Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2120090 > unrolled thread

Re: Noah's Ark has been found

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-05 04:30 -0700
    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-06-05 04:44 -0700
    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 04:47 -0700
      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-06-05 05:12 -0700
        Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 09:54 -0700
          Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 11:02 -0700
            Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 18:53 -0700
            Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:24 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:35 -0700
                Re: Noah's Ark  has been found hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-06-06 19:14 -0700
                  Re: Noah's Ark  has been found "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 19:25 -0700
                  Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 23:42 -0700
                    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-06-07 18:41 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 20:54 -0700
            Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 15:29 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark has been found "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-08 09:18 +1000
          Re: Noah's Ark  has been found hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-06-05 19:09 -0700
            Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 19:20 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 05:17 -0700
                Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 07:39 -0700
                  Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:13 -0700
                    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:36 -0700
      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 06:22 -0700
      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 06:40 -0700
        Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 10:00 -0700
          Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 10:10 -0700
          Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 05:35 -0700
            Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 07:42 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:14 -0700
                Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:37 -0700
            Re: Noah's Ark  has been found nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 08:05 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 08:37 -0700
      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found harry k <turnkey@q.com> - 2016-06-05 09:58 -0700
        Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 10:24 -0700
          Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-05 18:33 +0000
          Re: Noah's Ark  has been found hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-06-05 19:23 -0700
            Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 19:30 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark  has been found hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-06-06 00:16 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 16:13 -0700
                Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 23:39 -0700
                  Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 06:25 -0700
                    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 06:40 -0700
                    Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 19:46 -0700
                      Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 16:23 -0700
                  Re: Noah's Ark has been found Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-07 20:30 +0000
                    Re: Noah's Ark has been found "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-08 09:23 +1000
          Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 05:51 -0700
            Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 07:44 -0700
              Re: Noah's Ark  has been found Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:17 -0700
        Re: Noah's Ark  has been found "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-05 21:02 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#2120090 — Re: Noah's Ark has been found

In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
 BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:

> Science will prove Noah's Ark.  

How will it do that?

-- 

JD

Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
up a God superior to themselves. Most 
Gods have the manners and morals of a 
spoiled child.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120102

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:30:11 PM UTC+8, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
>  BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Science will prove Noah's Ark.  
> 
> How will it do that?

They can find some mini ones, the Noah Ark's great grand children.
> 
> -- 
> 
> JD
> 
> Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
> up a God superior to themselves. Most 
> Gods have the manners and morals of a 
> spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120106

Well, for starters it proves you can build it and that it would hold all the animals. 

Of course, but surprising how many atheists can't do that elementary arithmetic.

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:30:11 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
>  BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Science will prove Noah's Ark.  
> 
> How will it do that?
> 
> -- 
> 
> JD
> 
> Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
> up a God superior to themselves. Most 
> Gods have the manners and morals of a 
> spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120140

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:47:45 PM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> Well, for starters it proves you can build it and that it would hold all the animals. 

Cunt, for a starter, where did the huge amount of water come from?????
And why a worldwide flood to kill all human, because your proto=pixie was evil??????
> 
> Of course, but surprising how many atheists can't do that elementary arithmetic.
> 
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:30:11 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
> >  BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Science will prove Noah's Ark.  
> > 
> > How will it do that?
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > JD
> > 
> > Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
> > up a God superior to themselves. Most 
> > Gods have the manners and morals of a 
> > spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120244

The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A lot of the world is still under water from it.

And there is suffering because in the Tree of Life, all things that can happen, do happen, the happy and the sad. Blessed are the Poor, for in other branches they will win the lottery and find true love that doesn't fade. To chop off all branches with any suffering would be near infinite murder on a hypercosmic scale. 

A small price to pay for eternal life in the Many Worlds, living all your possible lives, always have, always will.

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 8:12:28 AM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:47:45 PM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > Well, for starters it proves you can build it and that it would hold all the animals. 
> 
> Cunt, for a starter, where did the huge amount of water come from?????
> And why a worldwide flood to kill all human, because your proto=pixie was evil??????
> > 
> > Of course, but surprising how many atheists can't do that elementary arithmetic.
> > 
> > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:30:11 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > > In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
> > >  BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Science will prove Noah's Ark.  
> > > 
> > > How will it do that?
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 
> > > JD
> > > 
> > > Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
> > > up a God superior to themselves. Most 
> > > Gods have the manners and morals of a 
> > > spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120276

On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:

> The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
> lot of the world is still under water from it.

http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.

Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood ever 
actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature lower 
than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.

No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just a 
massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical production 
of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.) 

The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age 
where education about the physical universe amounted to little more than 
"there are four elements".

Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should 
we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant 
twaddle, knowing it is wrong?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120572

No, Monkey Brain, the rain falling, and ice melting isn't going to heat the earth to 2000 C. Rain and melting ice doesn't do that. It's the opposite, melting ice cools things down. Glad to help.


On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> 
> > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
> > lot of the world is still under water from it.
> 
> http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
> 
> Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood ever 
> actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature lower 
> than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
> 
> No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just a 
> massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical production 
> of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.) 
> 
> The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age 
> where education about the physical universe amounted to little more than 
> "there are four elements".
> 
> Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should 
> we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant 
> twaddle, knowing it is wrong?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120879

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> 
> > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
> > lot of the world is still under water from it.
> 
> http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
> 
> Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood ever 
> actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature lower 
> than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
> 
> No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just a 
> massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical production 
> of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.) 
> 
> The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age 
> where education about the physical universe amounted to little more than 
> "there are four elements".
> 
> Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should 
> we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant 
> twaddle, knowing it is wrong?

Thanks. That was fascinating and very much appreciated. 

The whole Noah myth is so fantastic, it amazes me that anyone, no matter how intellectually blighted by fundie religion, can give it any credence at all. At first I thought these morons were kidding, but they're not; they actually believe the nonsense. Kurt won't reply to you. He won't ever, ever admit he's wrong and he'll just start another thread hoping no one sees this. I bookmarked the link, though. His latest ploy is to respond hysterically that you can't read Hebrew and don't really understand Genesis 7. I pointed him to an interlinear site that contains the original Hebrew and a literal  translation (which is not hard at all to understand), and he refused to answer.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120890

Jesus says: "If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit."

On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:24:30 PM UTC-4, Wexford Eire wrote:
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > 
> > > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
> > > lot of the world is still under water from it.
> > 
> > http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
> > 
> > Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood ever 
> > actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature lower 
> > than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
> > 
> > No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just a 
> > massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical production 
> > of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.) 
> > 
> > The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age 
> > where education about the physical universe amounted to little more than 
> > "there are four elements".
> > 
> > Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should 
> > we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant 
> > twaddle, knowing it is wrong?
> 
> Thanks. That was fascinating and very much appreciated. 
> 
> The whole Noah myth is so fantastic, it amazes me that anyone, no matter how intellectually blighted by fundie religion, can give it any credence at all. At first I thought these morons were kidding, but they're not; they actually believe the nonsense. Kurt won't reply to you. He won't ever, ever admit he's wrong and he'll just start another thread hoping no one sees this. I bookmarked the link, though. His latest ploy is to respond hysterically that you can't read Hebrew and don't really understand Genesis 7. I pointed him to an interlinear site that contains the original Hebrew and a literal  translation (which is not hard at all to understand), and he refused to answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2121185

On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:35:17 AM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> Jesus says: "If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit."

Of course, all the theists will fall into a pit dug by Jesus!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:24:30 PM UTC-4, Wexford Eire wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> > > On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
> > > > lot of the world is still under water from it.
> > > 
> > > http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
> > > 
> > > Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood ever 
> > > actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature lower 
> > > than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
> > > 
> > > No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just a 
> > > massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical production 
> > > of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.) 
> > > 
> > > The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age 
> > > where education about the physical universe amounted to little more than 
> > > "there are four elements".
> > > 
> > > Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should 
> > > we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant 
> > > twaddle, knowing it is wrong?
> > 
> > Thanks. That was fascinating and very much appreciated. 
> > 
> > The whole Noah myth is so fantastic, it amazes me that anyone, no matter how intellectually blighted by fundie religion, can give it any credence at all. At first I thought these morons were kidding, but they're not; they actually believe the nonsense. Kurt won't reply to you. He won't ever, ever admit he's wrong and he'll just start another thread hoping no one sees this. I bookmarked the link, though. His latest ploy is to respond hysterically that you can't read Hebrew and don't really understand Genesis 7. I pointed him to an interlinear site that contains the original Hebrew and a literal  translation (which is not hard at all to understand), and he refused to answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2121190

hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:35:17 AM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
>> Jesus says: "If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit."
> 
> Of course, all the theists will fall into a pit dug by
> Jesus!!!!!!!!!!!! 
>> 
>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:24:30 PM UTC-4, Wexford Eire wrote:
>>> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice
>>>>> Age. A 
>>>>> lot of the world is still under water from it.
>>>> 
>>>> http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
>>>> 
>>>> Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the
>>>> flood ever 
>>>> actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature
>>>> lower 
>>>> than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
>>>> 
>>>> No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all
>>>> just a 
>>>> massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical
>>>> production 
>>>> of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.)
>>>> 
>>>> The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific
>>>> age 
>>>> where education about the physical universe amounted to little
>>>> more than "there are four elements".
>>>> 
>>>> Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why
>>>> should 
>>>> we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant
>>>> twaddle, knowing it is wrong?
>>> 
>>> Thanks. That was fascinating and very much appreciated.
>>> 
>>> The whole Noah myth is so fantastic, it amazes me that anyone, no
>>> matter how intellectually blighted by fundie religion, can give it
>>> any credence at all. At first I thought these morons were kidding,
>>> but they're not; they actually believe the nonsense. Kurt won't
>>> reply to you. He won't ever, ever admit he's wrong and he'll just
>>> start another thread hoping no one sees this. I bookmarked the
>>> link, though. His latest ploy is to respond hysterically that you
>>> can't read Hebrew and don't really understand Genesis 7. I pointed
>>> him to an interlinear site that contains the original Hebrew and a
>>> literal  translation (which is not hard at all to understand), and
>>> he refused to answer.    

noah's ark was real if it wasn't , 
he would've collected the animals in an F-150     

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2121301

Jesus says: "You see the splinter that is in your brother’s eye, but you do not see the beam that is in your eye. When you remove the beam from your eye, then you will see clearly to remove the splinter from your brother’s eye." 

On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 10:14:29 PM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:35:17 AM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > Jesus says: "If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit."
> 
> Of course, all the theists will fall into a pit dug by Jesus!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > 
> > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:24:30 PM UTC-4, Wexford Eire wrote:
> > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
> > > > > lot of the world is still under water from it.
> > > > 
> > > > http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
> > > > 
> > > > Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood ever 
> > > > actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature lower 
> > > > than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
> > > > 
> > > > No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just a 
> > > > massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical production 
> > > > of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.) 
> > > > 
> > > > The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age 
> > > > where education about the physical universe amounted to little more than 
> > > > "there are four elements".
> > > > 
> > > > Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should 
> > > > we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant 
> > > > twaddle, knowing it is wrong?
> > > 
> > > Thanks. That was fascinating and very much appreciated. 
> > > 
> > > The whole Noah myth is so fantastic, it amazes me that anyone, no matter how intellectually blighted by fundie religion, can give it any credence at all. At first I thought these morons were kidding, but they're not; they actually believe the nonsense. Kurt won't reply to you. He won't ever, ever admit he's wrong and he'll just start another thread hoping no one sees this. I bookmarked the link, though. His latest ploy is to respond hysterically that you can't read Hebrew and don't really understand Genesis 7. I pointed him to an interlinear site that contains the original Hebrew and a literal  translation (which is not hard at all to understand), and he refused to answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2121751

On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 2:42:50 PM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> Jesus says: "You see the splinter that is in your brother’s eye, but you do not see the beam that is in your eye. When you remove the beam from your eye, then you will see clearly to remove the splinter from your brother’s eye." 

