Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #282274 > unrolled thread

Teslas Theory of Gravity

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

Contents

  Teslas Theory of Gravity spocksghhost@gmail.com - 2016-02-18 18:09 -0800
    Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 18:16 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity spocksghhost@gmail.com - 2016-02-18 18:32 -0800
        Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 18:53 -0800
          Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity spocksghhost@gmail.com - 2016-02-18 19:02 -0800
            Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity spocksghhost@gmail.com - 2016-02-18 19:42 -0800
              Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Double-A <doublea333@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 12:01 -0800
                Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity spocksghhost@gmail.com - 2016-02-19 13:54 -0800
              Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 14:31 -0800
                Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity spocksghhost@gmail.com - 2016-02-19 15:49 -0800
                Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-19 20:01 -0700
    Teslas Theory of Gravity mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-19 05:48 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:02 -0800
        Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
          Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:11 -0800
            Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:59 -0800
              Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:37 -0700
    Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:03 -0800

#282274 — Teslas Theory of Gravity

In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 

Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 

Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#282275

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> 
> Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> 
> Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.

u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 


Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.

some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 


lolz. 


try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282276

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> > 
> > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> > 
> > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
> 
> u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
> 
> 
> Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
> 
> some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
> 
> 
> lolz. 
> 
> 
> try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.

Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282277

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:32:13 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> > > 
> > > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> > > 
> > > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
> > 
> > u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
> > 
> > 
> > Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
> > 
> > some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
> > 
> > 
> > lolz. 
> > 
> > 
> > try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.
> 
> Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.


dude, drop forever the 2d, and get rid of it. it does not in reality exist. :)

concentrate on 3d force creating the 'motions' 


it works, trust me. do you know negative first dimension? nevermind. 

u first must tether macro and micro physics together in a complete math system and keep working in 3d, as 2d is so last Millennia ago. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282278

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:53:14 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:32:13 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> > > > 
> > > > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> > > > 
> > > > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
> > > 
> > > u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
> > > 
> > > some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > lolz. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.
> > 
> > Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.
> 
> 
> dude, drop forever the 2d, and get rid of it. it does not in reality exist. :)
> 
> concentrate on 3d force creating the 'motions' 
> 
> 
> it works, trust me. do you know negative first dimension? nevermind. 
> 
> u first must tether macro and micro physics together in a complete math system and keep working in 3d, as 2d is so last Millennia ago.

If photon waves form at the intersection of gravitational fields, then those waves - as for instance starlight - are not at all accurate representations of the gravitational fields that the photons originate from. 

This is why gravity waves only exist when utilizing the micro/macroscopic interaction between subatomic/superatomic structure. But what structure is that, besides what the 10^-10Hz reveals?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282279

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:02:34 PM UTC-5, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:53:14 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:32:13 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
> > > > 
> > > > u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
> > > > 
> > > > some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > lolz. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.
> > > 
> > > Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.
> > 
> > 
> > dude, drop forever the 2d, and get rid of it. it does not in reality exist. :)
> > 
> > concentrate on 3d force creating the 'motions' 
> > 
> > 
> > it works, trust me. do you know negative first dimension? nevermind. 
> > 
> > u first must tether macro and micro physics together in a complete math system and keep working in 3d, as 2d is so last Millennia ago.
> 
> If photon waves form at the intersection of gravitational fields, then those waves - as for instance starlight - are not at all accurate representations of the gravitational fields that the photons originate from. 
> 
> This is why gravity waves only exist when utilizing the micro/macroscopic interaction between subatomic/superatomic structure. But what structure is that, besides what the 10^-10Hz reveals?

Let me answer my own question. The 10^-10Hz represents the time at which an event is seen to take place, let's say 1/f = 1/10^-10Hz, or 0.0000000001Hz, which is incidentally, seen as a gamma ray frequency. 

If there were any photons expelled during this interval, then it would be seen as the rate at which energy was being destroyed between the sub- and super- atomic interface. Likewise, at this interface there would be a future null cone of the hypersurface of a positive pole, projected from the origin of the gravity field, as well as a past null cone of the hyperspatial field point (what some people refer to as spooky action).

Conscious perception of time may require different measuring gauges, which is why I believe the 'gravity wave' phenomenon is a complete hoax.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282286

