Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2581101 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-17 14:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-01-19 13:35 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 717 — 47 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 14:23 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 17:10 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 16:25 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 18:07 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 01:27 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 02:23 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 19:29 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-17 19:40 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 02:48 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 19:58 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-17 19:39 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 19:58 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 03:14 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 20:56 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:51 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 21:55 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 21:09 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 11:47 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:04 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 13:04 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 14:11 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:37 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 04:09 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 11:08 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 12:19 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 11:42 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 12:49 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:02 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:24 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 14:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 13:12 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 16:26 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 16:10 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 18:55 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 19:36 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 20:02 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 20:04 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 21:22 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 20:37 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-19 21:43 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 13:49 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 14:59 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:26 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-19 13:34 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ann Coulter <jthomq@gmaiil.con> - 2019-01-19 08:35 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-19 20:16 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Dana Loesch <jthomq@gmaiil.con> - 2019-01-19 12:21 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 14:00 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-19 21:46 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-19 19:40 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 13:59 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-19 19:36 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-19 19:35 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-19 17:22 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rod° <dx7066801@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 19:58 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 02:23 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 07:03 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rod° <dx7066801@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 07:39 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 09:48 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-18 13:39 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 12:15 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-18 20:17 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-18 15:29 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rod° <dx7066801@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 11:43 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-18 12:50 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:36 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 11:28 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rod° <dx7066801@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 12:17 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 11:27 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-18 11:21 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-17 20:34 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-17 21:05 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 19:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-17 21:18 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 19:33 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 03:11 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 20:57 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 04:11 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 04:53 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-18 12:56 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay zencycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-18 09:05 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 02:23 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 02:22 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:22 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 04:53 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 21:00 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-18 08:14 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 11:38 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 12:22 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:37 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 18:07 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 16:33 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:15 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 17:40 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 18:13 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 18:29 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 16:30 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:16 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-17 20:28 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-18 13:00 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 05:16 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:11 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 04:53 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 21:07 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Bill Rozier <scum.wieber.pal@losers.com> - 2019-01-17 21:52 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-18 06:06 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:42 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-18 08:45 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Your Naturalistic Constitution Is In Error <sowewakohwa.2018@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 08:48 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:48 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 11:19 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 11:30 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:41 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:51 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 15:31 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:48 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 18:08 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:17 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:39 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-18 12:57 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 18:09 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:17 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-18 12:52 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 09:58 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> - 2019-01-18 07:21 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2019-01-18 11:07 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:38 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-18 12:49 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 05:19 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:37 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:39 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:27 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:53 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 18:00 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:50 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-18 08:00 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:40 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:45 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:34 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:36 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 18:06 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-18 13:31 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-18 20:19 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:41 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay One more stroke or seizure and I've had it <derek_mash@groupmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:46 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 11:12 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-19 07:48 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-19 09:01 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-19 08:31 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 11:18 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay AlleyCat <alleypussybitch@aohell.com> - 2019-01-19 11:23 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 11:48 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay AlleyCat <alleypussybitch@aohell.com> - 2019-01-19 11:59 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:27 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay AlleyCat <alleypussybitch@aohell.com> - 2019-01-19 12:28 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:55 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 13:18 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay AlleyCat <alleypussybitch@aohell.com> - 2019-01-19 21:52 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-19 20:37 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 20:07 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <sam@ted.street> - 2019-01-20 04:50 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:07 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 23:12 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:16 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 23:22 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:30 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 23:42 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:50 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <sam@ted.street> - 2019-01-20 05:56 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-19 21:59 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay zencycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-20 10:37 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 23:59 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay zencycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-20 11:22 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <sam@ted.street> - 2019-01-20 05:40 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 23:45 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <sam@ted.street> - 2019-01-20 05:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:34 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:55 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 10:55 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Jerry Buchanan <some.fucking.terrell.pal@douchebags.r.us> - 2019-01-20 11:06 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:15 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:13 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-20 04:20 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <sam@ted.street> - 2019-01-20 15:43 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-20 10:52 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 11:04 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 11:01 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 10:58 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay zencycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-20 08:15 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-25 11:02 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <sam@ted.street> - 2019-01-20 05:19 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <sam@ted.street> - 2019-01-20 05:14 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:21 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <sam@ted.street> - 2019-01-20 05:40 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 21:53 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-19 21:58 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:56 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-19 08:19 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:03 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-19 07:51 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-19 09:06 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-19 08:34 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 14:57 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-19 20:44 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay the late Mark Wieber <chronic.löoser@dole-scröunging.shitbags.of.taft> - 2019-01-19 21:48 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-20 03:58 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 14:55 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay John Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2019-01-19 11:57 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 16:11 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay John Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2019-01-19 21:51 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-20 04:16 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Michael Christ <jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.con> - 2019-01-21 08:29 +1100
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-20 15:10 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 15:23 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-19 20:40 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-20 04:17 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-20 08:48 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-20 10:55 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-20 10:04 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-20 12:54 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-20 12:27 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-20 14:28 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2019-01-19 13:19 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 05:32 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 06:44 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 17:46 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-19 02:44 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-17 17:34 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 17:46 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 06:43 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 05:07 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 09:34 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 07:36 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:18 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:25 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:41 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:04 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 17:40 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:31 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 16:15 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:30 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-19 00:37 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:57 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:35 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:35 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:34 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:32 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 12:15 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:16 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:24 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:25 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:05 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:10 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 17:42 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:07 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:36 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay zencycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-18 12:31 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2019-01-18 12:35 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:26 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:39 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:08 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:12 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2019-01-18 12:29 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 15:38 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 16:32 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:15 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 17:45 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 17:44 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:59 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:43 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-18 13:27 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 11:46 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 12:17 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:10 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:13 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 17:53 