Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2068825

Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You

From Moses <moses@7sinai.74>
Newsgroups alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism, alt.religion.christian
Subject Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You
Date 2016-03-02 10:50 -0500
Organization Water
Message-ID <56D70BC9.79F7@7sinai.74> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <nb6104$1ll$1@dont-email.me> <56D6D82D.6003@7sinai.74> <jrqddbhkdebql6c5dveasvmjqmfp49mja8@4ax.com> <56D6F2C0.6F20@7sinai.74> <j91edbpd4gmi847vp7uf2ce0935ek3lejd@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Gordon wrote:

> Moses wrote:

> >Gordon wrote:

> >> Moses wrote:

> >> >>  Moses a écrit :

> >> >> > we WANT you to have your own evidence of God, many people already have this evidence.

> >> >> > with me so far?

> >> >> If there was any "god", it would be a non-issue, like air or gravity.

> >> >that's not necessarily true,

> >> >God is a conscious Being, not a spot on the wall.

> >> >if i was going to present my evidence to substantiate a particular "activated complex" in a reaction of certain
> >> >chemicals i would either have to assume that you had the prerequisites to understand what i say and how i explain
> >> >it, or, i would have to lead you by the hand and show you how this evidence is gathered and interpreted, and
> >> >then show you the substantiation for a particular case. i could talk until i was blue in the face about reaction
> >> >rates and activated complexes and rate laws and mixing methodologies but you'd have to go into the lab and actually
> >> >do some of this with your own grubby little paws or you would have nothing we could relate. i could even show you
> >> >pretty blue colored solutions and scrawl a bunch of chicken scratch symbology on the chalkboard and you would still
> >> >have nothing without a similar experience. it can -become- a "non-issue" but until you have the like experience,
> >> >it will remain an issue.

> >> My thinking on this is that God is a form of cosmic consciousness,
> >> comprised of something like quantum entanglements between sub-atomic
> >> particles throughout the multiverse. These entanglements function in a
> >> way that is similar to the synapses in our brain. The speed of light
> >> is not a restrictive matter in this type of entanglements. God's brain
> >> throughout the multiverse is aware of everything from the hair on our
> >> head to the vast complexity of the multiverse.

> >i don't think entanglement theory suggests that two electrons may be permanently spin-paired.
> >two electrons are spin-paired when they reside in a spin-paired energy state, like the various
> >atomic and molecular orbitals described by the s p d and f secondary quantum numbers [l] and
> >the magnetic quantum number, ml. you get the spin pairing [spin up and spin down] from the
> >4th quantum number, the spin magnetic number, ms.

<....>

> >> Heaven is "above" us in terms of spatial dimensions, not above us in
> >> terms of the earth's gravitational field.  Gordon

> >now all you have to do is design a mechanical device that can detect this phenomenon.
> >i would suggest that such a mechanical device is already present, and that this
> >mechanical device is the human brain. a marvel of design.

> This information is all very rational, but I wasn't referring to
> electrons or atoms. I was referring to sub-atomic particles such as
> quarks, leptons, protons, neutrons, etc., or maybe even strings,
> super-strings and membranes.   Gordon

i get that part, but the actual entanglement experiments are done on electrons which are leptons,
and not much in the way of actual entanglement experimentation has been carried out on quarks et al.
and entanglement does entail spin-pairing. i don't think you mean that there are quarks floating 
through space which are not part of a proton or a neutron, i.e. the larger blob, are you?,,
and that these quarks, on disparate molecules, have been demonstrated to be 
spin-paired or otherwise 'entangled'? but you think it's possible?

as a side comment, i don't think anyone has ever gathered up a jar of quarks.
usually what you get is a reproducible scatter tracks in a photographic emulsion,
and then they disappear into phat air as if they were just some sort of energetic phantom.

but you would like to suggest that, "heaven" is a web of entangled energy-particles
and this web extends into the natural manifestation of time space and matter on 
some 'higher' dimensional level.  correct?

what my problem would center around is

in the absence of 3-D volume, length X width X height,  where are your quarks?

are they all dancing on the head of a pin? or really, an infinitessimal non-volume?

what happens if you squish all the space out of matter? a complete loss of atomic integrity

and one other thing, if space is expanding and all the galaxies are running away from each other like spots on an inflating balloon,

how do super-massive galactic central regions ....collide?

either they do not collide, or the balloon theory is faulty.   ?