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 7:42:49 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:02:34 PM UTC-5, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:53:14 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:32:13 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
> > > > > 
> > > > > u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
> > > > > 
> > > > > some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > lolz. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.
> > > > 
> > > > Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > dude, drop forever the 2d, and get rid of it. it does not in reality exist. :)
> > > 
> > > concentrate on 3d force creating the 'motions' 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > it works, trust me. do you know negative first dimension? nevermind. 
> > > 
> > > u first must tether macro and micro physics together in a complete math system and keep working in 3d, as 2d is so last Millennia ago.
> > 
> > If photon waves form at the intersection of gravitational fields, then those waves - as for instance starlight - are not at all accurate representations of the gravitational fields that the photons originate from. 
> > 
> > This is why gravity waves only exist when utilizing the micro/macroscopic interaction between subatomic/superatomic structure. But what structure is that, besides what the 10^-10Hz reveals?
> 
> Let me answer my own question. The 10^-10Hz represents the time at which an event is seen to take place, let's say 1/f = 1/10^-10Hz, or 0.0000000001Hz, which is incidentally, seen as a gamma ray frequency. 
> 
> If there were any photons expelled during this interval, then it would be seen as the rate at which energy was being destroyed between the sub- and super- atomic interface. Likewise, at this interface there would be a future null cone of the hypersurface of a positive pole, projected from the origin of the gravity field, as well as a past null cone of the hyperspatial field point (what some people refer to as spooky action).
> 
> Conscious perception of time may require different measuring gauges, which is why I believe the 'gravity wave' phenomenon is a complete hoax.


Do you have any references for this Tesla theory of gravity?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282295

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 3:01:30 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 7:42:49 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:02:34 PM UTC-5, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:53:14 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:32:13 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > lolz. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > dude, drop forever the 2d, and get rid of it. it does not in reality exist. :)
> > > > 
> > > > concentrate on 3d force creating the 'motions' 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > it works, trust me. do you know negative first dimension? nevermind. 
> > > > 
> > > > u first must tether macro and micro physics together in a complete math system and keep working in 3d, as 2d is so last Millennia ago.
> > > 
> > > If photon waves form at the intersection of gravitational fields, then those waves - as for instance starlight - are not at all accurate representations of the gravitational fields that the photons originate from. 
> > > 
> > > This is why gravity waves only exist when utilizing the micro/macroscopic interaction between subatomic/superatomic structure. But what structure is that, besides what the 10^-10Hz reveals?
> > 
> > Let me answer my own question. The 10^-10Hz represents the time at which an event is seen to take place, let's say 1/f = 1/10^-10Hz, or 0.0000000001Hz, which is incidentally, seen as a gamma ray frequency. 
> > 
> > If there were any photons expelled during this interval, then it would be seen as the rate at which energy was being destroyed between the sub- and super- atomic interface. Likewise, at this interface there would be a future null cone of the hypersurface of a positive pole, projected from the origin of the gravity field, as well as a past null cone of the hyperspatial field point (what some people refer to as spooky action).
> > 
> > Conscious perception of time may require different measuring gauges, which is why I believe the 'gravity wave' phenomenon is a complete hoax.
> 
> 
> Do you have any references for this Tesla theory of gravity?
> 
> Double-A

Actually, maybe its not a reference, but a take-off of looking at the  1/10^-10Hz, or 0.0000000001Hz, as 1/f, which is the increment at which photons are being emitted. This scientist refers to it in his theory of time travel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZbFsFWk__c

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282300

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 7:42:49 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:02:34 PM UTC-5, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:53:14 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:32:13 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
> > > > > 
> > > > > u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
> > > > > 
> > > > > some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > lolz. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.
> > > > 
> > > > Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > dude, drop forever the 2d, and get rid of it. it does not in reality exist. :)
> > > 
> > > concentrate on 3d force creating the 'motions' 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > it works, trust me. do you know negative first dimension? nevermind. 
> > > 
> > > u first must tether macro and micro physics together in a complete math system and keep working in 3d, as 2d is so last Millennia ago.
> > 
> > If photon waves form at the intersection of gravitational fields, then those waves - as for instance starlight - are not at all accurate representations of the gravitational fields that the photons originate from. 
> > 
> > This is why gravity waves only exist when utilizing the micro/macroscopic interaction between subatomic/superatomic structure. But what structure is that, besides what the 10^-10Hz reveals?
> 
> Let me answer my own question. The 10^-10Hz represents the time at which an event is seen to take place, let's say 1/f = 1/10^-10Hz, or 0.0000000001Hz, which is incidentally, seen as a gamma ray frequency. 
> 
> If there were any photons expelled during this interval, then it would be seen as the rate at which energy was being destroyed between the sub- and super- atomic interface. Likewise, at this interface there would be a future null cone of the hypersurface of a positive pole, projected from the origin of the gravity field, as well as a past null cone of the hyperspatial field point (what some people refer to as spooky action).
> 
> Conscious perception of time may require different measuring gauges, which is why I believe the 'gravity wave' phenomenon is a complete hoax.

at UC Berkeley my school we slowed the speed of light down to turtle slow. It is the medium a photon passes through that affects the delivery rate. On the other hand, super subtomic photons can carry neutrino like objects across our local universe with faster than a speed of light velocity. 