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:06 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 15:39 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 16:33 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 17:48 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 18:16 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 18:28 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 07:56 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-17 19:34 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-17 17:43 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-17 19:55 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 06:58 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:30 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:36 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:26 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Matt Singer <out.of.key@wyebur.con> - 2019-01-18 12:48 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 17:54 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:06 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:45 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-18 15:14 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:42 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:46 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-19 07:56 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 14:52 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-19 11:55 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:05 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Gunner Asch <gunner_arschhh_lickkker@I_suck_off_ray---ray-happy-n-gay_big__time.shitbags.com> - 2019-01-19 12:10 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:31 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-19 12:37 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 13:00 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 16:08 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay J Oche <tjoche43@nospamunowere.com> - 2019-01-20 00:42 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Jay Santos <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-19 16:46 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 18:55 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 09:54 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay DoD <Danskin_Dickhead@losers.be.losers.con> - 2019-01-29 10:21 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 03:09 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-19 16:58 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 16:06 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 12:04 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:55 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 17:59 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:06 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:50 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 05:04 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 06:41 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-18 07:59 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 11:38 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 09:44 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:28 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:53 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 18:02 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 16:36 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:51 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-18 12:58 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 18:03 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:52 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 11:50 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 12:16 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 15:32 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 13:37 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-18 18:04 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-19 04:53 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 15:23 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 16:35 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:15 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 17:37 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay zencycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-18 11:17 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2019-01-21 17:00 +1100
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-21 02:02 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 09:10 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-21 08:36 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 15:27 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-21 11:43 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-21 11:53 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-21 14:23 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 18:11 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-21 14:35 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 14:08 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 14:14 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 14:23 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-21 21:27 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 15:02 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-21 18:04 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-21 17:58 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-21 18:19 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-22 06:39 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 16:57 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-22 14:29 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 13:42 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-22 16:46 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 22:43 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-22 18:10 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 16:32 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-22 15:40 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-22 16:44 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 17:54 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-22 17:08 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-23 06:36 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 16:37 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-23 20:00 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 13:03 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-23 21:38 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-23 16:41 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-24 00:02 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-23 17:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-23 17:05 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-24 20:31 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:09 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-24 23:38 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-21 20:38 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-21 18:42 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 19:44 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-22 07:17 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 13:48 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-22 08:58 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 09:32 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-22 08:37 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-22 08:39 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 11:43 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-22 16:47 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 22:43 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 14:51 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-22 18:10 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 15:12 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 16:30 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-22 15:36 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-23 04:06 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-23 13:55 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-23 13:39 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-23 12:18 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 12:29 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-23 17:45 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-23 16:14 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-23 15:17 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-24 07:08 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 13:49 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-24 10:56 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-25 06:24 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-25 06:23 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 16:05 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-24 12:25 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 11:31 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 11:32 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-24 15:47 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:03 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-24 18:54 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-24 14:07 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:15 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 16:10 -0600
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-25 06:25 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 16:31 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-22 15:37 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 15:55 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-22 15:58 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 21:46 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-23 06:34 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-23 08:41 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 12:56 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-23 17:46 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 20:03 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-24 07:10 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 11:08 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-24 15:49 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:01 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 11:11 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 12:18 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-25 06:28 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:45 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-25 10:50 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-25 10:51 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 11:29 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:04 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 12:07 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:24 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 12:25 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:37 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 12:47 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:54 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 13:59 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:04 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 13:10 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:17 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 13:29 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:38 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 13:42 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:54 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 14:29 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 14:33 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 14:38 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 14:44 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 14:45 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 14:50 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 14:53 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 14:57 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 15:34 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 15:34 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 15:47 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 15:54 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 17:19 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:47 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-25 10:46 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 13:41 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-25 14:11 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 14:44 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-25 14:46 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 15:00 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-25 16:16 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 21:36 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-25 22:50 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 01:08 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-26 08:27 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-26 16:35 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:23 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-26 21:04 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-26 19:33 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-27 01:48 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-27 04:30 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 22:20 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-27 08:05 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-27 08:08 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-27 08:20 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-27 08:24 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 13:25 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-27 18:21 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 16:56 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-27 23:39 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 16:57 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-28 01:12 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 17:28 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 11:13 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 11:23 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 12:30 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 12:25 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 17:24 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 19:42 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 23:15 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 00:02 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:40 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 11:39 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 19:20 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 19:52 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 21:02 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 21:04 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 21:14 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 00:20 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 01:39 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 11:52 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:53 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:20 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:22 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:23 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:34 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:37 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:45 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:02 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:13 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:24 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:38 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 05:20 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:35 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 05:20 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:43 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 11:55 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 19:21 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 20:04 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 21:13 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 00:25 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 01:37 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:47 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:22 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:38 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 17:21 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 20:07 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-24 16:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:48 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:18 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:57 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 14:30 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 14:34 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 14:39 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 14:46 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 14:50 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 14:53 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 14:54 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 15:35 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 15:49 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 15:55 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-25 00:14 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay MattB. <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 16:35 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-25 00:55 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:52 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:51 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 17:19 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 13:06 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:10 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 13:12 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:19 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 13:29 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 19:30 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 09:56 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-25 12:40 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:14 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:39 -0800
Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-24 17:19 -0700
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-24 16:32 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 17:22 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-24 19:22 -0700
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-24 18:54 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-24 20:33 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-25 05:09 +0000
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Michael Christ <jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.con> - 2019-01-26 07:24 +1100
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-24 22:44 -0700
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-25 07:52 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 19:50 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-24 22:02 -0700
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 22:47 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-25 21:33 +0000
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-25 14:09 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-26 07:41 +0000
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-25 23:52 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-26 21:48 +0000
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 21:49 -0700
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-25 06:41 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-25 16:17 +0000
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-25 12:49 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-25 21:33 +0000
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 20:52 -0800
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-26 14:34 +0000
Re: Perhaps build a human border wall was Trump denies Pelosi aircraft Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-26 08:58 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 12:54 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-24 06:39 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 11:18 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 12:23 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:27 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 11:43 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 11:50 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:25 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 12:26 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:38 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:13 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-01-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 14:08 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 11:30 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 11:40 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 11:41 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:26 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 12:27 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:44 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 12:48 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:50 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 13:05 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-24 12:55 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-24 13:06 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-22 17:52 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-22 17:06 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-23 06:29 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-23 06:29 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-23 06:07 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-23 13:55 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-23 06:00 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-23 08:17 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-24 06:40 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 13:49 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-24 10:57 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2019-01-25 06:21 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-24 16:05 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 04:40 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 05:20 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 06:38 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 06:43 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 07:35 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 07:53 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 17:49 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 18:05 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 18:10 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-18 19:14 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-19 03:18 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 13:53 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-19 19:33 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Peter Pan <pan@172.16.1.1> - 2019-01-23 06:44 +0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-22 17:02 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Peter Pan <pan@172.16.1.1> - 2019-01-24 17:16 +0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 07:16 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-18 18:39 +0000
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> - 2019-01-18 05:37 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 06:45 -0700
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> - 2019-01-18 05:52 -0800
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay default <default@defaulter.net> - 2019-01-18 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-19 13:35 +0000
Page 23 of 36 — ← Prev page 1 … 21 22 [23] 24 25 … 36 Next page →
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 14:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <nh7f4ehk7feifs4uovb0937dqngfe29clj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2584148 |
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:47:37 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:43:11 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:58:27 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>NoBody responded saying he thinks I am telling lies he cannot quote. >>> >>>And what are you doing? >> >>Talking to himself. Snit is a strange one. > >Really? >And all this time I thought it was you - using another name. I do know where you live....;-))))) Kidding that was a good insult.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 18:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2n8f4els9knrd28vtvpbjj149rdh1cor6b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2584220 |
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:51:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:47:37 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:43:11 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:58:27 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>NoBody responded saying he thinks I am telling lies he cannot quote. >>>> >>>>And what are you doing? >>> >>>Talking to himself. Snit is a strange one. >> >>Really? >>And all this time I thought it was you - using another name. > > >I do know where you live....;-))))) Kidding that was a good insult. OK. But you have to admit that snit is really a nasty troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 15:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rp8f4etvlg30itou9jgqs8rjg2cmfe9bru@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2584236 |
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:10:52 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:51:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:47:37 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:43:11 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:58:27 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>NoBody responded saying he thinks I am telling lies he cannot quote. >>>>> >>>>>And what are you doing? >>>> >>>>Talking to himself. Snit is a strange one. >>> >>>Really? >>>And all this time I thought it was you - using another name. >> >> >>I do know where you live....;-))))) Kidding that was a good insult. > >OK. >But you have to admit that snit is really a nasty troll. Very true. Think that is one of the things the majority of posters here agree to left or right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 16:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gapnd6F7ikbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2584238 |
On 1/22/19 4:12 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:10:52 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:51:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:47:37 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:43:11 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:58:27 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> NoBody responded saying he thinks I am telling lies he cannot quote. >>>>>> >>>>>> And what are you doing? >>>>> >>>>> Talking to himself. Snit is a strange one. >>>> >>>> Really? >>>> And all this time I thought it was you - using another name. >>> >>> >>> I do know where you live....;-))))) Kidding that was a good insult. >> >> OK. >> But you have to admit that snit is really a nasty troll. > > Very true. Think that is one of the things the majority of posters > here agree to left or right. > What you really agree with is you cannot refute the claims I make, nor defend the ones you make. Here, claims to prove my point: * The Democrats back improved physical barriers * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional desires would offer much benefit * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land from US citizens * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same level Republicans did last year * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has been emergent... and is thus a lie * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico and California. Trump has withheld funds for these * We have an immigration system that can make people wait decades to get visas, which leads to a black market immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period would increase the black market for guns * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 15:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2ON1E.104817$Q95.20758@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #2584258 |
On 1/22/2019 3:30 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/22/19 4:12 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:10:52 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:51:17 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:47:37 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:43:11 -0800, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:58:27 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NoBody responded saying he thinks I am telling lies he cannot quote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And what are you doing? >>>>>> >>>>>> Talking to himself. Snit is a strange one. >>>>> >>>>> Really? >>>>> And all this time I thought it was you - using another name. >>>> >>>> >>>> I do know where you live....;-))))) Kidding that was a good insult. >>> >>> OK. >>> But you have to admit that snit is really a nasty troll. >> >> Very true. Think that is one of the things the majority of posters >> here agree to left or right. >> > > What you really agree with is you cannot refute the claims I make, What claims? "Got it."? "your insecurities"? "Cool."? What is to refute? -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 04:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <emag4ehf2nl9oo03dpvl2cf24kjc9tlq9f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2584258 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Here, claims to prove my point: > >* The Democrats back improved physical barriers + So what? + Republicans back treating illegal immigrants like humans. >* Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional > desires would offer much benefit Been there, done that. You are lying. Drug trafficking: I know that a lot of cheap heroin (like cheaper than beer cheap) comes up I-5 from Mexico, contributing to the local epidemic Human trafficking: Ever heard of Tenancingo, Mexico? That city's economy is built on the bodies of the women they sell. despite his intention to use the wall to keep out Mexicans who try to slip illegally into the U.S., the massive building project could actually be boon for one Mexican cement maker: Cemex (CX), which has extensive operations on both sides of the Rio Grande. Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. >* Trump accepted blame for the shutdown Yeah, he did. And now he regrets saying it. Now he is willing to sahre the blame. And he is the only one willing to negotiate. The dems feel they are in great shape because of what Trump said. >* The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding > (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) Some were also pissed that Trump got the nomination in front of their pals Jeb, cruz, Christie, Guiliani, Romney, Kasich, etc. Trump cut in line and they didn't like it. >* Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores Not true. Your stupid bird story doesn't "fly." >* Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land > from US citizens And..........? >* Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally LIE. And stupid statement. >* The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same > level Republicans did last year <yawn> So what? Trump made a promise to build a wall. Americans voted for him because of this promise. You sound like you are whining. >* The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has > been emergent... and is thus a lie It certainly is an emergency. Nearly a million people are not getting paid. That seeems like an emergency to me. >* We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, > such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico > and California. Trump has withheld funds for these We can't keep throwing good money after bad. It is time for people to start working their own problems out. >* We have an immigration system that can make people wait > decades to get visas, which leads to a black market > immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period > would increase the black market for guns And you blame Trump for this? WHY? >* The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party > did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. When pelosi walks into a meeting and says: "NO WALL," then there is no negotiation there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 13:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gara39FhvhbU15@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2584564 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> Here, claims to prove my point: >> >> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers > > + So what? So the claims to the contrary are lies. > + Republicans back treating illegal immigrants like humans. This is in response to what? And please cite. > > >> * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional >> desires would offer much benefit > > Been there, done that. > You are lying. Cite the evidence of benefits. > Drug trafficking: I know that a lot of cheap heroin (like cheaper than > beer cheap) comes up I-5 from Mexico, contributing to the local > epidemic > Human trafficking: Ever heard of Tenancingo, Mexico? That city's > economy is built on the bodies of the women they sell. > > despite his intention to use the wall to keep out Mexicans who try to > slip illegally into the U.S., the massive building project could > actually be boon for one Mexican cement maker: Cemex (CX), which has > extensive operations on both sides of the Rio Grande. > > Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the > Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall > in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. We have walls. Cite your claim the walls Trump wants to add would offer significant benefits. > > >> * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown > > Yeah, he did. And now he regrets saying it. > Now he is willing to sahre the blame. > And he is the only one willing to negotiate. > The dems feel they are in great shape because of what Trump said. Why expect the opposition party to give in more than his own party did? > > >> * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding >> (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) > > Some were also pissed that Trump got the nomination in front of their > pals Jeb, cruz, Christie, Guiliani, Romney, Kasich, etc. Trump cut in > line and they didn't like it. Which of those you list do you think blocked his funding requests? And if his own party will not give in why should the opposition party? > > >> * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores > > Not true. Your stupid bird story doesn't "fly." No counter. Got it. > > >> * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land >> from US citizens > > And..........? You fail to see the problem with taking private property by force even in the absence of any evidence of public good. Got it. > > >> * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally > > LIE. > And stupid statement. No counter. Got it. > > > >> * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same >> level Republicans did last year > > <yawn> > So what? > Trump made a promise to build a wall. > Americans voted for him because of this promise. > You sound like you are whining. I am noting facts. And Trump’s promise was that Mexico would pay for his symbolic wall. > > >> * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has >> been emergent... and is thus a lie > > It certainly is an emergency. Nearly a million people are not getting > paid. That seeems like an emergency to me. The wall is not going to pay people. But yes, Trump has created a crisis. > > > >> * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, >> such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico >> and California. Trump has withheld funds for these > > We can't keep throwing good money after bad. You want to pay for a wall not shown to have value but not for clean water for Americans. Got it. The put America first claim of Trump is a lie. He puts his ego first. > It is time for people to start working their own problems out. Yet the Republicans did not impeach Trump. > > >> * We have an immigration system that can make people wait >> decades to get visas, which leads to a black market >> immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period >> would increase the black market for guns > > And you blame Trump for this? WHY? What made you think in terms of it being Trump’s fault? > > >> * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party >> did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. > > When pelosi walks into a meeting and says: "NO WALL," then there is > no negotiation there. > She offered as much as his own party. No wall (beyond the billion + already on the table) is the right way to deal with his tantrum. Give in to tantrums and you get more of them. As you noted — this shut down is a crisis. Why encourage Trump to create more by giving in?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 13:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9mbh4ehs7qnfamtg31o9nse7bebecfq1af@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2584622 |
nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>> >>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >> >> + So what? > >So the claims to the contrary are lies. Improved barriers are not what is required. A wall is what was asked for. NOT improved barriers. >> + Republicans back treating illegal immigrants like humans. > >This is in response to what? And please cite. It is in response to your "improved barriers" silliness. Like I said: "So what!" Everyone wants improvement and humaneness. You don't have to make the claim. >>> * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional >>> desires would offer much benefit >> >> Been there, done that. >> You are lying. > >Cite the evidence of benefits. What do you think I posted below? Are you really that stupid? Drug trafficking: I know that a lot of cheap heroin (like cheaper than beer cheap) comes up I-5 from Mexico, contributing to the local epidemic Human trafficking: Ever heard of Tenancingo, Mexico? That city's economy is built on the bodies of the women they sell. despite his intention to use the wall to keep out Mexicans who try to slip illegally into the U.S., the massive building project could actually be boon for one Mexican cement maker: Cemex (CX), which has extensive operations on both sides of the Rio Grande. Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. > >We have walls. Cite your claim the walls Trump wants to add would offer >significant benefits. Read what I said above. We do not have walls where they are needed. In some places, there isn't even a fence. >>> * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown >> >> Yeah, he did. And now he regrets saying it. >> Now he is willing to sahre the blame. >> And he is the only one willing to negotiate. >> The dems feel they are in great shape because of what Trump said. > >Why expect the opposition party to give in more than his own party did? Because the opposition party was once for a wall. I can understand some republicans being pissed off because trump showed them all up and jumped line to be the nominee. >>> * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding >>> (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) >> >> Some were also pissed that Trump got the nomination in front of their >> pals Jeb, cruz, Christie, Guiliani, Romney, Kasich, etc. Trump cut in >> line and they didn't like it. > >Which of those you list do you think blocked his funding requests? And if >his own party will not give in why should the opposition party? Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) Amash, an outspoken fiscal conservative and member of the House Freedom Caucus, was one of the two among the group, including several firebrands, to vote against the measure and oppose border wall funding. Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) Buck, the other House Freedom Caucus member to vote against the bill, went against caucus leaders Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) as they pushed Trump to not back down from his demand for border wall funding. He told Colorado Public Radio this month, however, that a border wall shouldn’t be the cause for a government shutdown. Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.) Curbelo, who lost a reelection bid in November, has been a frequent Trump critic, particularly over the White House’s demands on immigration. He helped introduced a bill earlier this year that tied border wall funding in exchange for a path to citizenship for two million young undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children, commonly referred to as "Dreamers." Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) Hurd, a House moderate who won reelection in November by less than 1 point, has pushed for a “smart border wall” that uses “cutting edge” technology to protect the border rather than a physical wall. Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.) Paulsen, who lost reelection by double digits in November, has long opposed border wall funding. He’s said he supports tighter border security and wants to crack down on people living in the U.S. without documentation, but also wants a fix allowing Dreamers to stay in the country. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) Ros-Lehtinen, who was the first Latina elected to Congress, announced earlier this year she would be retiring at the end of her term. Democrats flipped her seat in November. She refused to come out in support of a border wall while representing her majority-Hispanic district and torched the Trump administration earlier this year for its “zero tolerance” immigration policy, which resulted in an increased number of family separations at the border. Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) Upton has said that a border wall may be appropriate in some areas of the border, but that different security measures “may be sufficient” in other areas. Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) Valadao, who lost reelection by less than a point in November, ripped the Trump administration earlier this year on family separations and been a supporter of tying border security legislation to a fix for Dreamers. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/422424-the-8-republicans-who-voted-against-trumps-border-wall >>> * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores >> >> Not true. Your stupid bird story doesn't "fly." > >No counter. Got it. Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? >>> * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land >>> from US citizens >> >> And..........? > >You fail to see the problem with taking private property by force even in >the absence of any evidence of public good. Got it. Public Good? Drugs, human trafficing, illegal entires..... These are good? >>> * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally >> >> LIE. >> And stupid statement. > >No counter. Got it. Still a stupid statement. >>> * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same >>> level Republicans did last year >> >> <yawn> >> So what? >> Trump made a promise to build a wall. >> Americans voted for him because of this promise. >> You sound like you are whining. > >I am noting facts. And Trump’s promise was that Mexico would pay for his >symbolic wall. And they will, .... indirectly. Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid cuts are also options]. “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you start, and then you get reimbursed.” President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a check from the Mexican government directly. Rather, he said, Mexico will be paying for the wall indirectly, “many, many times over” via the trade agreement his administration recently renegotiated with Canada and Mexico to replace NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement). Certainly, the president has a habit of speaking imprecisely and not being familiar with the details of his campaign’s or administration’s policy proposals. Nevertheless, it is disingenuous for his critics to huff and puff over what they perceive as a lie. Campaign policy memos clearly show that – as the president now indicates – using trade negotiations and measures is a key tactic he advocated for pursuing his border wall objective and getting get Mexico to contribute to wall funding indirectly. >>> * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has >>> been emergent... and is thus a lie >> >> It certainly is an emergency. Nearly a million people are not getting >> paid. That seeems like an emergency to me. > >The wall is not going to pay people. Do you read and comprehend the news? >>> * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, >>> such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico >>> and California. Trump has withheld funds for these >> >> We can't keep throwing good money after bad. > >You want to pay for a wall not shown to have value but not for clean water >for Americans. Got it. The wall has value. I have shown this a dozen times. I can't help if you are stupid. Why should people in Ohio pay for stupid decisions made in Flint, Mich? As for Puerto rico, the claim is that only 85 percent of the country has electrical power today. Well guess what, before the hurricane, it was less than 85 percent. It is a 3rd world island. Mountains, poor roads, poor people. The hurricane did not cause this. >The put America first claim of Trump is a lie. He puts his ego first. Fake news. How much of your salary did you give away? >> It is time for people to start working their own problems out. > >Yet the Republicans did not impeach Trump. He isn't a problem for us. He is merely a thorn in your paw. You can't stand that hillery lost. >>> * We have an immigration system that can make people wait >>> decades to get visas, which leads to a black market >>> immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period >>> would increase the black market for guns >> >> And you blame Trump for this? WHY? > >What made you think in terms of it being Trump’s fault? Why did you bring it up? Oh yeah, you HATE Trump. That is why. >>> * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party >>> did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. >> >> When pelosi walks into a meeting and says: "NO WALL," then there is >> no negotiation there. >She offered as much as his own party. They wanted a wall 8 years ago. > No wall (beyond the billion + already on the table) is the right way to >deal with his tantrum. Give in to tantrums and you get more of them. You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? >As you noted — this shut down is a crisis. Why encourage Trump to create >more by giving in? He gave in on Daca.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 12:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gart0tFm1qdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2584686 |
On 1/23/19 11:39 AM, Patrick wrote: > nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>>> >>>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >>> >>> + So what? >> >> So the claims to the contrary are lies. > > Improved barriers are not what is required. > A wall is what was asked for. > NOT improved barriers. Then why did Trump lie when he said he did not care what you call it? >>> + Republicans back treating illegal immigrants like humans. >> >> This is in response to what? And please cite. > > It is in response to your "improved barriers" silliness. > Like I said: "So what!" > Everyone wants improvement and humaneness. > You don't have to make the claim. You did not answer the question about treating illegal immigrants like humans. >>>> * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional >>>> desires would offer much benefit >>> >>> Been there, done that. >>> You are lying. >> >> Cite the evidence of benefits. > > What do you think I posted below? > Are you really that stupid? > > Drug trafficking: I know that a lot of cheap heroin (like cheaper than > beer cheap) comes up I-5 from Mexico, contributing to the local > epidemic > Human trafficking: Ever heard of Tenancingo, Mexico? That city's > economy is built on the bodies of the women they sell. > > despite his intention to use the wall to keep out Mexicans who try to > slip illegally into the U.S., the massive building project could > actually be boon for one Mexican cement maker: Cemex (CX), which has > extensive operations on both sides of the Rio Grande. > > Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the > Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall > in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. Notice, NO evidence the wall Trump is pushing for would offer ANY benefit over the walls we have and the Democrats have agreed to improve / extend. Not one bit of benefit shown. The wall will simply not do much. It will not stop people from seeking asylum. It will not stop people from overstaying visas (which is how the majority of people here illegally get here -- legally). It will not do much if anything to stop smuggling of people and drugs. It will not stop people from entering by boat or plane or tunnel >> We have walls. Cite your claim the walls Trump wants to add would offer >> significant benefits. > > Read what I said above. > We do not have walls where they are needed. > In some places, there isn't even a fence. You have NO support. Got it. >>>> * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown >>> >>> Yeah, he did. And now he regrets saying it. >>> Now he is willing to sahre the blame. >>> And he is the only one willing to negotiate. >>> The dems feel they are in great shape because of what Trump said. >> >> Why expect the opposition party to give in more than his own party did? > > Because the opposition party was once for a wall. > I can understand some republicans being pissed off because trump > showed them all up and jumped line to be the nominee. You gave no reason the opposition party should give him more for his ego than his own party did. >>>> * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding >>>> (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) >>> >>> Some were also pissed that Trump got the nomination in front of their >>> pals Jeb, cruz, Christie, Guiliani, Romney, Kasich, etc. Trump cut in >>> line and they didn't like it. >> >> Which of those you list do you think blocked his funding requests? And if >> his own party will not give in why should the opposition party? > > Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) Amash, an outspoken fiscal conservative > and member of the House Freedom Caucus, was one of the two among the > group, including several firebrands, to vote against the measure and > oppose border wall funding. Not on your above list. > Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) Buck, the other House Freedom Caucus member > to vote against the bill, went against caucus leaders Jim Jordan > (R-Ohio) and Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) as they pushed Trump to not back > down from his demand for border wall funding. He told Colorado Public > Radio this month, however, that a border wall shouldn’t be the cause > for a government shutdown. Not on your above list. > Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.) Curbelo, who lost a reelection bid in > November, has been a frequent Trump critic, particularly over the > White House’s demands on immigration. He helped introduced a bill > earlier this year that tied border wall funding in exchange for a path > to citizenship for two million young undocumented immigrants brought > to the country as children, commonly referred to as "Dreamers." Not on your above list. > Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) Hurd, a House moderate who won reelection > in November by less than 1 point, has pushed for a “smart border wall” > that uses “cutting edge” technology to protect the border rather than > a physical wall. Not on your above list. > Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.) Paulsen, who lost reelection by double > digits in November, has long opposed border wall funding. He’s said he > supports tighter border security and wants to crack down on people > living in the U.S. without documentation, but also wants a fix > allowing Dreamers to stay in the country. Not on your above list. > Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) Ros-Lehtinen, who was the first > Latina elected to Congress, announced earlier this year she would be > retiring at the end of her term. Democrats flipped her seat in > November. She refused to come out in support of a border wall while > representing her majority-Hispanic district and torched the Trump > administration earlier this year for its “zero tolerance” immigration > policy, which resulted in an increased number of family separations at > the border. Not on your above list. > Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) Upton has said that a border wall may be > appropriate in some areas of the border, but that different security > measures “may be sufficient” in other areas. Not on your above list. > Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) Valadao, who lost reelection by less > than a point in November, ripped the Trump administration earlier this > year on family separations and been a supporter of tying border > security legislation to a fix for Dreamers. > https://thehill.com/homenews/house/422424-the-8-republicans-who-voted-against-trumps-border-wall Not on your above list. But good of you to note that there is STILL opposition to him from his own party. There should be more. > >>>> * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores >>> >>> Not true. Your stupid bird story doesn't "fly." >> >> No counter. Got it. > > Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. > You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? You have no counter but to lie about what I said. This shows you are insecure about views. >>>> * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land >>>> from US citizens >>> >>> And..........? >> >> You fail to see the problem with taking private property by force even in >> the absence of any evidence of public good. Got it. > > Public Good? > Drugs, human trafficing, illegal entires..... > These are good? You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support for your claims. >>>> * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally >>> >>> LIE. >>> And stupid statement. >> >> No counter. Got it. > > Still a stupid statement. