Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2167371 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-11 12:43 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-15 23:22 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 180 — 35 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 12:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-11 13:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft WeHang FagZ And Jews Too <macabbeus@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 13:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-11 23:44 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> - 2016-09-11 16:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 23:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 00:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 14:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Normal Human <NH@....> - 2016-09-12 08:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-11 15:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-11 16:28 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-12 00:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 07:31 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-12 12:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 08:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-12 14:26 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 19:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 12:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 22:43 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-12 22:18 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 06:45 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-12 23:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 00:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 22:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 20:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 20:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 01:34 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 08:23 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-15 11:29 -0600
Re: Theism is Witchcraft John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-09-15 11:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 20:44 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-16 06:34 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 20:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-15 19:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-16 10:25 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 22:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 06:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 22:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-17 07:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-17 11:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-18 09:55 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-17 10:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-17 16:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 18:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-17 13:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-18 09:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 20:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 15:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 19:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 07:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-12 22:29 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 08:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 00:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-13 07:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-13 18:03 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 21:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 06:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 02:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 11:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 06:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 12:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 07:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 15:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 03:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 15:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 03:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 15:29 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 02:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-15 14:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-09-15 19:37 +0100
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-14 01:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-14 11:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 19:45 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 14:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 07:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 22:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 23:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 03:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 08:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft "Hot-Text" <hot-text@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-16 18:57 -0500
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-16 22:06 -0600
"Wisely Non-Theist" "Billy_Ray_Ferrell_USA-VP_2016" <billyrferrell@minpin.mshome.net> - 2016-09-17 00:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-12 17:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> - 2016-09-11 19:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-09-11 15:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-09-11 15:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-09-12 07:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 00:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 00:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-14 10:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-14 14:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-14 12:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-09-16 22:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-09-13 10:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-13 11:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-09-16 22:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 09:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-13 17:21 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 19:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-14 03:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-13 20:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 22:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-13 20:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-14 20:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> - 2016-09-14 00:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-14 01:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 22:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-13 21:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-15 09:32 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-14 17:38 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-14 23:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 08:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft HGW <hw@....> - 2016-09-15 18:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 02:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-15 22:48 +0200
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-09-15 15:02 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 02:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-16 08:16 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-16 01:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-16 12:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-17 01:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-17 10:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-17 16:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 23:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-15 22:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 17:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-15 17:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 04:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 21:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 01:56 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 08:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-17 07:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 04:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 16:25 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-17 16:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 12:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 17:26 +0000
