Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2581969
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism, alt.atheism, alt.politics.economics, alt.philosophy, alt.politics.usa.constitution |
| Subject | Re: Who pays for Illegals? |
| Date | 2019-01-18 17:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gafatuFt3pcU7@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <q1t6de$ekf$2@dont-email.me> <gaencvFp0jlU4@mid.individual.net> <q1tplk$vj8$4@dont-email.me> <gaf95iFsk8aU15@mid.individual.net> <q1ts21$d7m$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 1/18/19 5:47 PM, Peter Franks wrote: ... >>>> Where are you confused? If I tell you 2+2=4 and you need help, the >>>> only way to help you is to understand what part you are missing. You >>>> have not said where you are lost on the idea of equal rights. >>> >>> How is taking from one and giving to another equal? >> >> Are you suggesting we cannot require one person to give to another, >> even if the other is dependent on the first for life? If so you just >> struck down your own abortion arguments. LOL! >> >> But as far as a more direct answer: to tax people based on their >> income (or other circumstances) is not unequal > > Which is not what you are suggesting. You are suggesting that those > that have pay for those that don't. > > You've failed multiple 'attempts' to explain how that is equal. What part of 2+2=4 confuses you? > Bye Bye! >> as long as you do not do so in an unequal way (say based on sex or >> color or race or gender). And to say we will help ANYONE who cannot >> work, no matter sex or color or race or gender, is also not unequal. >> >> I do get what you are trying to say -- you want to look at things in a >> very naive and superficial way. It is a common rhetorical "trick" but >> it is not a rational argument against having a good safety net. >> > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Who pays for Illegals? Peter Franks <none@none.com> - 2019-01-18 10:37 -0800
Re: Who pays for Illegals? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 12:23 -0700
Re: Who pays for Illegals? Peter Franks <none@none.com> - 2019-01-18 16:06 -0800
Re: Who pays for Illegals? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for Illegals? Peter Franks <none@none.com> - 2019-01-18 16:47 -0800
Re: Who pays for Illegals? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-18 17:56 -0700
csiph-web