Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #275292 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 142 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000
Re: Plane truth HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100
Re: Plane truth george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> - 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
Re: Plane truth Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-10 15:26 -0700
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 15:45 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:20 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:21 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid is caught lying again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:32 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 13:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:28 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-10 08:59 -0400
Re: Plane truth BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 21:05 +0100
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( WTC Core Columns Turn To Dust? ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 15:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 17:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400
Re: Ignorance of aircraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000
Re: Ignorance of aircraft BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
Re: delusions about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500
Re: Rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500
Re: Rocky's ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:16 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:33 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:02 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:39 -0500
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:51 +0000
Re: Rocky runs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:09 -0400
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0500
Re: Imaginary missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:29 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:25 -0500
Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 17:58 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 17:40 -0500
Re: Rocky is really stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Rocky still stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:40 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:24 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 05:49 +0200
Re: Phantom missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:35 +0000
Re: Phantom missiles "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-13 10:56 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500
Re: Plane truth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400
Re: Plane delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) |
| Message-ID | <E4udnXxgb7n2V2jInZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275726 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:04hbvat2oq5uqojhp6irt4e2fiho6eects@4ax.com... > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 09:27:03 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:rssava1dc8sec02gscpceokpm8gm04i9ja@4ax.com... >>> >>> Kind of sad, really. While Bast's posts are very entertaining, >>> and fascinating from a standpoint of clinical psychology, it's sad >>> that s/he is so unable to accept the truth. >> >>The truth is there is no hard evidence that ties a 757 to the Pentagon or >>Pranksville, PA. >> > > What does this LIE gain you? Look at your very own evidence. It does not have any hard evidence at all of a jet at all at Pranksville, PA or at the Pentagon. Here this should help prove you are a BIG LIAR who does not care that you are also the victim of BIG LIES from the media: 9/11 Illusions, Special Effects, and Other Magic Tricks ><http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/911-illusions-special-effects-and-other-magic-tricks>< or http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IGtfcYoHLGI/UHmHpeKqwbI/AAAAAAAAA7Q/mO62hgqy6M0/s1600/fetznewpages6x9sizework8xX.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275651 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.305eb48115c3fe498c298@news.giganews.com... > Just goes to show how delusional she is. "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-1412144-1561.htm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <q0idva9k2kv38s7vek76f9456bkva38fr3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #275870 |
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 01:55:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their belief >wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." > http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-1412144-1561.htm Great sig file Roger. It describes you perfectly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <T5udna_YHe4_32rInZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275870 |
<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:fe127b12-a75b-4fae-bf2f-62155cb4d46b@googlegroups.com... > On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 2:56:42 AM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >> news:MPG.305eb48115c3fe498c298@news.giganews.com... >> >> > Just goes to show how delusional she is. >> >> "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their belief >> wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." >> http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-1412144-1561.htm > > Wow. That's very deep. It's fits YOU perfectly. I doubt it because you are the one that thinks a 757 can fold it's wings back like a bird and neatly tuck it's wings and it's engines into a small hole when in realty real jets fly apart on impact. BTW here is a very good video for you. Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s And even tough I have it set to start at 25:58 after you watch that part I suggest you keep watching or restart it from the beginning because jets are not as tough as you have been led to believe. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <74d346b0d647b58c0a62ec5db6e9050c@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #275626 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> K Wills (Shill #3), in <news:ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the >>> schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking >>> truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >>>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. Bullshit. Utter and complete bullshit. If you knew even a tiny bit about aerodynamics, you'd realize what a fucking idiot you are, Roger. >>> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground >>> delusional fuckwit? >>> >>> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, >>> delusional fuckwit? >> Wait a second ???? >> Which side are you arguing for ? >> >> As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. > Bwahahahahahaha! > You honestly got me to laugh at that. >> Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be >> controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering >> debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. Bullshit. Ground effect means you can push a plane close to the ground at *very* high speed and it's practically impossible to make it hit the ground. Ground effect means there is increased lift and decreased induced drag when the wing is in close proximity to the fixed surface of the ground due to interruption of the wingtip vortices and downwash. Thus, the plane can go faster (for the same power output) and is more stable at any height less than the aircraft's wingspan. As the aircraft gets closer to the ground, the effect becomes more pronounced... meaning it gets harder and harder to drive the plane into the ground the closer to the ground the plane gets, at speeds above stall speed. It also means it's extremely difficult to "tip" the plane... as one wing dips, ground effect becomes more pronounced, adding additional lift to that wing. Vice versa for the opposite wing. Landing is a balancing act of lowering speed just enough to reduce ground effect lift so the plane can get to the ground. At any speed above landing speed, it's nearly impossible to drive a plane to the ground against the ground effect, once stable ground effect has been established. So all that terrorist had to do was get within wingspan distance of the ground, keep the throttles wide open, set slight down flaps so the plane kept trying to settle downward against ground effect, and that plane would stay low and fast. The Critical Mach number for the 767 is 0.91... that's 692 MPH. Cruise Mach is 0.86, or 567 MPH. Certification requirements demand a 20% margin over Critical Mach before flutter onset. So Boeing designed the 767 to withstand up to 830 MPH. Moronic kooks. Try looking at reality for once. <snicker> -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roget Wittekind. I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator" that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a "nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to silence them. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: delusions about airplanes |
