Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #169806 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 672 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Slaughtering concert goers. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 12:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 15:49 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 20:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 19:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:38 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 22:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-05-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-31 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 03:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 11:59 -0700
Re: â Snowflake â Slaughtering concert goers. â Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:07 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:13 -0600
Re: â Snowflake â ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? â Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:21 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:55 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:56 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-01 23:35 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-01 23:57 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 00:07 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-01 20:29 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 08:32 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 08:32 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:51 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 18:09 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 17:10 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 00:13 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 18:50 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:00 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:29 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:20 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:03 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:26 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:54 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:58 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:57 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:04 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: â Snowflake â ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? â Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:12 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:14 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:19 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:16 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:39 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:30 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:34 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:47 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:28 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:27 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:38 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:53 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:33 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:11 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:47 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 05:40 +0000
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:03 -0600
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:36 -0600
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-07 05:45 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-02 01:20 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:34 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:02 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 09:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-03 20:11 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:37 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:02 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:48 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:43 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 00:21 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 05:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 05:52 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 07:04 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-10 04:35 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 01:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 15:46 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Corwin Esterness <woolcross@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 12:00 -0600
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 17:56 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 17:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Bill (not Jillians) DOW #3" <noemail@none.not> - 2018-06-09 20:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-12 00:11 +0100
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:29 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 19:04 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 19:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:12 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:59 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 19:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 20:21 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 18:53 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:58 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500
Page 4 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 34 Next page →
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <petf6j$s0f$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170301 |
In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>> statement. Odd if you do. >> Odd that you don't. > Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. > ... Maybe if one was not from America? I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. > What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. Nope.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170305 |
On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: > >>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. > >>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? > >>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>> statement. Odd if you do. > >>> Odd that you don't. > >> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... > > Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. All we have to go on are the > words s/he wrote. Of course the context of a society requires information not present in every sentence uttered. Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to completely twist meanings. >> ... Maybe if one was not from America? > > I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. > >> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. > > Nope. I do hope you are just trolling. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <peunqr$gka$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170308 |
In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>> statement. Odd if you do. >>>> Odd that you don't. >>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. > Of course the context of a society requires information not present in > every sentence uttered.... The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. > ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, I assume, taking things FAR > too literally and doing so in a way to completely twist meanings. I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to carry a weapon in a military capacity." >>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. > I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep and bear arms. >>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >> Nope. > I do hope you are just trolling. My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170478 |
