Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #210157 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-10-02 10:05 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 75 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
Re: Trump is a salesman. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:12 -0600
Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:47 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:50 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 17:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:49 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 19:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 22:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-05 10:15 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 20:55 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:56 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:00 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-03 10:09 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 14:25 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:52 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:57 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:50 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:05 -0600
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 17:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361da881650a4f52989d91@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210380 |
In article <bkti9b.kg5.19.6@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-10-02 3:48 PM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >>> Checkmate! In article <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, > >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either. He said on TV last night > >>>>> that he's not planning to run again, so I wouldn't be at all surprised > >>>>> if he votes against Kavanaugh. Personally, I suspect that he's > >>>>> worried about something in his own past. Everybody has their own > >>>>> dirty laundry if you look hard enough. > >>>>> > >>>>> Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that Kavanaugh threw ice at > >>>>> someone a few decades ago. I'll just bet that everyone currently on > >>>>> the Supreme Court has never done anything as serious as that! > >>>> > >>>> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme Court justice. He > >>>> could throw ice at that old sleeping dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg, to > >>>> wake her up from time to time. LOL. > >>> > >>> Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... if he can find > >>> anyone else willing to go through the character assassination that the > >>> Dems will undoubtedly cook up. I'm hoping that the evil witch Feinstein > >>> loses in November. Time to put that old hag out to pasture. > >> > >> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and our > >> Republic? > > > > Why do you want to destroy the constitution? > > > why do you want to bicker Fauz news told me to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 19:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3620711fd603512a989e10@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210395 |
In article <6qedrdduts02fu1fhofcg9mqeuci32kbuh@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > In an article Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > <...> > > >> You sure are a big fat nothing in comparison to Colonel Burke. > > > >I could promote myself to General on Usenet if I wanted to. > > Now, don't be sarcastic. I think the Colonel is the > genuine article and so does the Janithor and many > others agree with us. One would have to be a fake vet not to believe him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 19:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pp6jut$qvf$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210395 |
x-no-archive: yes On 10/4/2018 5:29 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:10:34 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> In an article Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> It's possible. We don't have many Corporals in the Army anymore... most >>>> Corporals have a combat MOS. A Corporal is an E-4, same as a Specialist >>>> Fourth Class, but technically a Corporal outranks a Spec 4. He may have >>>> been promoted one or more times, but gotten busted back down to E-4. >>> >>> Did you ever rank higher than a Spec-4? >> >> Nope. They told me they'd put me up for E-5 if I extended my tour in >> 'Nam. I said thanks, but no thanks. > > You sure are a big fat nothing in comparison to Colonel Burke. I wouldn't say that, Checky served honorably. </slurp>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 22:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pp6ugo$k7p$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #211022 |
x-no-archive: yes On 10/4/2018 10:23 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pp6jut$qvf$1@news.albasani.net>, > Janithor@comcast.net says... > > >> >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 10/4/2018 5:29 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:10:34 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> In an article Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's possible. We don't have many Corporals in the Army anymore... most >>>>>> Corporals have a combat MOS. A Corporal is an E-4, same as a Specialist >>>>>> Fourth Class, but technically a Corporal outranks a Spec 4. He may have >>>>>> been promoted one or more times, but gotten busted back down to E-4. >>>>> >>>>> Did you ever rank higher than a Spec-4? >>>> >>>> Nope. They told me they'd put me up for E-5 if I extended my tour in >>>> 'Nam. I said thanks, but no thanks. >>> >>> You sure are a big fat nothing in comparison to Colonel Burke. >> >> I wouldn't say that, Checky served honorably. >> >> </slurp> > > Indeed I did, and now I get 10% discounts at Home Depot and Lowe's. You > could say I've saved a pretty penny on my remodel. Well, you weren't in the shit like the Colonel and me, but you did your duty.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-05 10:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nw70c0.bbpb111fujcc8N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #210395 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled: > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled: > > > > <...> > > > > >> You sure are a big fat nothing in comparison to Colonel Burke. > > > > > >I could promote myself to General on Usenet if I wanted to. > > > > Now, don't be sarcastic. I think the Colonel is the > > genuine article and so does the Janithor and many > > others agree with us. > > I think the Kernel is one of your socks, and so do a lot of other people. There's no doubt about it, synchrony tells the tale. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 20:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp142n$odj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210380 |
