Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #282033

Re: meteroite kills man in India

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 09.02.2016 19:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > > > How can NASA milk it for all it's got?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Nasa is not an Indian agency.
> > > > >
> > > > > Loosing a man is certainly a big loss for India, but Nasa isn't involved.
> > > >
> > > > You underestimate NASA....
> > > >
> > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > >
> > > Here is the NASA involved response:
> > >
> > > "But NASA scientists in the United States were more emphatic, saying in a public statement that
> > > the photographs posted online were more consistent with “a land based explosion” than with something from space."
> > > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/world/asia/that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says.html?_r=0
> > >
> > > Now, let me translate it for you...
> > >
> > > NASA is saying, 'if we say it's a meteroite, it's a meteroite. If we say it's not
> > > a meteroite, it's not a metorite.' NASA is saying to India, "Go fuck yourself!"
> > >
> > > In other words, any rock that falls from space and lands anywhere on Earth, NASA OWNS IT!
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > You people never learn, do you?
> >
> > In other words, NASA didn't authorize that meteroite to kill that man in india.
> 
> In other words...
> 
> always keep in mind the conclusions of: Appendix-F.txt
> 
> http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt
> 
> Conclusions
> 
> "an attempt to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> success in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> 
> "perfection and success".
> 
> That means, no meteroite can kill a man in India cause NASA is getting paid to prevent it.
> 
> So, to "to assure the government of NASA perfection and
> success", NASA has no choice but to say,
> 
> that-wasnt-a-meteorite-that-killed-a-man-in-india-nasa-says
> 
> "in order to ensure the supply of funds."
> 
> The Starmaker


Of course, there doesn't exist in India a scientist that is knowldegable enough to look at it, Right?

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 10:45 -0800
  Re: meteroite kills man in India Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-09 12:53 -0600
    Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 11:22 -0800
  Re: meteroite kills man in India Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-10 07:11 +0100
    Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 00:09 -0800
      Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 00:19 -0800
        Re: meteroite kills man in India "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:27 -0500
        Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 08:27 -0800
          Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 08:36 -0800
            Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 13:06 -0800
              Re: meteroite kills man in India The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 14:09 -0800

csiph-web