Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #210181 > unrolled thread
| Started by | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 122 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:55 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:52 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 22:50 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:57 -0400
Re: Kensi admits to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:04 -0600
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:35 -0400
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:53 -0400
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:59 -0600
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:33 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:30 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:15 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Andrew Grant Carrick <9904.Blue.Bonnet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 18:56 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 16:49 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361f24e378272069994daf@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #210740 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bl03id.o0u.19.9@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-10-03 2:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <gdcardheqkvn13qj77lk2k8k222p1omio1@4ax.com>, > > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > > > >> > >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:59:22 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> In an article greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >>>> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:19:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Cuntalina hasn't got anybody here who can stand talking to her anymore. > >>>> > >>>> Hey, I still enjoy talking to her. > >>>> > >>>>> She'll get smacked down every time she oozes her slimy self in here. > >>>> > >>>> She's pretty high on the list of *life of the party* IMO. > >>>> > >>>>> Well, Greg will still talk to her, but he doesn't respect the whore any > >>>>> more than anyone else does. Once trash, always trash. > >>>> > >>>> Drag a dollar bill through alt.checkmate... LOL! > >>>> > >>>> So, she gets a wee bit drunk from time to time and tells > >>>> it like she thinks it is. I can't fault her for that. She > >>>> sure is a LOT more interesting than the likes of PeeScent, > >>>> pandora, turkey, Nads, kensi, rachel, Darlene, and that > >>>> fibreOptic loon. > >>>> > >>>> And, try to remember that Usenet is all about free speech. > >>>> Even if you happen to disagree with it somebody else might > >>>> agree and find it worthwhile. > >>> > >>> And I exercise my free speech without hesitation. Given her track > >>> record, I knew this day would come. > >> > >> Even way back she's always done a pretty good > >> job stirring the pot. She seems to know what > >> buttons to push. > > > > Anybody can "flame" on that level. It doesn't require any intellect, > > talent, or class... just a disgusting gutter mouth, which says a lot > > about her as a person, and how she was raised. She's as low class as a > > ghetto rat. > > > don't ya just hate unqualified bickerers Amateurs... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pp4da1$1of$29@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #210647 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:15:09 +0000, SWD wrote: > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:04:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <bkt9k5.hp4.19.10@news.alt.net>, >> persent@gmail.com says... >> >> >> >>> On 2018-10-02 1:18 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>> > by Checkmate! In article >>> > <9fe7rddte19mq9gr7l75f3cgj1g767om38@4ax.com>, >>> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:25:53 -0700, Checkmate >>> >> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> >>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> >>>> <...> >>> >>>> >>> >>>>>> FAKE pandora. Checky and I drove the real pandora off >>> >>>>>> alt.checkmate. The real pandora displayed all the fury of a >>> >>>>>> woman scorned and flounced off. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Don't include me in your personal vendetta. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> LOL! It wasn't Yours Truly who sucked up to pandora for two or >>> >>>> three years and tried to shelter her from those who found her >>> >>>> highly offensive. That would be you. That she turned on you and >>> >>>> revealed her true self is what I tried to tell you well in >>> >>>> advance. But, >>> >>>> you wouldn't listen because she had you cuckolded. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I have been consistent, otoh. I've always disliked pandora >>> >>>> mostly because she is so shallow and insecure. >>> >>>> It got so it sickened me to read her patting her own back and >>> >>>> bragging how rich she was and how many things she owned. So, now >>> >>>> I hate pandora. She's earned it. You should hate her too. >>> >>> >>> >>> I still don't hate her, but the "backstabber" comment has soured >>> >>> things AFAIC. >>> >> >>> >> Yup, that's way more of a betrayal than an inebriated Miss Kitty >>> >> saying you threw your kitty up against the wall and broke its >>> >> brittle little bones. LOL. Pandora doesn't even have the excuse >>> >> of a snoot full. >>> > >>> > Miss Kitty is like a box of chocolates, where occasionally you get >>> > one with a rock in it. >>> > >>> it just depends on the 6 pack , >>> i think you should bring shiny and neon back >> >> Kachina isn't into Usenet much anymore. She's dropped in a couple of >> times, but it's not like it used to be so I can't say I blame her. > > Damn that kensi, driving off all of the most entertaining loons until > only the boring ones like % and Skeeter and Catalina are left! > > This is all kensi's fault! Cursing kensi, eh? I'll let you off with a warning this time, because you also credited her with a bunch of major kook meltdown-flounces in the same breath. But watch yourself. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 07:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361fc9d5fc4776a2989ddd@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210814 |
