Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #284315 > unrolled thread

Re: Arguing with lunatics

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:57 -0500
    Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:12 +0000
      Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:03 -0500
        Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:50 +0000
          Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-01 12:57 -0500
            Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-01 19:39 +0000
    Re: Arguing with lunatics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 18:04 -0400

#284315 — Re: Arguing with lunatics

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
> This thread is for whether we should argue with lunatics such as yourself,
> not for actually arguing with lunatics such as yourself.

Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not leave "Surviving 
Corners" at the very bottom to two 110 story buildings but deep underground 
MRR nukes can.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And how do you explain how many different images there were of the alleged 
Flight 175 when they should have all been consistent?

You claim a gazillion pounds of debris was found at Ground Zero but you 
still have no explanation for how it could get around the "Surviving 
Corners."  ROTFLMAO
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

From what I see of you and NIST total inability to explain why there were 
"Surviving Corners" to both the Twin Towers makes you and NIST the 
lunatics/fabricators.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#284316

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
> news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> This thread is for whether we should argue with lunatics such as yourself,
>> not for actually arguing with lunatics such as yourself.
> 
> Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not

Jets don't have anything to do with arguing with lunatics such as yourself.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#284351

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:sqd2vc-e3c.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> This thread is for whether we should argue with lunatics such as 
>>> yourself,
>>> not for actually arguing with lunatics such as yourself.
>>
>> Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not
>
> Jets don't have anything to do with arguing with lunatics such as 
> yourself.

What Jets?  9/11 was just a made for TV movie that used CGIs instead of real 
jets and the following is proof that something else besides jets vaporized 
the Twin Towers before a gazillion pounds of debris could crush the 
Surviving Corners.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#284360

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:sqd2vc-e3c.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> This thread is for whether we should argue with lunatics such as 
>>>> yourself,
>>>> not for actually arguing with lunatics such as yourself.
>>>
>>> Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not
>>
>> Jets don't have anything to do with arguing with lunatics such as 
>> yourself.
> 
> What Jets?

Exactly; no one was talking about jets.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#284428

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:c56avc-kd8.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>> news:sqd2vc-e3c.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>> This thread is for whether we should argue with lunatics such as
>>>>> yourself,
>>>>> not for actually arguing with lunatics such as yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not
>>>
>>> Jets don't have anything to do with arguing with lunatics such as
>>> yourself.
>>
>> What Jets?
>
> Exactly; no one was talking about jets.

Does that mean that you agree that no real jets were used on 9/11?

And you still have to explain how a "Global Collapse" can fail to crush 
every single corner at the very bottom of two 110 story buildings.  ROTFLMAO
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

The truth is you and NIST can not explain why the remains of the Twin Towers 
resemble a Nuclear Demolition instead of a jet fuel demolition..

Rocky
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#284432

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:c56avc-kd8.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:sqd2vc-e3c.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>>> This thread is for whether we should argue with lunatics such as
>>>>>> yourself,
>>>>>> not for actually arguing with lunatics such as yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not
>>>>
>>>> Jets don't have anything to do with arguing with lunatics such as
>>>> yourself.
>>>
>>> What Jets?
>>
>> Exactly; no one was talking about jets.
> 
> Does that mean that you agree that no real jets were used on 9/11?

Nope, it means you can't pay attention.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#284318

Rocky wrote:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> This thread is for whether we should argue with lunatics such as
>> yourself, not for actually arguing with lunatics such as yourself.
>
> Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not leave "Surviving
> Corners" at the very bottom to two 110 story buildings but deep
> underground MRR nukes can.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> And how do you explain how many different images there were of the
> alleged Flight 175 when they should have all been consistent?
>
> You claim a gazillion pounds of debris was found at Ground Zero but you
> still have no explanation for how it could get around the "Surviving
> Corners."  ROTFLMAO
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> From what I see of you and NIST total inability to explain why there
> were "Surviving Corners" to both the Twin Towers makes you and NIST the
> lunatics/fabricators.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky





I hope Trump keeps his promise to have a real investigation on 9/11 after 
he's elected.
When the truth comes out,  a lot of shill posters here will lose their jobs.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web