 +0800
    Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well Derald <derald@invalid.net> - 2017-03-16 11:12 -0500
      [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 01:02 +0800
        Re: [OT] Flasherly <Flasherly@live.com> - 2017-03-17 01:30 -0400

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →


#278032 — Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system?

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-19 19:07 +0800
SubjectRe: So no human could make a truly secured operating system?
Message-ID<oalokl$qp9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278012
On 19/03/2017 12:37 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:16:15 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>      Stop making new threads for your replies. Either reply within the
> initial thread, or don't reply.
>

Could you write a 100% secured OS then? Don't just question and 
challenge me. :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278035 — Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system?

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-19 07:53 -0500
SubjectRe: So no human could make a truly secured operating system?
Message-ID<movsccho43skd0q35pfdn2mtidukujbqp2@4ax.com>
In reply to#278032
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:07:47 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 19/03/2017 12:37 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:16:15 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>      Stop making new threads for your replies. Either reply within the
>> initial thread, or don't reply.
>>
>
>Could you write a 100% secured OS then? Don't just question and 
>challenge me. :)

     I am happy with WIN 10, Ubuntu and Mint, so there is no need for
me to do so. Not that it would matter. I lack the knowledge necessary
to make an OS.
     I will question and challenge you. Contrary to your delusion, you
have NO control over what others do.
     What is at the root of your belief that you have this authority
over others?

-- 
Shill #3. 
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278066 — Re: write your own operating system single-handed?

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-20 18:35 +0800
SubjectRe: write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<oaob3t$277$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278035
On 19/03/2017 8:53 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> I am happy with WIN 10, Ubuntu and Mint, so there is no need for
> me to do so. Not that it would matter. I lack the knowledge necessary
> to make an OS.
> I will question and challenge you. Contrary to your delusion, you
> have NO control over what others do.
> What is at the root of your belief that you have this authority
> over others?
>
 > Your lack of evidence is noted. Since your claim is not
 > true, you couldn't offer any.
 > Make your own operating system. If you're not willing
 > to do that, then just shut up about it.

That task will require eternal life and infinite time to do so, giving 
the amount of time and resourced consumed by Micro$oft and other US 
companies.

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278100 — Re: write your own operating system single-handed?

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-21 03:58 -0500
SubjectRe: write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<1pq1dcpq0s0hbvcobm4nbeemf2f8pc51mv@4ax.com>
In reply to#278066
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:35:23 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 19/03/2017 8:53 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> I am happy with WIN 10, Ubuntu and Mint, so there is no need for
>> me to do so. Not that it would matter. I lack the knowledge necessary
>> to make an OS.
>> I will question and challenge you. Contrary to your delusion, you
>> have NO control over what others do.
>> What is at the root of your belief that you have this authority
>> over others?
>>
> > Your lack of evidence is noted. Since your claim is not
> > true, you couldn't offer any.
> > Make your own operating system. If you're not willing
> > to do that, then just shut up about it.
>
>That task will require eternal life and infinite time to do so, 

     Not at all. Maybe a few years to code and test, but not a
lifetime.

>giving 
>the amount of time and resourced consumed by Micro$oft and other US 
>companies.

     Completely irrelevant.
     Now make the OS you want or shut up.

-- 
Shill #3. 
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278108 — Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2017-03-21 09:17 -0300
SubjectRe: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<1862dcpvl75kkdnj1fj4fbutdd53tfb6h9@4ax.com>
In reply to#278100
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:58:28 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

>     Completely irrelevant.
>     Now make the OS you want or shut up.

	You do realize you are replying to a crazy person ?
	[]'s

	PS please use the OT flag when posting off topic. OS's made by
magicians, black magic and ISIS (AKA NSA) are off topic here, even if
they are free.
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278121 — Re: [OT] Who's really crazy?

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-21 22:12 +0800
SubjectRe: [OT] Who's really crazy?
Message-ID<oarc6s$jpf$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278108
On 21/03/2017 8:17 PM, Shadow wrote:
>
> You do realize you are replying to a crazy person ?
> []'s
>
> PS please use the OT flag when posting off topic. OS's made by
> magicians, black magic and ISIS (AKA NSA) are off topic here, even if
> they are free.

Well, you don't know who's really crazy in a true, real world war!

May the Force and farces be with you! :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278154 — Re: [OT] Who's really crazy?