In article <pp4da1$1of$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:15:09 +0000, SWD wrote: > > > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:04:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >> Checkmate! In article <bkt9k5.hp4.19.10@news.alt.net>, > >> persent@gmail.com says... > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 2018-10-02 1:18 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >>> > by Checkmate! In article > >>> > <9fe7rddte19mq9gr7l75f3cgj1g767om38@4ax.com>, > >>> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:25:53 -0700, Checkmate > >>> >> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >>> >>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>>>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >>> >>>> <...> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>>> FAKE pandora. Checky and I drove the real pandora off > >>> >>>>>> alt.checkmate. The real pandora displayed all the fury of a > >>> >>>>>> woman scorned and flounced off. > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Don't include me in your personal vendetta. > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> LOL! It wasn't Yours Truly who sucked up to pandora for two or > >>> >>>> three years and tried to shelter her from those who found her > >>> >>>> highly offensive. That would be you. That she turned on you and > >>> >>>> revealed her true self is what I tried to tell you well in > >>> >>>> advance. But, > >>> >>>> you wouldn't listen because she had you cuckolded. > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> I have been consistent, otoh. I've always disliked pandora > >>> >>>> mostly because she is so shallow and insecure. > >>> >>>> It got so it sickened me to read her patting her own back and > >>> >>>> bragging how rich she was and how many things she owned. So, now > >>> >>>> I hate pandora. She's earned it. You should hate her too. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I still don't hate her, but the "backstabber" comment has soured > >>> >>> things AFAIC. > >>> >> > >>> >> Yup, that's way more of a betrayal than an inebriated Miss Kitty > >>> >> saying you threw your kitty up against the wall and broke its > >>> >> brittle little bones. LOL. Pandora doesn't even have the excuse > >>> >> of a snoot full. > >>> > > >>> > Miss Kitty is like a box of chocolates, where occasionally you get > >>> > one with a rock in it. > >>> > > >>> it just depends on the 6 pack , > >>> i think you should bring shiny and neon back > >> > >> Kachina isn't into Usenet much anymore. She's dropped in a couple of > >> times, but it's not like it used to be so I can't say I blame her. > > > > Damn that kensi, driving off all of the most entertaining loons until > > only the boring ones like % and Skeeter and Catalina are left! > > > > This is all kensi's fault! > > Cursing kensi, eh? > > I'll let you off with a warning this time, because you also credited her > with a bunch of major kook meltdown-flounces in the same breath. > > But watch yourself. Hey...fuck you and piss on Kensi. <waiting for punishment>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-05 03:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pp6n69$1dc$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #210851 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:55:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp4da1$1of$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:15:09 +0000, SWD wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:04:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> > >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> >> by Checkmate! In article <bkt9k5.hp4.19.10@news.alt.net>, >> >> persent@gmail.com says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 2018-10-02 1:18 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> >>> > posts by Checkmate! In article >> >>> > <9fe7rddte19mq9gr7l75f3cgj1g767om38@4ax.com>, >> >>> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:25:53 -0700, Checkmate >> >>> >> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >>> >>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >>> >>>> <...> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>>>> FAKE pandora. Checky and I drove the real pandora off >> >>> >>>>>> alt.checkmate. The real pandora displayed all the fury of a >> >>> >>>>>> woman scorned and flounced off. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> Don't include me in your personal vendetta. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> LOL! It wasn't Yours Truly who sucked up to pandora for two >> >>> >>>> or three years and tried to shelter her from those who found >> >>> >>>> her highly offensive. That would be you. That she turned on >> >>> >>>> you and revealed her true self is what I tried to tell you >> >>> >>>> well in advance. But, >> >>> >>>> you wouldn't listen because she had you cuckolded. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> I have been consistent, otoh. I've always disliked pandora >> >>> >>>> mostly because she is so shallow and insecure. >> >>> >>>> It got so it sickened me to read her patting her own back and >> >>> >>>> bragging how rich she was and how many things she owned. So, >> >>> >>>> now I hate pandora. She's earned it. You should hate her too. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> I still don't hate her, but the "backstabber" comment has >> >>> >>> soured things AFAIC. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Yup, that's way more of a betrayal than an inebriated Miss Kitty >> >>> >> saying you threw your kitty up against the wall and broke its >> >>> >> brittle little bones. LOL. Pandora doesn't even have the >> >>> >> excuse of a snoot full. >> >>> > >> >>> > Miss Kitty is like a box of chocolates, where occasionally you >> >>> > get one with a rock in it. >> >>> > >> >>> it just depends on the 6 pack , >> >>> i think you should bring shiny and neon back >> >> >> >> Kachina isn't into Usenet much anymore. She's dropped in a couple >> >> of times, but it's not like it used to be so I can't say I blame >> >> her. >> > >> > Damn that kensi, driving off all of the most entertaining loons until >> > only the boring ones like % and Skeeter and Catalina are left! >> > >> > This is all kensi's fault! >> >> Cursing kensi, eh? >> >> I'll let you off with a warning this time, because you also credited >> her with a bunch of major kook meltdown-flounces in the same breath. >> >> But watch yourself. > > Hey...fuck you and piss on Kensi. > > <waiting for punishment> If you'd seen what kensi did to AB and some of the other megakooks of the past, you'd be quaking in your boots right now at the thought of incurring her wrath. Not mine. Hers. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 22:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36209b795b60f185989e22@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #211035 |
In article <pp6n69$1dc$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:55:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > In article <pp4da1$1of$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:15:09 +0000, SWD wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:04:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > > >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> >> by Checkmate! In article <bkt9k5.hp4.19.10@news.alt.net>, > >> >> persent@gmail.com says... > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> On 2018-10-02 1:18 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > >> >>> > posts by Checkmate! In article > >> >>> > <9fe7rddte19mq9gr7l75f3cgj1g767om38@4ax.com>, > >> >>> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:25:53 -0700, Checkmate > >> >>> >> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > >> >>> >> wrote: > >> >>> >>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >>> >>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >>> >>>> <...> > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>>>> FAKE pandora. Checky and I drove the real pandora off > >> >>> >>>>>> alt.checkmate. The real pandora displayed all the fury of a > >> >>> >>>>>> woman scorned and flounced off. > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> Don't include me in your personal vendetta. > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> LOL! It wasn't Yours Truly who sucked up to pandora for two > >> >>> >>>> or three years and tried to shelter her from those who found > >> >>> >>>> her highly offensive. That would be you. That she turned on > >> >>> >>>> you and revealed her true self is what I tried to tell you > >> >>> >>>> well in advance. But, > >> >>> >>>> you wouldn't listen because she had you cuckolded. > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> I have been consistent, otoh. I've always disliked pandora > >> >>> >>>> mostly because she is so shallow and insecure. > >> >>> >>>> It got so it sickened me to read her patting her own back and > >> >>> >>>> bragging how rich she was and how many things she owned. So, > >> >>> >>>> now I hate pandora. She's earned it. You should hate her too. > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> I still don't hate her, but the "backstabber" comment has > >> >>> >>> soured things AFAIC. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Yup, that's way more of a betrayal than an inebriated Miss Kitty > >> >>> >> saying you threw your kitty up against the wall and broke its > >> >>> >> brittle little bones. LOL. Pandora doesn't even have the > >> >>> >> excuse of a snoot full. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Miss Kitty is like a box of chocolates, where occasionally you > >> >>> > get one with a rock in it. > >> >>> > > >> >>> it just depends on the 6 pack , > >> >>> i think you should bring shiny and neon back > >> >> > >> >> Kachina isn't into Usenet much anymore. She's dropped in a couple > >> >> of times, but it's not like it used to be so I can't say I blame > >> >> her. > >> > > >> > Damn that kensi, driving off all of the most entertaining loons until > >> > only the boring ones like % and Skeeter and Catalina are left! > >> > > >> > This is all kensi's fault! > >> > >> Cursing kensi, eh? > >> > >> I'll let you off with a warning this time, because you also credited > >> her with a bunch of major kook meltdown-flounces in the same breath. > >> > >> But watch yourself. > > > > Hey...fuck you and piss on Kensi. > > > > <waiting for punishment> > > If you'd seen what kensi did to AB and some of the other megakooks of the > past, you'd be quaking in your boots right now at the thought of incurring > her wrath. > > Not mine. Hers. > > <snicker> Yawn, all talk....