Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2170056 > unrolled thread
| Started by | viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-17 19:24 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-21 09:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 61 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> - 2016-09-17 19:24 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 19:27 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> - 2016-09-18 04:46 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 19:20 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 19:35 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 20:07 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 20:24 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 03:54 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Beam Me Up Scotty <Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainable-self-destructive-and-contradicting@cyberspace.nebulax.com> - 2016-09-17 23:58 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-18 15:10 +1000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 05:49 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-18 16:17 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 16:42 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-19 20:45 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 10:01 +1000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 00:13 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 00:14 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 16:14 +1000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 03:11 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-20 11:59 +1000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 01:11 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 00:18 -0500
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? stunnel bear <stb@be.ar> - 2016-09-20 08:36 -0600
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Beam Me Up Scotty <Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainable-self-destructive-and-contradicting@cyberspace.nebulax.com> - 2016-09-20 12:06 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 07:58 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 10:49 +0100
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-20 12:02 +1000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 02:28 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2016-09-19 21:33 -0500
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? stunnel bear <stb@be.ar> - 2016-09-20 08:37 -0600
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-21 11:59 +1000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2016-09-20 21:15 -0500
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 10:14 +1000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2016-09-21 20:47 -0500
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Beam Me Up Scotty <I'm-Really-Not-Sure@Idiocracy.gov> - 2016-09-22 01:41 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-20 17:58 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Beam Me Up Scotty <Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainable-self-destructive-and-contradicting@cyberspace.nebulax.com> - 2016-09-18 11:43 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 21:26 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 02:55 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 02:53 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 05:31 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 06:11 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 06:21 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 07:13 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 10:29 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 18:15 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 11:32 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 19:05 +0000
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 17:15 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 19:25 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-18 06:39 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 06:02 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> - 2016-09-19 20:06 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-09-21 01:27 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? DailyCaller <dailycaller@caller.net> - 2016-09-18 15:09 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? The Religious Right <rright@god.ru> - 2016-09-18 15:24 -0400
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 04:55 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 05:42 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 10:46 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> - 2016-09-21 02:20 -0700
Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 09:44 -0700
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 01:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <nrqgd0$nd1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2170951 |
Le 2016-09-19 à 21:59, Alex W. a écrit : > On 19/09/2016 17:11, Olrik wrote: >> Le 2016-09-19 à 02:14, Alex W. a écrit : >>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote: >>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit : >>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big time, >>>>>>>>> folk!!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, that >>>>>>>> wouldn't >>>>>>>> have happened. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> People kill people. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with me >>>>>> wherever >>>>>> I go. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's the second amendment.... >>>> >>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment? >>>> >>> >>> I would not. >>> >>> That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on the >>> side of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible to me >>> that a citizen may not defend himself and his home against intruders >>> without being arrested and charged for this "crime". >> >> Is it your contention that everybody should have the right to own a >> firearm, regardless of any "constitutional" (or just law) regards, bear >> it in public and display it? >> > > Given proper safeguards, regulations and education, Yeah! Utopia! > I see no problem > with that. Criminals should not be allowed to own firearms, of course. :-D You do realize that pretty much every criminal already has a gun, yes? > Proper storage and training should be a prerequisite for a licence. But > given all that, why should a person not be allowed to own a firearm? Because people are stupid, violent and illiterate. I *do* prefer to have some criminals owning guns to have millions of hillbillies, crossbreeding halfwits carrying guns, UZIs and AK-47s to the mall. -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 00:18 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <nrqgqb$oag$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2171027 |
