Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #240013 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 17:53 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 01:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-22 23:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 09:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:22 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 09:10 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 14:26 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:36 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:01 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:24 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:53 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 10:57 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 20:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 18:11 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 11:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 15:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 13:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 18:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 22:49 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:48 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:29 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:34 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:32 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 21:00 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:45 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:04 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:34 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 08:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 08:58 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 09:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:31 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:05 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:09 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 17:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:55 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 12:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 13:09 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:47 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 08:50 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:48 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-26 19:53 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 13:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:43 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 15:09 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 12:15 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 14:37 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 18:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 15:24 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 17:24 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 16:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 22:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 20:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 10:43 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 10:14 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 16:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 14:11 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 19:25 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 17:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 23:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 16:11 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 17:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 13:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brqou8.l93.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #241499 |
On 2018-12-25 1:17 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <brqght.s0c.19.13@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 9:47 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: > @@@@@ > On 12/25/2018 11:02 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > @@@@@ >> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> > @@@@@ >> wrote: > @@@@@ >>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, > @@@@@ >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ >>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate > @@@@@ >>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer > @@@@@ >>>>> side of > @@@@@ >>>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid > @@@@@ >>>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>> The two have different physical properties. While the > @@@@@ >>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are > @@@@@ >>>> in constant motion. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window > @@@@@ >>>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with > @@@@@ >>>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed > @@@@@ >>>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to > @@@@@ >>>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like > @@@@@ >>>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough > @@@@@ >>>> to claim the air passes through the window pane > @@@@@ >>>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't > @@@@@ >>>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as > @@@@@ >>>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules > @@@@@ >>>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold > @@@@@ >>>> themselves. The entire process is not like an > @@@@@ >>>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no > @@@@@ >>>> air blowing through anything like it does through > @@@@@ >>>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and > @@@@@ >>>> oranges in your scientific folly. > @@@@@ >>> > @@@@@ >>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- > @@@@@ >>> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >> Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > Electromagneticism, for instance, can't stop so there's always a zero > @@@@@ > point potential energy that can't be removed. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ what if i turn off the linear > > Your neighbors will be able to watch TV again. > i don't have any neighbors but i really don't have any neighbors
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241326 |
On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> >>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >> >> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >> >> The two have different physical properties. While the >> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >> in constant motion. >> >> This means that the air on the outside of a window >> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >> to claim the air passes through the window pane >> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >> themselves. The entire process is not like an >> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >> air blowing through anything like it does through >> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >> >> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >> oranges in your scientific folly. > > All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- > to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative temperatures where things are so impossibly cold that they become impossibly hot. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 10:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvttnm$6jq$7@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241342 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 8:28 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer >>>> side of >>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>> >>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>> >>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>> in constant motion. >>> >>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>> >>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>> oranges in your scientific folly. >> >> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit > > Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative temperatures where > things are so impossibly cold that they become impossibly hot. Don't argue with Greg, he's a scientist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c2f98d1e003f77a8@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #241342 |