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-17 11:48 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-17 12:54 -0500
Re: Theism is Witchcraft Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-09-17 12:47 -0600
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 20:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-17 12:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 20:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 17:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 02:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 03:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-16 05:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-16 16:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-17 19:00 +0200
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> - 2016-09-14 00:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 00:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-14 20:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-14 15:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-14 18:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-09-14 03:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft tirebiter <dontspamme666@bigfoot.com> - 2016-09-14 18:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is Witchcraft hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-09-15 23:22 -0700
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
| From | Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-14 17:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <aaa-513863.17382714092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2168558 |
Atheists are the only ones who are free from witchcraft
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-14 23:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <57da1643$0$30253$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #2168560 |
On 09/14/2016 07:38 PM, Wisely Non-Theist wrote: > Atheists are the only ones who are free from witchcraft > Obviously an atheist who does not understand the power of the mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-14 23:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <aaa-B31CE1.23154214092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2168624 |
In article <57da1643$0$30253$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com>, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/14/2016 07:38 PM, Wisely Non-Theist wrote: > > Atheists are the only ones who are free from witchcraft > > > Obviously an atheist who does not understand the power of the mind. The mind power of atheists is not witchcraft! Except in the eyes of witches!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 03:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hmjktb5qje1j4m1l3msmdmo3hng4dviqe1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2168624 |
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 23:32:17 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <57da1643$0$30253$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com> wrote: >On 09/14/2016 07:38 PM, Wisely Non-Theist wrote: >> Atheists are the only ones who are free from witchcraft >> >Obviously an atheist who does not understand the power of the mind. Elaborate. What does that mean? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor OBastard. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-14 23:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <57da172e$0$61822$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #2168558 |
On 09/14/2016 07:32 PM, HGW wrote: > On 14/09/16 12:12, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:01:06 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> > >>>>>> A religious person is a thoroughly demoralized individual who, either >>>>>> by misfortune or plain stupidity has had such a miserable existence >>>>>> that it will go to any length to reassure its deluded mind that it >>>>>> will >>>>>> one day be given a second chance at life. >>>>> >>>>> True. Especially deeply religious atheisst >>>> >>>> As rare as hirsute bald men. >>>> >>>> <snip even more lies> >>>> >>> Obviously we are in the presence of an atheist of great faith! >> >> Obviously we are in the presence of a deliberately and arrogantly >> nasty, lying theist. > > The main difference between a religious preacher and a used car salesman > is that the latter's product actually exists, at least until the money > has been paid. So you are saying that psychologists, psychiatrists,, analysts, lawyers, and "libs who give "needed" counseling" are all basically used care salesmen liars only they have no product to sell. You sound like some Lib due to your lack of thinking.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 08:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e3uup5Ff2bcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2168625 |
Am 15.09.2016 05:36, schrieb benj: >> The main difference between a religious preacher and a used car salesman >> is that the latter's product actually exists, at least until the money >> has been paid. > > So you are saying that psychologists, psychiatrists,, analysts, lawyers, > and "libs who give "needed" counseling" are all basically used care > salesmen liars only they have no product to sell. You sound like some > Lib due to your lack of thinking. > > Services of the various kinds, like e.g. the work of a lawyer, do not necessarily contain material objects. This is why they are called 'services' and not 'sale'. Commercial services are different to churches, since they are in fact commercial, while a church is not. Most religions are strictly non-commercial. The mixture of commercial interests and believe was somehow a speciality of the medieval Catholic Church. On the other end of the same scale we had Hinduist monks, who had to beg for food. Most religions of today are more in the middle and collect some money, but mainly to maintain the life of the priests and to run the system of the church. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 18:01 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nrdkhf$1lme$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2168653 |
On 15/09/16 16:52, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 15.09.2016 05:36, schrieb benj: > >>> The main difference between a religious preacher and a used car salesman >>> is that the latter's product actually exists, at least until the money >>> has been paid. > Services of the various kinds, like e.g. the work of a lawyer, do not > necessarily contain material objects. > > This is why they are called 'services' and not 'sale'. > > Commercial services are different to churches, since they are in fact > commercial, while a church is not. > > Most religions are strictly non-commercial. HAHAHHHAHHAHA! That's a joke, surely. They are all in it for the money and sex under the guise of respectability and honesty. The best way to lose your friends is to criticize a charity worker even if you know they are fiddling the till to buy their grog.. > The mixture of commercial interests and believe was somehow a speciality > of the medieval Catholic Church. > > On the other end of the same scale we had Hinduist monks, who had to beg > for food. > > Most religions of today are more in the middle and collect some money, > but mainly to maintain the life of the priests and to run the system of > the church. Now that homosexuality is legal in many countries, the church is having a lot of trouble enlisting priests. I wonder why... > TH --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 02:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-DBC024.02505215092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2168653 |