On 10/2/2018 6:48 PM, Skeeter wrote: > Why do you want to destroy the constitution? Constitutions make very genius presidents take a sad. I you want The President to be happy, you have to destroy the constitution and buy him an ice cream so his life won't be destroyed. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e79308e719b51989d97@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210436 |
In article <pp142n$odj$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/2/2018 6:48 PM, Skeeter wrote: > > Why do you want to destroy the constitution? > > Constitutions make very genius presidents take a sad. I you want The > President to be happy, you have to destroy the constitution and buy him > an ice cream so his life won't be destroyed. Back to bed youngster.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 00:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #210380 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:48:02 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article >> > <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either. He said on TV last >> >> >night that he's not planning to run again, so I wouldn't be at all >> >> >surprised if he votes against Kavanaugh. Personally, I suspect >> >> >that he's worried about something in his own past. Everybody has >> >> >their own dirty laundry if you look hard enough. >> >> > >> >> >Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that Kavanaugh threw ice >> >> >at someone a few decades ago. I'll just bet that everyone >> >> >currently on the Supreme Court has never done anything as serious >> >> >as that! >> >> >> >> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme Court justice. >> >> He could throw ice at that old sleeping dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy >> >> Ginsberg, to wake her up from time to time. LOL. >> > >> > Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... if he can >> > find anyone else willing to go through the character assassination >> > that the Dems will undoubtedly cook up. I'm hoping that the evil >> > witch Feinstein loses in November. Time to put that old hag out to >> > pasture. >> >> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and our >> Republic? > > Why do you want to destroy the constitution? I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man cooties. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e7966a1057eb989d98@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210437 |
In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:48:02 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article > >> > <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, > >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either. He said on TV last > >> >> >night that he's not planning to run again, so I wouldn't be at all > >> >> >surprised if he votes against Kavanaugh. Personally, I suspect > >> >> >that he's worried about something in his own past. Everybody has > >> >> >their own dirty laundry if you look hard enough. > >> >> > > >> >> >Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that Kavanaugh threw ice > >> >> >at someone a few decades ago. I'll just bet that everyone > >> >> >currently on the Supreme Court has never done anything as serious > >> >> >as that! > >> >> > >> >> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme Court justice. > >> >> He could throw ice at that old sleeping dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy > >> >> Ginsberg, to wake her up from time to time. LOL. > >> > > >> > Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... if he can > >> > find anyone else willing to go through the character assassination > >> > that the Dems will undoubtedly cook up. I'm hoping that the evil > >> > witch Feinstein loses in November. Time to put that old hag out to > >> > pasture. > >> > >> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and our > >> Republic? > > > > Why do you want to destroy the constitution? > > I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass > with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist > fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless > surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man > cooties. Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? You idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 10:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp2it9$13mu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210528 |
On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:48:02 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article >>>>> <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, >>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either. He said on TV last >>>>>>> night that he's not planning to run again, so I wouldn't be at all >>>>>>> surprised if he votes against Kavanaugh. Personally, I suspect >>>>>>> that he's worried about something in his own past. Everybody has >>>>>>> their own dirty laundry if you look hard enough. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that Kavanaugh threw ice >>>>>>> at someone a few decades ago. I'll just bet that everyone >>>>>>> currently on the Supreme Court has never done anything as serious >>>>>>> as that! >>>>>> >>>>>> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme Court justice. >>>>>> He could throw ice at that old sleeping dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy >>>>>> Ginsberg, to wake her up from time to time. LOL. >>>>> >>>>> Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... if he can >>>>> find anyone else willing to go through the character assassination >>>>> that the Dems will undoubtedly cook up. I'm hoping that the evil >>>>> witch Feinstein loses in November. Time to put that old hag out to >>>>> pasture. >>>> >>>> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and our >>>> Republic? >>> >>> Why do you want to destroy the constitution? >> >> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass >> with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist >> fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless >> surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man >> cooties. > > Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? You > idiot. If The President says you're guilty, you're guilty. Don't need no trial. Don't need no evidence. Plus, the Constitution doesn't apply when you're being loyal and protecting The President. That's why we need a loyal political hack sworn to protect The President on the Supreme Court. Don't forget to mention that. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e81148e231c0a989dad@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210538 |