On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: > >>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. > >>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? > >>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. > >>>>> Odd that you don't. > >>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... > >>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. > >> Of course the context of a society requires information not present in >> every sentence uttered.... > > The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you were a real man you wouldn't > need a gun" is foolish. We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to ignore context of US society (and many others). You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. >> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, I assume, taking things FAR >> too literally and doing so in a way to completely twist meanings. > > I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word partially explains how you can > argue that "bear arms" does not mean "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of > "to carry a weapon in a military capacity." I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. But see how you seek to twist even that. >>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? > >>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. > >> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. > > Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep and bear arms. Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. > >>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. > >>> Nope. > >> I do hope you are just trolling. > > My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <pev2m3$mdg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170489 |
In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. >>>>>> Odd that you don't. >>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >>> Of course the context of a society requires information not present in >>> every sentence uttered.... >> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you were a real man you >> wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. > We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look > into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to > suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to > ignore context of US society (and many others). How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the context. > You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change the fact you twisted his > words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you want. >>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, >>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to >>> completely twist meanings. >> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word >> partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean >> "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to >> carry a weapon in a military capacity." > I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of the > words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. > But see how you seek to twist even that. >>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep >> and bear arms. > Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. No word play involved on my part. >>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >>>> Nope. >>> I do hope you are just trolling. >> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV > You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. You invent context to satisfy your desires.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <PpGQC.344740$nq5.83150@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #170519 |
On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: > >>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. > >>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? > >>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. > >>>>>>> Odd that you don't. > >>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... > >>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. > >>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not present in >>>> every sentence uttered.... > >>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you were a real man you >>> wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. > >> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look >> into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to >> suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to >> ignore context of US society (and many others). > > How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the context. > >> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change the fact you twisted his >> words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. > > I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you want. > >>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, >>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to >>>> completely twist meanings. > >>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word >>> partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean >>> "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to >>> carry a weapon in a military capacity." > >> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of the >> words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. > > Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. > >> But see how you seek to twist even that. > >>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? > >>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. > >>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. > >>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep >>> and bear arms. > >> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. > > No word play involved on my part. > >>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. > >>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. > >>>>> Nope. > >>>> I do hope you are just trolling. > >>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV > >> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. > > You invent context to satisfy your desires. And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen used the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not traveling in the army) I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary that the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 definition is to serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can easily look it up. Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more credible than THE accepted world reference for the English language.