The team at UC B won the Nobel for it. Light speed is only a boundary not a brick wall. :) so the start energy ( info packet) and arrival energy are compartmentalized in different value systems.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282301

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:31:36 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 7:42:49 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:02:34 PM UTC-5, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:53:14 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:32:13 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > lolz. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > dude, drop forever the 2d, and get rid of it. it does not in reality exist. :)
> > > > 
> > > > concentrate on 3d force creating the 'motions' 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > it works, trust me. do you know negative first dimension? nevermind. 
> > > > 
> > > > u first must tether macro and micro physics together in a complete math system and keep working in 3d, as 2d is so last Millennia ago.
> > > 
> > > If photon waves form at the intersection of gravitational fields, then those waves - as for instance starlight - are not at all accurate representations of the gravitational fields that the photons originate from. 
> > > 
> > > This is why gravity waves only exist when utilizing the micro/macroscopic interaction between subatomic/superatomic structure. But what structure is that, besides what the 10^-10Hz reveals?
> > 
> > Let me answer my own question. The 10^-10Hz represents the time at which an event is seen to take place, let's say 1/f = 1/10^-10Hz, or 0.0000000001Hz, which is incidentally, seen as a gamma ray frequency. 
> > 
> > If there were any photons expelled during this interval, then it would be seen as the rate at which energy was being destroyed between the sub- and super- atomic interface. Likewise, at this interface there would be a future null cone of the hypersurface of a positive pole, projected from the origin of the gravity field, as well as a past null cone of the hyperspatial field point (what some people refer to as spooky action).
> > 
> > Conscious perception of time may require different measuring gauges, which is why I believe the 'gravity wave' phenomenon is a complete hoax.
> 
> at UC Berkeley my school we slowed the speed of light down to turtle slow. It is the medium a photon passes through that affects the delivery rate. On the other hand, super subtomic photons can carry neutrino like objects across our local universe with faster than a speed of light velocity. 
> 
> 
> The team at UC B won the Nobel for it. Light speed is only a boundary not a brick wall. :) so the start energy ( info packet) and arrival energy are compartmentalized in different value systems.

Are you talking about spin-1 baryonic matter? Maybe neutrinos can be recognized as both a hot and cold, dark-matter candidate. Maybe not. But if 'dark matter' is none other than 'disappeared matter', maybe so. Sort of like the infamous tachyon and tardyon - applied to hot dark matter and cold dark matter - makes them both disappeared (super-atomic, disappeared hot dark vs. subatomic, disappeared cold dark). 

I don't know where this is leading. A superconducting H3 liquid crystal inside a proto-star may be characterized as dark matter with a variable fine structure constant (making it disappear inside a forming star), and polarizing the accelerating, group speed 'disappeared' photons (core rotation disk) from the trailing, non-group photons, which are seen as the external solar flares, similar to what we see on the surface of the sun. 

What happened to the disappeared core rotation disk? Is it somehow in Harmonic resonant alignment with the galactic core, that produces a virtual gravitic resonance that continually spirals from within the zero point quantum field?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282308

GO BACK TO BEZERKLEY AND TAKE SOME PHYSICS COURSES, FAGGOT!

Saul Levy


On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:31:34 -0800 (PST), Arc Michael
<abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 7:42:49 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:02:34 PM UTC-5, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:53:14 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
>> > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:32:13 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 9:16:22 PM UTC-5, Arc Michael wrote:
>> > > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:09:05 PM UTC-8, spocks...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function ? of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law. 
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > u forgot spin rate and so did Einstein, in his early papers. lolz. you people are so dumb. 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Albert Eisenstein ( Spelling?) fucked  up special relativity. he forgot acceleration and de acceleration. When he got old, he wrote, whoops, fucked up.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > some other scientist alerted him to his flaw. 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > lolz. 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > try the apple does not move but the early moves rather fast and centrifugal force  acts as a magnet: thus the apple falls toward the earth and at the same spin rate as the earth spins.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Assuming that the plane of gravity in question, is a 2D flat plane aligned with he earth's surface, all adjacent particles on this flat plane are spin aligned, so that an observer can assume the reference plane IMO as the positively charged ionosphere of projected area in proportion to the distance from the earth's surface. The spins on both of these flat spaces of projection grow wider as the ionospheric height has been reached.
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > dude, drop forever the 2d, and get rid of it. it does not in reality exist. :)
>> > > 
>> > > concentrate on 3d force creating the 'motions' 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > it works, trust me. do you know negative first dimension? nevermind. 
>> > > 
>> > > u first must tether macro and micro physics together in a complete math system and keep working in 3d, as 2d is so last Millennia ago.
>> > 
>> > If photon waves form at the intersection of gravitational fields, then those waves - as for instance starlight - are not at all accurate representations of the gravitational fields that the photons originate from. 
>> > 
>> > This is why gravity waves only exist when utilizing the micro/macroscopic interaction between subatomic/superatomic structure. But what structure is that, besides what the 10^-10Hz reveals?
>> 
>> Let me answer my own question. The 10^-10Hz represents the time at which an event is seen to take place, let's say 1/f = 1/10^-10Hz, or 0.0000000001Hz, which is incidentally, seen as a gamma ray frequency. 
>> 
>> If there were any photons expelled during this interval, then it would be seen as the rate at which energy was being destroyed between the sub- and super- atomic interface. Likewise, at this interface there would be a future null cone of the hypersurface of a positive pole, projected from the origin of the gravity field, as well as a past null cone of the hyperspatial field point (what some people refer to as spooky action).
>> 
>> Conscious perception of time may require different measuring gauges, which is why I believe the 'gravity wave' phenomenon is a complete hoax.
>
>at UC Berkeley my school we slowed the speed of light down to turtle slow. It is the medium a photon passes through that affects the delivery rate. On the other hand, super subtomic photons can carry neutrino like objects across our local universe with faster than a speed of light velocity. 
>
>
>The team at UC B won the Nobel for it. Light speed is only a boundary not a brick wall. :) so the start energy ( info packet) and arrival energy are compartmentalized in different value systems.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282282