"Olrik" <olrik666@gmail.com> wrote in message news:nrqgd0$nd1$1@dont-email.me... > Le 2016-09-19 à 21:59, Alex W. a écrit : >> On 19/09/2016 17:11, Olrik wrote: >>> Le 2016-09-19 à 02:14, Alex W. a écrit : >>>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote: >>>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit : >>>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big time, >>>>>>>>>> folk!!! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, that >>>>>>>>> wouldn't >>>>>>>>> have happened. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> People kill people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with me >>>>>>> wherever >>>>>>> I go. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's the second amendment.... >>>>> >>>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I would not. >>>> >>>> That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on the >>>> side of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible to me >>>> that a citizen may not defend himself and his home against intruders >>>> without being arrested and charged for this "crime". >>> >>> Is it your contention that everybody should have the right to own a >>> firearm, regardless of any "constitutional" (or just law) regards, bear >>> it in public and display it? >>> >> >> Given proper safeguards, regulations and education, > > Yeah! Utopia! > >> I see no problem >> with that. Criminals should not be allowed to own firearms, of course. > > :-D > > You do realize that pretty much every criminal already has a gun, yes? > >> Proper storage and training should be a prerequisite for a licence. But >> given all that, why should a person not be allowed to own a firearm? > > Because people are stupid, violent and illiterate. > > I *do* prefer to have some criminals owning guns to have millions of > hillbillies, crossbreeding halfwits carrying guns, UZIs and AK-47s to the > mall. That's because you are a homo....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | stunnel bear <stb@be.ar> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 08:36 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <nrrhgg$3ds$15@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #2171027 |
On 9/19/2016 11:11 PM, Olrik wrote: > I *do* prefer to have some criminals owning guns to have millions of > hillbillies That is because you are an utter MORON!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Beam Me Up Scotty <Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainable-self-destructive-and-contradicting@cyberspace.nebulax.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 12:06 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <W7dEz.58400$e%3.13249@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #2171164 |
On 09/20/2016 10:36 AM, stunnel bear wrote:
> On 9/19/2016 11:11 PM, Olrik wrote:
>> I *do* prefer to have some criminals owning guns to have millions of
>> hillbillies
>
> That is because you are an utter MORON!
Liberals are so smart and elitist that they don't want to get dirty
shaking hands with working people and kissing those Hillbilly babies.
--
That's Karma
*Rumination*
38 - The problem with the global warming theory is that "a theory is
like a bowl of ice-cream" it only takes a little dab of bullshit to ruin
the whole thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 07:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco-gmail.com@news.easynews.com> |
| In reply to | #2170624 |
"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote: >> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit : >>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big time, >>>>>>> folk!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! >>>>>> >>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, that >>>>>> wouldn't >>>>>> have happened. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bombs don't kill people. >>>>> >>>>> People kill people. >>>> >>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with me >>>> wherever >>>> I go. >>>> >>> >>> It's the second amendment.... >> >> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment? >> > > I would not. > > That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on the side > of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible to me that a > citizen may not defend himself and his home against intruders without > being arrested and charged for this "crime". Is that what happens in the UK?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 10:49 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <EOueGVAfS73XFwvb@hotmail.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #2170639 |
In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco- gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> writes >"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote: >>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit : >>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big time, >>>>>>>> folk!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, that >>>>>>> wouldn't >>>>>>> have happened. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bombs don't kill people. >>>>>> >>>>>> People kill people. >>>>> >>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with me >>>>> wherever >>>>> I go. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's the second amendment.... >>> >>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment? There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no constitutional amendments. >>> >> >> I would not. >> >> That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on the side >> of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible to me that a >> citizen may not defend himself and his home against intruders without >> being arrested and charged for this "crime". > >Is that what happens in the UK? People are allowed to use "reasonable force" in self defence (in England and Wales - the situation in Scotland and in Northern Ireland may differ) -- John Ritson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 12:02 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <e4bjmeFgj1dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2170677 |