In article <e3uup5Ff2bcU1@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am 15.09.2016 05:36, schrieb benj: > > >> The main difference between a religious preacher and a used car salesman > >> is that the latter's product actually exists, at least until the money > >> has been paid. > > > > So you are saying that psychologists, psychiatrists,, analysts, lawyers, > > and "libs who give "needed" counseling" are all basically used care > > salesmen liars only they have no product to sell. You sound like some > > Lib due to your lack of thinking. > > > > > > Services of the various kinds, like e.g. the work of a lawyer, do not > necessarily contain material objects. > > This is why they are called 'services' and not 'sale'. > > Commercial services are different to churches, since they are in fact > commercial, while a church is not. > > Most religions are strictly non-commercial. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- JD Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a God superior to themselves. Most Gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 22:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e40fpdFqrs6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2168677 |
Am 15.09.2016 11:50, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: >> Services of the various kinds, like e.g. the work of a lawyer, do not >> necessarily contain material objects. >> >> This is why they are called 'services' and not 'sale'. >> >> Commercial services are different to churches, since they are in fact >> commercial, while a church is not. >> >> Most religions are strictly non-commercial. > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > Most people overestimate the importance of money. A church is not really a business and has not primarily commercial interests. Churches are related to the spiritual realm and cover philosophical questions, ethics and moral. People also try to acquire certain experiences, that are elevated above the usual life. Something as profane as money does not really fit into such a picture. And most churches are actually poor. But there are major exceptions from this rule, like e.g. the Catholic Church. But being wealthy does not mean, that the Catholics only exist to earn money. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 15:02 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Theism is Witchcraft |
| Message-ID | <VIRGIL-E653F1.15022915092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2168867 |
Atheism does not rely on magic! -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 19:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-4373C4.19230215092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2168867 |
In article <e40fpdFqrs6U1@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am 15.09.2016 11:50, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: > > >> Services of the various kinds, like e.g. the work of a lawyer, do not > >> necessarily contain material objects. > >> > >> This is why they are called 'services' and not 'sale'. > >> > >> Commercial services are different to churches, since they are in fact > >> commercial, while a church is not. > >> > >> Most religions are strictly non-commercial. > > > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > Most people overestimate the importance of money. > > A church is not really a business and has not primarily commercial > interests. Churches are related to the spiritual realm and cover > philosophical questions, ethics and moral. > > People also try to acquire certain experiences, that are elevated above > the usual life. > > Something as profane as money does not really fit into such a picture. > > And most churches are actually poor. > > But there are major exceptions from this rule, like e.g. the Catholic > Church. > > But being wealthy does not mean, that the Catholics only exist to earn > money. Explain all those huge mansions of all those evangelical ministers. Explain Pat Robertson telling elderly people who can barely pay the bill to keep the lights on, who might have to choose between food and their medications, that they should continue sending money to him. Religion is ALL about the money. -- JD Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a God superior to themselves. Most Gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 02:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrfn5a$iil$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #2169000 |
On 2016-09-16, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > > Religion is ALL about the money. > Selling smoke for money ;p -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 08:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e41h1uF3bqbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2169000 |
Am 16.09.2016 04:23, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: >>>> Most religions are strictly non-commercial. >>> >>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> >> >> Most people overestimate the importance of money. >> >> A church is not really a business and has not primarily commercial >> interests. Churches are related to the spiritual realm and cover >> philosophical questions, ethics and moral. >> >> People also try to acquire certain experiences, that are elevated above >> the usual life. >> >> Something as profane as money does not really fit into such a picture. >> >> And most churches are actually poor. >> >> But there are major exceptions from this rule, like e.g. the Catholic >> Church. >> >> But being wealthy does not mean, that the Catholics only exist to earn >> money. > > Explain all those huge mansions of all those evangelical ministers. I am German and 'Priester' (priests) of 'EKD' (Evangelische Kirche Deutschlands ~ evangelical church of Germany) do not own large mansions. Also the churches are not that large, even if some buildings are huge. EKD is a certain form of protestantism, which is typical for Germany. It is very remote to the Church of England for instance, even if they are also Protestants. > Explain Pat Robertson telling elderly people who can barely pay the bill > to keep the lights on, who might have to choose between food and their > medications, that they should continue sending money to him. The American forms of protestantism are almost unknown in Germany, similar the semi-commercial churches. > Religion is ALL about the money. > Business is about money, but churches are not a business. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 01:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-666C24.01153916092016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2169061 |
In article <e41h1uF3bqbU1@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am 16.09.2016 04:23, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: > > >>>> Most religions are strictly non-commercial. > >>> > >>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > >>> > >> > >> Most people overestimate the importance of money. > >> > >> A church is not really a business and has not primarily commercial > >> interests. Churches are related to the spiritual realm and cover > >> philosophical questions, ethics and moral. > >> > >> People also try to acquire certain experiences, that are elevated above > >> the usual life. > >> > >> Something as profane as money does not really fit into such a picture. > >> > >> And most churches are actually poor. > >> > >> But there are major exceptions from this rule, like e.g. the Catholic > >> Church. > >> > >> But being wealthy does not mean, that the Catholics only exist to earn > >> money. > > > > Explain all those huge mansions of all those evangelical ministers. > > I am German and 'Priester' (priests) of 'EKD' (Evangelische Kirche > Deutschlands ~ evangelical church of Germany) do not own large mansions. > > Also the churches are not that large, even if some buildings are huge. > > EKD is a certain form of protestantism, which is typical for Germany. > > It is very remote to the Church of England for instance, even if they > are also Protestants. > > > > > Explain Pat Robertson telling elderly people who can barely pay the bill > > to keep the lights on, who might have to choose between food and their > > medications, that they should continue sending money to him. > > The American forms of protestantism are almost unknown in Germany, > similar the semi-commercial churches. Lucky you. > > Religion is ALL about the money. > > > > Business is about money, but churches are not a business. They are in the US. -- JD Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream up a God superior to themselves. Most Gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 12:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ju2otb9kjra5paihbq550aam10pktd6q0i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2169061 |
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:16:19 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:
>> Explain all those huge mansions of all those evangelical ministers.