Spocks...@gmail.com
In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. 
----------------

Did you know that Tesla used to fuck his pet bird?

A *male* bird

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282287

mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Spocks...@gmail.com
> In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time.


really, i didn't know that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282309

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Spocks...@gmail.com
> > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time.
> 
> really, i didn't know that.



I'm not sure what "fall" means...


i mean...if it is not at rest then it's...coasting, not falling, right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282310

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Spocks...@gmail.com
> > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time.
> >
> > really, i didn't know that.
> 
> I'm not sure what "fall" means...
> 
> i mean...if it is not at rest then it's...coasting, not falling, right?



i mean...if you quickly grab the earth away
before the ball hits the earth ground,
the ball keeps going.

It's not falling.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282323

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 11:10:57 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Spocks...@gmail.com
> > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time.
> > >
> > > really, i didn't know that.
> > 
> > I'm not sure what "fall" means...
> > 
> > i mean...if it is not at rest then it's...coasting, not falling, right?
> 
> 
> 
> i mean...if you quickly grab the earth away
> before the ball hits the earth ground,
> the ball keeps going.
> 
> It's not falling.

that is why Einstein failed. He ripped of Christian Johannes Kepler ( math prodigy)  but when he pub his first papers on SR, he forgot spin rate fluxs, what we call acceleration and de acceleration. That is why the ball still falls down strait, even when earth is spinning 1000s of miles per hour. 

Saul Levy is still grapplin' with the effects of Earth's strong gravity; he is still attempting after 2 years to stand on two peg legs. He was super high two years ago, got the munchies, was to lazy to go to the kitchen and chomped off his two appendages. He blames, of course, others - here Gravity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282326

ARCieMORON SCREWS IT YET AGAIN!

IT'S NOT 1000S OF MPH, ONLY A MAXIMUM OF ONE 1000 (AT THE EQUATOR!

I TOLD YOU BEFORE TO GET SOME ASTRONOMY COURSESj FAGGOT!

IDIOT ARCieBOI, I AM NOT FAT!

Saul Levy


On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:59:17 -0800 (PST), Arc Michael
<abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 11:10:57 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > 
>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >
>> > > mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Spocks...@gmail.com
>> > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time.
>> > >
>> > > really, i didn't know that.
>> > 
>> > I'm not sure what "fall" means...
>> > 
>> > i mean...if it is not at rest then it's...coasting, not falling, right?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> i mean...if you quickly grab the earth away
>> before the ball hits the earth ground,
>> the ball keeps going.
>> 
>> It's not falling.
>
>that is why Einstein failed. He ripped of Christian Johannes Kepler ( math prodigy)  but when he pub his first papers on SR, he forgot spin rate fluxs, what we call acceleration and de acceleration. That is why the ball still falls down strait, even when earth is spinning 1000s of miles per hour. 
>
>Saul Levy is still grapplin' with the effects of Earth's strong gravity; he is still attempting after 2 years to stand on two peg legs. He was super high two years ago, got the munchies, was to lazy to go to the kitchen and chomped off his two appendages. He blames, of course, others - here Gravity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282288

spocksghhost@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton’s apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time.
> 
> Gravity is the opposite reaction to the spontaneous emission and absorption of photon energy. The continuous outward momentum of EMR creates the inward force of gravity.  The quantum wave particle function Ψ of quantum mechanics expands as an inverse sphere forming one universal process with both the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force using the inverse square law.
> 
> Quantum uncertainty, electrical potential and gravitational potential are linked by one universal process. Light c^2 will radiate out in a sphere 4(pi) of EMR from its radius forming a square of probability.



really...i didn't know that.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web