Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #281887 > unrolled thread

meteroite kills man in India

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

Contents

  meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 10:45 -0800
    Re: meteroite kills man in India Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-09 12:53 -0600
      Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 11:22 -0800
    Re: meteroite kills man in India Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-10 07:11 +0100
      Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 00:09 -0800
        Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 00:19 -0800
          Re: meteroite kills man in India "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:27 -0500
          Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 08:27 -0800
            Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 08:36 -0800
              Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 13:06 -0800
                Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 14:09 -0800

#281887 — meteroite kills man in India

How can NASA milk it for all it's got?




maybe sell meteroite blocking lotion...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#281888

On 2/9/2016 12:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
>
>
>
>
> maybe sell meteroite blocking lotion...
>


I think


   it


         was aiming



                         for




Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281889

Sergio wrote:
> 
> On 2/9/2016 12:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > maybe sell meteroite blocking lotion...
> >
> 
> I think
> 
>    it
> 
>          was aiming
> 
>                          for
> 
> Starmaker


If there was any..."aiming", it certaintly wasn't the intention of the
meteroite.

Maybe the moon was doing the aiming, and used it's gravitional pull...

to perform a trick shot....


while making it rain on your head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281931

Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
>


Nasa is not an Indian agency.

Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.

The other question you mentioned is also interesting: what had the 
people of NASA done with all the money (supposed the Moon land was a 
fake)???

>
>
> maybe sell meteroite blocking lotion...

Yes, Nasa should take part in the cosmetic industry and sell super duper 
sun-blockers, too ('Moon tested').

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281932

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> >
> 
> Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> 
> Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.


You underestimate NASA....


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281934

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> >
> > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > >
> >
> > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> >
> > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> 
> You underestimate NASA....
> 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0


Here is the NASA involved response:

"But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0


Now, let me translate it for you...

NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"

In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!


The Starmaker



You people never learn, do you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281950

The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
>>>> How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nasa is not an Indian agency.
>>>
>>> Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't
>>> involved.
>>
>> You underestimate NASA....
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
>
>
> Here is the NASA involved response:
>
> "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in
> a public statement that
> the photographs posted online were more consistent with "a land based
> explosion" than with something from space."
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
>
>
> Now, let me translate it for you...
>
> NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we
> say it's not
> a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck
> yourself!"
>
> In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on
> Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
>
>
> The Starmaker
>
>
>
> You people never learn, do you?





And I'm sure as NASA got involved, and spent another $5 million of US tax 
dollars for the investigation.
(that took them all of 5 minutes)
The yank minions are all waving thier flags and shouting,... USA NUMBER ONE 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281955

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > >
> > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> >
> > You underestimate NASA....
> >
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> 
> Here is the NASA involved response:
> 
> "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> 
> Now, let me translate it for you...
> 
> NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> 
> In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> You people never learn, do you?


In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#281956

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > > >
> > > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> > >
> > > You underestimate NASA....
> > >
> > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> >
> > Here is the NASA involved response:
> >
> > "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> > the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> >
> > Now, let me translate it for you...
> >
> > NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> > a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> >
> > In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> >
> > The Starmaker
> >
> > You people never learn, do you?
> 
> In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.


In other words...

always keep in mind the conclusions of: Appendix-F.txt

http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt





Conclusions


"an attempt to assure the government of NASA perfection and
success in order to ensure the supply of funds."


"perfection and success".


That means, no meteroite can kill a man in India cause NASA is getting paid to prevent it.


So, to "to assure the government of NASA perfection and
success", NASA has no choice but to say, 

that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says


"in order to ensure the supply of funds."




The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282033

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > > > >
> > > > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> > > >
> > > > You underestimate NASA....
> > > >
> > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > >
> > > Here is the NASA involved response:
> > >
> > > "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> > > the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > >
> > > Now, let me translate it for you...
> > >
> > > NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> > > a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> > >
> > > In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > You people never learn, do you?
> >
> > In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.
> 
> In other words...
> 
> always keep in mind the conclusions of: Appendix-F.txt
> 
> http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt
> 
> Conclusions
> 
> "an attempt to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> success in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> 
> "perfection and success".
> 
> That means, no meteroite can kill a man in India cause NASA is getting paid to prevent it.
> 
> So, to "to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> success", NASA has no choice but to say,
> 
> that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says
> 
> "in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> 
> The Starmaker


Of course, there doesn't exist in India a scientist that is knowldegable enough to look at it, Right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282037

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> > > > >
> > > > > You underestimate NASA....
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > > >
> > > > Here is the NASA involved response:
> > > >
> > > > "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> > > > the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > > >
> > > > Now, let me translate it for you...
> > > >
> > > > NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> > > > a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> > > >
> > > > In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > You people never learn, do you?
> > >
> > > In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.
> >
> > In other words...
> >
> > always keep in mind the conclusions of: Appendix-F.txt
> >
> > http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt
> >
> > Conclusions
> >
> > "an attempt to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> > success in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> >
> > "perfection and success".
> >
> > That means, no meteroite can kill a man in India cause NASA is getting paid to prevent it.
> >
> > So, to "to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> > success", NASA has no choice but to say,
> >
> > that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says
> >
> > "in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> Of course, there doesn't exist in India a scientist that is knowldegable enough to look at it, Right?



Imagine...one of those NASA guys looking at the pictures and he says...

"It looks like a meteorite to me!"

They'll tell him..."YOU'RE FUCKIN FIRED!!!!"


That's the Truth about working at NASA...you disagree, you're fired,
Right?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web