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-22 03:48 -0500
SubjectRe: [OT] Who's really crazy?
Message-ID<rie4dclpoti5k9vi5d7r35nvhdahsm9nqn@4ax.com>
In reply to#278121
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 22:12:28 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 21/03/2017 8:17 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>
>> You do realize you are replying to a crazy person ?
>> []'s
>>
>> PS please use the OT flag when posting off topic. OS's made by
>> magicians, black magic and ISIS (AKA NSA) are off topic here, even if
>> they are free.
>
>Well, you don't know who's really crazy in a true, real world war!
>
>May the Force and farces be with you! :)

     To claim to KNOW you are crazy may be a bit much. However, your
posts make it very clear you have some sort of mental illness. Or
you've done an Oscar worth performance of someone who does.

-- 
Shill #3. 
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278162 — Re: [OT] Are we in war?

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-22 19:54 +0800
SubjectRe: [OT] Are we in war?
Message-ID<oatogf$t8d$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278154
On 22/03/2017 4:48 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>
>> Well, you don't know who's really crazy in a true, real world war!
>> May the Force and farces be with you! :)
>
> To claim to KNOW you are crazy may be a bit much. However, your
> posts make it very clear you have some sort of mental illness. Or
> you've done an Oscar worth performance of someone who does.

In a war, confronting countries and people always accuse the other side 
being mad. Are you and me in war?

I am NOT seeing you as enemy though. I also would NOT be surprised if 
you, your teams, your city and your country declare wars on people like 
me. :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278210 — Re: [OT] Are we in war?

FromFlasherly <Flasherly@live.com>
Date2017-03-22 15:58 -0400
SubjectRe: [OT] Are we in war?
Message-ID<6uj5dctecgg6t25h9ohtmvhi693jdhmoic@4ax.com>
In reply to#278162
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:54:38 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:

>In a war, confronting countries and people always accuse the other side 
>being mad. Are you and me in war?
>
>I am NOT seeing you as enemy though. I also would NOT be surprised if 
>you, your teams, your city and your country declare wars on people like 
>me. :)

Every age makes its own enemies, declares its own wars.  The economy
in a statement by reason to pause, and step back and wonder over a
course of shock and awe.  ...Wars being once such inclimate affairs,
not to mention expensive propositions, usually confined to the
seething hearths of discontent during winter months;- only springing
forth, fully armored, into a blossoming affair of dilettante when the
cold ice encasements of expansion melted;- if less a mind to time for
the following winter, given a remainder of the same hearth of course
to once more provide privy to ponder ensuing terms for peaceful
agreement, and thus concur what surrounding ravages be sufficient and
economically viable to minimally sustain all further malcontent.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278125 — Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?

FromKeith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Date2017-03-21 08:12 -0700
SubjectRe: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<lnwpbibr5d.fsf@kst-u.example.com>
In reply to#278108
Shadow <Sh@dow.br> writes:
[...]
> 	PS please use the OT flag when posting off topic.

Actually, please use the OT tag *and then don't post*.

Followups redirected

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278126 — write your own operating system single-handed?

FromburfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk>
Date2017-03-21 12:09 -0400
Subjectwrite your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<oarj2i$cs9$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278125
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:12:14 -0700
Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:

> Followups redirected


Why, you afraid?? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278127 — Re: write your own operating system single-handed?

FromRichard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Date2017-03-21 16:33 +0000
SubjectRe: write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<oarkf5$lkl$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278126
On 21/03/17 16:09, burfordTjustice wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:12:14 -0700
> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
>
>> Followups redirected
>
>
> Why, you afraid??

What of? A non sequitur? They're not particularly scary.

By the way, it's "Buford", not "Burford". Check the credits.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278130 — Re: write your own operating system single-handed?

From"James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Date2017-03-21 13:21 -0400
SubjectRe: write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<c52ceb9d-c4c9-f0a4-4458-7b396d25707d@verizon.net>
In reply to#278127
On 03/21/2017 12:33 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 21/03/17 16:09, burfordTjustice wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:12:14 -0700
>> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Followups redirected
>>
>>
>> Why, you afraid??
>
> What of? A non sequitur? They're not particularly scary.

In this context, you're right. In other contexts, they can be pretty 
scary. Consider, for instance, non sequiturs heard at a major State 
dinner, popping out of the mouth of someone with the power to authorize 
a nuclear attack (no, I'm not referring to any actual recent events - I 
just tried to construct the worst-case scenario - that it currently 
seems significantly most plausible than it would have seemed a year ago 
is just a coincidence).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278131 — Re: write your own operating system single-handed?

Fromscott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
Date2017-03-21 17:25 +0000
SubjectRe: write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<5mdAA.43762$zC6.20589@fx29.iad>
In reply to#278127
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
>On 21/03/17 16:09, burfordTjustice wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:12:14 -0700
>> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Followups redirected
>>
>>
>> Why, you afraid??
>
>What of? A non sequitur? They're not particularly scary.
>
>By the way, it's "Buford", not "Burford". Check the credits.
>

[alt.conspiracy removed]

That BTJ bot is one of the false-news posters that polluted
Usenet prior to the election.   You're better off if you
simply ignore it.   It has been traced back to a big
PR firm called Burston-Marsteller (whose output lives up
to their initials).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278133 — Re: write your own operating system single-handed?

FromburfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk>
Date2017-03-21 14:19 -0400
SubjectRe: write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<oarqlg$cf7$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278131
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:25:21 GMT
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote:

> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
> >On 21/03/17 16:09, burfordTjustice wrote:
> >> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:12:14 -0700
> >> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Followups redirected
> >>
> >>
> >> Why, you afraid??
> >
> >What of? A non sequitur? They're not particularly scary.
> >
> >By the way, it's "Buford", not "Burford". Check the credits.
> >
> 
> [alt.conspiracy removed]
> 
> That BTJ bot is one of the false-news posters that polluted
> Usenet prior to the election.   You're better off if you
> simply ignore it.   It has been traced back to a big
> PR firm called Burston-Marsteller (whose output lives up
> to their initials).

proof or are you just another dunk/drug mouth running??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278132 — Re: write your own operating system single-handed?

FromburfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk>
Date2017-03-21 14:18 -0400
SubjectRe: write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<oarqjt$cf7$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278127
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:33:23 +0000
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:

> On 21/03/17 16:09, burfordTjustice wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:12:14 -0700
> > Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Followups redirected
> >
> >
> > Why, you afraid??
> 
> What of? A non sequitur? They're not particularly scary.
> 
> By the way, it's "Buford", not "Burford". Check the credits.
> 

Talk to my mum you girlie male.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278135 — Re: write your own operating system single-handed?

FromRichard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Date2017-03-21 19:26 +0000
SubjectRe: write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<oaruj7$qrr$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278132
On 21/03/17 18:18, burfordTjustice wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:33:23 +0000
> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 21/03/17 16:09, burfordTjustice wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:12:14 -0700
>>> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Followups redirected
>>>
>>>
>>> Why, you afraid??
>>
>> What of? A non sequitur? They're not particularly scary.
>>
>> By the way, it's "Buford", not "Burford". Check the credits.
>>
>
> Talk to my mum you girlie male.

I think that tells us everything we need to know. Bye now.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278153 — Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-22 03:48 -0500
SubjectRe: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<ihe4dcldodv03vpravqmudegrujq5jvg5s@4ax.com>
In reply to#278108
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:17:24 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:58:28 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>     Completely irrelevant.
>>     Now make the OS you want or shut up.
>
>	You do realize you are replying to a crazy person ?
>	[]'s
>

     Yes.
     I find it entertaining.

>	PS please use the OT flag when posting off topic. OS's made by
>magicians, black magic and ISIS (AKA NSA) are off topic here, even if
>they are free.

     I don't know what group you're posting from, but almost nothing
is off topic in alt.conspiracy.

-- 
Shill #3. 
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278156 — Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?

FromDavid Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Date2017-03-22 10:44 +0100
SubjectRe: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<oatgta$3qk$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#278153
On 22/03/17 09:48, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:17:24 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 	PS please use the OT flag when posting off topic. OS's made by
>> magicians, black magic and ISIS (AKA NSA) are off topic here, even if
>> they are free.
> 
>      I don't know what group you're posting from, but almost nothing
> is off topic in alt.conspiracy.
> 

That's fair enough - for alt.conspiracy.  But it would be nice to keep
this sort of thread out of comp.programming and comp.lang.c.  I can't
answer for alt.comp.freeware and alt-comp.os.windows-10.

(I haven't set the follow-up group, because I have no illusions that the
muppets, bots and and sociopaths in this group would follow it.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#278224 — Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-22 20:11 -0500
SubjectRe: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed?
Message-ID<q586dclpmmra5m3bfnp8g9igsr6lk6is0u@4ax.com>
In reply to#278156
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:44:57 +0100, David Brown
<david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:

>On 22/03/17 09:48, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:17:24 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 	PS please use the OT flag when posting off topic. OS's made by
>>> magicians, black magic and ISIS (AKA NSA) are off topic here, even if
>>> they are free.
>> 
>>      I don't know what group you're posting from, but almost nothing
>> is off topic in alt.conspiracy.
>> 
>
>That's fair enough - for alt.conspiracy.  But it would be nice to keep
>this sort of thread out of comp.programming and comp.lang.c.  I can't
>answer for alt.comp.freeware and alt-comp.os.windows-10.
>
>(I haven't set the follow-up group, because I have no illusions that the
>muppets, bots and and sociopaths in this group would follow it.)

     That's fair. I will snip the other groups after this reply.

-- 
Shill #3. 
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.freeware


csiph-web