>
>I am German and 'Priester' (priests) of 'EKD' (Evangelische Kirche
>Deutschlands ~ evangelical church of Germany) do not own large mansions.
But they still manage to eat, do they not, with little effort beyond
babbling the words of faith to people who already tend to believe in
such words.
In this country, on the other hand, we do have evangelists in
mansions. When I was a kid (Kind) back in the 50s, I learned that
Billy Graham went from revival to revival in a fleet of seven
Cadillacs (then considered the very "richest" American production
automobile), and wondered why he was unable to haul his holy arse
about in seven Fords. He did not live in a shack, either:
http://www.celebrityhousepictures.com/billy-graham.php
We also have numerous evangelicals pretty much in poverty--they tend
to hold services featuring rattlesnakes and such--but one never hears
of one starving to death.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 01:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nri6qq$puh$12@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2169281 |
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:50:32 -0400, Don Martin wrote: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:16:19 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > >>> Explain all those huge mansions of all those evangelical ministers. >> >>I am German and 'Priester' (priests) of 'EKD' (Evangelische Kirche >>Deutschlands ~ evangelical church of Germany) do not own large mansions. > > But they still manage to eat, do they not, with little effort beyond > babbling the words of faith to people who already tend to believe in > such words. > > In this country, on the other hand, we do have evangelists in mansions. > When I was a kid (Kind) back in the 50s, I learned that Billy Graham > went from revival to revival in a fleet of seven Cadillacs (then > considered the very "richest" American production automobile), and > wondered why he was unable to haul his holy arse about in seven Fords. > He did not live in a shack, either: > http://www.celebrityhousepictures.com/billy-graham.php > > We also have numerous evangelicals pretty much in poverty--they tend to > hold services featuring rattlesnakes and such--but one never hears of > one starving to death. Because they're more likely to die from snake venom poisoning. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 10:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p8iqtbl92fdvmhv78j96n86r8k3srt5vc6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2169522 |
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 01:38:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:50:32 -0400, Don Martin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:16:19 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>>
>>>> Explain all those huge mansions of all those evangelical ministers.
>>>
>>>I am German and 'Priester' (priests) of 'EKD' (Evangelische Kirche
>>>Deutschlands ~ evangelical church of Germany) do not own large mansions.
>>
>> But they still manage to eat, do they not, with little effort beyond
>> babbling the words of faith to people who already tend to believe in
>> such words.
>>
>> In this country, on the other hand, we do have evangelists in mansions.
>> When I was a kid (Kind) back in the 50s, I learned that Billy Graham
>> went from revival to revival in a fleet of seven Cadillacs (then
>> considered the very "richest" American production automobile), and
>> wondered why he was unable to haul his holy arse about in seven Fords.
>> He did not live in a shack, either:
>> http://www.celebrityhousepictures.com/billy-graham.php
>>
>> We also have numerous evangelicals pretty much in poverty--they tend to
>> hold services featuring rattlesnakes and such--but one never hears of
>> one starving to death.
>
>Because they're more likely to die from snake venom poisoning.
