Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #279248 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-11-23 19:16 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 47 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 11:00 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 17:16 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 00:57 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 22:34 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 23:11 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:30 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 00:41 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:40 -0500
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 13:00 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 07:10 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:01 -0600
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2015-11-22 22:32 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 14:17 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 21:37 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-24 12:17 -0700
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-24 13:41 -0600
Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-24 13:30 -0700
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-24 15:41 -0600
Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-24 15:32 -0700
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-24 13:01 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-03 18:21 -0700
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-24 22:08 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:40 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 10:24 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 12:01 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-25 01:18 -0700
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 12:58 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-29 12:37 -0700
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 16:54 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 06:48 -0600
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-10 07:15 -0700
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-10 07:13 -0700
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-11-23 11:02 -0600
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 11:38 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-27 11:14 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 12:00 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-27 15:35 -0600
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 16:53 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 19:15 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 08:43 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-11-26 08:26 -0500
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-09 10:34 +0000
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-09 08:31 -0600
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-10 19:29 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-23 17:55 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-23 19:16 -0700
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 13:01 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <0bf9b160-947f-4a3a-ab5b-0ff81c19269e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #279391 |
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 11:41:22 AM UTC-8, Notroll2015 wrote: > I BET YOUR BALLS GET THAT BIG WHEN YOU SIT ON YOUR 1,000 YEAR OLD NUTSACK. > > Notroll2015 > > "Saul Levy" wrote in message > news:goatlover5@4ax.com... > > YOU AIN'T SMART, FAKER! > > EARTH'S DIAMETER IS 7918 MILES, NOT THE RADIUS, SHITFORBRAINS! > > YOU SURE FUCKED THAT ONE UP, LIKE THE FAKER YOU ARE! > > Saul Levy > > > On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:37:22 -0800, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> Sjouke Burry wrote: > >> > > >> > On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote: > >> > > benj wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/ > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> non·sense > >> > >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/ > >> > >>>> noun > >> > >>>> noun: nonsense > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> 1. > >> > >>>> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no > >> > >>>> sense. > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific > >> > >>>> community'... > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 > >> > >>>> miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense? > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it, > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system? > >> > >> > >> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that > >> > >> we > >> > >> see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as > >> > >> QM > >> > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien > >> > >> life > >> > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the > >> > >> idea > >> > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious > >> > >> and > >> > >> ignorant? > >> > > > >> > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar > >> > > system are Earth-size planets? > >> > > > >> > 2. venus and earth. > >> > >> I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from... > >> > >> In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi. > >> > >> You know what you shoe size is, ... > >> > >> Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the > >> earth is??? > >> > >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi. > >> > >> Venus-size is 3,760 mi > >> > >> It's a smaller size shoe. > >> > >> Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size, 2,106 mi > >> > >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi. > >> > >> If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the > >> answered changed???? > >> > >> I don't get it. > > > > > >Okay, I'll make it simple...only a smart person can answer this question > >correctly.. > > > >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. > > > >if I mutiply that number by 2, > > > >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi radius > > > > > >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No?? how is that possible for a unic?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-03 18:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <cjq16blnmjd23vu6ilv4g9ioj3uontdh8i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279395 |