An idiot said and the fools listened.....
> 
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 10:14:29 PM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:35:17 AM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > Jesus says: "If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit."
> > 
> > Of course, all the theists will fall into a pit dug by Jesus!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > > 
> > > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:24:30 PM UTC-4, Wexford Eire wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
> > > > > > lot of the world is still under water from it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood ever 
> > > > > actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature lower 
> > > > > than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just a 
> > > > > massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical production 
> > > > > of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.) 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age 
> > > > > where education about the physical universe amounted to little more than 
> > > > > "there are four elements".
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should 
> > > > > we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant 
> > > > > twaddle, knowing it is wrong?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks. That was fascinating and very much appreciated. 
> > > > 
> > > > The whole Noah myth is so fantastic, it amazes me that anyone, no matter how intellectually blighted by fundie religion, can give it any credence at all. At first I thought these morons were kidding, but they're not; they actually believe the nonsense. Kurt won't reply to you. He won't ever, ever admit he's wrong and he'll just start another thread hoping no one sees this. I bookmarked the link, though. His latest ploy is to respond hysterically that you can't read Hebrew and don't really understand Genesis 7. I pointed him to an interlinear site that contains the original Hebrew and a literal  translation (which is not hard at all to understand), and he refused to answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2121221

On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:24:27 -0700, Wexford Eire wrote:

> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
>> 
>> > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
>> > lot of the world is still under water from it.
>> 
>> http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
>> 
>> Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood
>> ever actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature
>> lower than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
>> 
>> No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just
>> a massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical
>> production of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that
>> water.)
>> 
>> The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age
>> where education about the physical universe amounted to little more
>> than "there are four elements".
>> 
>> Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should
>> we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant
>> twaddle, knowing it is wrong?
> 
> Thanks. That was fascinating and very much appreciated.

Thanks go to Marty; he was a wonder in the good old days. :)
> 
> The whole Noah myth is so fantastic, it amazes me that anyone, no matter
> how intellectually blighted by fundie religion, can give it any credence
> at all. 

Religion in general is about on an intellectual par with hunting for 
extraterrestrial intelligence by digging in a sewer.  The fact the folks 
doing it seem to think this is worthwhile just goes to show how effective 
brainwashing can be... any why it is so absolutely crucial for them to be 
able to inflict it upon defenseless kids lacking the critical analysis 
skills to recognize the bullshit being fed to them.

Frankly, it's child abuse, and cruelty.  Given the history of religion, 
though, it's not surprising it still happens, or that people rejoice in 
this sort of vileness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2121668

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> 
> > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A
> > lot of the world is still under water from it.
> 
> http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
> 
> Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the flood ever 
> actually happened as described, nothing with a melting temperature lower 
> than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would have survived.
> 
> No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all just a 
> massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical production 
> of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that water.) 
> 
> The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific age 
> where education about the physical universe amounted to little more than 
> "there are four elements".
> 
> Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why should 
> we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such arrant 
> twaddle, knowing it is wrong?

He doesn't know it's wrong. Kurt thinks it's fair if he can try to gull the rubes by surfing the web for poofs (and ignoring anything contrary to his nonsense) or, more likely, by simply pulling things out of thin air. He seldom, if ever, provides any proof whatsoever for any of his absurd claims. If he's totally thwarted and made to look like the ass he is, he'll simply start a new topic and repeat the same garbage. I find it hard to believe that in the 21st Century there are people with enough education to read and write who actually post the nonsense I see here. I think the theists who post here are (1) lonely, (2) without a mate, (3) un or terribly underemployed, (4) failures in school and in their social lives, and (5) still living in their parents' home. Religion is the easiest damn thing to adopt if you have nothing else. The fundies will take anyone, Jesus loves everyone, even abject failures (wife beaters, drunks, the mean and ignorant, all welcome), and it takes little or no effort to read and "understand" religious tracts. Hell, you don't even have to read. Our religious friends seem to spend one hell of lot more time on youtube than actually reading anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2121697 — Re: Noah's Ark has been found

On 08/06/2016 08:29, Wexford Eire wrote:
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:03:19 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:54:26 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote:
>>
>>> The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice
>>> Age. A lot of the world is still under water from it.
>>
>> http://holysmoke.org/cretins/fludmath.html.
>>
>> Given you probably won't read it, the short version is: if the
>> flood ever actually happened as described, nothing with a melting
>> temperature lower than that of fused quartz, at about 2000 C, would
>> have survived.
>>
>> No trees, no animals, no people, no water, no land, nothing... all
>> just a massive sea of superheated slag, thanks to simple mechanical
>> production of heat via movement of large masses (you know, all that
>> water.)
>>
>> The flood, and everything about it, is fodder for a pre-scientific
>> age where education about the physical universe amounted to little
>> more than "there are four elements".
>>
>> Is that *your* level of understanding of physics?  If it is, why
>> should we take you seriously?  If it isn't, why would you spew such
>> arrant twaddle, knowing it is wrong?
>
> He doesn't know it's wrong. Kurt thinks it's fair if he can try to
> gull the rubes by surfing the web for poofs (and ignoring anything
> contrary to his nonsense)

Ahem ... surfing the web for what?  For who?