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/visa-overstays-outnumber-illegal-border-crossings-trend-expected-continue-n730216 ----- The majority of immigrants settling in the U.S. without authorization are first coming to the country legally, raising questions about the effectiveness of President Donald Trump's plan to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexican border. Crossing the border is not the way "the large majority of persons now become undocumented," the Center for Migration Studies (CMS) said in a recent report. Two-thirds of those who joined the undocumented population did so by entering with a valid visa and then overstaying their period of admission, the center repored. Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries since 2007. ----- >>>> * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same >>>> level Republicans did last year >>> >>> <yawn> >>> So what? >>> Trump made a promise to build a wall. >>> Americans voted for him because of this promise. >>> You sound like you are whining. >> >> I am noting facts. And Trump’s promise was that Mexico would pay for his >> symbolic wall. > > And they will, .... indirectly. If you think they will then no need for Trump to hold the country hostage to get his ego-wall. > Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, > until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all > remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all > temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary > cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we > issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source > of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from > Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports > of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid > cuts are also options]. > > “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief > telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you > start, and then you get reimbursed.” > > President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a > wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a > check from the Mexican government directly. Please quote where he said this during the campaign. > Rather, he said, Mexico > will be paying for the wall indirectly, “many, many times over” via > the trade agreement his administration recently renegotiated with > Canada and Mexico to replace NAFTA (the North American Free Trade > Agreement). > > Certainly, the president has a habit of speaking imprecisely and not > being familiar with the details of his campaign’s or administration’s > policy proposals. Nevertheless, it is disingenuous for his critics to > huff and puff over what they perceive as a lie. Campaign policy memos > clearly show that – as the president now indicates – using trade > negotiations and measures is a key tactic he advocated for pursuing > his border wall objective and getting get Mexico to contribute to wall > funding indirectly. > > >>>> * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has >>>> been emergent... and is thus a lie >>> >>> It certainly is an emergency. Nearly a million people are not getting >>> paid. That seeems like an emergency to me. >> >> The wall is not going to pay people. > > Do you read and comprehend the news? I do not read it all, but I do read your comments here and know you did not back your views. >>>> * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, >>>> such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico >>>> and California. Trump has withheld funds for these >>> >>> We can't keep throwing good money after bad. >> >> You want to pay for a wall not shown to have value but not for clean water >> for Americans. Got it. > > The wall has value. It has a cost... but no value has been shown. > I have shown this a dozen times. > I can't help if you are stupid. > > Why should people in Ohio pay for stupid decisions made in Flint, > Mich? As for Puerto rico, the claim is that only 85 percent of the > country has electrical power today. Well guess what, before the > hurricane, it was less than 85 percent. It is a 3rd world island. > Mountains, poor roads, poor people. The hurricane did not cause this. > > >> The put America first claim of Trump is a lie. He puts his ego first. > > Fake news. > How much of your salary did you give away? > > > >>> It is time for people to start working their own problems out. >> >> Yet the Republicans did not impeach Trump. > > He isn't a problem for us. > He is merely a thorn in your paw. > You can't stand that hillery lost. As noted: the put America first claim is a lie. You have no desire to do that. >>>> * We have an immigration system that can make people wait >>>> decades to get visas, which leads to a black market >>>> immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period >>>> would increase the black market for guns >>> >>> And you blame Trump for this? WHY? >> >> What made you think in terms of it being Trump’s fault? > > Why did you bring it up? > Oh yeah, you HATE Trump. That is why. I am noting issues related to illegal immigration. Interesting how you claim the facts should lead to hating Trump. >>>> * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party >>>> did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. >>> >>> When pelosi walks into a meeting and says: "NO WALL," then there is >>> no negotiation there. > >> She offered as much as his own party. > > They wanted a wall 8 years ago. Yet they did not fund it more than the Democrats are now. >> No wall (beyond the billion + already on the table) is the right way to >> deal with his tantrum. Give in to tantrums and you get more of them. > > You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver > on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? Cite? >> As you noted — this shut down is a crisis. Why encourage Trump to create >> more by giving in? > > He gave in on Daca. Does not answer the question of why we should encourage Trump to create more crisis. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 12:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bu74rc.ann.19.15@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #2584699 |
On 2019-01-23 12:18 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 1/23/19 11:39 AM, Patrick wrote: >> nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>>>> >>>>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >>>> >>>> + So what? >>> >>> So the claims to the contrary are lies. >> >> Improved barriers are not what is required. >> A wall is what was asked for. >> NOT improved barriers. > > Then why did Trump lie when he said he did not care what you call it? > >>>> + Republicans back treating illegal immigrants like humans. >>> >>> This is in response to what? And please cite. >> >> It is in response to your "improved barriers" silliness. >> Like I said: "So what!" >> Everyone wants improvement and humaneness. >> You don't have to make the claim. > > You did not answer the question about treating illegal immigrants like > humans. > >>>>> * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional >>>>> desires would offer much benefit >>>> >>>> Been there, done that. >>>> You are lying. >>> >>> Cite the evidence of benefits. >> >> What do you think I posted below? >> Are you really that stupid? >> >> Drug trafficking: I know that a lot of cheap heroin (like cheaper than >> beer cheap) comes up I-5 from Mexico, contributing to the local >> epidemic >> Human trafficking: Ever heard of Tenancingo, Mexico? That city's >> economy is built on the bodies of the women they sell. >> despite his intention to use the wall to keep out Mexicans who try to >> slip illegally into the U.S., the massive building project could >> actually be boon for one Mexican cement maker: Cemex (CX), which has >> extensive operations on both sides of the Rio Grande. >> Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the >> Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall >> in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. > > Notice, NO evidence the wall Trump is pushing for would offer ANY > benefit over the walls we have and the Democrats have agreed to improve > / extend. > > Not one bit of benefit shown. > > The wall will simply not do much. > > It will not stop people from seeking asylum. > > It will not stop people from overstaying visas (which is how the > majority of people here illegally get here -- legally). > > It will not do much if anything to stop smuggling of people and drugs. > > It will not stop people from entering by boat or plane or tunnel > >>> We have walls. Cite your claim the walls Trump wants to add would offer >>> significant benefits. >> >> Read what I said above. >> We do not have walls where they are needed. >> In some places, there isn't even a fence. > > You have NO support. Got it. > >>>>> * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown >>>> >>>> Yeah, he did. And now he regrets saying it. >>>> Now he is willing to sahre the blame. >>>> And he is the only one willing to negotiate. >>>> The dems feel they are in great shape because of what Trump said. >>> >>> Why expect the opposition party to give in more than his own party did? >> >> Because the opposition party was once for a wall. >> I can understand some republicans being pissed off because trump >> showed them all up and jumped line to be the nominee. > > You gave no reason the opposition party should give him more for his ego > than his own party did. > >>>>> * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding >>>>> (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) >>>> >>>> Some were also pissed that Trump got the nomination in front of their >>>> pals Jeb, cruz, Christie, Guiliani, Romney, Kasich, etc. Trump cut in >>>> line and they didn't like it. >>> >>> Which of those you list do you think blocked his funding requests? >>> And if >>> his own party will not give in why should the opposition party? >> >> Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) Amash, an outspoken fiscal conservative >> and member of the House Freedom Caucus, was one of the two among the >> group, including several firebrands, to vote against the measure and >> oppose border wall funding. > > Not on your above list. > >> Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) Buck, the other House Freedom Caucus member >> to vote against the bill, went against caucus leaders Jim Jordan >> (R-Ohio) and Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) as they pushed Trump to not back >> down from his demand for border wall funding. He told Colorado Public >> Radio this month, however, that a border wall shouldn’t be the cause >> for a government shutdown. > > Not on your above list. > >> Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.) Curbelo, who lost a reelection bid in >> November, has been a frequent Trump critic, particularly over the >> White House’s demands on immigration. He helped introduced a bill >> earlier this year that tied border wall funding in exchange for a path >> to citizenship for two million young undocumented immigrants brought >> to the country as children, commonly referred to as "Dreamers." > > Not on your above list. > >> Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) Hurd, a House moderate who won reelection >> in November by less than 1 point, has pushed for a “smart border wall” >> that uses “cutting edge” technology to protect the border rather than >> a physical wall. > > Not on your above list. > >> Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.) Paulsen, who lost reelection by double >> digits in November, has long opposed border wall funding. He’s said he >> supports tighter border security and wants to crack down on people >> living in the U.S. without documentation, but also wants a fix >> allowing Dreamers to stay in the country. > > Not on your above list. > >> Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) Ros-Lehtinen, who was the first >> Latina elected to Congress, announced earlier this year she would be >> retiring at the end of her term. Democrats flipped her seat in >> November. She refused to come out in support of a border wall while >> representing her majority-Hispanic district and torched the Trump >> administration earlier this year for its “zero tolerance” immigration >> policy, which resulted in an increased number of family separations at >> the border. > > Not on your above list. > >> Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) Upton has said that a border wall may be >> appropriate in some areas of the border, but that different security >> measures “may be sufficient” in other areas. > > Not on your above list. > >> Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) Valadao, who lost reelection by less >> than a point in November, ripped the Trump administration earlier this >> year on family separations and been a supporter of tying border >> security legislation to a fix for Dreamers. >> https://thehill.com/homenews/house/422424-the-8-republicans-who-voted-against-trumps-border-wall >> > > Not on your above list. > > But good of you to note that there is STILL opposition to him from his > own party. There should be more. > >> >>>>> * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores >>>> >>>> Not true. Your stupid bird story doesn't "fly." >>> >>> No counter. Got it. >> >> Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. >> You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? > > You have no counter but to lie about what I said. > > This shows you are insecure about views. > >>>>> * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land >>>>> from US citizens >>>> >>>> And..........? >>> >>> You fail to see the problem with taking private property by force >>> even in >>> the absence of any evidence of public good. Got it. >> >> Public Good? >> Drugs, human trafficing, illegal entires..... >> These are good? > > You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support > for your claims. > >>>>> * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally >>>> >>>> LIE. >>>> And stupid statement. >>> >>> No counter. Got it. >> >> Still a stupid statement. > > https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/visa-overstays-outnumber-illegal-border-crossings-trend-expected-continue-n730216 > > ----- > The majority of immigrants settling in the U.S. without authorization > are first coming to the country legally, raising questions about the > effectiveness of President Donald Trump's plan to build a wall on the > U.S.-Mexican border. > > Crossing the border is not the way "the large majority of persons now > become undocumented," the Center for Migration Studies (CMS) said in a > recent report. Two-thirds of those who joined the undocumented > population did so by entering with a valid visa and then overstaying > their period of admission, the center repored. > > Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, > and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries > since 2007. > ----- > >>>>> * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same >>>>> level Republicans did last year >>>> >>>> <yawn> >>>> So what? >>>> Trump made a promise to build a wall. >>>> Americans voted for him because of this promise. >>>> You sound like you are whining. >>> >>> I am noting facts. And Trump’s promise was that Mexico would pay for his >>> symbolic wall. >> >> And they will, .... indirectly. > > If you think they will then no need for Trump to hold the country > hostage to get his ego-wall. > >> Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, >> until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all >> remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all >> temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary >> cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we >> issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source >> of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from >> Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports >> of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid >> cuts are also options]. >> >> “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief >> telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you >> start, and then you get reimbursed.” >> >> President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a >> wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a >> check from the Mexican government directly. > > Please quote where he said this during the campaign. > >> Rather, he said, Mexico >> will be paying for the wall indirectly, “many, many times over” via >> the trade agreement his administration recently renegotiated with >> Canada and Mexico to replace NAFTA (the North American Free Trade >> Agreement). >> >> Certainly, the president has a habit of speaking imprecisely and not >> being familiar with the details of his campaign’s or administration’s >> policy proposals. Nevertheless, it is disingenuous for his critics to >> huff and puff over what they perceive as a lie. Campaign policy memos >> clearly show that – as the president now indicates – using trade >> negotiations and measures is a key tactic he advocated for pursuing >> his border wall objective and getting get Mexico to contribute to wall >> funding indirectly. >> >>>>> * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has >>>>> been emergent... and is thus a lie >>>> >>>> It certainly is an emergency. Nearly a million people are not getting >>>> paid. That seeems like an emergency to me. >>> >>> The wall is not going to pay people. >> >> Do you read and comprehend the news? > > I do not read it all, but I do read your comments here and know you did > not back your views. > >>>>> * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, >>>>> such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico >>>>> and California. Trump has withheld funds for these >>>> >>>> We can't keep throwing good money after bad. >>> >>> You want to pay for a wall not shown to have value but not for clean >>> water >>> for Americans. Got it. >> >> The wall has value. > > It has a cost... but no value has been shown. > >> I have shown this a dozen times. >> I can't help if you are stupid. >> >> Why should people in Ohio pay for stupid decisions made