YOUR JACKASS SPELLING LOWERS YOUR SHIT, ARCieFRAUD! Saul Levy On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:01:36 -0800 (PST), Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 11:41:22 AM UTC-8, Notroll2015 wrote: >> I BET YOUR BALLS GET THAT BIG WHEN YOU SIT ON YOUR 1,000 YEAR OLD NUTSACK. >> >> Notroll2015 >> >> "Saul Levy" wrote in message >> news:goatlover5@4ax.com... >> >> YOU AIN'T SMART, FAKER! >> >> EARTH'S DIAMETER IS 7918 MILES, NOT THE RADIUS, SHITFORBRAINS! >> >> YOU SURE FUCKED THAT ONE UP, LIKE THE FAKER YOU ARE! >> >> Saul Levy >> >> >> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:37:22 -0800, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> >> >> Sjouke Burry wrote: >> >> > >> >> > On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > > benj wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/ >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> non·sense >> >> > >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/ >> >> > >>>> noun >> >> > >>>> noun: nonsense >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> 1. >> >> > >>>> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no >> >> > >>>> sense. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific >> >> > >>>> community'... >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 >> >> > >>>> miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense? >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it, >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system? >> >> > >> >> >> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that >> >> > >> we >> >> > >> see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as >> >> > >> QM >> >> > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien >> >> > >> life >> >> > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the >> >> > >> idea >> >> > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious >> >> > >> and >> >> > >> ignorant? >> >> > > >> >> > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar >> >> > > system are Earth-size planets? >> >> > > >> >> > 2. venus and earth. >> >> >> >> I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from... >> >> >> >> In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi. >> >> >> >> You know what you shoe size is, ... >> >> >> >> Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the >> >> earth is??? >> >> >> >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi. >> >> >> >> Venus-size is 3,760 mi >> >> >> >> It's a smaller size shoe. >> >> >> >> Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size, 2,106 mi >> >> >> >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi. >> >> >> >> If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the >> >> answered changed???? >> >> >> >> I don't get it. >> > >> > >> >Okay, I'll make it simple...only a smart person can answer this question >> >correctly.. >> > >> >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. >> > >> >if I mutiply that number by 2, >> > >> >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi radius >> > >> > >> >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No?? > >how is that possible for a unic?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 22:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5655504A.7BF7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279390 |
Saul Levy, a poster from the astronomy newsgroup got the answer wrong.
I have to repeat the question:
The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius.
if I mutiply that number by 2,
2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi "radius"
The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No??
Now for Saul Levy, here is the definition of radius:
ra·di·us
'rade?s/
noun
noun: radius; plural noun: radii; plural noun: radiuses
1.
a straight line from the center to the circumference of a circle or sphere.
The distance from the center to the edge of a circle. It is half of the circle's diameter.
I have to repeat the question:
The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius.
if I mutiply that number (the earth radius) by 2,
2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi "radius"
The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No??
Or in other words, a planet with a radius of 7,918 mi, is it Earth-size? Yes or No??
Is this question too tough for yous?
Saul Levy wrote:
>
> YOU AIN'T SMART, FAKER!
>
> EARTH'S DIAMETER IS 7918 MILES, NOT THE RADIUS, SHITFORBRAINS!
>
> YOU SURE FUCKED THAT ONE UP, LIKE THE FAKER YOU ARE!
>
> Saul Levy
>
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:37:22 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> Sjouke Burry wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > > benj wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> non·sense
> >> > >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
> >> > >>>> noun
> >> > >>>> noun: nonsense
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> 1.
> >> > >>>> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
> >> > >> see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
> >> > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
> >> > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
> >> > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
> >> > >> ignorant?
> >> > >
> >> > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
> >> > > system are Earth-size planets?
> >> > >
> >> > 2. venus and earth.
> >>
> >> I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from...
> >>
> >> In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi.
> >>
> >> You know what you shoe size is, ...
> >>
> >> Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the earth is???
> >>
> >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.
> >>
> >> Venus-size is 3,760 mi
> >>
> >> It's a smaller size shoe.
> >>
> >> Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size, 2,106 mi
> >>
> >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.
> >>
> >> If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the answered changed????
> >>
> >> I don't get it.
> >
> >
> >Okay, I'll make it simple...only a smart person can answer this question correctly..
> >
> >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius.