Doesn't he have Grindr on his mobile yet?


  or, more likely, by simply pulling things
> out of thin air.

That's only fair -- it's where his god lives, after all.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120583

On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 12:54:30 AM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A lot of the world is still under water from it.

Nonsense, Cunt.
If there was a global warming for all the ice in North and South poles to melt, you would have failed agriculture and all living matters might not survive too.

Also, the water from the ice would not cover the world right to the mountain bottom, let alone top.
> 
> And there is suffering because in the Tree of Life, all things that can happen, do happen, the happy and the sad. Blessed are the Poor, for in other branches they will win the lottery and find true love that doesn't fade. To chop off all branches with any suffering would be near infinite murder on a hypercosmic scale.

You have drifted into insanity, try some good medicine....or are you on LSD as PM did? 
> 
> A small price to pay for eternal life in the Many Worlds, living all your possible lives, always have, always will.

Such delusion is really for the stupid theists....go on.
> 
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 8:12:28 AM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:47:45 PM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > Well, for starters it proves you can build it and that it would hold all the animals. 
> > 
> > Cunt, for a starter, where did the huge amount of water come from?????
> > And why a worldwide flood to kill all human, because your proto=pixie was evil??????
> > > 
> > > Of course, but surprising how many atheists can't do that elementary arithmetic.
> > > 
> > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:30:11 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > > > In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
> > > >  BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Science will prove Noah's Ark.  
> > > > 
> > > > How will it do that?
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 
> > > > JD
> > > > 
> > > > Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
> > > > up a God superior to themselves. Most 
> > > > Gods have the manners and morals of a 
> > > > spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120590

I didn't say all the ice melted, try addressing the far more difficult subject of what I actually did say, not your idiot lie about what I said.

And thanks for the demonstration of why I never read segmented posts, all most forum atheists know is deliberate lies, like right now.

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 10:09:57 PM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 12:54:30 AM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A lot of the world is still under water from it.
> 
> Nonsense, Cunt.
> If there was a global warming for all the ice in North and South poles to melt, you would have failed agriculture and all living matters might not survive too.
> 
> Also, the water from the ice would not cover the world right to the mountain bottom, let alone top.
> > 
> > And there is suffering because in the Tree of Life, all things that can happen, do happen, the happy and the sad. Blessed are the Poor, for in other branches they will win the lottery and find true love that doesn't fade. To chop off all branches with any suffering would be near infinite murder on a hypercosmic scale.
> 
> You have drifted into insanity, try some good medicine....or are you on LSD as PM did? 
> > 
> > A small price to pay for eternal life in the Many Worlds, living all your possible lives, always have, always will.
> 
> Such delusion is really for the stupid theists....go on.
> > 
> > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 8:12:28 AM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:47:45 PM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > > Well, for starters it proves you can build it and that it would hold all the animals. 
> > > 
> > > Cunt, for a starter, where did the huge amount of water come from?????
> > > And why a worldwide flood to kill all human, because your proto=pixie was evil??????
> > > > 
> > > > Of course, but surprising how many atheists can't do that elementary arithmetic.
> > > > 
> > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:30:11 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > > > > In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > >  BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Science will prove Noah's Ark.  
> > > > > 
> > > > > How will it do that?
> > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > 
> > > > > JD
> > > > > 
> > > > > Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
> > > > > up a God superior to themselves. Most 
> > > > > Gods have the manners and morals of a 
> > > > > spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120777

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 10:20:35 PM UTC-4, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> I didn't say all the ice melted, try addressing the far more difficult subject of what I actually did say, not your idiot lie about what I said.

You're always backpedaling, Kurt. For a significant quality of ice to melt quickly enough to meet Noah's schedule, the earth would have heated up like  a furnace. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. Get over it.

