Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2120160 > unrolled thread

Re: Noah's Ark has been found

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 06:42 -0700
    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 10:13 -0700
      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 05:57 -0700
    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 11:45 -0700
      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-05 14:27 -0500
        Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 15:34 -0700
        Re: Noah's Ark has been found "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 09:46 +1000
      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-05 15:33 -0700
    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-05 21:02 -0700
      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 05:59 -0700

#2120160 — Re: Noah's Ark has been found

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 12:07:24 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote:
> Science will prove Noah's Ark.

"Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood, and therefore there was no arc. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH YOU PEOPLE? The story makes no sense. Noah was allegedly 600 years old. Do you believe that, too? How can you? How can any mature adult read this nonsense and take any stock in it at all?  Why don't you grow up?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120256

Science has never proved anything. It's the THEORY of General Relativity and the Quantum THEORY, not the PROOF of General Relativity or the Quantum Proof.

It's not a damn religion, you only worship it because you are totally ignorant of it.

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM UTC-4, Wexford Eire wrote:
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 12:07:24 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote:
> > Science will prove Noah's Ark.
> 
> "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood, and therefore there was no arc. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH YOU PEOPLE? The story makes no sense. Noah was allegedly 600 years old. Do you believe that, too? How can you? How can any mature adult read this nonsense and take any stock in it at all?  Why don't you grow up?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120787

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 1:13:30 PM UTC-4, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> Science has never proved anything. It's the THEORY of General Relativity and the Quantum THEORY, not the PROOF of General Relativity or the Quantum Proof.

OK, moron Kurt, then by your logic planes don't fly, internal combustion engines are a myth, your computer is a dream, the periodic table is meaningless construct, and viruses don't cause disease. 

> 
> It's not a damn religion, you only worship it because you are totally ignorant of it.
> 
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM UTC-4, Wexford Eire wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 12:07:24 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote:
> > > Science will prove Noah's Ark.
> > 
> > "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood, and therefore there was no arc. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH YOU PEOPLE? The story makes no sense. Noah was allegedly 600 years old. Do you believe that, too? How can you? How can any mature adult read this nonsense and take any stock in it at all?  Why don't you grow up?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120308

On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 06:42:23 -0700, Wexford Eire wrote:

> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 12:07:24 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote:
>> Science will prove Noah's Ark.
> 
> "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood, and
> therefore there was no arc. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH
> YOU PEOPLE? The story makes no sense. Noah was allegedly 600 years old.
> Do you believe that, too? How can you? How can any mature adult read
> this nonsense and take any stock in it at all?  Why don't you grow up?

The flood couldn't have happened - insufficient water.

If there were sufficient water, it couldn't have happened anyway - too 
much heat.

If the heat were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - boats that 
big, made of wood, cannot withstand the forces of being asea.

If those forces were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way 
to collect all the animals.

If the animals were collected, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way 
to house, feed and clean up after the animals.

If the housing, feeding and cleaning were dealt with, it couldn't have 
happened anyway - the carnivores would kill off the others almost 
instantly after landing.

If the carnivore issue were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened - 
no way to clean up the silt-laden, salty, brackish lands and waters fast 
enough for things to live in and on them.

If that were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened, because the old 
fuck doing it was 600 and limited to tools just out of the stone age, 
where one Ken Ham in his infinite stupidity has demonstrated that even 
with modern power equipment and millions of dollars and essentially 
unlimited labour, it's a damn big job to build a boat that scale 
*without* needing it to float and house umpteen billion critters and 
their food.

The fact that putative adults can actually believe such a story is 
probably the single greatest indictment of the educational systems we 
have in place.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120323