Well, yes, that _does_ make the papers from time to time. The bite,
and the fact that their services are typically held miles up dirt
roads from any medical facility, does them in quicker than the dodgy
cooking of their parishioners. Besides, aren't true believers
supposed to be poison proof?
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 16:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrjrq7$1ddh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2169769 |
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:21:18 -0400, Don Martin wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 01:38:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:50:32 -0400, Don Martin wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:16:19 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> Explain all those huge mansions of all those evangelical ministers. >>>> >>>>I am German and 'Priester' (priests) of 'EKD' (Evangelische Kirche >>>>Deutschlands ~ evangelical church of Germany) do not own large >>>>mansions. >>> >>> But they still manage to eat, do they not, with little effort beyond >>> babbling the words of faith to people who already tend to believe in >>> such words. >>> >>> In this country, on the other hand, we do have evangelists in >>> mansions. When I was a kid (Kind) back in the 50s, I learned that >>> Billy Graham went from revival to revival in a fleet of seven >>> Cadillacs (then considered the very "richest" American production >>> automobile), and wondered why he was unable to haul his holy arse >>> about in seven Fords. He did not live in a shack, either: >>> http://www.celebrityhousepictures.com/billy-graham.php >>> >>> We also have numerous evangelicals pretty much in poverty--they tend >>> to hold services featuring rattlesnakes and such--but one never hears >>> of one starving to death. >> >>Because they're more likely to die from snake venom poisoning. > > Well, yes, that _does_ make the papers from time to time. The bite, > and the fact that their services are typically held miles up dirt roads > from any medical facility, does them in quicker than the dodgy cooking > of their parishioners. Does the dodgy cooking include rattler stew? > Besides, aren't true believers supposed to be poison proof? True believers are also supposed to be truthful, but we both know the evidence for that is non-existent. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 23:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57DB9437.2271@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2169000 |
Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > In article <e40fpdFqrs6U1@mid.individual.net>, > Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > > > Am 15.09.2016 11:50, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: > > > > >> Services of the various kinds, like e.g. the work of a lawyer, do not > > >> necessarily contain material objects. > > >> > > >> This is why they are called 'services' and not 'sale'. > > >> > > >> Commercial services are different to churches, since they are in fact > > >> commercial, while a church is not. > > >> > > >> Most religions are strictly non-commercial. > > > > > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > > > > Most people overestimate the importance of money. > > > > A church is not really a business and has not primarily commercial > > interests. Churches are related to the spiritual realm and cover > > philosophical questions, ethics and moral. > > > > People also try to acquire certain experiences, that are elevated above > > the usual life. > > > > Something as profane as money does not really fit into such a picture. > > > > And most churches are actually poor. > > > > But there are major exceptions from this rule, like e.g. the Catholic > > Church. > > > > But being wealthy does not mean, that the Catholics only exist to earn > > money. > > Explain all those huge mansions of all those evangelical ministers. A church is a Hospitol for sinnners...as a hospitol is a place for injured bodies, the church is for injured souls. You cannot go to your doctor and tell him you murdered somebody...your soul hurts. The Doctor would probably give wrong advise like turn yourself to the police. You go to the doctors of the soul... shouldn't both doctors get paid for their services???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 22:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57DB88A6.575D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2168867 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 15.09.2016 11:50, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: > > >> Services of the various kinds, like e.g. the work of a lawyer, do not > >> necessarily contain material objects. > >> > >> This is why they are called 'services' and not 'sale'. > >> > >> Commercial services are different to churches, since they are in fact > >> commercial, while a church is not. > >> > >> Most religions are strictly non-commercial. > > > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > Most people overestimate the importance of money. > > A church is not really a business and has not primarily commercial > interests. Churches are related to the spiritual realm and cover > philosophical questions, ethics and moral. > > People also try to acquire certain experiences, that are elevated above > the usual life. > > Something as profane as money does not really fit into such a picture. > > And most churches are actually poor. > > But there are major exceptions from this rule, like e.g. the Catholic > Church. > > But being wealthy does not mean, that the Catholics only exist to earn > money. > > TH a church is a hospitol for sinners...if you murder someone, and it bothers you...you don't want to be stupid enought to confess to the police...you confess to the church. It's a hospitol for...sinners. Then you're free to murder someone else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web