> >
> >if I mutiply that number by 2,
> >
> >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi radius
> >
> >
> >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-25 07:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ |
| Message-ID | <dbl3g0F9b7rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #279415 |
Am 25.11.2015 07:08, schrieb The Starmaker: > Saul Levy, a poster from the astronomy newsgroup got the answer wrong. > > I have to repeat the question: > > > The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. > > if I mutiply that number by 2, > > 2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi "radius" > > > The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No?? > > You don't want to ask seriously if 3959 equals 7918 ? Answer: no. But if you want to create classes of celestial bodies, it might be a possibility to classify all planets from -say- 5000 to 10000 km radius into one class (called: 'Earth-sized' - for example). This 'Earth-sized' is in fact not true for many members of such a category. But this is not a requirement for grouping things into classes. I would also suggest, not to use such 'imperial units' anymore (in connection with physics), since they fell out of fashion in almost any country on this planet. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-25 10:24 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ |
| Message-ID | <5655FCEE.7480@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279416 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 25.11.2015 07:08, schrieb The Starmaker: > > Saul Levy, a poster from the astronomy newsgroup got the answer wrong. > > > > I have to repeat the question: > > > > > > The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. > > > > if I mutiply that number by 2, > > > > 2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi "radius" > > > > > > The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No?? > > > > > > You don't want to ask seriously if 3959 equals 7918 ? > > Answer: no. > > But if you want to create classes of celestial bodies, it might be a > possibility to classify all planets from -say- 5000 to 10000 km radius > into one class (called: 'Earth-sized' - for example). > > This 'Earth-sized' is in fact not true for many members of such a > category. But this is not a requirement for grouping things into classes. > > I would also suggest, not to use such 'imperial units' anymore (in > connection with physics), since they fell out of fashion in almost any > country on this planet. > > TH It is very simple.. if you're searching for Life on other planets.. for another Earth.. you simply take a precise number and use that number to find another Earth. That number would be a planet with the exact raduis of the Earth, and having the same distance from the Sun. 92.96 million mi by is 3,959 mi. You find those precise numbers anywhere else in the universe... you got another Earth. The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-25 12:01 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ |
| Message-ID | <565613AA.4FD5@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279438 |
Jack Monaco wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > That number would be a planet with the exact raduis of the Earth, and > > having the same distance from the Sun. 92.96 million mi by is 3,959 mi. > > You find those precise numbers anywhere else in the universe... > > you got another Earth. > > Of course not. It needs an invisible magnetic field around it, an > atmosphere, water and continents. Yes, it is what I call..."another Earth". Just make sure the numbers are precise, exact...do not deviate from it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-25 01:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dkra5b9pr9hlkelall9rke56d4rs6l1kcr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279415 |
YOU ARE STILL A FAKER! YOU WILL ALWAYS BE A FAKER! Saul Levy <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Saul Levy, a poster from the astronomy newsgroup got the answer wrong. > >I have to repeat the question: > > >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. > >if I mutiply that number by 2, > >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi "radius" > > >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No?? > > > >Now for Saul Levy, here is the definition of radius: > >ra·di·us >'rade?s/ >noun >noun: radius; plural noun: radii; plural noun: radiuses > > 1. > a straight line from the center to the circumference of a circle or sphere. > > The distance from the center to the edge of a circle. It is half of the circle's diameter. > > > >I have to repeat the question: > > >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. > >if I mutiply that number (the earth radius) by 2, > >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi "radius" > > >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No?? > > >Or in other words, a planet with a radius of 7,918 mi, is it Earth-size? Yes or No?? > > > >Is this question too tough for yous? > > >Saul Levy wrote: >> >> YOU AIN'T SMART, FAKER! >> >> EARTH'S DIAMETER IS 7918 MILES, NOT THE RADIUS, SHITFORBRAINS! >> >> YOU SURE FUCKED THAT ONE UP, LIKE THE FAKER YOU ARE! >> >> Saul Levy >> >> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:37:22 -0800, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> >> >> Sjouke Burry wrote: >> >> > >> >> > On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > > benj wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/ >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> non·sense >> >> > >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/ >> >> > >>>> noun >> >> > >>>> noun: nonsense >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> 1. >> >> > >>>> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'... >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense? >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it, >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system? >> >> > >> >> >> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we >> >> > >> see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM >> >> > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life >> >> > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea >> >> > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and >> >> > >> ignorant? >> >> > > >> >> > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar >> >> > > system are Earth-size planets? >> >> > > >> >> > 2. venus and earth. >> >> >> >> I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from... >> >> >> >> In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi. >> >> >> >> You know what you shoe size is, ... >> >> >> >> Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the earth is??? >> >> >> >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi. >> >> >> >> Venus-size is 3,760 mi >> >> >> >> It's a smaller size shoe. >> >> >> >> Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size, 2,106 mi >> >> >> >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi. >> >> >> >> If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the answered changed???? >> >> >> >> I don't get it. >> > >> > >> >Okay, I'll make it simple...only a smart person can answer this question correctly.. >> > >> >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. >> > >> >if I mutiply that number by 2, >> > >> >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi radius >> > >> > >> >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 12:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5658C3EB.228E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279418 |
You're funny. Ever thought about gettin into show business? I'll make you a Star! The Starmaker Saul Levy wrote: > > YOU ARE STILL A FAKER! > > YOU WILL ALWAYS BE A FAKER! > > Saul Levy > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Saul Levy, a poster from the astronomy newsgroup got the answer wrong. > > > >I have to repeat the question: > > > > > >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. > > > >if I mutiply that number by 2, > > > >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi "radius" > > > > > >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No?? > > > > > > > >Now for Saul Levy, here is the definition of radius: > > > >ra·di·us > >'rade?s/ > >noun > >noun: radius; plural noun: radii; plural noun: radiuses > > > > 1. > > a straight line from the center to the circumference of a circle or sphere. > > > > The distance from the center to the edge of a circle. It is half of the circle's diameter. > > > > > > > >I have to repeat the question: > > > > > >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. > > > >if I mutiply that number (the earth radius) by 2, > > > >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi "radius" > > > > > >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No?? > > > > > >Or in other words, a planet with a radius of 7,918 mi, is it Earth-size? Yes or No?? > > > > > > > >Is this question too tough for yous? > > > > > >Saul Levy wrote: > >> > >> YOU AIN'T SMART, FAKER! > >> > >> EARTH'S DIAMETER IS 7918 MILES, NOT THE RADIUS, SHITFORBRAINS! > >> > >> YOU SURE FUCKED THAT ONE UP, LIKE THE FAKER YOU ARE! > >> > >> Saul Levy > >> > >> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:37:22 -0800, The Starmaker > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > >> >The Starmaker wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Sjouke Burry wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote: > >> >> > > benj wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> >> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >> >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >> >> > >>>>> > >> >> > >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/ > >> >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> non·sense > >> >> > >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/ > >> >> > >>>> noun > >> >> > >>>> noun: nonsense > >> >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> 1. > >> >> > >>>> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense. > >> >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'... > >> >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet > >> >> > >>>> > >> >> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense? > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it, > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system? > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we > >> >> > >> see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM > >> >> > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life > >> >> > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea > >> >> > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and > >> >> > >> ignorant? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar > >> >> > > system are Earth-size planets? > >> >> > > > >> >> > 2. venus and earth. > >> >> > >> >> I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from... > >> >> > >> >> In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi. > >> >> > >> >> You know what you shoe size is, ... > >> >> > >> >> Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the earth is??? > >> >> > >> >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi. > >> >> > >> >> Venus-size is 3,760 mi > >> >> > >> >> It's a smaller size shoe. > >> >> > >> >> Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size, 2,106 mi > >> >> > >> >> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi. > >> >> > >> >> If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the answered changed???? > >> >> > >> >> I don't get it. > >> > > >> > > >> >Okay, I'll make it simple...only a smart person can answer this question correctly.. > >> > > >> >The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius. > >> > > >> >if I mutiply that number by 2, > >> > > >> >2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi radius > >> > > >> > > >> >The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 12:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2tkm5blu79v4p6d1uquck40qmpkadt3nia@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279490 |
