Re: Was she looking for love ?

From	mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Newsgroups	alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: Was she looking for love ?
Date	2018-10-03 14:25 -0400
Organization	here and there
Message-ID	<pp31j7$1umo$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <MPG.361da38eaf7f19e5989d85@reader.albasani.net> <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me> <MPG.361e7966a1057eb989d98@reader.albasani.net> <pp2it9$13mu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pp2t48$jvu$3@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/3/2018 1:09 PM, Janithor wrote:> On 10/3/2018 7:15 AM, mixed nuts 
wrote:
>> On 10/3/2018 10:00 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <pp1434$1of$20@dont-email.me>,
>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:48:02 -0600, Skeeter
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In article <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:54:08 -0700,
>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article 
>>>>>>> <b6m7rd5nradj74h1uq3lgg7ib1tg6der0p@4ax.com>, 
>>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:31:56 -0700, Checkmate 
>>>>>>>> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either.  He said
>>>>>>>>> on TV last night that he's not planning to run again,
>>>>>>>>> so I wouldn't be at all surprised if he votes against
>>>>>>>>> Kavanaugh.  Personally, I suspect that he's worried
>>>>>>>>> about something in his own past.  Everybody has their
>>>>>>>>> own dirty laundry if you look hard enough.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that
>>>>>>>>> Kavanaugh threw ice at someone a few decades ago.
>>>>>>>>> I'll just bet that everyone currently on the Supreme
>>>>>>>>> Court has never done anything as serious as that!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme
>>>>>>>> Court justice. He could throw ice at that old sleeping
>>>>>>>> dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg, to wake her up from time
>>>>>>>> to time.  LOL.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump...
>>>>>>> if he can find anyone else willing to go through the
>>>>>>> character assassination that the Dems will undoubtedly
>>>>>>> cook up.  I'm hoping that the evil witch Feinstein loses
>>>>>>> in November.  Time to put that old hag out to pasture.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of
>>>>>> law, and our Republic?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why do you want to destroy the constitution?
>>>> 
>>>> I don't. On the other hand I dearly wish Trump would stop
>>>> wiping his ass with it. Though maybe he can be convinced to
>>>> stop by telling the racist fuck that Obama sneezed on it back
>>>> when he flip-flopped on warrantless surveillance, so Trump has
>>>> been exposing his own butt cheeks to black man cooties.
>>> 
>>> Finding someone guilty without trial is "for" the constitution?
>>> You idiot.
>> 
>> If The President says you're guilty, you're guilty.  Don't need no
>>  trial.  Don't need no evidence.  Plus, the Constitution doesn't
>> apply when you're being loyal and protecting The President.  That's
>> why we need a loyal political hack sworn to protect The President
>> on the Supreme Court.  Don't forget to mention that.
> 
> Plus, Kavanaugh has a high IQ.  We need to listen to the smart
> people.

But only the ones with a certificate from a major theological university 
founded by a tv evangelical preacher with a doctorate in modern 
christian ethics and a very nice jet where he can communicate directly 
with god and jump up out of his set in rapturous joy and not be arrested 
by an air marshal.

-- 
Grizzly H.

Thread

Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
  Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
      Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
        Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
        Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
          Re: Trump is a salesman. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:12 -0600
        Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
          Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
          Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
  Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
    Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
      Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
        Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
      China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
        Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
      Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
    Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
    Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
      Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:38 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:47 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:50 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:56 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 17:09 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:49 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 19:57 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 22:57 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-05 10:15 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 20:55 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:56 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:00 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:15 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-03 10:09 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 14:25 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:11 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:39 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:52 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:57 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:48 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:50 -0500
          Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
          Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0600
      Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
  Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:05 -0600

csiph-web