in Flint, >> Mich? As for Puerto rico, the claim is that only 85 percent of the >> country has electrical power today. Well guess what, before the >> hurricane, it was less than 85 percent. It is a 3rd world island. >> Mountains, poor roads, poor people. The hurricane did not cause this. >> >> >>> The put America first claim of Trump is a lie. He puts his ego first. >> >> Fake news. >> How much of your salary did you give away? >> >> >> >>>> It is time for people to start working their own problems out. >>> >>> Yet the Republicans did not impeach Trump. >> >> He isn't a problem for us. >> He is merely a thorn in your paw. >> You can't stand that hillery lost. > > As noted: the put America first claim is a lie. You have no desire to do > that. > > >>>>> * We have an immigration system that can make people wait >>>>> decades to get visas, which leads to a black market >>>>> immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period >>>>> would increase the black market for guns >>>> >>>> And you blame Trump for this? WHY? >>> >>> What made you think in terms of it being Trump’s fault? >> >> Why did you bring it up? >> Oh yeah, you HATE Trump. That is why. > > I am noting issues related to illegal immigration. Interesting how you > claim the facts should lead to hating Trump. > >>>>> * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party >>>>> did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. >>>> >>>> When pelosi walks into a meeting and says: "NO WALL," then there is >>>> no negotiation there. >> >>> She offered as much as his own party. >> >> They wanted a wall 8 years ago. > > Yet they did not fund it more than the Democrats are now. > >>> No wall (beyond the billion + already on the table) is the right way to >>> deal with his tantrum. Give in to tantrums and you get more of them. >> >> You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver >> on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? > > Cite? > >>> As you noted — this shut down is a crisis. Why encourage Trump to create >>> more by giving in? >> >> He gave in on Daca. > > Does not answer the question of why we should encourage Trump to create > more crisis. > > > > > do you pop your zits snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 17:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5fqh4e1repu63gu5ll95q0b3rri5dp466l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2584699 |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:18:51 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/23/19 11:39 AM, Patrick wrote: >> nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>>>> >>>>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >>>> >>>> + So what? >>> >>> So the claims to the contrary are lies. >> >> Improved barriers are not what is required. >> A wall is what was asked for. >> NOT improved barriers. > >Then why did Trump lie when he said he did not care what you call it? Are you so stupid that you can't figure it out? >> Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the >> Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall >> in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. > >Notice, NO evidence the wall Trump is pushing for would offer ANY >benefit over the walls we have and the Democrats have agreed to improve >/ extend. LIAR. Pelosi said: "NO WALL." https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2019/01/04/pelosi-says-no-wall-while-trump-allies-put-daca-on-the-table-370394 >Not one bit of benefit shown. >The wall will simply not do much. Stops illegal aliens. Stops drugs and human trafficing. Are you stupid? >It will not stop people from seeking asylum. Of course not. That is not the purpose of the wall. Maybe you are just stupid. >It will not stop people from overstaying visas (which is how the >majority of people here illegally get here -- legally). We don't have the time or money to go after the ones who overstay. We are spending our money on trying to catch the illegal criminals who are killing the people and stealing their things. And then the liberal judges turn them back loose. >It will not do much if anything to stop smuggling of people and drugs. Yes, it will. Are you stupid? (That was rhetorical!) >It will not stop people from entering by boat or plane or tunnel Walls don't do that. Are you stupid? (That was rhetorical!) >You gave no reason the opposition party should give him more for his ego >than his own party did. Because it is the adult thing to do. >But good of you to note that there is STILL opposition to him from his >own party. There should be more. Loozers who are not acting like adults. >> Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. >> You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? > >You have no counter but to lie about what I said. Tell me you didn't mention 108 "Species" of birds. Tell me. Are you stupid? (That was rhetorical!) >You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support >for your claims. Are you stupid? (That was rhetorical!) >Crossing the border is not the way "the large majority of persons now >become undocumented," the Center for Migration Studies (CMS) said in a >recent report. Two-thirds of those who joined the undocumented >population did so by entering with a valid visa and then overstaying >their period of admission, the center repored. We cannot chase the criminals illegally crossing the border AND those who overstayed their VISA's. >Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, >and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries >since 2007. And there are 11 million illegals who crossed the boarder illegally. >> Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, >> until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all >> remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all >> temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary >> cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we >> issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source >> of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from >> Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports >> of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid >> cuts are also options]. >> >> “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief >> telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you >> start, and then you get reimbursed.” >> >> President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a >> wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a >> check from the Mexican government directly. > >Please quote where he said this during the campaign. No. I state it is true. You look it up. Wait.... I forgot you are stupid..... I guess I have to lead you to water. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/08/16/donald-trump-releases-immigration-reform-plan-designed-to-get-americans-back-to-work/ >> The wall has value. > >It has a cost... but no value has been shown. <Yawn> >I am noting issues related to illegal immigration. Interesting how you >claim the facts should lead to hating Trump. <Yawn> >> You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver >> on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? > >Cite? Obama's broken promises. Raise the minimum wage and index it to inflation. Close the prison at Guantanamo Bay. Create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Close special-interest corporate loopholes. End the practice of writing legislation behind closed doors. Restrict people moving between lobbying and working in the administration. Convene a bipartisan group of key lawmakers to foster better executive-legislative relations on foreign policy. Establish a low national carbon-fuel standard. Make a sustained push to support Israel and achieve the goal of two states — a Jewish state in Israel and a Palestinian state. Double federal funding for basic research over 10 years (2009-2018). Ensure freedom to unionize and fight for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act. Create 1 million new manufacturing jobs between 2012 and 2016. Double U.S. exports over the next five years (2013-2017). End the war in Afghanistan in 2014. Lead the world in college graduates by 2020. Train 2 million Americans in a community college-business partnership. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/obama-promises/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 16:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gasaqpFp08lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2584840 |
On 1/23/19 3:45 PM, Patrick wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:18:51 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 1/23/19 11:39 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>>>>> >>>>>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >>>>> >>>>> + So what? >>>> >>>> So the claims to the contrary are lies. >>> >>> Improved barriers are not what is required. >>> A wall is what was asked for. >>> NOT improved barriers. >> >> Then why did Trump lie when he said he did not care what you call it? > > Are you so stupid that you can't figure it out? >>> Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the >>> Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall >>> in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. >> >> Notice, NO evidence the wall Trump is pushing for would offer ANY >> benefit over the walls we have and the Democrats have agreed to improve >> / extend. > > LIAR. > Pelosi said: "NO WALL." > https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2019/01/04/pelosi-says-no-wall-while-trump-allies-put-daca-on-the-table-370394 > > >> Not one bit of benefit shown. >> The wall will simply not do much. > > Stops illegal aliens. Stops drugs and human trafficing. > Are you stupid? > > >> It will not stop people from seeking asylum. > > Of course not. > That is not the purpose of the wall. > Maybe you are just stupid. > > > >> It will not stop people from overstaying visas (which is how the >> majority of people here illegally get here -- legally). > > We don't have the time or money to go after the ones who overstay. > We are spending our money on trying to catch the illegal criminals who > are killing the people and stealing their things. > And then the liberal judges turn them back loose. > > >> It will not do much if anything to stop smuggling of people and drugs. > > Yes, it will. > Are you stupid? > (That was rhetorical!) > > >> It will not stop people from entering by boat or plane or tunnel > > Walls don't do that. > Are you stupid? > (That was rhetorical!) > > > >> You gave no reason the opposition party should give him more for his ego >> than his own party did. > > Because it is the adult thing to do. > > > >> But good of you to note that there is STILL opposition to him from his >> own party. There should be more. > > Loozers who are not acting like adults. > > > >>> Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. >>> You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? >> >> You have no counter but to lie about what I said. > > Tell me you didn't mention 108 "Species" of birds. > Tell me. > Are you stupid? > (That was rhetorical!) > > >> You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support >> for your claims. > > Are you stupid? > (That was rhetorical!) > > > >> Crossing the border is not the way "the large majority of persons now >> become undocumented," the Center for Migration Studies (CMS) said in a >> recent report. Two-thirds of those who joined the undocumented >> population did so by entering with a valid visa and then overstaying >> their period of admission, the center repored. > > We cannot chase the criminals illegally crossing the border AND those > who overstayed their VISA's. > > > >> Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, >> and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries >> since 2007. > > And there are 11 million illegals who crossed the boarder illegally. > > >>> Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, >>> until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all >>> remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all >>> temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary >>> cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we >>> issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source >>> of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from >>> Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports >>> of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid >>> cuts are also options]. >>> >>> “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief >>> telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you >>> start, and then you get reimbursed.” >>> >>> President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a >>> wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a >>> check from the Mexican government directly. >> >> Please quote where he said this during the campaign. > > No. > I state it is true. > You look it up. > Wait.... > I forgot you are stupid..... > I guess I have to lead you to water. > https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/08/16/donald-trump-releases-immigration-reform-plan-designed-to-get-americans-back-to-work/ > > >>> The wall has value. >> >> It has a cost... but no value has been shown. > > <Yawn> > > >> I am noting issues related to illegal immigration. Interesting how you >> claim the facts should lead to hating Trump. > > <Yawn> > > > > > > > >>> You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver >>> on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? >> >> Cite? > > Obama's broken promises. > > Raise the minimum wage and index it to inflation. > Close the prison at Guantanamo Bay. > Create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. > Close special-interest corporate loopholes. > End the practice of writing legislation behind closed doors. > Restrict people moving between lobbying and working in the > administration. > Convene a bipartisan group of key lawmakers to foster better > executive-legislative relations on foreign policy. > Establish a low national carbon-fuel standard. > Make a sustained push to support Israel and achieve the goal of two > states — a Jewish state in Israel and a Palestinian state. > Double federal funding for basic research over 10 years (2009-2018). > Ensure freedom to unionize and fight for passage of the Employee Free > Choice Act. > Create 1 million new manufacturing jobs between 2012 and 2016. > Double U.S. exports over the next five years (2013-2017). > End the war in Afghanistan in 2014. > Lead the world in college graduates by 2020. > Train 2 million Americans in a community college-business partnership. > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/obama-promises/ > You keep trying to bury / obfuscate the facts. Here they are again (with some comments: * The Democrats back improved physical barriers You whined they do not back the term "wall", but Trump has said he does not care what term is used, and agreed with the terms the Democrats use. * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional desires would offer much benefit You made unsupported claims of benefits. * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown You claim he regrets that but offered no support. * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) You noted how not all even back it now. * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores You had no counter but lied about me saying birds cannot fly over walls. * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land from US citizens You noted you did not care if the government takes land even if it cannot show a need or value to it. * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally You denied this even though it is true, then minimized it when you realized your denial was ignorant. * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same level Republicans did last year Do not even recall your answer on this. * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has been emergent... and is thus a lie You claimed that there was something that did, but named nothing relevant. * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico and California. Trump has withheld funds for these You noted that the America First claim is a lie. * We have an immigration system that can make people wait decades to get visas, which leads to a black market immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period would increase the black market for guns You showed no understanding of this. * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. You showed no understanding of this. You then made clams about liberals wanting only one thing... but offered no support for your claim. You really are not good at backing your claims. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 15:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vC62E.128784$n85.34089@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #2584847 |
