Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #240013 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 17:53 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 01:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-22 23:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 09:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:22 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 09:10 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 14:26 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:36 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:01 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:24 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:53 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 10:57 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 20:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 18:11 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 11:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 15:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 13:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 18:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 22:49 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:48 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:29 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:34 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:32 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 21:00 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:45 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:04 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:34 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 08:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 08:58 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 09:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:31 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:05 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:09 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 17:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:55 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 12:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 13:09 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:47 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 08:50 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:48 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-26 19:53 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 13:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:43 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 15:09 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 12:15 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 14:37 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 18:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 15:24 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 17:24 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 16:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 22:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 20:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 10:43 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 10:14 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 16:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 14:11 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 19:25 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 17:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 23:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 16:11 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 17:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q032p5$2fi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242064 |
On 12/27/2018 12:07 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> *headdesk* >> >> Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would >> be made extremely cold. > > But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. > The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact > that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all > that motion away and the pane goes away. *headdesk* > It cannot. No motion = the death of matter as matter > is defined by motion. *headdesk* Matter is defined by nonzero rest mass... >> Little Fakey Jr. is about to disappear up his own tailpipe. With >> assistance, if necessary. :P > > Nice threat of physical violence from a claimed pacifist MID, ko0k? >>> You are just too indoctrinated >> >> *headdesk* > > Well, you are. You have many years of indoctrination > which you call *higher education*. You have no original > thoughts - you only parrot your indoctrination. I have a Ph.D. ... and you don't get one of those without contributing original research in your field, kOok. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t24a2edeme5gf45if8vppde4bb32fl1ql3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242087 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:39:51 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 12/27/2018 12:07 PM, stinky puddles piddled: >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> *headdesk* >>> >>> Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would >>> be made extremely cold. >> >> But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. >> The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact >> that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all >> that motion away and the pane goes away. > >*headdesk* > >> It cannot. No motion = the death of matter as matter >> is defined by motion. > >*headdesk* > >Matter is defined by nonzero rest mass... > >>> Little Fakey Jr. is about to disappear up his own tailpipe. With >>> assistance, if necessary. :P >> >> Nice threat of physical violence from a claimed pacifist > >MID, ko0k? > >>>> You are just too indoctrinated >>> >>> *headdesk* >> >> Well, you are. You have many years of indoctrination >> which you call *higher education*. You have no original >> thoughts - you only parrot your indoctrination. > >I have a Ph.D. ... and you don't get one of those without contributing >original research in your field, kOok. A Doctor of Philosophy? What kind of a qualification is philosophy for science? Seems to me one is anathema to the other... -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q05m3i$1lt2$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242096 |
On 12/27/2018 12:49 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:39:51 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> I have a Ph.D. ... and you don't get one of those without contributing >> original research in your field, kOok. > > A Doctor of Philosophy? What kind of a qualification > is philosophy for science? > > Seems to me one is anathema to the other... Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.369009ec6281536783a@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #242399 |
In article <q05m3i$1lt2$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/27/2018 12:49 PM, stinky puddles piddled: >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:39:51 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> I have a Ph.D. ... and you don't get one of those without contributing >>> original research in your field, kOok. >> >> A Doctor of Philosophy? What kind of a qualification >> is philosophy for science? >> >> Seems to me one is anathema to the other... > >Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... You allow uneducated babbling to pain you? No self control?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8snc2e9mepceb4kalf4492v265840rcnr2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242399 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:21:58 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: <...> >Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... You ain't seen pain the likes of which you will see if you don't stop disrespecting me. <rosins up the cane switch> -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2de1.oad.17.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242413 |
On 2018-12-28 10:40 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:21:58 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > <...> > >> Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... > > You ain't seen pain the likes of which you will > see if you don't stop disrespecting me. > > <rosins up the cane switch> > fk you frack face
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q08cnv$1dng$8@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242413 |