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Here's Some More Evidence For You  "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-02-26 16:53 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-02-26 18:14 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 20:26 -0600
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-02-26 22:09 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-02-26 22:55 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-02-27 04:06 -0800
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-27 09:03 -0600
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-02-26 21:03 -0600
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You August Rode <aug.rode@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 22:33 -0500
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-02-26 22:07 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-02-27 14:09 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Greywolf <greywolftheatheist@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 14:29 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-02-27 20:34 -0600
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You August Rode <aug.rode@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 22:31 -0500
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 22:31 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-02-28 13:39 +0100
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 19:29 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-02-27 18:33 +0100
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 10:33 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Marvin Sebourn <osugeography@aol.com> - 2016-02-27 14:20 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 06:39 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-02-27 14:04 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 14:16 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-28 00:31 +0000
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-29 03:33 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 18:20 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-02-28 09:22 -0500
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-28 08:33 -0600
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-02-28 12:36 -0500
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 00:02 +0000
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-02-29 17:46 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-01 00:14 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 17:52 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-03 01:16 +0000
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-29 03:42 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 14:33 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 15:33 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 00:13 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-02-27 18:16 +0100
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-27 11:44 -0600
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-02-27 16:25 -0500
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-02-27 14:29 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 18:11 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 18:25 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-02-28 13:19 +0100
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-28 06:34 -0600
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 14:40 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 15:46 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:42 -0800
  Here's Some More Evidence For You mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-28 06:59 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 07:41 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-03-01 09:22 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 09:40 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-01 23:21 +0100
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 16:45 -0600
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 17:20 -0800
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 02:20 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-02 18:01 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 19:00 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 04:01 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-03 06:17 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 22:04 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 18:56 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 13:35 +0100
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-03 01:21 +0000
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 03:35 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-03 18:57 -0500
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 15:57 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 21:01 -0800
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 02:25 +0100
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-28 08:02 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 08:20 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-02-29 02:59 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 06:45 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-29 03:16 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 06:48 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-02-29 10:55 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Greywolf <greywolftheatheist@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 11:06 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 11:16 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-01 00:23 +0000
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 11:25 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 11:36 -0800
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Marvin Sebourn <osugeography@aol.com> - 2016-02-29 13:54 -0800
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-02-29 23:30 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 00:16 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 06:10 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 06:39 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-01 21:09 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Greywolf <greywolftheatheist@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 12:46 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 20:37 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-03-01 07:41 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 06:08 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-03-01 08:25 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 06:45 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 07:37 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 07:45 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 10:13 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 17:52 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-03 01:37 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-02 21:10 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-03 01:25 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-02 00:43 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 18:04 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 16:14 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-01 20:16 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 07:21 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 06:30 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 07:26 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 07:34 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 08:12 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-02 01:08 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 16:21 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 20:53 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-02 00:35 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 20:35 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-02 01:00 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-03-02 07:22 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 08:05 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-02 10:59 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-03-02 13:11 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 13:17 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 12:53 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 13:21 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 15:30 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 13:48 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 16:11 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 06:27 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Greywolf <greywolftheatheist@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 06:46 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-01 07:23 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-02 01:29 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Marvin Sebourn <osugeography@aol.com> - 2016-03-01 10:08 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Marvin Sebourn <osugeography@aol.com> - 2016-03-01 10:33 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-01 23:40 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 16:42 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 16:10 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-02-29 15:56 -0600
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-01 22:43 +0100
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 16:21 -0600
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-02 00:19 +0100
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 16:02 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 23:47 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-02 00:59 -0800
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-02 04:06 -0800
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:14 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 10:17 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-03 06:00 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-03 13:55 -0800
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-03 13:54 -0800
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-03-02 07:33 -0600
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 06:56 -0800
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-03 05:47 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 14:17 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.five> - 2016-03-01 10:58 -0500
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 11:56 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-01 21:17 +0000
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.> - 2016-03-01 16:22 -0500
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 16:34 -0600
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.5> - 2016-03-01 17:44 -0500
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 17:26 -0600
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.6> - 2016-03-01 18:34 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 18:11 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.7> - 2016-03-01 19:15 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 19:37 -0600
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-02 01:57 +0100
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-01 20:07 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 19:31 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-01 21:06 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-01 21:39 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:55 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-01 21:54 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-02 17:45 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-02 17:45 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-04 00:38 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-04 00:37 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 03:20 +0100
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 21:12 -0500
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 03:27 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-03 18:57 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-04 00:46 +0000
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-01 21:12 -0500
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-01 20:33 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-02 00:09 -0500
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 01:27 -0500
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-02 07:10 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-02 07:29 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 04:42 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-03 02:03 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 08:28 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 04:41 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-03 02:06 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:37 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-03-02 07:37 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-02 09:03 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-03-02 09:24 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-02 10:50 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-02 11:23 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-02 12:14 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 11:38 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 09:46 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-03 06:10 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-03 13:54 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-04 00:52 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:06 -0700
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:18 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:58 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 14:29 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-03 08:38 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 09:42 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 10:19 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-02 17:45 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:12 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 14:36 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 08:20 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 08:20 -0600
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 02:48 -0800
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@7sinai.74> - 2016-03-02 06:05 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 04:39 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 04:39 -0800
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 08:37 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 08:32 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-03 05:54 -0800
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-02 08:13 -0600
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 06:50 -0800
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-03 13:54 +0100
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-04 00:56 +0000
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:07 -0700
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 20:42 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Andy W <chordack@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 15:44 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 15:54 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-03-03 13:52 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Andy W <chordack@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:28 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2016-03-04 07:22 -0600
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-03-04 05:58 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:57 -0800
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Joe Bruno <ajtandy114@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 12:35 -0800
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Joe Bruno <ajtandy114@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 12:37 -0800

csiph-web