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <pevc4a$62p$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170549 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:14:24 -0400, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >> >>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >> >>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >> >>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. >> >>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >> >>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >> >>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >> >>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not present >>>>> in every sentence uttered.... >> >>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you >>>> were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >> >>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look >>> into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to >>> suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to >>> ignore context of US society (and many others). >> >> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the >> context. >> >>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change >>> the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. >> >> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you >> want. >> >>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, >>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to >>>>> completely twist meanings. >> >>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word >>>> partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean >>>> "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to >>>> carry a weapon in a military capacity." >> >>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of >>> the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >> >> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >> >>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >> >>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >> >>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >> >>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >> >>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep >>>> and bear arms. >> >>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >> >> No word play involved on my part. >> >>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >> >>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >> >>>>>> Nope. >> >>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >> >>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >> >>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >> >> You invent context to satisfy your desires. > > And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen used > the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not traveling in > the army) > > I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary that > the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 definition is to > serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can easily look it up. > > Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more credible > than THE accepted world reference for the English language. A little bit about snit the troll: http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <pevc58$62p$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170549 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:14:24 -0400, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >> >>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >> >>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >> >>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. >> >>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >> >>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >> >>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >> >>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not present >>>>> in every sentence uttered.... >> >>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you >>>> were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >> >>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look >>> into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to >>> suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to >>> ignore context of US society (and many others). >> >> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the >> context. >> >>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change >>> the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. >> >> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you >> want. >> >>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, >>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to >>>>> completely twist meanings. >> >>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word >>>> partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean >>>> "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to >>>> carry a weapon in a military capacity." >> >>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of >>> the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >> >> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >> >>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >> >>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >> >>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >> >>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >> >>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep >>>> and bear arms. >> >>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >> >> No word play involved on my part. >> >>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >> >>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >> >>>>>> Nope. >> >>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >> >>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >> >>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >> >> You invent context to satisfy your desires. > > And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen used > the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not traveling in > the army) > > I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary that > the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 definition is to > serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can easily look it up. > > Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more credible > than THE accepted world reference for the English language. A little bit about snit the troll: http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <fngs48Fb1d7U8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170553 |
simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:14:24 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> >>>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>> >>>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. >>> >>>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >>> >>>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >>> >>>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >>> >>>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not present >>>>>> in every sentence uttered.... >>> >>>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you >>>>> were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >>> >>>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look >>>> into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to >>>> suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to >>>> ignore context of US society (and many others). >>> >>> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the >>> context. >>> >>>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change >>>> the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. >>> >>> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you >>> want. >>> >>>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, >>>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to >>>>>> completely twist meanings. >>> >>>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word >>>>> partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean >>>>> "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to >>>>> carry a weapon in a military capacity." >>> >>>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of >>>> the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >>> >>> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >>> >>>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >>> >>>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >>> >>>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >>> >>>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >>> >>>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep >>>>> and bear arms. >>> >>>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >>> >>> No word play involved on my part. >>> >>>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>>>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >>> >>>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >>> >>>>>>> Nope. >>> >>>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >>> >>>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >>> >>>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >>> >>> You invent context to satisfy your desires. >> >> And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen used >> the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not traveling in >> the army) >> >> I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary that >> the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 definition is to >> serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can easily look it up. >> >> Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more credible >> than THE accepted world reference for the English language. > > A little bit about snit the troll: > > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html > > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html > > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html > Those are not about me in any way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:20 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <1mgmzmahlxhs0.7gdmirdgt2aw$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #170566 |
On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:04 GMT, Snit wrote: > simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:14:24 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>>>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >>>> >>>>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >>>> >>>>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>>>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >>>> >>>>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not present >>>>>>> in every sentence uttered.... >>>> >>>>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you >>>>>> were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >>>> >>>>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look >>>>> into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to >>>>> suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to >>>>> ignore context of US society (and many others). >>>> >>>> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the >>>> context. >>>> >>>>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change >>>>> the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. >>>> >>>> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you >>>> want. >>>> >>>>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, >>>>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to >>>>>>> completely twist meanings. >>>> >>>>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word >>>>>> partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean >>>>>> "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to >>>>>> carry a weapon in a military capacity." >>>> >>>>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of >>>>> the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >>>> >>>> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >>>> >>>>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >>>> >>>>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >>>> >>>>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >>>> >>>>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >>>> >>>>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep >>>>>> and bear arms. >>>> >>>>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >>>> >>>> No word play involved on my part. >>>> >>>>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>>>>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >>>> >>>>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. >>>> >>>>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >>>> >>>>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >>>> >>>>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >>>> >>>> You invent context to satisfy your desires. >>> >>> And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen used >>> the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not traveling in >>> the army) >>> >>> I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary that >>> the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 definition is to >>> serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can easily look it up. >>> >>> Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more credible >>> than THE accepted world reference for the English language. >> >> A little bit about snit the troll: >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> > > Those are not about me in any way. Oh yes they are snit and nothing you can do or say can change your past transgressions. I defy you to find another troll who is despised as much as you are. I would say Tholen but he disappeared many years ago. You OTOH continue to thrive, much like a cockroach after a nuclear blast. Sandman's site has some very accurate information regarding you and your sock puppets. http://usenet.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit And for those who have not made the connection yet, snit = Michael Glasser of Prescott AZ. He lives in a double wide trailer with his wife and several home schooled children. He has no gainful employment but his wife runs a daycare center out of the trailer. Michael Glasser collects a monthly disability check because he convinced some doctor pill that he suffers from a variety of anxiety type illnesses. What is of note is how this supposed sick person can troll the Internet every day of the year including Christmas, New Years and other holidays and not for a couple of hours per day but literally 24x7. For those of you in the USA, it's a prime example of your tax dollars hard at work. And for those keeping track, this is yet another example of sin't dishonesty so next time he drops the I'm honorable line on you remember this post. Not that it's difficult to locate posts where snit is lying. It's actually trivial.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <fnh0iuFbk5tU15@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170578 |