> 
> And thanks for the demonstration of why I never read segmented posts, all most forum atheists know is deliberate lies, like right now.
> 
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 10:09:57 PM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 12:54:30 AM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A lot of the world is still under water from it.
> > 
> > Nonsense, Cunt.
> > If there was a global warming for all the ice in North and South poles to melt, you would have failed agriculture and all living matters might not survive too.
> > 
> > Also, the water from the ice would not cover the world right to the mountain bottom, let alone top.
> > > 
> > > And there is suffering because in the Tree of Life, all things that can happen, do happen, the happy and the sad. Blessed are the Poor, for in other branches they will win the lottery and find true love that doesn't fade. To chop off all branches with any suffering would be near infinite murder on a hypercosmic scale.
> > 
> > You have drifted into insanity, try some good medicine....or are you on LSD as PM did? 
> > > 
> > > A small price to pay for eternal life in the Many Worlds, living all your possible lives, always have, always will.
> > 
> > Such delusion is really for the stupid theists....go on.
> > > 
> > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 8:12:28 AM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:47:45 PM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > > > Well, for starters it proves you can build it and that it would hold all the animals. 
> > > > 
> > > > Cunt, for a starter, where did the huge amount of water come from?????
> > > > And why a worldwide flood to kill all human, because your proto=pixie was evil??????
> > > > > 
> > > > > Of course, but surprising how many atheists can't do that elementary arithmetic.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:30:11 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > > > > > In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > >  BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Science will prove Noah's Ark.  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > How will it do that?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > JD
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
> > > > > > up a God superior to themselves. Most 
> > > > > > Gods have the manners and morals of a 
> > > > > > spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2120809

Idiot forum atheists. Melting Ice ABSORBS heat, it doesn't create it. Latent heat of fusion and it's a LOT of heat that gets ABSORBED, NOT CREATED.

Comic relief.

On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:17:36 AM UTC-4, Wexford Eire wrote:
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 10:20:35 PM UTC-4, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > I didn't say all the ice melted, try addressing the far more difficult subject of what I actually did say, not your idiot lie about what I said.
> 
> You're always backpedaling, Kurt. For a significant quality of ice to melt quickly enough to meet Noah's schedule, the earth would have heated up like  a furnace. IT'S A BLOODY MYTH. Get over it.
> 
> > 
> > And thanks for the demonstration of why I never read segmented posts, all most forum atheists know is deliberate lies, like right now.
> > 
> > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 10:09:57 PM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 12:54:30 AM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > > The water came from the global warming from the end of the Ice Age. A lot of the world is still under water from it.
> > > 
> > > Nonsense, Cunt.
> > > If there was a global warming for all the ice in North and South poles to melt, you would have failed agriculture and all living matters might not survive too.
> > > 
> > > Also, the water from the ice would not cover the world right to the mountain bottom, let alone top.
> > > > 
> > > > And there is suffering because in the Tree of Life, all things that can happen, do happen, the happy and the sad. Blessed are the Poor, for in other branches they will win the lottery and find true love that doesn't fade. To chop off all branches with any suffering would be near infinite murder on a hypercosmic scale.
> > > 
> > > You have drifted into insanity, try some good medicine....or are you on LSD as PM did? 
> > > > 
> > > > A small price to pay for eternal life in the Many Worlds, living all your possible lives, always have, always will.
> > > 
> > > Such delusion is really for the stupid theists....go on.
> > > > 
> > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 8:12:28 AM UTC-4, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:47:45 PM UTC+8, Kurt Kurt wrote:
> > > > > > Well, for starters it proves you can build it and that it would hold all the animals. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cunt, for a starter, where did the huge amount of water come from?????
> > > > > And why a worldwide flood to kill all human, because your proto=pixie was evil??????
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Of course, but surprising how many atheists can't do that elementary arithmetic.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 7:30:11 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > > > > > > In article <8d8b7bf7-755c-453c-a230-51a08c43c17c@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > >  BAR <biblearcheologyresearch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Science will prove Noah's Ark.  
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > How will it do that?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > JD
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
> > > > > > > up a God superior to themselves. Most 
> > > > > > > Gods have the manners and morals of a 
> > > > > > > spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web