On 12/28/2018 12:40 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:21:58 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > <...> > >> Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... > > You ain't seen pain the likes of which you will > see if you don't stop disrespecting me. > > <rosins up the cane switch> K0oKthR3At!!1! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368eb9adb10f5941995d28@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #242064 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <v11a2etes5d15n9bh0eavssu3bg08t1c5q@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... < <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: < >> < >>> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. < >>> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, < >>> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible < >>> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest < >>> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? < >> < >> You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. < >> Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin < >> there can be no transference of heat to matter that < >> is that cold. < > < >*headdesk* < > < >Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would < >be made extremely cold. < < But, there would be no pane at zero degrees Kelvin. < The pane exists as it is observed due to the fact < that its molecules are in constant motion. Take all < that motion away and the pane goes away. < Now, if only the PAIN of your uneducated babbling would go away... -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q036o1$kgv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242050 |
On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: > HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad > physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the > Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed nuts, > Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q038jq$3tc$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #242113 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/27/2018 10:47 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad >> physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed >> nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. > > Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. Dude, if you don't want your award, give it to me, I'll take it. You should see my collection of KOTMs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 17:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q03l94$n2v$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242122 |
On 12/27/2018 2:19 PM, Janithor wrote: > On 12/27/2018 10:47 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >>> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming >>> bad physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >>> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed >>> nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. >> >> Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. > > Dude, if you don't want your award, give it to me, I'll take it. You > should see my collection of KOTMs. Are awards transferable? Maybe I can declare myself FNVW (interim), write my own rules and present the award. That oughta work. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvudh.185.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242113 |
On 2018-12-27 11:47 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad >> physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed >> nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. > > Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. > i'm watching the council meeting , you could be one of these guys
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q03g4j$1v1u$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242124 |
On 12/27/2018 2:23 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-27 11:47 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >>> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming >>> bad physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the >>> Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed >>> nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. >> >> Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. >> > i'm watching the council meeting , > you could be one of these guys Looks like Mayor Al has it under control. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs05ou.v1k.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242147 |
On 2018-12-27 2:27 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/27/2018 2:23 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-27 11:47 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/27/2018 11:40 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> HIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming >>>> bad physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for >>>> the Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, >>>> mixed nuts, Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. >>> >>> Leave me out of this. I make a living doing physics. >>> >> i'm watching the council meeting , >> you could be one of these guys > > Looks like Mayor Al has it under control. > he's the new guy his family is half the population here
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368efa4bb747d519995d2d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #242050 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q02v9v$1ib6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... < Subject: Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction < From: kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> < Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate < < < < < On 12/25/2018 12:30 PM, stinky puddles piddled more physics wallbangers: < > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:36 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: < > < >> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. < >> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, < >> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible < >> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest < >> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? < > < > You can't transfer heat unless you have movement. < > Since there is zero movement at zero degrees Kelvin < > there can be no transference of heat to matter that < > is that cold. < < *headdesk* < < Air molecules hitting the pane would heat the pane up, and the air would < be made extremely cold. < < *looks up at timestamp* < *does a double take* < < THIS is the best way you lot could spend Christmas morning? Foaming bad < physics to usenet? If I hadn't already nominated Skeetard for the < Wollman for this month I'd have to nominate you, Checkmate, mixed nuts, < Janithor, *and* Skeetard jointly for it. < Except that I only bothered to poast for a short while that morning. You may note that I also predicted that some Ko0k (you, apparently) would try to make a big deal out of that and babble some bullshit about non- existent "awards" as if there was a law against poasting on holidays or something. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvtu12$6jq$9@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241364 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 9:07 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <2km42epcvmlpe3s7tv1kkbqtr3h920e46l@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:43 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ >In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ >>On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ >>>In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ >>>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of > @@@@@ >>>>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid > @@@@@ >>>>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>The two have different physical properties. While the > @@@@@ >>>>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are > @@@@@ >>>>in constant motion. > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>This means that the air on the outside of a window > @@@@@ >>>>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with > @@@@@ >>>>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed > @@@@@ >>>>molecules of the window pane can't move around to > @@@@@ >>>>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like > @@@@@ >>>>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough > @@@@@ >>>>to claim the air passes through the window pane > @@@@@ >>>>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't > @@@@@ >>>>cause the window pane to become cold as well as > @@@@@ >>>>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules > @@@@@ >>>>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold > @@@@@ >>>>themselves. The entire process is not like an > @@@@@ >>>>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no > @@@@@ >>>>air blowing through anything like it does through > @@@@@ >>>>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! > @@@@@ >>>> > @@@@@ >>>>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and > @@@@@ >>>>oranges in your scientific folly. > @@@@@ >>> > @@@@@ >>>All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- > @@@@@ >>>to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ >Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ There is one GIANT problem with that theory, > @@@@@ however. If there is no movement at all then > @@@@@ there is no way to *transfer* the cold so it > @@@@@ wouldn't even feel cold. > > THUD! > > > @@@@@ It would be the perfect insulation. A zero degree > @@@@@ Kelvin window pane would not be capable of letting > @@@@@ any heat out of the window or letting any cold in. > > There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. > The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, > the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's impossible > to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the strongest > heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? > > Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week > before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't > know shit about much of anything. He does a good job of winding you up, though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 10:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvtuea$6jq$12@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241432 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 10:51 AM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-25 11:48 a.m., Janithor wrote: >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 12/25/2018 9:07 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <2km42epcvmlpe3s7tv1kkbqtr3h920e46l@4ax.com>, >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> >>> >>> @@@@@ >>> @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:43 -0700, Skeeter >>> <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> @@@@@ >In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> @@@@@ >>On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter >>> <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> @@@@@ >>>In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> @@@@@ >>>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate >>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>> @@@@@ >>>> >>> @@@@@ >>>>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the >>> warmer side of >>> @@@@@ >>>>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck >>> and a stupid >>> @@@@@ >>>>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>> @@@@@ >>>> >>> @@@@@ >>>>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>> @@@@@ >>>> >>> @@@@@ >>>>The two have different physical properties. While the >>> @@@@@ >>>>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>> @@@@@ >>>>in constant motion. >>> @@@@@ >>>> >>> @@@@@ >>>>This means that the air on the outside of a window >>> @@@@@ >>>>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>> @@@@@ >>>>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>> @@@@@ >>>>molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>> @@@@@ >>>>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>> @@@@@ >>>>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>> @@@@@ >>>>to claim the air passes through the window pane >>> @@@@@ >>>>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>> @@@@@ >>>>cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>> @@@@@ >>>>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>> @@@@@ >>>>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>> @@@@@ >>>>themselves. The entire process is not like an >>> @@@@@ >>>>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>> @@@@@ >>>>air blowing through anything like it does through >>> @@@@@ >>>>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>> @@@@@ >>>> >>> @@@@@ >>>>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>> @@@@@ >>>>oranges in your scientific folly. >>> @@@@@ >>> >>> @@@@@ >>>All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the >>> impossible- >>> @@@@@ >>>to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees >>> Fahrenheit >>> @@@@@ >> >>> @@@@@ >>Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. >>> @@@@@ > >>> @@@@@ >Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man! >>> @@@@@ >>> @@@@@ There is one GIANT problem with that theory, >>> @@@@@ however. If there is no movement at all then >>> @@@@@ there is no way to *transfer* the cold so it >>> @@@@@ wouldn't even feel cold. >>> >>> THUD! >>> >>> @@@@@ It would be the perfect insulation. A zero degree >>> @@@@@ Kelvin window pane would not be capable of letting >>> @@@@@ any heat out of the window or letting any cold in. >>> >>> There IS no way to "transfer" cold. You transfer heat, you dumb fuck. >>> The greater the differential between something hot and something cold, >>> the faster heat migrates to the colder place. That's why it's >>> impossible >>> to reach absolute zero in the first place. How the fuck is the >>> strongest >>> heat sink imaginable going to suddenly function as an insulator? >>> >>> Every week, you manage to say something even more stupid than the week >>> before, and you're either too ignorant or too vain to admit you don't >>> know shit about much of anything. >> >> He does a good job of winding you up, though. >> > it's enough to make me LOL , > especially when he e-mails me first , > and says , watch this A Christmas flying email, does it get any better?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvu36g$cs0$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241432 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 12:14 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pvtu12$6jq$9@news.albasani.net>, > Janithor@comcast.net says... > @@@@@ He does a good job of winding you up, though. > > That's why I come here... to get wound up, and to wind other people up. I come here to be enlightened.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 13:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvu6aa$2u8$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241498 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/25/2018 1:00 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:16:19 -0800, Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote: > > <...> > >> I come here to be enlightened. > > Then do read all of PeeScent's posts as they > are written at a level you might find challenging > but at least you have some small ability to begin > to understand them. No, from you I learned that cold radiates. There's a lot of good stuff here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c3032503991dd7a9@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #241343 |
In article <2km42epcvmlpe3s7tv1kkbqtr3h920e46l@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:07:43 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>In article <b3l42elud27hl80c5h34mgivri1unu8nf3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:58:19 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of >>>>>>the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid >>>>>>fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >>>>> >>>>>You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >>>>> >>>>>The two have different physical properties. While the >>>>>molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are >>>>>in constant motion. >>>>> >>>>>This means that the air on the outside of a window >>>>>can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with >>>>>a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed >>>>>molecules of the window pane can't move around to >>>>>do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like >>>>>a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough >>>>>to claim the air passes through the window pane >>>>>so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't >>>>>cause the window pane to become cold as well as >>>>>deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules >>>>>bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold >>>>>themselves. The entire process is not like an >>>>>air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no >>>>>air blowing through anything like it does through >>>>>a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >>>>> >>>>>You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and >>>>>oranges in your scientific folly. >>>> >>>>All molecules are in constant motion. Until they reach the impossible- >>>>to-reach temperature of zero kelvin, or minus 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit >>> >>>Nothing is moving at zero degrees Kelvin. >> >>Um, that's what it said. That's fucking cold man! > >There is one GIANT problem with that theory, >however. If there is no movement at all then >there is no way to *transfer* the cold so it >wouldn't even feel cold. It's not a theory, it's a fact. <sound like Nads now> > >It would be the perfect insulation. A zero degree >Kelvin window pane would not be capable of letting >any heat out of the window or letting any cold in.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web