On 1/23/2019 3:14 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/23/19 3:45 PM, Patrick wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:18:51 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/23/19 11:39 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >>>>>> >>>>>> + So what? >>>>> >>>>> So the claims to the contrary are lies. >>>> >>>> Improved barriers are not what is required. >>>> A wall is what was asked for. >>>> NOT improved barriers. >>> >>> Then why did Trump lie when he said he did not care what you call it? >> >> Are you so stupid that you can't figure it out? > > > >>>> Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the >>>> Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall >>>> in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. >>> >>> Notice, NO evidence the wall Trump is pushing for would offer ANY >>> benefit over the walls we have and the Democrats have agreed to improve >>> / extend. >> >> LIAR. >> Pelosi said: "NO WALL." >> https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2019/01/04/pelosi-says-no-wall-while-trump-allies-put-daca-on-the-table-370394 >> >> >> >>> Not one bit of benefit shown. >>> The wall will simply not do much. >> >> Stops illegal aliens. Stops drugs and human trafficing. >> Are you stupid? >> >> >>> It will not stop people from seeking asylum. >> >> Of course not. >> That is not the purpose of the wall. >> Maybe you are just stupid. >> >> >> >>> It will not stop people from overstaying visas (which is how the >>> majority of people here illegally get here -- legally). >> >> We don't have the time or money to go after the ones who overstay. >> We are spending our money on trying to catch the illegal criminals who >> are killing the people and stealing their things. >> And then the liberal judges turn them back loose. >> >> >>> It will not do much if anything to stop smuggling of people and drugs. >> >> Yes, it will. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >>> It will not stop people from entering by boat or plane or tunnel >> >> Walls don't do that. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >> >>> You gave no reason the opposition party should give him more for his ego >>> than his own party did. >> >> Because it is the adult thing to do. >> >> >> >>> But good of you to note that there is STILL opposition to him from his >>> own party. There should be more. >> >> Loozers who are not acting like adults. >> >> >> >>>> Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. >>>> You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? >>> >>> You have no counter but to lie about what I said. >> >> Tell me you didn't mention 108 "Species" of birds. >> Tell me. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >>> You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support >>> for your claims. >> >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >> >>> Crossing the border is not the way "the large majority of persons now >>> become undocumented," the Center for Migration Studies (CMS) said in a >>> recent report. Two-thirds of those who joined the undocumented >>> population did so by entering with a valid visa and then overstaying >>> their period of admission, the center repored. >> >> We cannot chase the criminals illegally crossing the border AND those >> who overstayed their VISA's. >> >> >> >>> Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, >>> and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries >>> since 2007. >> >> And there are 11 million illegals who crossed the boarder illegally. >> >> >>>> Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, >>>> until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all >>>> remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all >>>> temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary >>>> cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we >>>> issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source >>>> of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from >>>> Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports >>>> of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid >>>> cuts are also options]. >>>> >>>> “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief >>>> telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you >>>> start, and then you get reimbursed.” >>>> >>>> President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a >>>> wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a >>>> check from the Mexican government directly. >>> >>> Please quote where he said this during the campaign. >> >> No. >> I state it is true. >> You look it up. >> Wait.... >> I forgot you are stupid..... >> I guess I have to lead you to water. >> https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/08/16/donald-trump-releases-immigration-reform-plan-designed-to-get-americans-back-to-work/ >> >> >> >>>> The wall has value. >>> >>> It has a cost... but no value has been shown. >> >> <Yawn> >> >> >>> I am noting issues related to illegal immigration. Interesting how you >>> claim the facts should lead to hating Trump. >> >> <Yawn> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver >>>> on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? >>> >>> Cite? >> >> Obama's broken promises. >> >> Raise the minimum wage and index it to inflation. >> Close the prison at Guantanamo Bay. >> Create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. >> Close special-interest corporate loopholes. >> End the practice of writing legislation behind closed doors. >> Restrict people moving between lobbying and working in the >> administration. >> Convene a bipartisan group of key lawmakers to foster better >> executive-legislative relations on foreign policy. >> Establish a low national carbon-fuel standard. >> Make a sustained push to support Israel and achieve the goal of two >> states — a Jewish state in Israel and a Palestinian state. >> Double federal funding for basic research over 10 years (2009-2018). >> Ensure freedom to unionize and fight for passage of the Employee Free >> Choice Act. >> Create 1 million new manufacturing jobs between 2012 and 2016. >> Double U.S. exports over the next five years (2013-2017). >> End the war in Afghanistan in 2014. >> Lead the world in college graduates by 2020. >> Train 2 million Americans in a community college-business partnership. >> >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/obama-promises/ >> > > > You keep trying to bury / obfuscate the facts. Here they are again (with > some comments: > > * The Democrats back improved physical barriers Still no citation for this. Looks like Snot is still engaging in /ipse dixit/ -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 07:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3haj4elsq88nrf3eu265es24au0ajn6740@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2584847 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/23/19 3:45 PM, Patrick wrote: >> Are you so stupid that you can't figure it out? <MAJOR SNIP> >> Pelosi said: "NO WALL." >> https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2019/01/04/pelosi-says-no-wall-while-trump-allies-put-daca-on-the-table-370394 >>> You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support >>> for your claims. >> >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> <Yawn> >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/obama-promises/ >You keep trying to bury / obfuscate the facts. Here they are again (with >some comments: < SNIP AGAIN. Already answered.> >* Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores > >You had no counter but lied about me saying birds cannot fly over walls. You brought up 108 species of birds that would be affected. How soon you forget that you are stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 13:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gatu3uF50qoU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2584847 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/23/19 3:45 PM, Patrick wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:18:51 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/23/19 11:39 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >>>>>> >>>>>> + So what? >>>>> >>>>> So the claims to the contrary are lies. >>>> >>>> Improved barriers are not what is required. >>>> A wall is what was asked for. >>>> NOT improved barriers. >>> >>> Then why did Trump lie when he said he did not care what you call it? >> >> Are you so stupid that you can't figure it out? > > > >>>> Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the >>>> Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall >>>> in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. >>> >>> Notice, NO evidence the wall Trump is pushing for would offer ANY >>> benefit over the walls we have and the Democrats have agreed to improve >>> / extend. >> >> LIAR. >> Pelosi said: "NO WALL." >> https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2019/01/04/pelosi-says-no-wall-while-trump-allies-put-daca-on-the-table-370394 >> >> >>> Not one bit of benefit shown. >>> The wall will simply not do much. >> >> Stops illegal aliens. Stops drugs and human trafficing. >> Are you stupid? >> >> >>> It will not stop people from seeking asylum. >> >> Of course not. >> That is not the purpose of the wall. >> Maybe you are just stupid. >> >> >> >>> It will not stop people from overstaying visas (which is how the >>> majority of people here illegally get here -- legally). >> >> We don't have the time or money to go after the ones who overstay. >> We are spending our money on trying to catch the illegal criminals who >> are killing the people and stealing their things. >> And then the liberal judges turn them back loose. >> >> >>> It will not do much if anything to stop smuggling of people and drugs. >> >> Yes, it will. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >>> It will not stop people from entering by boat or plane or tunnel >> >> Walls don't do that. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >> >>> You gave no reason the opposition party should give him more for his ego >>> than his own party did. >> >> Because it is the adult thing to do. >> >> >> >>> But good of you to note that there is STILL opposition to him from his >>> own party. There should be more. >> >> Loozers who are not acting like adults. >> >> >> >>>> Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. >>>> You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? >>> >>> You have no counter but to lie about what I said. >> >> Tell me you didn't mention 108 "Species" of birds. >> Tell me. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >>> You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support >>> for your claims. >> >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >> >>> Crossing the border is not the way "the large majority of persons now >>> become undocumented," the Center for Migration Studies (CMS) said in a >>> recent report. Two-thirds of those who joined the undocumented >>> population did so by entering with a valid visa and then overstaying >>> their period of admission, the center repored. >> >> We cannot chase the criminals illegally crossing the border AND those >> who overstayed their VISA's. >> >> >> >>> Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, >>> and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries >>> since 2007. >> >> And there are 11 million illegals who crossed the boarder illegally. >> >> >>>> Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, >>>> until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all >>>> remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all >>>> temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary >>>> cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we >>>> issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source >>>> of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from >>>> Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports >>>> of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid >>>> cuts are also options]. >>>> >>>> “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief >>>> telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you >>>> start, and then you get reimbursed.” >>>> >>>> President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a >>>> wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a >>>> check from the Mexican government directly. >>> >>> Please quote where he said this during the campaign. >> >> No. >> I state it is true. >> You look it up. >> Wait.... >> I forgot you are stupid..... >> I guess I have to lead you to water. >> https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/08/16/donald-trump-releases-immigration-reform-plan-designed-to-get-americans-back-to-work/ >> >> >>>> The wall has value. >>> >>> It has a cost... but no value has been shown. >> >> <Yawn> >> >> >>> I am noting issues related to illegal immigration. Interesting how you >>> claim the facts should lead to hating Trump. >> >> <Yawn> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver >>>> on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? >>> >>> Cite? >> >> Obama's broken promises. >> >> Raise the minimum wage and index it to inflation. >> Close the prison at Guantanamo Bay. >> Create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. >> Close special-interest corporate loopholes. >> End the practice of writing legislation behind closed doors. >> Restrict people moving between lobbying and working in the >> administration. >> Convene a bipartisan group of key lawmakers to foster better >> executive-legislative relations on foreign policy. >> Establish a low national carbon-fuel standard. >> Make a sustained push to support Israel and achieve the goal of two >> states — a Jewish state in Israel and a Palestinian state. >> Double federal funding for basic research over 10 years (2009-2018). >> Ensure freedom to unionize and fight for passage of the Employee Free >> Choice Act. >> Create 1 million new manufacturing jobs between 2012 and 2016. >> Double U.S. exports over the next five years (2013-2017). >> End the war in Afghanistan in 2014. >> Lead the world in college graduates by 2020. >> Train 2 million Americans in a community college-business partnership. >> >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/obama-promises/ >> > > > You keep trying to bury / obfuscate the facts. Here they are again (with > some comments: > > * The Democrats back improved physical barriers > > You whined they do not back the term "wall", but Trump has said he does > not care what term is used, and agreed with the terms the Democrats use. Patrick had no response. > > * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional > desires would offer much benefit > > You made unsupported claims of benefits. Patrick had no response. > * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown > > You claim he regrets that but offered no support. Patrick had no response. > > * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding > (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) > > You noted how not all even back it now. Patrick had no response. > > * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores > > You had no counter but lied about me saying birds cannot fly over walls. Patrick responded confusing harm to an ecosystem with birds being unable to fly over walls. > > * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land > from US citizens > > You noted you did not care if the government takes land even if it > cannot show a need or value to it. Patrick had no response. > > * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally > > You denied this even though it is true, then minimized it when you > realized your denial was ignorant. Patrick had no response. > > * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same > level Republicans did last year > > Do not even recall your answer on this. Patrick had no response. > > * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has > been emergent... and is thus a lie > > You claimed that there was something that did, but named nothing relevant. Patrick had no response. > > * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, > such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico > and California. Trump has withheld funds for these > > You noted that the America First claim is a lie. Patrick had no response. > > * We have an immigration system that can make people wait > decades to get visas, which leads to a black market > immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period > would increase the black market for guns > > You showed no understanding of this. Patrick had no response. > > * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party > did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. > > You showed no understanding of this. Patrick had no response. > > > You then made clams about liberals wanting only one thing... but offered > no support for your claim. Patrick had no response. > > You really are not good at backing your claims. > Patrick had no response.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 10:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nvnj4edol6h08loabbqqke87b23rirjtj9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2585177 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Patrick had no response. >> >> * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional >> desires would offer much benefit >> >> You made unsupported claims of benefits. > >Patrick had no response. > >> * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown >> >> You claim he regrets that but offered no support. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding >> (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) >> >> You noted how not all even back it now. > >Patrick had no response. Why would I respond to an idiot?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 06:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <gdsl4ep2gkpv5gi3n3slc6umr3sh2sduft@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2585207 |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:56:29 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>Patrick had no response. >>> >>> * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional >>> desires would offer much benefit >>> >>> You made unsupported claims of benefits. >> >>Patrick had no response. >> >>> * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown >>> >>> You claim he regrets that but offered no support. >> >>Patrick had no response. >>> >>> * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding >>> (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) >>> >>> You noted how not all even back it now. >> >>Patrick had no response. > >Why would I respond to an idiot? Zactly. The troll is so dumb that he doesn't realize that people become bored with his trolling that they don't bother replying to him anymore.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 06:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dcsl4ehbs6rpprtv0cgp2n9hivs8gjva3c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2585177 |