On 6/2/18 6:20 PM, Horace wrote: > On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:04 GMT, Snit wrote: > >> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:14:24 -0400, benj wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>>>>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>>>>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not present >>>>>>>> in every sentence uttered.... >>>>> >>>>>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you >>>>>>> were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >>>>> >>>>>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look >>>>>> into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to >>>>>> suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to >>>>>> ignore context of US society (and many others). >>>>> >>>>> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the >>>>> context. >>>>> >>>>>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change >>>>>> the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. >>>>> >>>>> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you >>>>> want. >>>>> >>>>>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, >>>>>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to >>>>>>>> completely twist meanings. >>>>> >>>>>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word >>>>>>> partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean >>>>>>> "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to >>>>>>> carry a weapon in a military capacity." >>>>> >>>>>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of >>>>>> the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >>>>> >>>>> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >>>>> >>>>>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >>>>> >>>>>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >>>>> >>>>>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >>>>> >>>>>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep >>>>>>> and bear arms. >>>>> >>>>>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >>>>> >>>>> No word play involved on my part. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>>>>>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>> >>>>>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >>>>> >>>>>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >>>>> >>>>>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >>>>> >>>>> You invent context to satisfy your desires. >>>> >>>> And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen used >>>> the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not traveling in >>>> the army) >>>> >>>> I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary that >>>> the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 definition is to >>>> serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can easily look it up. >>>> >>>> Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more credible >>>> than THE accepted world reference for the English language. >>> >>> A little bit about snit the troll: >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>> >> >> Those are not about me in any way. > > Oh yes they are snit and nothing you can do or say can change your past > transgressions. > I defy you to find another troll who is despised as much as you are. I > would say Tholen but he disappeared many years ago. You OTOH continue to > thrive, much like a cockroach after a nuclear blast. > Sandman's site has some very accurate information regarding you and your > sock puppets. > > http://usenet.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit > > And for those who have not made the connection yet, snit = Michael Glasser > of Prescott AZ. He lives in a double wide trailer with his wife and several > home schooled children. He has no gainful employment but his wife runs a > daycare center out of the trailer. Michael Glasser collects a monthly > disability check because he convinced some doctor pill that he suffers from > a variety of anxiety type illnesses. What is of note is how this supposed > sick person can troll the Internet every day of the year including > Christmas, New Years and other holidays and not for a couple of hours per > day but literally 24x7. > > For those of you in the USA, it's a prime example of your tax dollars hard > at work. > > And for those keeping track, this is yet another example of sin't > dishonesty so next time he drops the I'm honorable line on you remember > this post. > Not that it's difficult to locate posts where snit is lying. > It's actually trivial. > What a bizarre tantrum you are throwing. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 02:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <pevjkt$8me$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170594 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:03:10 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/2/18 6:20 PM, Horace wrote: >> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:04 GMT, Snit wrote: >> >>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:14:24 -0400, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from >>>>>>>>>>>>> that statement. Odd if you do. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not >>>>>>>>>> presented. >>>>>>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not >>>>>>>>> present in every sentence uttered.... >>>>>> >>>>>>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if >>>>>>>> you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >>>>>> >>>>>>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to >>>>>>> look into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted >>>>>>> that to suggest he was saying police are not real men, which >>>>>>> required you to ignore context of US society (and many others). >>>>>> >>>>>> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the >>>>>> context. >>>>>> >>>>>>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not >>>>>>> change the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic >>>>>>> interpretation. >>>>>> >>>>>> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you >>>>>> want. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, >>>>>>>>> actively, >>>>>>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way >>>>>>>>> to completely twist meanings. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written >>>>>>>> word partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does >>>>>>>> not mean "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited >>>>>>>> interpretation of "to carry a weapon in a military capacity." >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning >>>>>>> of the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >>>>>> >>>>>>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to >>>>>>>> keep and bear arms. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >>>>>> >>>>>> No word play involved on my part. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they >>>>>>>>>>>> must not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >>>>>> >>>>>>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >>>>>> >>>>>> You invent context to satisfy your desires. >>>>> >>>>> And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen >>>>> used the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not >>>>> traveling in the army) >>>>> >>>>> I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary >>>>> that the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 >>>>> definition is to serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can >>>>> easily look it up. >>>>> >>>>> Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more >>>>> credible than THE accepted world reference for the English language. >>>> >>>> A little bit about snit the troll: >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>> >>>> >>> Those are not about me in any way. >> >> Oh yes they are snit and nothing you can do or say can change your past >> transgressions. >> I defy you to find another troll who is despised as much as you are. I >> would say Tholen but he disappeared many years ago. You OTOH continue >> to thrive, much like a cockroach after a nuclear blast. >> Sandman's site has some very accurate information regarding you and >> your sock puppets. >> >> http://usenet.