| Message-ID | <22efcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #275623 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. >> >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground >> delusional fuckwit? >> >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, >> delusional fuckwit? > > > > > > Wait a second ???? > Which side are you arguing for ? > > As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. > Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be > controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering > debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. I see you haven't a clue what ground effect is or how it effects an airplanes performance. FYI ground effect has zero effect on the controllability of an airplane. The only thing that prevents an airplane, any airplane, from flying very close to the ground is the common sense of the pilot. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) |
| Message-ID | <qZSdnTNxPeCvXmnInZ2dnUU7-RWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275611 |
<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... > On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> > wrote: >> > >> >>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >> > >> >>Everyone. >> >>...Except YOU, of course. >> > >> > Missile type and platform then? >> >> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >> >> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >> >> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the >> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >> >> Rocky > > OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a > missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? > > What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few whistle blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. DUH And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain why the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the dozen or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G> Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially since you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight down. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) |
| Message-ID | <qdj9vattd4ri8s9c597c5l12plgfap02ot@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #275621 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 19:27:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com...
>> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com...
>>> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile?
>>> >
>>> >>Everyone.
>>> >>...Except YOU, of course.
>>> >
>>> > Missile type and platform then?
>>>
>>> See the following video and start it at 25:25.
>>>
>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
>>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 )
>>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s
>>>
>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the
>>> type of missile used didn't have a problem.
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a
>> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well?
>>
>> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements?
>
>People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few whistle
>blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story.
>
Since you're making this up (cite the people referenced if they
exist), your lie fails.
>So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead.
>DUH
>
To whom he spoke is not relevant. His qualifications are.
>And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain why
>the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the dozen
>or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G>
>
And most everyone else.
>Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially since
>you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight
>down.
Actually, FNVW and Jim have each offered very rational and
plausible explanations. You did read and verify their explanations,
right? Or did they use words that caused your head to hurt?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) |
| Message-ID | <98OdnQZwpOFnT2nInZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275627 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:qdj9vattd4ri8s9c597c5l12plgfap02ot@4ax.com... > Actually, FNVW and Jim have each offered very rational and > plausible explanations. You did read and verify their explanations, > right? Or did they use words that caused your head to hurt? They are both so full of bullshit I don't even bother to open any of their post anymore. Besides it isn't up to Jim and FN Nut to explain what NIST tried so very hard to avoid. DUH.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky babbles on |
| Message-ID | <fcefcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #275630 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:qdj9vattd4ri8s9c597c5l12plgfap02ot@4ax.com... >> Actually, FNVW and Jim have each offered very rational and >> plausible explanations. You did read and verify their explanations, >> right? Or did they use words that caused your head to hurt? > > They are both so full of bullshit I don't even bother to open any of their > post anymore. Yep, the words caused his delusional head to hurt. > Besides it isn't up to Jim and FN Nut to explain what NIST tried so very > hard to avoid. DUH. However it is up to you to explain how you became so batshit crazy. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) |
| Message-ID | <r66dnSuKp82NPGjInZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275630 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:rhsava91m4mc05uc28s0qbflighilbd1df@4ax.com... > > I seem to recall NIST's explanation about the collapses doing a > fine job. NIST never even tried to address why the Twin Towers fell as fast as they did especially when so much of them were not damaged. And NIST never bothered to explain why a building with so much water could not put out that fire by itself. That is what the explosions in the basements of the Twin Towers did, they redirected that water supply elsewhere. BTW one of the first things I noticed was the media walked up to a woman who was by the Twin Towers when the explosions happened in the lower floors and they were trying to tell her what she saw but she made it clear she was talking about ground level and not 70 - 90 stories up in the air. Again, to see how evasive NIST has been see: NIST's Evasion http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html Or better yet search for NIST Collapse Creed with the following: https://www.google.com/search?q=nist+collapse+creed The fact remains NIST was very evasive in every step of the way including why they never considered the use of nukes or explosives on either of the Twin Towers or on WTC7. BTW I spoke to someone who uses a camera a lot with a high powered zoom and he knows that if a jet was easily visible in a narrow shot it should have been in the wide shot too. So there goes your bullshit about Chopper 5. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) |
| Message-ID | <m6hbvad6thjfqhp8cl6qdfsjddhlfta27n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #275705 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:14:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:rhsava91m4mc05uc28s0qbflighilbd1df@4ax.com...
