Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #59167 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-01 19:42 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-07-05 21:32 +0000 |
| Articles | 5 on this page of 25 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-01 19:42 -0400
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-01 16:53 -0700
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-01 16:55 -0700
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-01 20:20 -0400
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-01 17:59 -0700
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-02 22:11 +1000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-01 20:26 -0700
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-09 19:21 +1000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-07-09 09:36 +0000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-09 19:52 +1000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-09 12:16 -0400
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:30 +0000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-09 14:01 -0700
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 21:15 +0000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 14:24 -0400
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-10 12:32 -0700
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 22:44 +0000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-10 15:53 -0700
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 22:42 +0000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 05:39 -0400
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 20:45 +0000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-12 05:23 -0400
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-12 20:19 +0000
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-05 11:03 -0400
Re: WINNERS - June 2016 Usenet Kook Awards Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-05 21:32 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-11 20:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nm10hq$mg6$38@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59697 |
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:39:17 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 10/07/2016 6:42 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> Doesn't your own multiverse + anthropics hypothesis throw a monkey >> wrench into that? With that, humans necessarily wake up to find >> themselves in a branch where no earlier civilization set one of these >> doomsday devices off, but that needn't be because one setting one off >> is impossible or even improbable. In fact if most civilizations >> eventually do this it would explain the Fermi paradox. Each one is the >> first, and last, in its Hubble volume, modulo quantum branches. > > Branches arising from the symmetry breaking era that wind up with > particle physics such that such doomsday devices are easily made at > relatively low tech levels and commonly get set off by species with > anger (or delusion) management issues will have lower populations by far > than branches with physics forbidding such devices or making them > sufficiently difficult to build. Thus we're much more likely to observe > one of the latter branches, and should discover that in this region of > the multiverse, making such devices is hard. (It's probably not > impossible; that pesky dark energy suggests that our vacuum here is not > entirely stable.) Oh. Good point. I'd forgotten that some of what we consider to be "the laws of physics" were actually set by some sort of cooling process in the early universe, and might have gone differently (and therefore went lots of ways, if quantum branching is real).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 05:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nm2cud$tt5$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59701 |
On 11/07/2016 4:45 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Oh. Good point. I'd forgotten that some of what we consider to be "the > laws of physics" were actually set by some sort of cooling process in the > early universe, and might have gone differently (and therefore went lots > of ways, if quantum branching is real). Good thing I'm around to remind you of these things then. :) -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 20:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nm3jcd$5er$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59718 |
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 05:23:23 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 11/07/2016 4:45 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> Oh. Good point. I'd forgotten that some of what we consider to be "the >> laws of physics" were actually set by some sort of cooling process in >> the early universe, and might have gone differently (and therefore went >> lots of ways, if quantum branching is real). > > Good thing I'm around to remind you of these things then. :) Good thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 11:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nlgi8v$jrd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59167 |
On 01/07/2016 7:42 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: g> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 20:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: g>> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog-Whistle Award g>> g>> And the winners are: kensi (trainer) and Greg Hall (trainee)! *does happy dance* g> **88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88**88 g> g> g> Typical demonstration of the flawed female brain. Proof that females g> are incapable of understanding simple logic. g> g> I told Nadegda in as simple a way as I could so she might have a g> chance of understanding, but, apparently, even that was too difficult g> for her typical, relatively small and illogical female brain to g> cope with. g> g> It appears that MUST be the case as otherwise only wilfulness may g> explain the FACT that she knew damned well that I did NOT respond g> because kensi blew a dog whistle. Rather, I responded because I g> read kensi's simpleton ROT13 and just couldn't resist rubbing her g> face in her own doodoo so that makes me the trainer and kensi is g> the dog. g> g> So, this being the case I REJECT as flawed your stupid award. g> Furthermore, what little respect I had for you as PRETEND Usenet g> Lady and Mistress is swirling down my actual and real flush g> toilet that I posted PROOF of. Nice acceptance speech, ko0ky. Heavily laced with misogyny, I note. I see you've *already* been nominated for July's Drumpf, so I'll just add the MID of your acceptance speech to the already-lengthy list of evidence tacked on by, presumably, Nadegda. g> My dear readers, can I help it if these two females are so bent upon g> demonstrating in public how a small and illogical female brain operates? g> Perhaps, I should give them a bit of a break, however, as evolution has g> clearly caused them to be barely functional in the brain department. g> g> Hundreds of thousands of years of females staying close to their g> caves while the men were out providing for them have served to g> evolve away any need for logic and spatial understanding. Indeed, g> these two items go hand in hand as logic is spatial in nature at g> its very core. g> g> So, even though I reject this dumb and flawed presentation of the g> Woodhouse Award, I understand the cause and actually rejoice in g> the fact that females are lost and illogical due to evolution, g> the reason being is it makes them easier prey when a man needs g> a good fuck. After all, a fully-functional brain in a female g> would only serve to detract from their main purpose which is g> being a helpmate to a man and for bearing his progeny. Wow. Just wow. Listen to little Donald Drumpf Jr. rant! *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 21:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nlh90h$sgh$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59280 |
On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 11:03:55 -0400, kensi wrote: > Wow. Just wow. > > Listen to little Donald Drumpf Jr. rant! > > *snicker* Disgusting, isn't he? I wonder if he'll have any competition this month?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web