In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > >On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>> >>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>> >>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>> >>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>> in constant motion. >>> >>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>> >>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>> oranges in your scientific folly. >> >> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit > >Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative temperatures where >things are so impossibly cold that they become impossibly hot. Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to do with the conversation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 14:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvu0rj$akg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241439 |
On 12/25/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > says... >> >> On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>> >>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>> >>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>> >>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>> in constant motion. >>>> >>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>> >>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>> oranges in your scientific folly. >>> >>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >> >> Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative temperatures where >> things are so impossibly cold that they become impossibly hot. > > Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to do with the > conversation. What if there aren't any molecules to move fast so the energy radiates away and makes your Space Force Battle Cruiser go like the dickens to carry Space Force landing teams to space beaches where they can seize control of the space resort sites and free the hostages? -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c3553b05579267b6@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #241455 |
In article <pvu0rj$akg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > >On 12/25/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie >> says... >>> >>> On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>> >>>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>>> >>>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>>> in constant motion. >>>>> >>>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>>>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>> >>>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>>> oranges in your scientific folly. >>>> >>>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>>> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >>> >>> Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative temperatures where >>> things are so impossibly cold that they become impossibly hot. >> >> Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to do with the >> conversation. > >What if there aren't any molecules to move fast so the energy radiates >away and makes your Space Force Battle Cruiser go like the dickens to >carry Space Force landing teams to space beaches where they can seize >control of the space resort sites and free the hostages? Then that would be ok.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvu1kv$g2f$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241455 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 11:36 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/25/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie >> says... >>> >>> On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate >>>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer >>>>>> side of >>>>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a >>>>>> stupid >>>>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>> >>>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>>> >>>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>>> in constant motion. >>>>> >>>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>>>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>> >>>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>>> oranges in your scientific folly. >>>> >>>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>>> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >>> >>> Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative temperatures where >>> things are so impossibly cold that they become impossibly hot. >> >> Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to do with the >> conversation. > > What if there aren't any molecules to move fast so the energy radiates > away and makes your Space Force Battle Cruiser go like the dickens to > carry Space Force landing teams to space beaches where they can seize > control of the space resort sites and free the hostages? and grab the space oil?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 15:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvu2q3$i6h$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241464 |
On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: > x-no-archive: yes > > On 12/25/2018 11:36 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/25/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie >>> says... >>>> >>>> On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer >>>>>>> side of >>>>>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a >>>>>>> stupid >>>>>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>>> >>>>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>>>> >>>>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>>>> in constant motion. >>>>>> >>>>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>>>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>>>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>>>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>>>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>>>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>>>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>>>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>>>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>>>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>>>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>>>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>>>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>>>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>>>>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>>> >>>>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>>>> oranges in your scientific folly. >>>>> >>>>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>>>> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees >>>>> Fahrenheit >>>> >>>> Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative temperatures where >>>> things are so impossibly cold that they become impossibly hot. >>> >>> Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to do with the >>> conversation. >> >> What if there aren't any molecules to move fast so the energy radiates >> away and makes your Space Force Battle Cruiser go like the dickens to >> carry Space Force landing teams to space beaches where they can seize >> control of the space resort sites and free the hostages? > > and grab the space oil? Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims living in Space Shitholes. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvu34r$cs0$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241493 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 12/25/2018 11:36 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/25/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the >>>>>>>> warmer side of >>>>>>>> the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a >>>>>>>> stupid >>>>>>>> fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>>>>> in constant motion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>>>>> can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>>>>> a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>>>>> molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>>>>> do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>>>>> a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>>>>> to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>>>>> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>>>>> cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>>>>> deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>>>>> bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>>>>> themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>>>>> air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>>>>> air blowing through anything like it does through >>>>>>> a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>>>>> oranges in your scientific folly. >>>>>> >>>>>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the >>>>>> impossible- >>>>>> to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees >>>>>> Fahrenheit >>>>> >>>>> Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative temperatures where >>>>> things are so impossibly cold that they become impossibly hot. >>>> >>>> Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to do with the >>>> conversation. >>> >>> What if there aren't any molecules to move fast so the energy >>> radiates away and makes your Space Force Battle Cruiser go like the >>> dickens to carry Space Force landing teams to space beaches where >>> they can seize control of the space resort sites and free the hostages? >> >> and grab the space oil? > > Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims living in > Space Shitholes. lol Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They need the oil as much as we do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 16:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvu7bl$16i2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241497 |
On 12/25/2018 3:15 PM, Janithor wrote: > On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: >>> On 12/25/2018 11:36 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>> On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed >>>>>>>>> on the warmer side of the glass as they are on the >>>>>>>>> colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid fuck mated >>>>>>>>> and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a >>>>>>>> gas. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>>>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules >>>>>>>> are in constant motion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window can >>>>>>>> bombard the fixed window pane molecules with a new >>>>>>>> supply of warmer molecules while the fixed molecules of >>>>>>>> the window pane can't move around to do so efficiently. >>>>>>>> That's why the window acts like a fixed barrier to the >>>>>>>> air. Nobody is stupid enough to claim the air passes >>>>>>>> through the window pane so why are you so stupid to >>>>>>>> claim the cold air doesn't cause the window pane to >>>>>>>> become cold as well as deny that a cold window pane >>>>>>>> causes the air molecules bumping up against the pane to >>>>>>>> NOT become cold themselves. The entire process is not >>>>>>>> like an air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is >>>>>>>> no air blowing through anything like it does through a >>>>>>>> condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and oranges >>>>>>>> in your scientific folly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach >>>>>>> the impossible- to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or >>>>>>> minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative >>>>>> temperatures where things are so impossibly cold that they >>>>>> become impossibly hot. >>>>> >>>>> Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to >>>>> do with the conversation. >>>> >>>> What if there aren't any molecules to move fast so the energy >>>> radiates away and makes your Space Force Battle Cruiser go like >>>> the dickens to carry Space Force landing teams to space beaches >>>> where they can seize control of the space resort sites and free >>>> the hostages? >>> >>> and grab the space oil? >> >> Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims >> living in Space Shitholes. > > lol > > Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They need > the oil as much as we do. America has many disgraces. No wall, for example. China has a wall. Japan has many walls. Very beautiful walls. Not disgraceful. And great respect for powerful, and very genius, leaders. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 14:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvube8$ja7$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241522 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 1:27 PM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/25/2018 3:15 PM, Janithor wrote: >> On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2018 11:36 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>> On 12/25/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>> On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed >>>>>>>>>> on the warmer side of the glass as they are on the >>>>>>>>>> colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid fuck mated >>>>>>>>>> and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a >>>>>>>>> gas. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The two have different physical properties. While the molecules >>>>>>>>> of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules >>>>>>>>> are in constant motion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window can >>>>>>>>> bombard the fixed window pane molecules with a new >>>>>>>>> supply of warmer molecules while the fixed molecules of >>>>>>>>> the window pane can't move around to do so efficiently. >>>>>>>>> That's why the window acts like a fixed barrier to the >>>>>>>>> air. Nobody is stupid enough to claim the air passes >>>>>>>>> through the window pane so why are you so stupid to >>>>>>>>> claim the cold air doesn't cause the window pane to >>>>>>>>> become cold as well as deny that a cold window pane >>>>>>>>> causes the air molecules bumping up against the pane to >>>>>>>>> NOT become cold themselves. The entire process is not >>>>>>>>> like an air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is >>>>>>>>> no air blowing through anything like it does through a >>>>>>>>> condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and oranges >>>>>>>>> in your scientific folly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach >>>>>>>> the impossible- to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or >>>>>>>> minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative >>>>>>> temperatures where things are so impossibly cold that they >>>>>>> become impossibly hot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to >>>>>> do with the conversation. >>>>> >>>>> What if there aren't any molecules to move fast so the energy >>>>> radiates away and makes your Space Force Battle Cruiser go like >>>>> the dickens to carry Space Force landing teams to space beaches >>>>> where they can seize control of the space resort sites and free >>>>> the hostages? >>>> >>>> and grab the space oil? >>> >>> Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims >>> living in Space Shitholes. >> >> lol >> >> Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They need >> the oil as much as we do. > > America has many disgraces. No wall, for example. China has a wall. > Japan has many walls. Very beautiful walls. Not disgraceful. And > great respect for powerful, and very genius, leaders. That doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't they bomb other countries for the oil?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 18:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvud74$1vg4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241537 |
On 12/25/2018 5:37 PM, Janithor wrote: > On 12/25/2018 1:27 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/25/2018 3:15 PM, Janithor wrote: >>> On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>> On 12/25/2018 11:36 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>> On 12/25/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <pvtls9$pov$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>>> On 12/25/2018 10:58 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>>>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed >>>>>>>>>>> on the warmer side of the glass as they are on the >>>>>>>>>>> colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid fuck mated >>>>>>>>>>> and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a >>>>>>>>>> gas. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>>>>>>> molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules >>>>>>>>>> are in constant motion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This means that the air on the outside of a window can >>>>>>>>>> bombard the fixed window pane molecules with a new >>>>>>>>>> supply of warmer molecules while the fixed molecules of >>>>>>>>>> the window pane can't move around to do so efficiently. >>>>>>>>>> That's why the window acts like a fixed barrier to the >>>>>>>>>> air. Nobody is stupid enough to claim the air passes >>>>>>>>>> through the window pane so why are you so stupid to >>>>>>>>>> claim the cold air doesn't cause the window pane to >>>>>>>>>> become cold as well as deny that a cold window pane >>>>>>>>>> causes the air molecules bumping up against the pane to >>>>>>>>>> NOT become cold themselves. The entire process is not >>>>>>>>>> like an air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is >>>>>>>>>> no air blowing through anything like it does through a >>>>>>>>>> condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and oranges >>>>>>>>>> in your scientific folly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach >>>>>>>>> the impossible- to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or >>>>>>>>> minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, you can flip the spins and go to negative >>>>>>>> temperatures where things are so impossibly cold that they >>>>>>>> become impossibly hot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then molecules would be moving very fast and has nothing to >>>>>>> do with the conversation. >>>>>> >>>>>> What if there aren't any molecules to move fast so the energy >>>>>> radiates away and makes your Space Force Battle Cruiser go like >>>>>> the dickens to carry Space Force landing teams to space beaches >>>>>> where they can seize control of the space resort sites and free >>>>>> the hostages? >>>>> >>>>> and grab the space oil? >>>> >>>> Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims >>>> living in Space Shitholes. >>> >>> lol >>> >>> Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They need >>> the oil as much as we do. >> >> America has many disgraces. No wall, for example. China has a wall. >> Japan has many walls. Very beautiful walls. Not disgraceful. And >> great respect for powerful, and very genius, leaders. > > That doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't they bomb other > countries for the oil? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 15:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvue6h$aot$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241554 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 3:07 PM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/25/2018 5:37 PM, Janithor wrote: >> On 12/25/2018 1:27 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/25/2018 3:15 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>> On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>>> and grab the space oil? >>>>> >>>>> Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims >>>>> living in Space Shitholes. >>>> >>>> lol >>>> >>>> Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They need >>>> the oil as much as we do. >>> >>> America has many disgraces. No wall, for example. China has a wall. >>> Japan has many walls. Very beautiful walls. Not disgraceful. And >>> great respect for powerful, and very genius, leaders. >> >> That doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't they bomb other >> countries for the oil? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE She's cute, but that still doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't China and Japan bomb other countries for the oil? And where is all the oil we stole?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 17:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c7826e3d692c67bb@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #241560 |