ALL YOU ARE IS A FAKER! YOU MAKE NOTHING, FOOL! SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GO AWAY, IMBECILE! Saul Levy On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:58:19 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >You're funny. Ever thought about gettin into show business? > >I'll make you a Star! > > >The Starmaker > > >Saul Levy wrote: >> >> YOU ARE STILL A FAKER! >> >> YOU WILL ALWAYS BE A FAKER! >> >> Saul Levy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 16:54 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <3cbc3c42-b0b2-433a-923e-f419584f86d9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #279418 |
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote: > YOU ARE STILL A FAKER! > > YOU WILL ALWAYS BE A FAKER! > > Saul Levy > > wat about a camel shacker? Does s/he sing u to sleep?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 06:48 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <n4bsb5$8vi$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #279782 |
"Arc Michael" wrote in message news:3cbc3c42-b0b2-433a-923e-f419584f86d9@googlegroups.com... On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote: > YOU ARE STILL A FAKER! > > YOU WILL ALWAYS BE A FAKER! > > Saul Levy > > wat about a camel shacker? Does s/he sing u to sleep? ******************** Hey, now don't shit about Solly's sweetheart. Her name is Fatima. She's a camel. Fatima can't sing, but Solly really enjoys the warmth between those two humps and says her tongue is amazing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 07:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <162j6bp8ji5u3lj2lq1splpuhi6935utmf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279788 |
YOUR TONGUE IS NOT, TROLL PIECE OF ELEPHANT SHIT! Saul Levy On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:48:41 -0600, "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> wrote: > > >"Arc Michael" wrote in message >news:3cbc3c42-b0b2-433a-923e-f419584f86d9@googlegroups.com... > >On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote: >> YOU ARE STILL A FAKER! >> >> YOU WILL ALWAYS BE A FAKER! >> >> Saul Levy >> >> > > >wat about a camel shacker? Does s/he sing u to sleep? > >******************** >Hey, now don't shit about Solly's sweetheart. Her name is Fatima. She's a >camel. Fatima can't sing, but Solly really enjoys the warmth between those >two humps and says her tongue is amazing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 07:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <6v1j6b53jof6r9clh7ae32q36p8cosi13t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279782 |
CAMELS CAN SING, ARCieFRAUD? STILL NO CAMELS AROUND HERE, LYING PIECE OF ELEPHANT SHIT! WHY DON'T YOU GO FUCK AN ELECTRIC OUTLET? THE HIGHER THE VOLTAGE THE BETTER! Saul Levy On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:54:51 -0800 (PST), Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 12:18:49 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote: >> YOU ARE STILL A FAKER! >> >> YOU WILL ALWAYS BE A FAKER! >> >> Saul Levy > > >wat about a camel shacker? Does s/he sing u to sleep?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-23 11:02 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ |
| Message-ID | <U9OdnfkYUI4s287LnZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279304 |
On 11/21/15 11/21/15 - 11:57 PM, benj wrote: > How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we see)? > People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM truth, yet when > one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life forms exist elsewhere > in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea "kook". Your appreciation of "science" is QUITE DIFFERENT from mine. I suspect you confuse science with the opinions of scientists. But there, too, we differ enormously. At present, we have no knowledge of the existence of alien life. I believe that the consensus among physicists who have thought about this is that the existence of alien life is not only possible, but reasonably probable (but none of us quantify that). However, speculating about what alien life forms might look like is definitely "kook". Or the stuff of movie fantasies.... Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-23 11:38 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <56536B19.791D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279354 |
Gary Harnagel wrote: > > On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 10:02:43 AM UTC-7, tjrob137 wrote: > > > > I believe that the consensus among physicists who have thought about > > this is that the existence of alien life is not only possible, but > > reasonably probable (but none of us quantify that). > > Fred Hoyle DID present his quantification: > > "Life cannot have had a random beginning ... The trouble is that there are > about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in a > random trial is only one part in 1040,000, an outrageously small > probability that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted > of organic soup." - Fred Hoyle > > I think that he was just a bit pessimistic, and so does everyone at SETI > or they wouldn't be there :-) Frank Drake tried it a different way and > came up with a few civilizations at our stage of development in our > galaxy right now. Maybe we'll get a better read on the probability by > studying Tabby's star ... Frank Drake calculations is WRONG. It is based on Mars having life on it's surface, and it does not...so that means you need to throw Frank Drake's calculations into the garbage where it belongs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 11:14 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. |
| Message-ID | <2LednWuWaq0TNsXLnZ2dnUVZ5gCdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279354 |
"Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message
news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{4.35P.Seattle.2015}...
Most scientists think "Life" requires liquid water. Ben_Jacoby
(benj), on the other hand, thinks something like "Star Wars" could be
true. Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys; fearing it might
justify murder and such, many reject it. Truth is: We're robots,
programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Like the sun, stars and
everything else... we consume "exergy" (energy that can do work); i.e.
we ratchet entropy. "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more.