>>
>> I seem to recall NIST's explanation about the collapses doing a
>> fine job.
>
>NIST never even tried to address why the Twin Towers fell as fast as they
>did especially when so much of them were not damaged.
>
They did. As dumbed down as I can make it:
The towers fell do to structural damage and weakening of the
supports.
If this is still to intellectual for you, there is nothing I can
do.
>And NIST never bothered to explain why a building with so much water could
>not put out that fire by itself.
The tanks on the top of each tower didn't contain enough water.
This has been explained to you several times.
>That is what the explosions in the
>basements of the Twin Towers did, they redirected that water supply
>elsewhere.
I am still waiting for your evidence of this fictional explosion.
>
>BTW one of the first things I noticed was the media walked up to a woman who
>was by the Twin Towers when the explosions happened in the lower floors and
>they were trying to tell her what she saw but she made it clear she was
>talking about ground level and not 70 - 90 stories up in the air.
Where can I, or anyone else with an interest, see this interview?
>
>Again, to see how evasive NIST has been see:
>
>NIST's Evasion
> http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html
>
>Or better yet search for NIST Collapse Creed with the following:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=nist+collapse+creed
>
Why don't you meet the burden you're under and provide the actual
evidence for your claims?
>The fact remains NIST was very evasive in every step of the way including
>why they never considered the use of nukes or explosives on either of the
>Twin Towers or on WTC7.
>
They weren't, of course. But your mind can't accept reality.
>BTW I spoke to someone who uses a camera a lot with a high powered zoom and
>he knows that if a jet was easily visible in a narrow shot it should have
>been in the wide shot too. So there goes your bullshit about Chopper 5.
><G>
I await your evidence for this claim. If you're lying, which you
are about to PROVE you are, you'll offer avoidance or nothing.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) |
| Message-ID | <sKidnTON8NAiUmjInZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275727 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:m6hbvad6thjfqhp8cl6qdfsjddhlfta27n@4ax.com... > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:14:25 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:rhsava91m4mc05uc28s0qbflighilbd1df@4ax.com... >>> >>> I seem to recall NIST's explanation about the collapses doing a >>> fine job. >> >>NIST never even tried to address why the Twin Towers fell as fast as they >>did especially when so much of them were not damaged. >> > > They did. As dumbed down as I can make it: I don't need dumbed down I need quotes asshole that way I now NIST said it instead of you. DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's ignorance |
| Message-ID | <0p0hcc-qfn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #275739 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > I don't need dumbed down I need quotes asshole that way I now NIST said it > instead of you. You need EVERYTHING dumbed down as between your ignorance, stupidity, and delusions you have the mental acumen of a tree stump. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) |
| Message-ID | <ejn9va1dq3n8kgq3vm6k73u2uhj1d0c5rt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #275621 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 19:27:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ><edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... >> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >>> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >>> > >>> >>Everyone. >>> >>...Except YOU, of course. >>> > >>> > Missile type and platform then? >>> >>> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >>> >>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >>> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the >>> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a >> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? >> >> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? > >People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few whistle >blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. So your Russian friend isn't an expert on anything. >So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. >DUH What weapons expert did Dimitri speak to? What missile and what platform do they say hit the Pentagon? >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) |
| Message-ID | <mt3ccu$8eg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #275621 |
On 13/09/2015 01:27, Rocky wrote: > <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... >> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >>>> >>>>> Everyone. >>>>> ...Except YOU, of course. >>>> >>>> Missile type and platform then? >>> >>> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >>> >>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >>> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the >>> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a >> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? >> >> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? > > People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few whistle > blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. > > So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. > DUH > > And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain why > the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the dozen > or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G> > > Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially since > you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight > down. > > Rocky > > Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again :- What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) |