On 19/09/2016 19:49, John Ritson wrote: > In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco- > gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> writes >> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote: >>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit : >>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big time, >>>>>>>>> folk!!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, that >>>>>>>> wouldn't >>>>>>>> have happened. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> People kill people. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with me >>>>>> wherever >>>>>> I go. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's the second amendment.... >>>> >>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment? > > There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no constitutional > amendments. Or rather, we have odd bits of law that mysteriously morph into additions to our unwritten constitution. > >>>> >>> >>> I would not. >>> >>> That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on the side >>> of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible to me that a >>> citizen may not defend himself and his home against intruders without >>> being arrested and charged for this "crime". >> >> Is that what happens in the UK? > > People are allowed to use "reasonable force" in self defence (in England > and Wales - the situation in Scotland and in Northern Ireland may > differ) > And "reasonable force" is interpreted very differently from one court and police force to another. If you keep a cricket bat by your bedside to defend yourself against an intruder, it is quite possible that you may be charged with aggravated assault should you use it against a burglar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 02:28 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <1646091620496031187.687344sam.m.tedesco-gmail.com@news.easynews.com> |
| In reply to | #2170955 |
"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 19/09/2016 19:49, John Ritson wrote: >> In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco- >> gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> writes >>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote: >>>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit : >>>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big time, >>>>>>>>>> folk!!! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, that >>>>>>>>> wouldn't >>>>>>>>> have happened. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> People kill people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with me >>>>>>> wherever >>>>>>> I go. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's the second amendment.... >>>>> >>>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment? >> >> There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no constitutional >> amendments. > > Or rather, we have odd bits of law that mysteriously morph into additions > to our unwritten constitution. > > >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I would not. >>>> >>>> That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on the side >>>> of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible to me that a >>>> citizen may not defend himself and his home against intruders without >>>> being arrested and charged for this "crime". >>> >>> Is that what happens in the UK? >> >> People are allowed to use "reasonable force" in self defence (in England >> and Wales - the situation in Scotland and in Northern Ireland may >> differ) >> > > And "reasonable force" is interpreted very differently from one court and > police force to another. If you keep a cricket bat by your bedside to > defend yourself against an intruder, it is quite possible that you may be > charged with aggravated assault should you use it against a burglar. That really is screwed up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 21:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <XnsA688DA18A77EAnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2170955 |
"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
news:e4bjmeFgj1dU1@mid.individual.net:
> On 19/09/2016 19:49, John Ritson wrote:
>> In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco-
>> gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com>
>> writes
>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote:
>>>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big
>>>>>>>>>> time, folk!!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal,
>>>>>>>>> that wouldn't
>>>>>>>>> have happened.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People kill people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with
>>>>>>> me wherever
>>>>>>> I go.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's the second amendment....
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment?
>>
>> There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no
>> constitutional amendments.
>
> Or rather, we have odd bits of law that mysteriously morph into
> additions to our unwritten constitution.
>
And no Supreme Court to nix laws that
violate said constitution.
>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would not.
>>>>
>>>> That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on
>>>> the side of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible
>>>> to me that a citizen may not defend himself and his home against
>>>> intruders without being arrested and charged for this "crime".
>>>
>>> Is that what happens in the UK?
>>
>> People are allowed to use "reasonable force" in self defence (in
>> England and Wales - the situation in Scotland and in Northern Ireland
>> may differ)
>>
>
> And "reasonable force" is interpreted very differently from one court
> and police force to another. If you keep a cricket bat by your
> bedside to defend yourself against an intruder, it is quite possible
> that you may be charged with aggravated assault should you use it
> against a burglar.