On 24 Jan 2019 13:49:50 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/23/19 3:45 PM, Patrick wrote: >>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:18:51 -0700, Snit >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/23/19 11:39 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>>> nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> + So what? >>>>>> >>>>>> So the claims to the contrary are lies. >>>>> >>>>> Improved barriers are not what is required. >>>>> A wall is what was asked for. >>>>> NOT improved barriers. >>>> >>>> Then why did Trump lie when he said he did not care what you call it? >>> >>> Are you so stupid that you can't figure it out? >> >> >> >>>>> Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the >>>>> Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall >>>>> in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. >>>> >>>> Notice, NO evidence the wall Trump is pushing for would offer ANY >>>> benefit over the walls we have and the Democrats have agreed to improve >>>> / extend. >>> >>> LIAR. >>> Pelosi said: "NO WALL." >>> https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2019/01/04/pelosi-says-no-wall-while-trump-allies-put-daca-on-the-table-370394 >>> >>> >>>> Not one bit of benefit shown. >>>> The wall will simply not do much. >>> >>> Stops illegal aliens. Stops drugs and human trafficing. >>> Are you stupid? >>> >>> >>>> It will not stop people from seeking asylum. >>> >>> Of course not. >>> That is not the purpose of the wall. >>> Maybe you are just stupid. >>> >>> >>> >>>> It will not stop people from overstaying visas (which is how the >>>> majority of people here illegally get here -- legally). >>> >>> We don't have the time or money to go after the ones who overstay. >>> We are spending our money on trying to catch the illegal criminals who >>> are killing the people and stealing their things. >>> And then the liberal judges turn them back loose. >>> >>> >>>> It will not do much if anything to stop smuggling of people and drugs. >>> >>> Yes, it will. >>> Are you stupid? >>> (That was rhetorical!) >>> >>> >>>> It will not stop people from entering by boat or plane or tunnel >>> >>> Walls don't do that. >>> Are you stupid? >>> (That was rhetorical!) >>> >>> >>> >>>> You gave no reason the opposition party should give him more for his ego >>>> than his own party did. >>> >>> Because it is the adult thing to do. >>> >>> >>> >>>> But good of you to note that there is STILL opposition to him from his >>>> own party. There should be more. >>> >>> Loozers who are not acting like adults. >>> >>> >>> >>>>> Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. >>>>> You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? >>>> >>>> You have no counter but to lie about what I said. >>> >>> Tell me you didn't mention 108 "Species" of birds. >>> Tell me. >>> Are you stupid? >>> (That was rhetorical!) >>> >>> >>>> You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support >>>> for your claims. >>> >>> Are you stupid? >>> (That was rhetorical!) >>> >>> >>> >>>> Crossing the border is not the way "the large majority of persons now >>>> become undocumented," the Center for Migration Studies (CMS) said in a >>>> recent report. Two-thirds of those who joined the undocumented >>>> population did so by entering with a valid visa and then overstaying >>>> their period of admission, the center repored. >>> >>> We cannot chase the criminals illegally crossing the border AND those >>> who overstayed their VISA's. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, >>>> and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries >>>> since 2007. >>> >>> And there are 11 million illegals who crossed the boarder illegally. >>> >>> >>>>> Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, >>>>> until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all >>>>> remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all >>>>> temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary >>>>> cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we >>>>> issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source >>>>> of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from >>>>> Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports >>>>> of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid >>>>> cuts are also options]. >>>>> >>>>> “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief >>>>> telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you >>>>> start, and then you get reimbursed.” >>>>> >>>>> President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a >>>>> wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a >>>>> check from the Mexican government directly. >>>> >>>> Please quote where he said this during the campaign. >>> >>> No. >>> I state it is true. >>> You look it up. >>> Wait.... >>> I forgot you are stupid..... >>> I guess I have to lead you to water. >>> https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/08/16/donald-trump-releases-immigration-reform-plan-designed-to-get-americans-back-to-work/ >>> >>> >>>>> The wall has value. >>>> >>>> It has a cost... but no value has been shown. >>> >>> <Yawn> >>> >>> >>>> I am noting issues related to illegal immigration. Interesting how you >>>> claim the facts should lead to hating Trump. >>> >>> <Yawn> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver >>>>> on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? >>>> >>>> Cite? >>> >>> Obama's broken promises. >>> >>> Raise the minimum wage and index it to inflation. >>> Close the prison at Guantanamo Bay. >>> Create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. >>> Close special-interest corporate loopholes. >>> End the practice of writing legislation behind closed doors. >>> Restrict people moving between lobbying and working in the >>> administration. >>> Convene a bipartisan group of key lawmakers to foster better >>> executive-legislative relations on foreign policy. >>> Establish a low national carbon-fuel standard. >>> Make a sustained push to support Israel and achieve the goal of two >>> states — a Jewish state in Israel and a Palestinian state. >>> Double federal funding for basic research over 10 years (2009-2018). >>> Ensure freedom to unionize and fight for passage of the Employee Free >>> Choice Act. >>> Create 1 million new manufacturing jobs between 2012 and 2016. >>> Double U.S. exports over the next five years (2013-2017). >>> End the war in Afghanistan in 2014. >>> Lead the world in college graduates by 2020. >>> Train 2 million Americans in a community college-business partnership. >>> >>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/obama-promises/ >>> >> >> >> You keep trying to bury / obfuscate the facts. Here they are again (with >> some comments: >> >> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >> >> You whined they do not back the term "wall", but Trump has said he does >> not care what term is used, and agreed with the terms the Democrats use. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional >> desires would offer much benefit >> >> You made unsupported claims of benefits. > >Patrick had no response. > >> * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown >> >> You claim he regrets that but offered no support. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding >> (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) >> >> You noted how not all even back it now. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores >> >> You had no counter but lied about me saying birds cannot fly over walls. > >Patrick responded confusing harm to an ecosystem with birds being unable to >fly over walls. >> >> * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land >> from US citizens >> >> You noted you did not care if the government takes land even if it >> cannot show a need or value to it. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally >> >> You denied this even though it is true, then minimized it when you >> realized your denial was ignorant. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same >> level Republicans did last year >> >> Do not even recall your answer on this. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has >> been emergent... and is thus a lie >> >> You claimed that there was something that did, but named nothing relevant. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, >> such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico >> and California. Trump has withheld funds for these >> >> You noted that the America First claim is a lie. > >Patrick had no response. > >> >> * We have an immigration system that can make people wait >> decades to get visas, which leads to a black market >> immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period >> would increase the black market for guns >> >> You showed no understanding of this. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party >> did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. >> >> You showed no understanding of this. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> >> You then made clams about liberals wanting only one thing... but offered >> no support for your claim. > >Patrick had no response. >> >> You really are not good at backing your claims. >> > >Patrick had no response. > Oh look stupid Snit is talking to himself again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 16:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gau61uF6n99U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2584847 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/23/19 3:45 PM, Patrick wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:18:51 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/23/19 11:39 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> nit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Here, claims to prove my point: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * The Democrats back improved physical barriers >>>>>> >>>>>> + So what? >>>>> >>>>> So the claims to the contrary are lies. >>>> >>>> Improved barriers are not what is required. >>>> A wall is what was asked for. >>>> NOT improved barriers. >>> >>> Then why did Trump lie when he said he did not care what you call it? >> >> Are you so stupid that you can't figure it out? > > > >>>> Walls WORK. Look at the great wall of China, the iron curtain, the >>>> Belfast Peace wall, the wall between Israel and 'palestine," the wall >>>> in Hungar, etc. Walls WORK. >>> >>> Notice, NO evidence the wall Trump is pushing for would offer ANY >>> benefit over the walls we have and the Democrats have agreed to improve >>> / extend. >> >> LIAR. >> Pelosi said: "NO WALL." >> https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2019/01/04/pelosi-says-no-wall-while-trump-allies-put-daca-on-the-table-370394 >> >> >>> Not one bit of benefit shown. >>> The wall will simply not do much. >> >> Stops illegal aliens. Stops drugs and human trafficing. >> Are you stupid? >> >> >>> It will not stop people from seeking asylum. >> >> Of course not. >> That is not the purpose of the wall. >> Maybe you are just stupid. >> >> >> >>> It will not stop people from overstaying visas (which is how the >>> majority of people here illegally get here -- legally). >> >> We don't have the time or money to go after the ones who overstay. >> We are spending our money on trying to catch the illegal criminals who >> are killing the people and stealing their things. >> And then the liberal judges turn them back loose. >> >> >>> It will not do much if anything to stop smuggling of people and drugs. >> >> Yes, it will. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >>> It will not stop people from entering by boat or plane or tunnel >> >> Walls don't do that. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >> >>> You gave no reason the opposition party should give him more for his ego >>> than his own party did. >> >> Because it is the adult thing to do. >> >> >> >>> But good of you to note that there is STILL opposition to him from his >>> own party. There should be more. >> >> Loozers who are not acting like adults. >> >> >> >>>> Your stupid counter was that birds couldn't fly over the fence. >>>> You are stupid. Did I mention this yet? >>> >>> You have no counter but to lie about what I said. >> >> Tell me you didn't mention 108 "Species" of birds. >> Tell me. >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >>> You have not shown the wall will help with that in ANY way. No support >>> for your claims. >> >> Are you stupid? >> (That was rhetorical!) >> >> >> >>> Crossing the border is not the way "the large majority of persons now >>> become undocumented," the Center for Migration Studies (CMS) said in a >>> recent report. Two-thirds of those who joined the undocumented >>> population did so by entering with a valid visa and then overstaying >>> their period of admission, the center repored. >> >> We cannot chase the criminals illegally crossing the border AND those >> who overstayed their VISA's. >> >> >> >>> Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, >>> and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries >>> since 2007. >> >> And there are 11 million illegals who crossed the boarder illegally. >> >> >>>> Trump campaign position paper, 2015: Mexico must pay for the wall and, >>>> until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all >>>> remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all >>>> temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary >>>> cancel them); increase fees on all border crossing cards – of which we >>>> issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source >>>> of visa overstays); increase fees on all NAFTA worker visas from >>>> Mexico (another major source of overstays); and increase fees at ports >>>> of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid >>>> cuts are also options]. >>>> >>>> “We’re going to get reimbursed,” Mr. Trump said during a brief >>>> telephone interview. “But I don’t want to wait that long. But you >>>> start, and then you get reimbursed.” >>>> >>>> President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a >>>> wall and have Mexico pay for it “obviously” did not mean getting a >>>> check from the Mexican government directly. >>> >>> Please quote where he said this during the campaign. >> >> No. >> I state it is true. >> You look it up. >> Wait.... >> I forgot you are stupid..... >> I guess I have to lead you to water. >> https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/08/16/donald-trump-releases-immigration-reform-plan-designed-to-get-americans-back-to-work/ >> >> >>>> The wall has value. >>> >>> It has a cost... but no value has been shown. >> >> <Yawn> >> >> >>> I am noting issues related to illegal immigration. Interesting how you >>> claim the facts should lead to hating Trump. >> >> <Yawn> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> You liberals just want one thing... to show that Trump cannot deliver >>>> on all his promises. Do you really think obammy did? >>> >>> Cite? >> >> Obama's broken promises. >> >> Raise the minimum wage and index it to inflation. >> Close the prison at Guantanamo Bay. >> Create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. >> Close special-interest corporate loopholes. >> End the practice of writing legislation behind closed doors. >> Restrict people moving between lobbying and working in the >> administration. >> Convene a bipartisan group of key lawmakers to foster better >> executive-legislative relations on foreign policy. >> Establish a low national carbon-fuel standard. >> Make a sustained push to support Israel and achieve the goal of two >> states — a Jewish state in Israel and a Palestinian state. >> Double federal funding for basic research over 10 years (2009-2018). >> Ensure freedom to unionize and fight for passage of the Employee Free >> Choice Act. >> Create 1 million new manufacturing jobs between 2012 and 2016. >> Double U.S. exports over the next five years (2013-2017). >> End the war in Afghanistan in 2014. >> Lead the world in college graduates by 2020. >> Train 2 million Americans in a community college-business partnership. >> >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/obama-promises/ >> > > > You keep trying to bury / obfuscate the facts. Here they are again (with > some comments: > > * The Democrats back improved physical barriers > > You whined they do not back the term "wall", but Trump has said he does > not care what term is used, and agreed with the terms the Democrats use. > > * Trump and his enablers cannot back that his additional > desires would offer much benefit > > You made unsupported claims of benefits. > > * Trump accepted blame for the shutdown > > You claim he regrets that but offered no support. > > * The Republicans mostly did not even back his request for funding > (hence why he did not get it in past years, and polls back this) > > You noted how not all even back it now. > > * Trump's wall would have bad ecological impacts he ignores > > You had no counter but lied about me saying birds cannot fly over walls. > > * Trump's wall would require using eminent domain to take land > from US citizens > > You noted you did not care if the government takes land even if it > cannot show a need or value to it. > > * Most illegal immigrants do not cross the border illegally > > You denied this even though it is true, then minimized it when you > realized your denial was ignorant. > > * The Democrats are offering to fund border security to the same > level Republicans did last year > > Do not even recall your answer on this. > > * The claim of an "emergency" is not based on anything that has > been emergent... and is thus a lie > > You claimed that there was something that did, but named nothing relevant. > > * We DO have real emergencies which have not been dealt with, > such as water in Flint and disaster relief in Puerto Rico > and California. Trump has withheld funds for these > > You noted that the America First claim is a lie. > > * We have an immigration system that can make people wait > decades to get visas, which leads to a black market > immigration system, much as a 20 year waiting period > would increase the black market for guns > > You showed no understanding of this. > > * The Democrats are offering Trump as much as his own party > did. The idea they refuse to negotiate is a lie. > > You showed no understanding of this. > > > You then made clams about liberals wanting only one thing... but offered > no support for your claim. > > You really are not good at backing your claims. > > Patrick lashed out when it was noted he had no response. He simply has no real point but feels the need to argue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 12:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v6tj4e5mavspfo87n78tgdksa6rvolfamq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2585210 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Patrick lashed out when it was noted he had no response. He simply has no >real point but feels the need to argue. It took you 287 lines to say that? I always back my claims, you idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 23 of 36 — ← Prev page 1 … 21 22 [23] 24 25 … 36 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web