| Message-ID | <idWdnRxSioJVy2rInZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275663 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mt3ccu$8eg$1@dont-email.me... > On 13/09/2015 01:27, Rocky wrote: >> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... >>> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >>>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >>>>> >>>>>> Everyone. >>>>>> ...Except YOU, of course. >>>>> >>>>> Missile type and platform then? >>>> >>>> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >>>> >>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >>>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >>>> >>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >>>> the >>>> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a >>> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? >>> >>> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? >> >> People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few >> whistle >> blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. >> >> So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. >> DUH >> >> And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain >> why >> the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the >> dozen >> or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G> >> >> Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially >> since >> you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight >> down. >> >> Rocky >> >> > > Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again :- > > What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? His knowledge of things nobody else came forward with. And that is very important in solving crime cases you clown. And do not forget Dimitri is not the only one that says underground nukes vaporized the Twin Towers because so does this guy: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) |
| Message-ID | <j-GdnXmt68-uHmrInZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #275970 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mt7v3a$o6f$3@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>> Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again >>> :- >>> >>> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? > >>His knowledge of things nobody else came forward with. > > So he has nothing whatsoever. Not even janitor for a community college. > He can act a little, and look like an expert to the kooktard sheeple, > watching him being "interviewed" as an "expert" on those 4 hr 47 minute > Youtube videos. I didn't say that. He shows what his credential are in the very first part of the video so all anybody has to do is start watching it to find out. DUH >>And do not forget Dimitri is not the only one that says underground nukes >>vaporized the Twin Towers because so does this guy: > > But is he stupid enough to respond "Nothing!" to the question: > "What happens when it [the nuclear blast wave] hits the air?" That info is in the link you removed from my post you idiot. You would learn a lot if you looked at it. And I can't forget to point out that all the hardware and software that the 9/11 hoaxsters had a their command screwed up when they tired to add a CGI to a video with a crane in it. Here, see for yourself: Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s "9/11 was a big lie, and the media showed us a poorly made film." Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) |
| Message-ID | <mt8asu$jut$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #275970 |
On 15/09/2015 00:22, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mt3ccu$8eg$1@dont-email.me... >> On 13/09/2015 01:27, Rocky wrote: >>> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:b6be6cd9-4d75-43e5-8064-6564a04b11ea@googlegroups.com... >>>> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Everyone. >>>>>>> ...Except YOU, of course. >>>>>> >>>>>> Missile type and platform then? >>>>> >>>>> See the following video and start it at 25:25. >>>>> >>>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] >>>>> ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) >>>>> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s >>>>> >>>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >>>>> the >>>>> type of missile used didn't have a problem. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> OK, we're supposed to believe Dimitri is a "nuclear expert." Now he's a >>>> missile expert and a aerodynamics expert as well? >>>> >>>> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications to make these judgements? >>> >>> People love to talk and Dimitri obviously had talked to quite a few >>> whistle >>> blowers who wanted to tell their side of the story. >>> >>> So you shouldn't be focused on Dimitri but who Dimitri spoke to instead. >>> DUH >>> >>> And do not forget, to this very date the only person that could explain >>> why >>> the debris from the Twin Towers did not fall straight down killing the >>> dozen >>> or so Survivors in the North Tower is Dimitri. <G> >>> >>> Your explanation for why those people survived is laughable especially >>> since >>> you have no reason for the debris to fall somewhere else besides straight >>> down. >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> Many have asked this question and you have never answered, so yet again :- >> >> What exactly ARE Dimitri's qualifications? > > His knowledge of things nobody else came forward with. And that is very > important in solving crime cases you clown. > > And do not forget Dimitri is not the only one that says underground nukes > vaporized the Twin Towers because so does this guy: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/ > > So no qualifications then, glad we cleared that up. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <oaj9vaheg218bpsbievttnnmobc3r2f25v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #275611 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 17:57:17 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile?
>>
>>>Everyone.
>>>...Except YOU, of course.
>>
>> Missile type and platform then?
>
>See the following video and start it at 25:25.
>
>Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
>( indexed to start at 25:25 )
> https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s
>
>A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the
>type of missile used didn't have a problem.
>
Note that no comment about type and platform is offered.
What make Dimitri an expert on this matter? I've seen the whole
video a few times, but I don't recall his CV being offered. Only his
UNVERIFIED claims about others telling him things.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web