Maybe you can plead it down to an ASBO.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | stunnel bear <stb@be.ar> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 08:37 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <nrrhjm$3ds$16@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #2170970 |
On 9/19/2016 8:33 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote: > Maybe you can plead it down to an ASBO. > STFU, twink.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-21 11:59 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <e4e7rcF5ev0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2170970 |
On 20/09/2016 12:33, Mitchell Holman wrote: > "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in > news:e4bjmeFgj1dU1@mid.individual.net: > >> On 19/09/2016 19:49, John Ritson wrote: >>> In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco- >>> gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> >>> writes >>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote: >>>>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit : >>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big >>>>>>>>>>> time, folk!!! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, >>>>>>>>>> that wouldn't >>>>>>>>>> have happened. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> People kill people. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with >>>>>>>> me wherever >>>>>>>> I go. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's the second amendment.... >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment? >>> >>> There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no >>> constitutional amendments. >> >> Or rather, we have odd bits of law that mysteriously morph into >> additions to our unwritten constitution. >> > > And no Supreme Court to nix laws that > violate said constitution. No Supreme Court per se, no. But then, we have managed really quite well with our system for a very long time now, so the absence of a final judicial arbiter does not appear to be a fatal flaw. > > >> >>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I would not. >>>>> >>>>> That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on >>>>> the side of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible >>>>> to me that a citizen may not defend himself and his home against >>>>> intruders without being arrested and charged for this "crime". >>>> >>>> Is that what happens in the UK? >>> >>> People are allowed to use "reasonable force" in self defence (in >>> England and Wales - the situation in Scotland and in Northern Ireland >>> may differ) >>> >> >> And "reasonable force" is interpreted very differently from one court >> and police force to another. If you keep a cricket bat by your >> bedside to defend yourself against an intruder, it is quite possible >> that you may be charged with aggravated assault should you use it >> against a burglar. > > > Maybe you can plead it down to an ASBO. > LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 21:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <XnsA689D7238CD1Enoemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2171445 |
"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:e4e7rcF5ev0U1
@mid.individual.net:
> On 20/09/2016 12:33, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
>> news:e4bjmeFgj1dU1@mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> On 19/09/2016 19:49, John Ritson wrote:
>>>> In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco-
>>>> gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com>
>>>> writes
>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big
>>>>>>>>>>>> time, folk!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal,
>>>>>>>>>>> that wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>> have happened.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> People kill people.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with
>>>>>>>>> me wherever
>>>>>>>>> I go.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's the second amendment....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment?
>>>>
>>>> There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no
>>>> constitutional amendments.
>>>
>>> Or rather, we have odd bits of law that mysteriously morph into
>>> additions to our unwritten constitution.
>>>
>>
>> And no Supreme Court to nix laws that
>> violate said constitution.
>
> No Supreme Court per se, no.
>
> But then, we have managed really quite well with our system for a very
> long time now, so the absence of a final judicial arbiter does not
> appear to be a fatal flaw.
>
I rather like the idea that even parliament
has to obey the law. Otherwise a "tyranny of the
majority" is possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not to say that our firearms legislation has not erred on
>>>>>> the side of panicky knee-jerk prohibition. It is incomprehensible
>>>>>> to me that a citizen may not defend himself and his home against
>>>>>> intruders without being arrested and charged for this "crime".
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that what happens in the UK?
>>>>
>>>> People are allowed to use "reasonable force" in self defence (in
>>>> England and Wales - the situation in Scotland and in Northern
Ireland
>>>> may differ)
>>>>
>>>
>>> And "reasonable force" is interpreted very differently from one court
>>> and police force to another. If you keep a cricket bat by your
>>> bedside to defend yourself against an intruder, it is quite possible
>>> that you may be charged with aggravated assault should you use it
>>> against a burglar.
>>
>>
>> Maybe you can plead it down to an ASBO.