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:45:55 -0700, Kelsey Bjarnason
<kbjarnason@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 06:42:23 -0700, Wexford Eire wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 12:07:24 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote:
>>> Science will prove Noah's Ark.
>> 
>> "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood, and
>> therefore there was no arc. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH
>> YOU PEOPLE? The story makes no sense. Noah was allegedly 600 years old.
>> Do you believe that, too? How can you? How can any mature adult read
>> this nonsense and take any stock in it at all?  Why don't you grow up?
>
>The flood couldn't have happened - insufficient water.
>
>If there were sufficient water, it couldn't have happened anyway - too 
>much heat.
>
>If the heat were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - boats that 
>big, made of wood, cannot withstand the forces of being asea.
>
>If those forces were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way 
>to collect all the animals.
>
>If the animals were collected, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way 
>to house, feed and clean up after the animals.
>
>If the housing, feeding and cleaning were dealt with, it couldn't have 
>happened anyway - the carnivores would kill off the others almost 
>instantly after landing.
>
>If the carnivore issue were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened - 
>no way to clean up the silt-laden, salty, brackish lands and waters fast 
>enough for things to live in and on them.
>
>If that were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened, because the old 
>fuck doing it was 600 and limited to tools just out of the stone age, 
>where one Ken Ham in his infinite stupidity has demonstrated that even 
>with modern power equipment and millions of dollars and essentially 
>unlimited labour, it's a damn big job to build a boat that scale 
>*without* needing it to float and house umpteen billion critters and 
>their food.
>
>The fact that putative adults can actually believe such a story is 
>probably the single greatest indictment of the educational systems we 
>have in place.

In Britain and Europe, anybody who tells the world they believe that
nonsense, gets laughed at and publicly treated as an idiot.

But for some reason, you're not supposed to do that in the USA.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120476

On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 14:27:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee wrote:

> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:45:55 -0700, Kelsey Bjarnason
> <kbjarnason@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 06:42:23 -0700, Wexford Eire wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 12:07:24 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote:
>>>> Science will prove Noah's Ark.
>>> 
>>> "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood, and
>>> therefore there was no arc. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER
>>> WITH YOU PEOPLE? The story makes no sense. Noah was allegedly 600
>>> years old.
>>> Do you believe that, too? How can you? How can any mature adult read
>>> this nonsense and take any stock in it at all?  Why don't you grow up?
>>
>>The flood couldn't have happened - insufficient water.
>>
>>If there were sufficient water, it couldn't have happened anyway - too
>>much heat.
>>
>>If the heat were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - boats that
>>big, made of wood, cannot withstand the forces of being asea.
>>
>>If those forces were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way
>>to collect all the animals.
>>
>>If the animals were collected, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way
>>to house, feed and clean up after the animals.
>>
>>If the housing, feeding and cleaning were dealt with, it couldn't have
>>happened anyway - the carnivores would kill off the others almost
>>instantly after landing.
>>
>>If the carnivore issue were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened
>>-
>>no way to clean up the silt-laden, salty, brackish lands and waters fast
>>enough for things to live in and on them.
>>
>>If that were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened, because the
>>old fuck doing it was 600 and limited to tools just out of the stone
>>age, where one Ken Ham in his infinite stupidity has demonstrated that
>>even with modern power equipment and millions of dollars and essentially
>>unlimited labour, it's a damn big job to build a boat that scale
>>*without* needing it to float and house umpteen billion critters and
>>their food.
>>
>>The fact that putative adults can actually believe such a story is
>>probably the single greatest indictment of the educational systems we
>>have in place.
> 
> In Britain and Europe, anybody who tells the world they believe that
> nonsense, gets laughed at and publicly treated as an idiot.
> 
> But for some reason, you're not supposed to do that in the USA.

Don't look at me, I'm a colonial.  We think they're complete freaking 
loons on this issue.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120525 — Re: Noah's Ark has been found

On 06/06/2016 05:27, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:45:55 -0700, Kelsey Bjarnason
> <kbjarnason@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 06:42:23 -0700, Wexford Eire wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 12:07:24 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote:
>>>> Science will prove Noah's Ark.
>>>
>>> "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood, and
>>> therefore there was no arc. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH
>>> YOU PEOPLE? The story makes no sense. Noah was allegedly 600 years old.
>>> Do you believe that, too? How can you? How can any mature adult read
>>> this nonsense and take any stock in it at all?  Why don't you grow up?
>>
>> The flood couldn't have happened - insufficient water.
>>
>> If there were sufficient water, it couldn't have happened anyway - too
>> much heat.
>>
>> If the heat were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - boats that
>> big, made of wood, cannot withstand the forces of being asea.
>>
>> If those forces were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way
>> to collect all the animals.
>>
>> If the animals were collected, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way
>> to house, feed and clean up after the animals.
>>
>> If the housing, feeding and cleaning were dealt with, it couldn't have
>> happened anyway - the carnivores would kill off the others almost
>> instantly after landing.
>>
>> If the carnivore issue were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened -
>> no way to clean up the silt-laden, salty, brackish lands and waters fast
>> enough for things to live in and on them.
>>
>> If that were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened, because the old
>> fuck doing it was 600 and limited to tools just out of the stone age,
>> where one Ken Ham in his infinite stupidity has demonstrated that even
>> with modern power equipment and millions of dollars and essentially
>> unlimited labour, it's a damn big job to build a boat that scale
>> *without* needing it to float and house umpteen billion critters and
>> their food.
>>
>> The fact that putative adults can actually believe such a story is
>> probably the single greatest indictment of the educational systems we
>> have in place.
>
> In Britain and Europe, anybody who tells the world they believe that
> nonsense, gets laughed at and publicly treated as an idiot.
>
> But for some reason, you're not supposed to do that in the USA.
>