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit >> >> And for those who have not made the connection yet, snit = Michael >> Glasser of Prescott AZ. He lives in a double wide trailer with his wife >> and several home schooled children. He has no gainful employment but >> his wife runs a daycare center out of the trailer. Michael Glasser >> collects a monthly disability check because he convinced some doctor >> pill that he suffers from a variety of anxiety type illnesses. What is >> of note is how this supposed sick person can troll the Internet every >> day of the year including Christmas, New Years and other holidays and >> not for a couple of hours per day but literally 24x7. >> >> For those of you in the USA, it's a prime example of your tax dollars >> hard at work. >> >> And for those keeping track, this is yet another example of sin't >> dishonesty so next time he drops the I'm honorable line on you remember >> this post. >> Not that it's difficult to locate posts where snit is lying. >> It's actually trivial. >> >> > What a bizarre tantrum you are throwing. Tantrum? You seem to be the one who is trying in vain to defend yourself. I'm laughing my ass off watching you make a fool of yourself. I'm pointing to facts that other people have written about you. Hundreds of people in fact. Are you claiming that these hundreds of people are wrong about you? They all seem to be saying the same or similar things about you snit. So are all of these people wrong?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <fnh31dFc4krU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170601 |
On 6/2/18 7:26 PM, simon singh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:03:10 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/2/18 6:20 PM, Horace wrote: >>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:04 GMT, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:14:24 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that statement. Odd if you do. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not >>>>>>>>>>> presented. >>>>>>>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not >>>>>>>>>> present in every sentence uttered.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if >>>>>>>>> you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to >>>>>>>> look into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted >>>>>>>> that to suggest he was saying police are not real men, which >>>>>>>> required you to ignore context of US society (and many others). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the >>>>>>> context. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not >>>>>>>> change the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic >>>>>>>> interpretation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you >>>>>>> want. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, >>>>>>>>>> actively, >>>>>>>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way >>>>>>>>>> to completely twist meanings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written >>>>>>>>> word partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does >>>>>>>>> not mean "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited >>>>>>>>> interpretation of "to carry a weapon in a military capacity." >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning >>>>>>>> of the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to >>>>>>>>> keep and bear arms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No word play involved on my part. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they >>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You invent context to satisfy your desires. >>>>>> >>>>>> And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen >>>>>> used the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not >>>>>> traveling in the army) >>>>>> >>>>>> I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary >>>>>> that the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 >>>>>> definition is to serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can >>>>>> easily look it up. >>>>>> >>>>>> Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more >>>>>> credible than THE accepted world reference for the English language. >>>>> >>>>> A little bit about snit the troll: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>> >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>> >>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Those are not about me in any way. >>> >>> Oh yes they are snit and nothing you can do or say can change your past >>> transgressions. >>> I defy you to find another troll who is despised as much as you are. I >>> would say Tholen but he disappeared many years ago. You OTOH continue >>> to thrive, much like a cockroach after a nuclear blast. >>> Sandman's site has some very accurate information regarding you and >>> your sock puppets. >>> >>> http://usenet.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit >>> >>> And for those who have not made the connection yet, snit = Michael >>> Glasser of Prescott AZ. He lives in a double wide trailer with his wife >>> and several home schooled children. He has no gainful employment but >>> his wife runs a daycare center out of the trailer. Michael Glasser >>> collects a monthly disability check because he convinced some doctor >>> pill that he suffers from a variety of anxiety type illnesses. What is >>> of note is how this supposed sick person can troll the Internet every >>> day of the year including Christmas, New Years and other holidays and >>> not for a couple of hours per day but literally 24x7. >>> >>> For those of you in the USA, it's a prime example of your tax dollars >>> hard at work. >>> >>> And for those keeping track, this is yet another example of sin't >>> dishonesty so next time he drops the I'm honorable line on you remember >>> this post. >>> Not that it's difficult to locate posts where snit is lying. >>> It's actually trivial. >>> >>> >> What a bizarre tantrum you are throwing. > > Tantrum? > You seem to be the one who is trying in vain to defend yourself. You are certainly working hard, and failing, to put me on the defensive. > I'm laughing my ass off watching you make a fool of yourself. I was enjoying this earlier but you have gotten to your standard insult and attack mode without even trying to be interesting or entertaining. I shall likely ignore you for a while -- in part just to see you cry. And you will. 100% predictable. > I'm pointing to facts that other people have written about you. > Hundreds of people in fact. > Are you claiming that these hundreds of people are wrong about you? > They all seem to be saying the same or similar things about you snit. > So are all of these people wrong? In other words you cannot quote me doing as you accuse. Cool! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 02:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <pevl9c$8me$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170611 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:45:00 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/2/18 7:26 PM, simon singh wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:03:10 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 6:20 PM, Horace wrote: >>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:04 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 20:14:24 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ??? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from that statement. Odd if you do. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not >>>>>>>>>>>> presented. >>>>>>>>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not >>>>>>>>>>> present in every sentence uttered.