In article <pvue6h$aot$1@news.albasani.net>, Janithor@comcast.net says... > >x-no-archive: yes > >On 12/25/2018 3:07 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/25/2018 5:37 PM, Janithor wrote: >>> On 12/25/2018 1:27 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2018 3:15 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>> On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>> On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: > >>>>>>> and grab the space oil? >>>>>> >>>>>> Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims >>>>>> living in Space Shitholes. >>>>> >>>>> lol >>>>> >>>>> Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They need >>>>> the oil as much as we do. >>>> >>>> America has many disgraces. No wall, for example. China has a wall. >>>> Japan has many walls. Very beautiful walls. Not disgraceful. And >>>> great respect for powerful, and very genius, leaders. >>> >>> That doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't they bomb other >>> countries for the oil? >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE > >She's cute, but that still doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't >China and Japan bomb other countries for the oil? And where is all the >oil we stole? When they have no answer this is what you get.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 16:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvuhsg$c5$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241577 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 4:24 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pvue6h$aot$1@news.albasani.net>, Janithor@comcast.net > says... >> >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 12/25/2018 3:07 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/25/2018 5:37 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2018 1:27 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>> On 12/25/2018 3:15 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>>> On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: >> >>>>>>>> and grab the space oil? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims >>>>>>> living in Space Shitholes. >>>>>> >>>>>> lol >>>>>> >>>>>> Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They need >>>>>> the oil as much as we do. >>>>> >>>>> America has many disgraces. No wall, for example. China has a wall. >>>>> Japan has many walls. Very beautiful walls. Not disgraceful. And >>>>> great respect for powerful, and very genius, leaders. >>>> >>>> That doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't they bomb other >>>> countries for the oil? >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE >> >> She's cute, but that still doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't >> China and Japan bomb other countries for the oil? And where is all the >> oil we stole? > > When they have no answer this is what you get. His brain is the size of Neptune, so I'm sure there is a hidden message in there rubes like you and me will never understand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 22:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvurp2$1r9r$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241580 |
On 12/25/2018 7:27 PM, Janithor wrote: > On 12/25/2018 4:24 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pvue6h$aot$1@news.albasani.net>, Janithor@comcast.net >> says... >>> On 12/25/2018 3:07 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2018 5:37 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>> On 12/25/2018 1:27 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>> On 12/25/2018 3:15 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and grab the space oil? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims >>>>>>>> living in Space Shitholes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> lol >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They >>>>>>> need the oil as much as we do. >>>>>> >>>>>> America has many disgraces. No wall, for example. China has a wall. >>>>>> Japan has many walls. Very beautiful walls. Not disgraceful. And >>>>>> great respect for powerful, and very genius, leaders. >>>>> >>>>> That doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't they bomb other >>>>> countries for the oil? >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE >>> >>> She's cute, but that still doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't >>> China and Japan bomb other countries for the oil? And where is all the >>> oil we stole? >> >> When they have no answer this is what you get. > > His brain is the size of Neptune, so I'm sure there is a hidden message > in there rubes like you and me will never understand. It's all about having a democrat disgrace and a democrat shutdown which will save enough money to pay for The Steel Slats and stop the WITCH HUNT!!!-URANIUM-EMAILS-ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!!!! collusions (which aren't illegal). -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 20:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvuma1$14t5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241560 |
On 12/25/2018 6:24 PM, Janithor wrote: > On 12/25/2018 3:07 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/25/2018 5:37 PM, Janithor wrote: >>> On 12/25/2018 1:27 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>> On 12/25/2018 3:15 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>> On 12/25/2018 12:09 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>> On 12/25/2018 2:49 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> and grab the space oil? >>>>>> >>>>>> Only after Space Force bombs the shit out of the Space Muslims >>>>>> living in Space Shitholes. >>>>> >>>>> lol >>>>> >>>>> Why aren't China and Japan bombing the shit out of anyone? They need >>>>> the oil as much as we do. >>>> >>>> America has many disgraces. No wall, for example. China has a >>>> wall. Japan has many walls. Very beautiful walls. Not >>>> disgraceful. And great respect for powerful, and very genius, leaders. >>> >>> That doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't they bomb other >>> countries for the oil? >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE > > She's cute, but that still doesn't answer my simple question. Why don't > China and Japan bomb other countries for the oil? And where is all the > oil we stole? They're a kind generous and loving bunch. They respect the greatest leader the world has ever seen and want to give him all the oil so he can make America Great. The oil is used to make concrete to build monumental skyscrapers in Manhattan so the President can provide housing and office space for his Russian and Asian friends who invest in his amazing projects which gives them a fast track to US citizenship so they can vote and give money to SuperPACs to elect their loyal and compassionate billionaire friend, The President. The oil is also used to power The President's aircraft and limousines so he can go to Asia and have fantastic meetings and fly to Mar a Lago to have dinner and play golfing for gold (bingo, bango, bongo) with his close Asian friends. This is what the China people are doing to let The President do happy president stuff without totally fking the world economy: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2018/09/04/chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-opens-up-unprecedented-opportunities/> -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q02vr4$1ib6$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241560 |
On 12/25/2018 6:24 PM, Janithor wrote: > And where is all the oil we stole? Still in the ground in the middle east, mostly. Why move it when you can just bomb away governments above it that have the temerity to consider it *their* oil to use or sell for the benefit of *their* people, then install a puppet regime that will let Western corporations come in and extract it cheaply over future years and decades, who will then turn around and sell it here at exorbitant markups? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1o0gqv2.78t2ak17fph7oN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #241554 |
mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE> Wow. Thank you. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon is impressed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q02q8f$qsk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241999 |
On 12/27/2018 5:43 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE> > > Wow. Thank you. Here it is with the words: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqpFjsMtCb0 -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web