>>
>
> LOL
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 10:14 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <e4gm44FnbtsU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2171454 |
On 21/09/2016 12:15, Mitchell Holman wrote: > "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:e4e7rcF5ev0U1 > @mid.individual.net: > >> On 20/09/2016 12:33, Mitchell Holman wrote: >>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in >>> news:e4bjmeFgj1dU1@mid.individual.net: >>> >>>> On 19/09/2016 19:49, John Ritson wrote: >>>>> In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco- >>>>> gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> >>>>> writes >>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote: >>>>>>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit : >>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, folk!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, >>>>>>>>>>>> that wouldn't >>>>>>>>>>>> have happened. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> People kill people. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around with >>>>>>>>>> me wherever >>>>>>>>>> I go. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's the second amendment.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment? >>>>> >>>>> There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no >>>>> constitutional amendments. >>>> >>>> Or rather, we have odd bits of law that mysteriously morph into >>>> additions to our unwritten constitution. >>>> >>> >>> And no Supreme Court to nix laws that >>> violate said constitution. >> >> No Supreme Court per se, no. >> >> But then, we have managed really quite well with our system for a very >> long time now, so the absence of a final judicial arbiter does not >> appear to be a fatal flaw. >> > > > I rather like the idea that even parliament > has to obey the law. Otherwise a "tyranny of the > majority" is possible. Arguably, we are close to that state of affairs now. Our politicians and governments are so addicted to opinion polls that they frequently twist and turn like weather-vanes depending on what the vox populi seems to indicate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-21 20:47 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <XnsA68AD2629686noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2171891 |
"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:e4gm44FnbtsU2
@mid.individual.net:
> On 21/09/2016 12:15, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:e4e7rcF5ev0U1
>> @mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> On 20/09/2016 12:33, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
>>>> news:e4bjmeFgj1dU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/09/2016 19:49, John Ritson wrote:
>>>>>> In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco-
>>>>>> gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com>
>>>>>> writes
>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here
big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, folk!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have happened.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> People kill people.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around
with
>>>>>>>>>>> me wherever
>>>>>>>>>>> I go.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's the second amendment....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no
>>>>>> constitutional amendments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or rather, we have odd bits of law that mysteriously morph into
>>>>> additions to our unwritten constitution.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And no Supreme Court to nix laws that
>>>> violate said constitution.
>>>
>>> No Supreme Court per se, no.
>>>
>>> But then, we have managed really quite well with our system for a
very
>>> long time now, so the absence of a final judicial arbiter does not
>>> appear to be a fatal flaw.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I rather like the idea that even parliament
>> has to obey the law. Otherwise a "tyranny of the
>> majority" is possible.
>
> Arguably, we are close to that state of affairs now. Our politicians
> and governments are so addicted to opinion polls that they frequently
> twist and turn like weather-vanes depending on what the vox populi
seems
> to indicate.
>
Growing up in the South I witnessed how
the Supreme Court led the way in establishing
and protecting minority rights that were VERY
unpopular with the public but were the right
thing to do. Rights which would not exist even
today it if were left up to elected politicians
and voters.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Beam Me Up Scotty <I'm-Really-Not-Sure@Idiocracy.gov> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 01:41 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <uaKEz.162$6T6.73@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #2171929 |
On 09/21/2016 09:47 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:e4gm44FnbtsU2
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>> On 21/09/2016 12:15, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:e4e7rcF5ev0U1
>>> @mid.individual.net:
>>>
>>>> On 20/09/2016 12:33, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>> news:e4bjmeFgj1dU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19/09/2016 19:49, John Ritson wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <610163670495964091.218980sam.m.tedesco-
>>>>>>> gmail.com@news.easynews.com>, Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> writes
>>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 19/09/2016 14:14, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Le 2016-09-18 à 20:01, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 15:49, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here
> big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, folk!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have happened.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bombs don't kill people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> People kill people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. Oh. In that case, I'll buy a few and carry one around
> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> me wherever
>>>>>>>>>>>> I go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's the second amendment....
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would you like the UK constitution to have such an amendment?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no written UK constitution, hence there are no
>>>>>>> constitutional amendments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or rather, we have odd bits of law that mysteriously morph into
>>>>>> additions to our unwritten constitution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And no Supreme Court to nix laws that
>>>>> violate said constitution.
>>>>
>>>> No Supreme Court per se, no.
>>>>
>>>> But then, we have managed really quite well with our system for a
> very
>>>> long time now, so the absence of a final judicial arbiter does not
>>>> appear to be a fatal flaw.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I rather like the idea that even parliament
>>> has to obey the law. Otherwise a "tyranny of the
>>> majority" is possible.