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here >>>>>>>>>> "if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to >>>>>>>>> look into the context to even try to) but the fact is you >>>>>>>>> twisted that to suggest he was saying police are not real men, >>>>>>>>> which required you to ignore context of US society (and many >>>>>>>>> others). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of >>>>>>>> the context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not >>>>>>>>> change the fact you twisted his words. You pushed a pedantic >>>>>>>>> interpretation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way >>>>>>>> you want. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, >>>>>>>>>>> actively, >>>>>>>>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a >>>>>>>>>>> way to completely twist meanings. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written >>>>>>>>>> word partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does >>>>>>>>>> not mean "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited >>>>>>>>>> interpretation of "to carry a weapon in a military capacity." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning >>>>>>>>> of the words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most >>>>>>>>>>> cultures. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to >>>>>>>>>> keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No word play involved on my part. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they must not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You invent context to satisfy your desires. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And so does everyone else, from the days when rights of Englishmen >>>>>>> used the term to mean carrying a sword while traveling (and not >>>>>>> traveling in the army) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English >>>>>>> Dictionary that the number1 definition is to carry arms while the >>>>>>> 1.1 definition is to serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy >>>>>>> can easily look it up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more >>>>>>> credible than THE accepted world reference for the English >>>>>>> language. >>>>>> >>>>>> A little bit about snit the troll: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Those are not about me in any way. >>>> >>>> Oh yes they are snit and nothing you can do or say can change your >>>> past transgressions. >>>> I defy you to find another troll who is despised as much as you are. >>>> I would say Tholen but he disappeared many years ago. You OTOH >>>> continue to thrive, much like a cockroach after a nuclear blast. >>>> Sandman's site has some very accurate information regarding you and >>>> your sock puppets. >>>> >>>> http://usenet.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit >>>> >>>> And for those who have not made the connection yet, snit = Michael >>>> Glasser of Prescott AZ. He lives in a double wide trailer with his >>>> wife and several home schooled children. He has no gainful employment >>>> but his wife runs a daycare center out of the trailer. Michael >>>> Glasser collects a monthly disability check because he convinced some >>>> doctor pill that he suffers from a variety of anxiety type illnesses. >>>> What is of note is how this supposed sick person can troll the >>>> Internet every day of the year including Christmas, New Years and >>>> other holidays and not for a couple of hours per day but literally >>>> 24x7. >>>> >>>> For those of you in the USA, it's a prime example of your tax dollars >>>> hard at work. >>>> >>>> And for those keeping track, this is yet another example of sin't >>>> dishonesty so next time he drops the I'm honorable line on you >>>> remember this post. >>>> Not that it's difficult to locate posts where snit is lying. >>>> It's actually trivial. >>>> >>>> >>> What a bizarre tantrum you are throwing. >> >> Tantrum? >> You seem to be the one who is trying in vain to defend yourself. > > You are certainly working hard, and failing, to put me on the defensive. > >> I'm laughing my ass off watching you make a fool of yourself. > > I was enjoying this earlier but you have gotten to your standard insult > and attack mode without even trying to be interesting or entertaining. I > shall likely ignore you for a while -- in part just to see you cry. > > And you will. > > 100% predictable. > >> I'm pointing to facts that other people have written about you. >> Hundreds of people in fact. >> Are you claiming that these hundreds of people are wrong about you? >> They all seem to be saying the same or similar things about you snit. >> So are all of these people wrong? > > In other words you cannot quote me doing as you accuse. Cool! Are you retarded? Incapable of answering a simple question? I think so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:58 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <l9m6hd9i6k0otesd7suoqtfoqsk36i1vjq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170617 |
>> >> In other words you cannot quote me doing as you accuse. Cool! > >Are you retarded? >Incapable of answering a simple question? >I think so. He's a lefty...sooo...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:57 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <h7m6hd94slnng6skmg1dsdnk56sjo48078@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170611 |
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 19:45:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> I'm laughing my ass off watching you make a fool of yourself. > >I was enjoying this earlier but you have gotten to your standard insult >and attack mode without even trying to be interesting or entertaining. I >shall likely ignore you for a while -- in part just to see you cry. Translation: Now that you have sit me in my place yet *again*, I'll run away for a while and sock up. *again*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <basbd0.bn6.19.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #170621 |
On 2018-06-02 7:57 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 19:45:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >>> I'm laughing my ass off watching you make a fool of yourself. >> >> I was enjoying this earlier but you have gotten to your standard insult >> and attack mode without even trying to be interesting or entertaining. I >> shall likely ignore you for a while -- in part just to see you cry. > > > Translation: Now that you have sit me in my place yet *again*, I'll > run away for a while and sock up. *again* > yay , but let me know who you are , so i don't jump all over it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? |
