Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon )

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
References	(2 earlier) <bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com> <Tu-dnbtfV7iTM2nInZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com> <uhrecc-dug.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mt2gvj$6km$1@dont-email.me> <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>
Subject	Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon )
Message-ID	<74d346b0d647b58c0a62ec5db6e9050c@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date	2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Organization	dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

K Wills (Shill #3), in
<news:ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:

>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>>> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the
>>> schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking
>>> truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but
>>>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem.

Bullshit. Utter and complete bullshit. If you knew even a tiny bit
about aerodynamics, you'd realize what a fucking idiot you are, Roger.

>>> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground
>>> delusional fuckwit?
>>>
>>> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent,
>>> delusional fuckwit?

>> Wait a second ????
>> Which side are you arguing for ?
>> 
>> As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement.

> Bwahahahahahaha!
> You honestly got me to laugh at that. 

>> Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be 
>> controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering 
>> debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. 

Bullshit. Ground effect means you can push a plane close to the ground
at *very* high speed and it's practically impossible to make it hit
the ground. Ground effect means there is increased lift and decreased
induced drag when the wing is in close proximity to the fixed surface
of the ground due to interruption of the wingtip vortices and
downwash. Thus, the plane can go faster (for the same power output)
and is more stable at any height less than the aircraft's wingspan. As
the aircraft gets closer to the ground, the effect becomes more
pronounced... meaning it gets harder and harder to drive the plane
into the ground the closer to the ground the plane gets, at speeds
above stall speed. It also means it's extremely difficult to "tip" the
plane... as one wing dips, ground effect becomes more pronounced,
adding additional lift to that wing. Vice versa for the opposite wing.

Landing is a balancing act of lowering speed just enough to reduce
ground effect lift so the plane can get to the ground. At any speed
above landing speed, it's nearly impossible to drive a plane to the
ground against the ground effect, once stable ground effect has been
established.

So all that terrorist had to do was get within wingspan distance of
the ground, keep the throttles wide open, set slight down flaps so the
plane kept trying to settle downward against ground effect, and that
plane would stay low and fast.

The Critical Mach number for the 767 is 0.91... that's 692 MPH. Cruise
Mach is 0.86, or 567 MPH. Certification requirements demand a 20%
margin over Critical Mach before flutter onset. So Boeing designed the
767 to withstand up to 830 MPH.

Moronic kooks. Try looking at reality for once.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

Thread

Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500
  Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
  Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
    Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:11 -0500
      Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
        Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500
          Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100
          Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500
            Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500
              Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200
      Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500
    Re: Plane truth "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000
      Re: Plane truth HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400
      Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100
        Re: Plane truth george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> - 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200
          Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500
            Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
              Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
            Re: Plane truth Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-10 15:26 -0700
  Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 15:45 -0400
    Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:20 -0400
      Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:54 -0400
        Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:21 -0400
        Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0500
          Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
          Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:54 -0400
            Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:09 -0400
              Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:29 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( Kid is caught lying again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:32 -0500
          Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 09:27 -0500
            Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 13:35 -0400
              Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:28 -0500
              Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-10 08:59 -0400
                Re: Plane truth BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
                Re: Plane truth 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 21:05 +0100
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
                Re: Plane truth  (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
                Re: Plane truth  (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 16:56 -0500
                Re: Plane truth  ( WTC Core Columns Turn To Dust? ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:40 -0500
    Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 15:55 -0500
      Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 17:03 -0400
        Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400
          Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400
            Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400
              Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400
                Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400
                Re: Ignorance of aircraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000
                Re: Ignorance of aircraft BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
                Re: delusions about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500
                Re: Rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500
                Re: Rocky's ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:16 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:20 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:33 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:57 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:56 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:02 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:32 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:39 -0500
                Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:51 +0000
                Re: Rocky runs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:09 -0400
                Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:48 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0500
                Re: Imaginary missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:29 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:06 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:25 -0500
                Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 17:58 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 17:40 -0500
                Re: Rocky is really stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:11 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:09 -0500
                Re: Rocky still stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:40 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:24 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +0200
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 05:49 +0200
                Re: Phantom missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:35 +0000
                Re: Phantom missiles "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-13 10:56 -0700
                Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400
                Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500
        Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500
          Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400
    Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500
      Re: Plane truth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000
        Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400
          Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400
          Re: Plane delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000

csiph-web