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nw382e.1k77zbfwnrgxnN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #210320 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > > You just lack a sense of humour sometimes. > > What are you talking about? You don't think > a chocolate with a rock in it is funny? [...] A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 04:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp209g$q3$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210504 |
On 10/3/2018 4:10 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] > >>> You just lack a sense of humour sometimes. >> >> What are you talking about? You don't think >> a chocolate with a rock in it is funny? > > [...] > > A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. Not unless you like the idea of your windows being egged, V!le. And I mean it. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:04 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Kensi admits to vandalism |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e7a762aa4b42c989d99@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210507 |
In article <pp209g$q3$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 10/3/2018 4:10 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > > Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >>> You just lack a sense of humour sometimes. > >> > >> What are you talking about? You don't think > >> a chocolate with a rock in it is funny? > > > > [...] > > > > A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. > > Not unless you like the idea of your windows being egged, V!le. And I > mean it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 10:35 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism |
| Message-ID | <pp2k43$14lo$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210529 |
On 10/3/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp209g$q3$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> On 10/3/2018 4:10 AM, Sn!pe wrote: >>> A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. >> >> Not unless you like the idea of your windows being egged, V!le. And I >> mean it. > > Kensi admits to vandalism Correction: kensi made a *conditional* threat of *future* petty vandalism. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e84a3f813cb61989db9@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210556 |
In article <pp2k43$14lo$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 10/3/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp209g$q3$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> On 10/3/2018 4:10 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > >>> A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. > >> > >> Not unless you like the idea of your windows being egged, V!le. And I > >> mean it. > > > > Kensi admits to vandalism > > Correction: kensi made a *conditional* threat of *future* petty vandalism. I hope you drink bleach.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 10:53 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism |
| Message-ID | <pp2l4p$14lo$14@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210571 |
On 10/3/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp2k43$14lo$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> On 10/3/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pp209g$q3$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>> On 10/3/2018 4:10 AM, Sn!pe wrote: >>>>> A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. >>>> >>>> Not unless you like the idea of your windows being egged, V!le. And I >>>> mean it. >>> >>> Kensi admits to vandalism >> >> Correction: kensi made a *conditional* threat of *future* petty vandalism. > > I hope you drink bleach. More violent ideation ... means you're melting, which means I win! *does a little victory dance* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:59 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e8749a6ea29f4989dc5@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210578 |
In article <pp2l4p$14lo$14@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 10/3/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp2k43$14lo$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> > >> On 10/3/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <pp209g$q3$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > >>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >>>> On 10/3/2018 4:10 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > >>>>> A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. > >>>> > >>>> Not unless you like the idea of your windows being egged, V!le. And I > >>>> mean it. > >>> > >>> Kensi admits to vandalism > >> > >> Correction: kensi made a *conditional* threat of *future* petty vandalism. > > > > I hope you drink bleach. > > More violent ideation ... means you're melting, which means I win! > > *does a little victory dance* By your actions I see you might have already drank it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 16:33 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism |
| Message-ID | <1nw3sjm.pwyenh1l6f15yN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #210590 |
Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > Professor Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. disguise confidently declared: > > On 10/3/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > > Professor Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist > > > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. disguise confidently declared: > > >> On 10/3/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > >>> Professor Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist > > >>> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. disguise confidently declared: > > >>> > > >>>> On 10/3/2018 4:10 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. > > >>>> > > >>>> Not unless you like the idea of your windows being egged, V!le. > > >>>> And I mean it. > > >>> > > >>> Kensi admits to vandalism > > >> > > >> Correction: kensi made a *conditional* threat of *future* petty vandalism > > > > > > I hope you drink bleach. > > > > More violent ideation ... means you're melting, which means I win! > > > > *does a little victory dance* > > By your actions I see you might have already drank it. Take no notice, Skeeter, the poor boy's a buffoon -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 16:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nw3sf2.174w4k9hym6vzN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #210507 |
Professor Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. disguise confidently declared: > On 10/3/2018 4:10 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > > Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >>> You just lack a sense of humour sometimes. > >> > >> What are you talking about? You don't think > >> a chocolate with a rock in it is funny? > > > > [...] > > > > A chocolate-coated brussels sprout at Halloween is funny. > > Not unless you like the idea of your windows being egged, V!le. > And I mean it. Do you -really- me*8n it, Paul? Should I be quaking in my boots? -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 09:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nw38b0.1hsz9z1iyfk53N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #210283 |
Catalina <Catalina@beach.sun> wrote: > And look who it is that is stirring up trouble, > the devil Gerg, again! AKA seamus Some mistake, Shirley? If that's true I will never speak to him again !!!1! -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Grant Carrick <9904.Blue.Bonnet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 18:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5h8tD.236839$4S3.77453@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #210283 |
"Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> wrote in news:bkvmee.3rg.17.1@news.alt.net: > I'm going to the ranch. > Are you Cattleina or Cuntalina? LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 16:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361ef548950367c8989dce@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210656 |
In article <gl9ard5hlidgq5kdn3k1m5l63odmc357vj@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:08:17 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > In article <qg4ard9afedpstuhoaemb6niil2t13b203@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:56:01 GMT, Andrew Grant Carrick <9904.Blue.Bonnet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> >"Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> wrote in > >> >news:bkvmee.3rg.17.1@news.alt.net: > >> >> I'm going to the ranch. > >> >> > >> >Are you Cattleina or Cuntalina? LOL! > >> > >> Hi Checky! > > > >Not me, so I think you'll figure it out. > > Ah, then it's probably Skeeter. He's been known to > use XNews. Or, it could be that asshole turkey but > he's been MIA since I booted his gay ass to the curb. I don't have a dog in this race, no froggerys here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nw37v4.ikk8271jbr8reN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #210280 |
Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled: [...] > So, now I hate pandora. She's earned it. You should hate her too. Hate is a very strong word; beware the error of hyperbole, wordsmith. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-9081C1.06473503102018@reader.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #210503 |
In article <1nw37v4.ikk8271jbr8reN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: > Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled: > > [...] > > > So, now I hate pandora. She's earned it. You should hate her too. > > Hate is a very strong word; beware the error of hyperbole, wordsmith. The fate of hate is to mate the sate--um--an. -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ An almond doesn't lactate. This post / \ Yet another supercilious snowflake for justice. insults Islam. Mohammed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jdo9rd5vk4j5rtbgqho6cne247e6g5k16p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #210503 |
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled: > >[...] > >> So, now I hate pandora. She's earned it. You should hate her too. > >Hate is a very strong word; beware the error of hyperbole, wordsmith. Perhaps you're right, K!te. From now on I will spell it the Usenet way. "Pandora is #1 on my "lits-o'-haet." -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web