>>
>> Arguably, we are close to that state of affairs now. Our politicians
>> and governments are so addicted to opinion polls that they frequently
>> twist and turn like weather-vanes depending on what the vox populi
> seems
>> to indicate.
>>
>
>
> Growing up in the South I witnessed how
> the Supreme Court led the way in establishing
> and protecting minority rights
Rights are rights NO matter who's they are...
There is NO such thing as minority rights.
And Republican President Eisenhower called in the National guard. That
wasn't the Supreme Court that did that.
> that were VERY
> unpopular with the public but were the right
> thing to do.
"unpopular" to treat people equally? But then again you might ask if
public schools improved from it and oddly enough you might ask if
private schools have reduced education quality as much as public schools.
The minority of the elite Liberals like Hillary getting special FBI
treatment is "unpopular"? Children being educated is NOT unpopular.
> Rights which would not exist even
> today it if were left up to elected politicians
> and voters.
I might then remind you that the Supreme Court upheld slavery as
constitutional, and it took WE THE PEOPLE to rise up and fight in a war
that resulted in the slaves being freed, after which the people passed
an amendment to the constitution banning slavery in the U.S.
jurisdiction. The Supreme court seems to be late to the party.
--
That's Karma
*Rumination*
3 - Liberals actions are easy to predict. They're those of a
Conservative after you take away all reason and responsibility.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 17:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <2s83ublrhuoqarvtcrrjsumc7i34c6im59@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2170955 |
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:02:51 +1000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>> People are allowed to use "reasonable force" in self defence (in England
>> and Wales - the situation in Scotland and in Northern Ireland may
>> differ)
>>
>
>And "reasonable force" is interpreted very differently from one court
>and police force to another. If you keep a cricket bat by your bedside
>to defend yourself against an intruder, it is quite possible that you
>may be charged with aggravated assault should you use it against a
>burglar.
Over here you have to have a throw-down weapon to put in the late
burglar's hand: then you're golden.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Beam Me Up Scotty <Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainable-self-destructive-and-contradicting@cyberspace.nebulax.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 11:43 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING!!! Did The Bombing In NYC Just Make Trump President??? |
| Message-ID | <nCyDz.8537$xS2.8397@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #2170113 |
On 09/18/2016 01:10 AM, Alex W. wrote:
> On 18/09/2016 13:54, Ted&Alice wrote:
>> viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote:
>>> And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big time,
>>> folk!!!
>>>
>>> Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary!
>>
>> We need stricter bomb control laws. If bombs were illegal, that wouldn't
>> have happened.
>>
>
> Bombs don't kill people.
>
> People kill people.
Register the bombs and do background checks on the owners...
Or we could be as strict with immigration as we are with Background
checks to get guns...
--
That's Karma ;)
*Rumination*
“I would hope that a wise *Latina woman* with the richness of her
experiences would more often than not reach a *better conclusion* than a
*white male* who hasn’t lived that life,” -Sonya Sotomayor-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 21:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c057672f-643f-4afb-b972-f1f77327002d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2170056 |
Second device is a pressure cooker. There is no defense, we have to go on offense and there's only one hope for that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hhyapster@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 02:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c7de4129-ede4-4d6a-83ac-52dee0800857@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2170105 |
On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 12:26:34 PM UTC+8, Kurt wrote: > Second device is a pressure cooker. > > There is no defense, we have to go on offense and there's only one hope for that. Ya, by kicking Trump ass hard....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hhyapster@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 02:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6a72941e-781f-42eb-b52b-da29c16c9546@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2170056 |
On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 10:24:28 AM UTC+8, viva padrepio wrote: > And New Jersey! And Virginia! The terrorists are here big time, folk!!! > > Thanks Obama! Thanks Crooked Hillary! Oh, Hillary is much more effective than Trumpidiot in tackling terrorism. GOP knows nothing about terrorism except dogmatic religion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web