There's a bloke building an ark in the Netherlands.

Last I heard, it had turned into a tourist attraction.

http://www.today.com/news/life-size-noahs-ark-replica-draws-tourists-netherlands-2D79452166

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120457

In article <3k8e2d-vko.ln1@spanky.localhost.net>,
 Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 06:42:23 -0700, Wexford Eire wrote:
> 
> > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 12:07:24 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote:
> >> Science will prove Noah's Ark.
> > 
> > "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood, and
> > therefore there was no arc. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH
> > YOU PEOPLE? The story makes no sense. Noah was allegedly 600 years old.
> > Do you believe that, too? How can you? How can any mature adult read
> > this nonsense and take any stock in it at all?  Why don't you grow up?
> 
> The flood couldn't have happened - insufficient water.
> 
> If there were sufficient water, it couldn't have happened anyway - too 
> much heat.
> 
> If the heat were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - boats that 
> big, made of wood, cannot withstand the forces of being asea.
> 
> If those forces were overcome, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way 
> to collect all the animals.
> 
> If the animals were collected, it couldn't have happened anyway - no way 
> to house, feed and clean up after the animals.
> 
> If the housing, feeding and cleaning were dealt with, it couldn't have 
> happened anyway - the carnivores would kill off the others almost 
> instantly after landing.
> 
> If the carnivore issue were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened - 
> no way to clean up the silt-laden, salty, brackish lands and waters fast 
> enough for things to live in and on them.

Not to mention the bare rock where the 31 feet of rain falling every 
single hour for 40 days and 40 nights completely stripped all soil away.



> If that were sorted out, it still couldn't have happened, because the old 
> fuck doing it was 600 and limited to tools just out of the stone age, 
> where one Ken Ham in his infinite stupidity has demonstrated that even 
> with modern power equipment and millions of dollars and essentially 
> unlimited labour, it's a damn big job to build a boat that scale 
> *without* needing it to float and house umpteen billion critters and 
> their food.
> 
> The fact that putative adults can actually believe such a story is 
> probably the single greatest indictment of the educational systems we 
> have in place.

-- 

JD

Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
up a God superior to themselves. Most 
Gods have the manners and morals of a 
spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120639

"Wexford Eire" wrote in message news:80027545-c82b-413d-b5fc-b61ad65400ad@googlegroups.com...
 BAR wrote:
> Science will prove Noah's Ark.
-
- "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood,

No.

- and therefore there was no arc.

How could science possibly do such a thing?

> IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH YOU PEOPLE?

Ah, here's the problem. You are obviously tiring to fight against the truth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120788

On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 12:02:51 AM UTC-4, Andrew wrote:
> "Wexford Eire" wrote in message news:80027545-c82b-413d-b5fc-b61ad65400ad@googlegroups.com...
>  BAR wrote:
> > Science will prove Noah's Ark.
> -
> - "Science" has already proven that there was no universal flood,
> 
> No.

Yes.

> 
> - and therefore there was no arc.
> 
> How could science possibly do such a thing?

The ravages of the flood would appear everywhere. They don't. 

> > IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH YOU PEOPLE?
> 
> Ah, here's the problem. You are obviously tiring to fight against the truth.

Ah, here's the problem, I'm trying to engage in a rational discussion with people suffering from self-induced stupidity. 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web