In article <pp2it9$13mu$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:48:02 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> > >>> In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>> melt! > >>>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >>>>> by Checkmate! In article > >>>>> <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, > >>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either. He said on TV last > >>>>>>> night that he's not planning to run again, so I wouldn't be at all > >>>>>>> surprised if he votes against Kavanaugh. Personally, I suspect > >>>>>>> that he's worried about something in his own past. Everybody has > >>>>>>> their own dirty laundry if you look hard enough. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that Kavanaugh threw ice > >>>>>>> at someone a few decades ago. I'll just bet that everyone > >>>>>>> currently on the Supreme Court has never done anything as serious > >>>>>>> as that! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme Court justice. > >>>>>> He could throw ice at that old sleeping dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy > >>>>>> Ginsberg, to wake her up from time to time. LOL. > >>>>> > >>>>> Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... if he can > >>>>> find anyone else willing to go through the character assassination > >>>>> that the Dems will undoubtedly cook up. I'm hoping that the evil > >>>>> witch Feinstein loses in November. Time to put that old hag out to > >>>>> pasture. > >>>> > >>>> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and our > >>>> Republic? > >>> > >>> Why do you want to destroy the constitution? > >> > >> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass > >> with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist > >> fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless > >> surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man > >> cooties. > > > > Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? You > > idiot. > > If The President says you're guilty, you're guilty. Don't need no > trial. Don't need no evidence. Plus, the Constitution doesn't apply > when you're being loyal and protecting The President. That's why we > need a loyal political hack sworn to protect The President on the > Supreme Court. Don't forget to mention that. Thanks for running from the truth again, lefty.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 10:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pp2t48$jvu$3@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210538 |
x-no-archive: yes On 10/3/2018 7:15 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:48:02 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by Checkmate! In article >>>>>> <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, >>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either. He said on TV last >>>>>>>> night that he's not planning to run again, so I wouldn't be at all >>>>>>>> surprised if he votes against Kavanaugh. Personally, I suspect >>>>>>>> that he's worried about something in his own past. Everybody has >>>>>>>> their own dirty laundry if you look hard enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that Kavanaugh threw ice >>>>>>>> at someone a few decades ago. I'll just bet that everyone >>>>>>>> currently on the Supreme Court has never done anything as serious >>>>>>>> as that! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme Court justice. >>>>>>> He could throw ice at that old sleeping dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy >>>>>>> Ginsberg, to wake her up from time to time. LOL. >>>>>> >>>>>> Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... if he can >>>>>> find anyone else willing to go through the character assassination >>>>>> that the Dems will undoubtedly cook up. I'm hoping that the evil >>>>>> witch Feinstein loses in November. Time to put that old hag out to >>>>>> pasture. >>>>> >>>>> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and our >>>>> Republic? >>>> >>>> Why do you want to destroy the constitution? >>> >>> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass >>> with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist >>> fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless >>> surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black >>> man >>> cooties. >> >> Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? You >> idiot. > > If The President says you're guilty, you're guilty. Don't need no > trial. Don't need no evidence. Plus, the Constitution doesn't apply > when you're being loyal and protecting The President. That's why we > need a loyal political hack sworn to protect The President on the > Supreme Court. Don't forget to mention that. Plus, Kavanaugh has a high IQ. We need to listen to the smart people.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 14:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp31j7$1umo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210637 |
On 10/3/2018 1:09 PM, Janithor wrote:> On 10/3/2018 7:15 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>> snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:48:02 -0600, Skeeter >>>> wrote: >>>>> In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>, >>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700, >>>>>> Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, >>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate >>>>>>>> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either. He said >>>>>>>>> on TV last night that he's not planning to run again, >>>>>>>>> so I wouldn't be at all surprised if he votes against >>>>>>>>> Kavanaugh. Personally, I suspect that he's worried >>>>>>>>> about something in his own past. Everybody has their >>>>>>>>> own dirty laundry if you look hard enough. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that >>>>>>>>> Kavanaugh threw ice at someone a few decades ago. >>>>>>>>> I'll just bet that everyone currently on the Supreme >>>>>>>>> Court has never done anything as serious as that! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme >>>>>>>> Court justice. He could throw ice at that old sleeping >>>>>>>> dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg, to wake her up from time >>>>>>>> to time. LOL. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... >>>>>>> if he can find anyone else willing to go through the >>>>>>> character assassination that the Dems will undoubtedly >>>>>>> cook up. I'm hoping that the evil witch Feinstein loses >>>>>>> in November. Time to put that old hag out to pasture. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of >>>>>> law, and our Republic? >>>>> >>>>> Why do you want to destroy the constitution? >>>> >>>> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop >>>> wiping his ass with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to >>>> stop by telling the racist fuck that Obama sneezed on it back >>>> when he flip-flopped on warrantless surveillance, so Trump has >>>> been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man cooties. >>> >>> Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? >>> You idiot. >> >> If The President says you're guilty, you're guilty. Don't need no >> trial. Don't need no evidence. Plus, the Constitution doesn't >> apply when you're being loyal and protecting The President. That's >> why we need a loyal political hack sworn to protect The President >> on the Supreme Court. Don't forget to mention that. > > Plus, Kavanaugh has a high IQ. We need to listen to the smart > people. But only the ones with a certificate from a major theological university founded by a tv evangelical preacher with a doctorate in modern christian ethics and a very nice jet where he can communicate directly with god and jump up out of his set in rapturous joy and not be arrested by an air marshal. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 22:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nw48at.lhu3hi14nqsb5N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #210637 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, but can he beat 180? With three darts? Not a chance. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 10:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp2kba$14lo$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210528 |
On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass >> with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist >> fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless >> surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man >> cooties. > > Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? You > idiot. Please to be pointing to where Nadegda has advocated for summary judgment for *any* offense, k0ok. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e848e94898cef989db8@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210561 |
In article <pp2kba$14lo$7@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass > >> with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist > >> fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless > >> surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man > >> cooties. > > > > Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? You > > idiot. > > Please to be pointing to where Nadegda has advocated for summary > judgment for *any* offense, k0ok. She say the judge is "guilty", no oproof, just her hateful opinion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 10:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp2l36$14lo$13@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210570 |
On 10/3/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp2kba$14lo$7@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass >>>> with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist >>>> fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless >>>> surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man >>>> cooties. >>> >>> Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? You >>> idiot. >> >> Please to be pointing to where Nadegda has advocated for summary >> judgment for *any* offense, k0ok. > > She say the judge is "guilty", no oproof, just her hateful opinion. She's *entitled* to her opinion, you reject from the retard factory. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e86cf71ea4471989dc1@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210576 |
In article <pp2l36$14lo$13@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 10/3/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp2kba$14lo$7@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> > >> On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>> says... > >>>> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass > >>>> with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist > >>>> fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless > >>>> surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man > >>>> cooties. > >>> > >>> Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution? You > >>> idiot. > >> > >> Please to be pointing to where Nadegda has advocated for summary > >> judgment for *any* offense, k0ok. > > > > She say the judge is "guilty", no oproof, just her hateful opinion. > > She's *entitled* to her opinion, you reject from the retard factory. Nice spin, she is a model demo, guilty as accused, "what should we accuse him of today"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 16:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nw3taf.hrh85p19aipg6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #210437 |
Paul "IQ 180" Derbyshire in his Nerdegda frock pompously pronounced: [...] > > Why do you want to destroy the constitution? > > I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop wiping his ass > with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to stop by telling the racist > fuck that Obama sneezed on it back when he flip-flopped on warrantless > surveillance, so Trump has been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man > cooties. > > -- > FNVWe Nadegda "black man cooties"? Colour me shocked. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 16:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_-idncl305k8pCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #210380 |
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:41:54 -0700, % wrote: > On 2018-10-02 8:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <bkti9b.kg5.19.6@news.alt.net>, >> persent@gmail.com says... >> >> >> >>> On 2018-10-02 3:48 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article >>>>>> <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, >>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate >>>>>>> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either. He said on TV last >>>>>>>> night that he's not planning to run again, so I wouldn't be at >>>>>>>> all surprised if he votes against Kavanaugh. Personally, I >>>>>>>> suspect that he's worried about something in his own past. >>>>>>>> Everybody has their own dirty laundry if you look hard enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that Kavanaugh threw ice >>>>>>>> at someone a few decades ago. I'll just bet that everyone >>>>>>>> currently on the Supreme Court has never done anything as serious >>>>>>>> as that! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme Court >>>>>>> justice. He could throw ice at that old sleeping dinosaur, Ruth >>>>>>> Buzzy Ginsberg, to wake her up from time to time. LOL. >>>>>> >>>>>> Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... if he can >>>>>> find anyone else willing to go through the character assassination >>>>>> that the Dems will undoubtedly cook up. I'm hoping that the evil >>>>>> witch Feinstein loses in November. Time to put that old hag out to >>>>>> pasture. >>>>> >>>>> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and >>>>> our Republic? >>>> >>>> Why do you want to destroy the constitution? >>>> >>> why do you want to bicker >> >> Remember when I invented bickering on Usenet? >> > no , i guess its because i've never seen a bicker here Bwahahahahahahahaha.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web