| Message-ID | <fngs47Fb1d7U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170549 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 6/2/2018 5:28 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fng73aF79g8U1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/2/18 9:14 AM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fneumeFu37vU2@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/1/18 11:47 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, >>>>>>>>>> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? >>>>>>>>>> <root@127.0.0.1> typed: >> >>>>>>>>>>> if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. >> >>>>>>>>>> Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? >> >>>>>>>>> I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>>>>>> statement. Odd if you do. >> >>>>>>>> Odd that you don't. >> >>>>>>> Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... >> >>>>>> Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. >>>>>> All we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. >> >>>>> Of course the context of a society requires information not present in >>>>> every sentence uttered.... >> >>>> The context wherein I take it is talk.politics.guns, and here "if you >>>> were a real man you >>>> wouldn't need a gun" is foolish. >> >>> We can debate how reasonable that statement was (I would have to look >>> into the context to even try to) but the fact is you twisted that to >>> suggest he was saying police are not real men, which required you to >>> ignore context of US society (and many others). >> >> How would you know? You just admitted that you are ignorant of the context. >> >>> You can keep trying to defend your word twisting -- does not change the >>> fact you twisted his >>> words. You pushed a pedantic interpretation. >> >> I took his words at face value. You can interpret them any way you want. >> >>>>> ... Again, not sure how you could not see this. You are, actively, >>>>> I assume, taking things FAR too literally and doing so in a way to >>>>> completely twist meanings. >> >>>> I see. Your desire to imply meaning not explicit in the written word >>>> partially explains how you can argue that "bear arms" does not mean >>>> "to carry a weapon," but a much more limited interpretation of "to >>>> carry a weapon in a military capacity." >> >>> I am saying, in both cases, we should go with the ACTUAL meaning of the >>> words and not a silly pedantic misinterpretation. >> >> Misinterpret all you want. I take them at face value. >> >>> But see how you seek to twist even that. >> >>>>>>> ... Maybe if one was not from America? >> >>>>>> I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. >> >>>>> I do not know... though I bet much is the same in most cultures. >> >>>> Most cultures don't have a constitutionally recognised right to keep >>>> and bear arms. >> >>> Irrelevant to your pedantic word play to twist meanings. >> >> No word play involved on my part. >> >>>>>>>> No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must >>>>>>>> not be real men, according to YFNPWHE. >> >>>>>>> What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. >> >>>>>> Nope. >> >>>>> I do hope you are just trolling. >> >>>> My context is talk.politics.guns. YMMV >> >>> You play pedantic word games to avoid meaning and context. >> >> You invent context to satisfy your desires. > > And so does everyone else, from the days when > rights of Englishmen used the term to mean carrying a sword while > traveling (and not traveling in the army) > > I've already posted the evidence from the Oxford English Dictionary that > the number1 definition is to carry arms while the 1.1 definition is to > serve in the army. Anyone not totally lazy can easily look it up. > > Somehow Snit seems to find some biased study for an agenda more credible > than THE accepted world reference for the English language. > > You rejected the use of the phrase to push an agenda. Not sure what else needs to be said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: â Snowflake â ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? â Snowflake â |
| Message-ID | <9ZqdnUVQqurCBY_GnZ2dnUU7-UnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #170305 |
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 23:47:53 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; ""max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <petf6j$s0f$2@dont-email.me>: >In news:fnerqlFtkheU1@mid.individual.net, Snit ><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>On 6/1/18 11:13 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>In news:fneq4rFtb3qU1@mid.individual.net, Snit >>><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>On 6/1/18 6:50 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>In news:mMqdnRBdYqvIBIzGnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com, Your Friendly >>>>>Neighbourhood ðķ Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? <root@127.0.0.1> typed: > >>>>>>if you were a real man you wouldn't need a gun. > >>>>>Are you implying cops aren't real men (or women)? > >>>>I most certainly would not take that as an implication from that >>>>statement. Odd if you do. > >>>Odd that you don't. > >>Would require ignoring basic context of our society.... > >Or it would require assuming additional information not presented. All >we have to go on are the words s/he wrote. > >>... Maybe if one was not from America? > >I suspect YFNPWHE isn't. > >>>No cop will work his/her shift without a gun, therefore they must not be >>>real men, according to YFNPWHE. > >>What a bizarre set of assumptions from you. Curious. > >Nope. hvordad. har du da? -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fndl5rFn1dhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170088 |
On 6/1/18 11:59 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:27:19 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/1/18 8:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 07:46:59 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/1/18 3:21 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 21:26:01 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/31/18 5:51 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:49:42 -0500, !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually, the "well regulated militia" was well detailed in article >>>>>>>> six of our Document [sic] of Confederation and ratified in 1781. Article >>>>>>>> six is very clear about it and has never been repealed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Holy SHIT you're stupid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of COURSE it's been "repealed," you ignorant fuck. >>>>>>> >>>>>> But the second amendment has not.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> He's babbling about "Document [sic] of Confederation" and claims it >>>>> was "never repealed." >>>>> >>>> It is not current law, of course, but the language it uses, and the way >>>> it describes a militia, is enlightening. >>> >>> Well, it doesn't "describe" a militia, actually. >>> >>> No vessel of war shall be kept up in time of peace by any State, >>> except such number only, as shall be deemed necessary by the United >>> States in Congress assembled, for the defense of such State, or its >>> trade; nor shall any body of forces be kept up by any State in time of >>> peace, except such number only, as in the judgement of the United >>> States in Congress assembled, shall be deemed requisite to garrison >>> the forts necessary for the defense of such State; but every State >>> shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined militia, >>> sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide and constantly >>> have ready for use, in public stores, a due number of filed pieces and >>> tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition and camp equipage. >> >> >> It describes the expectations > > Hmmmmm. Yet it doesn't define militia, as you previously maintained. It, along with plenty of other evidence, shows how the phrase "bear arms" and the concept of a militia was seen. >> of one, both you and I have quoted. >> >> Now one might say all of what it said is not required... but the second >> amendment makes no suggestion of anything otherwise. > > Well of course it does. If you read it. I have... and also shown the context for the meaning, which you ignore. You claim it means something other than what it says directly but offer no evidence. Not sure the value in this. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 34 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web