Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #167697 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 103 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:33 -0600
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 13:44 -0600
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 10:26 -0600
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:01 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:21 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 13:51 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:09 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:44 -0600
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:19 -0600
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p3slgdhi960gqel66m2nlftuvds2a1l49j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168605 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:36:25 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:35:07 -0400, Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote: >>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. >>>>> >>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea ) >>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage; >>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic >>>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style. >>>>> >>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal; >>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others. >>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger, >>>>> but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West >>>>> >>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ? >>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. >>>> >>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves? >>>> >>>As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been >>>sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and >>>sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African >>>badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. >>>Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black >>>Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the >>>party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think >>>that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with >>>our own eyes. >> >>It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of >>complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour. >> >>It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met >>have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't >>surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who >>want to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar >>people, they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no >>benefit whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their >>communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest >>from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the >>youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making >>the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in >>a sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it - >>decide to blame whitey. > >19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of > inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, > a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith > in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but > he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, > and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant > behavior. > >[1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings > of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as > individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the > leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization > or a mass movement with which he identifies himself. > > 20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists > protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke > police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be > effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but > because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist > trait. > > 21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion > or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the > leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle > cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too > prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. > Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of > benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. > For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black > people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or > dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a > diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal > and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative > action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take > such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. > >(Source: well.sf.ca.us ) All true and hopefully, your post will result in Michael Glasser, failed 4th grade science experiment of Prescott, Arizona to put his head through a noose.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fn0a4kF67okU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #168637 |
On 5/27/18 10:54 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:36:25 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." > <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > >> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:35:07 -0400, Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. >>>>>> >>>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea ) >>>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage; >>>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic >>>>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style. >>>>>> >>>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal; >>>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others. >>>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger, >>>>>> but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West >>>>>> >>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ? >>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. >>>>> >>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves? >>>>> >>>> As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been >>>> sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and >>>> sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African >>>> badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. >>>> Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black >>>> Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the >>>> party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think >>>> that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with >>>> our own eyes. >>> >>> It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of >>> complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour. >>> >>> It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met >>> have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't >>> surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who >>> want to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar >>> people, they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no >>> benefit whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their >>> communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest >> >from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the >>> youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making >>> the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in >>> a sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it - >>> decide to blame whitey. >> >> 19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of >> inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, >> a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith >> in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but >> he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, >> and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant >> behavior. >> >> [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings >> of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as >> individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the >> leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization >> or a mass movement with which he identifies himself. >> >> 20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists >> protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke >> police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be >> effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but >> because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist >> trait. >> >> 21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion >> or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the >> leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle >> cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too >> prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. >> Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of >> benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. >> For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black >> people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or >> dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a >> diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal >> and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative >> action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take >> such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. >> >> (Source: well.sf.ca.us ) > > All true and hopefully, your post will result in Michael Glasser, > failed 4th grade science experiment of Prescott, Arizona to put his > head through a noose. > I hope some day you get past your deep insecurities. Wow. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fnb82dF82riU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #168637 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 13:54:02 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:36:25 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." > <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > >>On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:35:07 -0400, Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. >>>>>> >>>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea ) >>>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage; >>>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic that's >>>>>> easy on the environment, Al Gore style. >>>>>> >>>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal; >>>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others. >>>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger, >>>>>> but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West >>>>>> >>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ? >>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and >>>>>> unfortunate. >>>>> >>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves? >>>>> >>>>As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been >>>>sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and >>>>sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African >>>>badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. >>>>Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare >>>>Black Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting >>>>against the party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. >>>>You'd think that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen >>>>it working with our own eyes. >>> >>>It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of >>>complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour. >>> >>>It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met >>>have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't >>>surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who want >>>to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar people, >>>they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no benefit >>>whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their >>>communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest >>>from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the >>>youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making >>>the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in a >>>sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it - decide >>>to blame whitey. >> >>19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of >> inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a >> self-promoter, >> a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith >> in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, >> but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be >> strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant >> behavior. >> >>[1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings >> of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as >> individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the >> leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization >> or a mass movement with which he identifies himself. >> >> 20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists >> protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally >> provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often >> be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but >> because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist >> trait. >> >> 21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion >> or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the >> leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral >> principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility >> is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for >> power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated >> to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying >> to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good >> for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in >> hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to >> take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least >> verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that >> affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists >> do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their >> emotional needs. >> >>(Source: well.sf.ca.us ) > > All true and hopefully, your post will result in Michael Glasser, failed > 4th grade science experiment of Prescott, Arizona to put his head > through a noose. So we have Unabomber-lite quoting the Unabomber, and crazed extremists agreeing with him. Why is the USENET so full of wingnut extremists? -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web