Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #211056

Re: Was she looking for love ?

From Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate
Subject Re: Was she looking for love ?
Date 2018-10-04 22:50 -0600
Organization FNVW
Message-ID <MPG.36209b795b60f185989e22@reader.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (14 earlier) <MPG.361dd17e6dd72671994d60@news.altopia.com> <pp30vd$qiq$3@news.mixmin.net> <pp4da1$1of$29@dont-email.me> <MPG.361fc9d5fc4776a2989ddd@reader.albasani.net> <pp6n69$1dc$4@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <pp6n69$1dc$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:55:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <pp4da1$1of$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> > says...
> >> 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 18:15:09 +0000, SWD wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:04:05 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> >> >> by Checkmate!  In article <bkt9k5.hp4.19.10@news.alt.net>,
> >> >> persent@gmail.com says...
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >>> On 2018-10-02 1:18 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> >>> > posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >>> > <9fe7rddte19mq9gr7l75f3cgj1g767om38@4ax.com>,
> >> >>> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >> >>> > 
> >> >>> > 
> >> >>> > 
> >> >>> >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:25:53 -0700, Checkmate
> >> >>> >> <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >>>   Sir  greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >> >>> >>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >>>>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >> >>> >>>> <...>
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>>>> FAKE pandora.  Checky and I drove the real pandora off
> >> >>> >>>>>> alt.checkmate.  The real pandora displayed all the fury of a
> >> >>> >>>>>> woman scorned and flounced off.
> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >>> >>>>> Don't include me in your personal vendetta.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> LOL!  It wasn't Yours Truly who sucked up to pandora for two
> >> >>> >>>> or three years and tried to shelter her from those who found
> >> >>> >>>> her highly offensive.  That would be you.  That she turned on
> >> >>> >>>> you and revealed her true self is what I tried to tell you
> >> >>> >>>> well in advance. But,
> >> >>> >>>> you wouldn't listen because she had you cuckolded.
> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >>> >>>> I have been consistent, otoh.  I've always disliked pandora
> >> >>> >>>> mostly because she is so shallow and insecure.
> >> >>> >>>> It got so it sickened me to read her patting her own back and
> >> >>> >>>> bragging how rich she was and how many things she owned. So,
> >> >>> >>>> now I hate pandora.  She's earned it. You should hate her too.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> I still don't hate her, but the "backstabber" comment has
> >> >>> >>> soured things AFAIC.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Yup, that's way more of a betrayal than an inebriated Miss Kitty
> >> >>> >> saying you threw your kitty up against the wall and broke its
> >> >>> >> brittle little bones.  LOL.  Pandora doesn't even have the
> >> >>> >> excuse of a snoot full.
> >> >>> > 
> >> >>> > Miss Kitty is like a box of chocolates, where occasionally you
> >> >>> > get one with a rock in it.
> >> >>> > 
> >> >>> it just depends on the 6 pack ,
> >> >>> i think you should bring shiny and neon back
> >> >> 
> >> >> Kachina isn't into Usenet much anymore.  She's dropped in a couple
> >> >> of times, but it's not like it used to be so I can't say I blame
> >> >> her.
> >> > 
> >> > Damn that kensi, driving off all of the most entertaining loons until
> >> > only the boring ones like % and Skeeter and Catalina are left!
> >> > 
> >> > This is all kensi's fault!
> >> 
> >> Cursing kensi, eh?
> >> 
> >> I'll let you off with a warning this time, because you also credited
> >> her with a bunch of major kook meltdown-flounces in the same breath.
> >> 
> >> But watch yourself.
> > 
> > Hey...fuck you and piss on Kensi.
> > 
> > <waiting for punishment>
> 
> If you'd seen what kensi did to AB and some of the other megakooks of the 
> past, you'd be quaking in your boots right now at the thought of incurring 
> her wrath.
> 
> Not mine. Hers.
> 
> <snicker>

Yawn, all talk....

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:55 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:52 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 22:50 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:10 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:57 -0400
                Re: Kensi admits to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:04 -0600
                Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:35 -0400
                Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600
                Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:53 -0400
                Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:59 -0600
                Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:33 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:30 +0100
            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:15 +0100
            Re: Was she looking for love ? Andrew Grant Carrick <9904.Blue.Bonnet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 18:56 +0000
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 16:49 -0600
        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
              Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
          Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
              Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400

csiph-web