*** Actually, it is SEX and BEER that motivates humankind aspire to
greatness ....
... SEX because it feels good and BEER, because there are lots and
lots of ugly women out there ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 12:00 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. |
| Message-ID | <5658B677.BB3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279488 |
=?UTF-8?B?SMOkZ2Fy?= wrote:
>
> "Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message
> news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{4.35P.Seattle.2015}...
>
> Most scientists think "Life" requires liquid water. Ben_Jacoby
> (benj), on the other hand, thinks something like "Star Wars" could be
> true. Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys; fearing it might
> justify murder and such, many reject it. Truth is: We're robots,
> programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Like the sun, stars and
> everything else... we consume "exergy" (energy that can do work); i.e.
> we ratchet entropy. "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more.
>
> *** Actually, it is SEX and BEER that motivates humankind aspire to
> greatness ....
> ... SEX because it feels good and BEER, because there are lots and
> lots of ugly women out there ....
Is that why I see ugy fat girls showing up at nightclubs one half hour
before it closes??
..and the ugly guys wait outside when it closes to pick up the drunk
chicks that are on their way out.
liquor is quicker..that is why God made beer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 15:35 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. |
| Message-ID | <n3aia9$f70$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #279488 |
"Hägar" wrote in message
news:2LednWuWaq0TNsXLnZ2dnUVZ5gCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
"Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message
news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{4.35P.Seattle.2015}...
Most scientists think "Life" requires liquid water. Ben_Jacoby
(benj), on the other hand, thinks something like "Star Wars" could be
true. Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys; fearing it might
justify murder and such, many reject it. Truth is: We're robots,
programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Like the sun, stars and
everything else... we consume "exergy" (energy that can do work); i.e.
we ratchet entropy. "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more.
***The problem for Hagar is that no woman could drink enough beer to make
him look doable.
*** Actually, it is SEX and BEER that motivates humankind aspire to
greatness ....
... SEX because it feels good and BEER, because there are lots and
lots of ugly women out there ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 16:53 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. |
| Message-ID | <5658FB12.2BFA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279494 |
Notroll2015 wrote:
>
> "Hägar" wrote in message
> news:2LednWuWaq0TNsXLnZ2dnUVZ5gCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message
> news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{4.35P.Seattle.2015}...
>
> Most scientists think "Life" requires liquid water. Ben_Jacoby
> (benj), on the other hand, thinks something like "Star Wars" could be
> true. Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys; fearing it might
> justify murder and such, many reject it. Truth is: We're robots,
> programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Like the sun, stars and
> everything else... we consume "exergy" (energy that can do work); i.e.
> we ratchet entropy. "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more.
>
> ***The problem for Hagar is that no woman could drink enough beer to make
> him look doable.
>
> *** Actually, it is SEX and BEER that motivates humankind aspire to
> greatness ....
> ... SEX because it feels good and BEER, because there are lots and
> lots of ugly women out there ....
If that is the case then he needs to do a 'bill cosby'...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 19:15 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. |
| Message-ID | <56591C34.6912@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279488 |
Kevrob wrote:
>
> On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 2:14:24 PM UTC-5, Hägar wrote:
> > "Jeff-Relf.Me" wrote in message
> > news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{4.35P.Seattle.2015}...
> >
> > Most scientists think "Life" requires liquid water. Ben_Jacoby
> > (benj), on the other hand, thinks something like "Star Wars" could be
> > true. Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys; fearing it might
> > justify murder and such, many reject it. Truth is: We're robots,
> > programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Like the sun, stars and
> > everything else... we consume "exergy" (energy that can do work); i.e.
> > we ratchet entropy. "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more.
> >
> >
> > *** Actually, it is SEX and BEER that motivates humankind aspire to
> > greatness ....
> > ... SEX because it feels good and BEER, because there are lots and
> > lots of ugly women out there ....
>
> You might have to substitute BEER with WINE COOLERS when explaining
> things from the female point of view.
>
> Kevin R
real girls drink beer...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web