Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #737066
| From | DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: 3D Printers |
| References | (15 earlier) <10d4lo9$2vuea$2@dont-email.me> <xn347de9gk.fsf@delorie.com> <10d6fra$3honb$1@dont-email.me> <xny0p5cb9t.fsf@delorie.com> <10d6o71$3jr48$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2025-10-21 11:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <xntszsckms.fsf@delorie.com> (permalink) |
Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> writes: > No doubt. But, the A filament would likely have cooled before you > got around to the B. Wouldn't this affect adhesion between the substances? > I.e., do such "joints" have less strength than continuous runs of *either* > substance? Yes and no. Inter-layer strength is much below cross-layer strength, but the old layer is still hot enough that the heat from the new extrusion is enough to fuse them. The software adjusts temperatures to make sure this happens, so having it happen for intra-layer adhesion is a given. For some prints and plastics, the problem is cooling it fast enough, not having it cool too fast. Most printers have part cooling fans. Printers and slicers are really good at managing thermal loads. > But that isn't too bad. I.e., if you had LED emitters on 0.1" centers, > you'd be able to see them as individual sources instead of "diffused" > into a composite. Yup, if they were up against the clear plastic. >> You would print light barriers (opaque) into the back of the panel to >> guide the light to where you wanted it. > > But that would require the windows (and emitters) to be farther apart > and/or closer to the emitters (Z axis). Printed walls can be 1mm or less in width, and arbitrarily tall. My printer can print 0.25mm walls. > The sample you referenced above seems like it could avoid these problems > but that may not be possible with other materials? I don't think it's a material issue, unless you can find a plastic with the same reflective constants as air ;-) >>> OK, that's easier to understand. The restriction for hysterical raisins? >> Cheap 8-bit microcontrollers, plus no need. > > Someone made a tradeoff (space vs smarts), in the past. It could just as > easily have been a "smarter" hardware interface with delayed value binding > (e.g., resolve symbols at print time). It's so easy to regenerate a gcode file in the slicer these days, that the main factor is the "no need" part. Modern printers use fast 32-bit processors and nobody has bothered making the gcode smarter. Faster and smaller, sure, but not smarter. The parameters you want are in the slicer, just slice it again.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-16 18:53 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2025-10-17 09:45 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-17 02:05 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2025-10-17 12:11 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-17 04:53 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-17 13:20 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-17 08:22 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-17 19:24 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-17 13:27 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-18 11:02 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 06:20 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-18 15:36 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 07:58 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 18:01 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-19 08:37 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 01:04 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-19 11:11 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 04:26 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 04:52 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-19 16:46 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:22 -0700
Re: 3D Printers DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2025-10-20 01:33 -0400
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 23:44 -0700
Re: 3D Printers DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2025-10-20 14:04 -0400
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-20 16:15 -0700
Re: 3D Printers DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2025-10-20 21:07 -0400
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-20 18:38 -0700
Re: 3D Printers DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2025-10-21 11:58 -0400
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-21 09:47 -0700
Re: 3D Printers DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2025-10-21 13:28 -0400
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-22 01:22 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-20 15:19 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-20 07:50 -0700
Re: 3D Printers albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-10-18 09:17 +0200
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-17 20:22 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-17 13:42 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-18 11:25 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 07:39 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-10-18 17:17 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 09:41 -0700
Re: 3D Printers antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-10-18 12:36 +0000
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 06:52 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 02:03 -0700
Re: 3D Printers albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-10-18 09:12 +0200
Re: 3D Printers DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2025-10-19 00:44 -0400
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 22:04 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 22:08 -0700
Re: 3D Printers liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-19 10:34 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 03:44 -0700
Re: 3D Printers DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2025-10-20 00:53 -0400
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 22:08 -0700
Re: 3D Printers DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2025-10-20 01:50 -0400
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 23:59 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-20 00:01 -0700
Re: 3D Printers john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-17 08:32 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-19 02:10 +1100
Re: 3D Printers john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 09:09 -0700
Re: 3D Printers Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2025-10-19 03:46 +0200
Re: 3D Printers john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 20:11 -0700
Re: 3D Printers liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-19 10:34 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2025-10-19 14:41 +0200
Re: 3D Printers liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-19 15:29 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2025-10-20 17:35 +0200
Re: 3D Printers liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 17:22 +0100
Re: 3D Printers Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2025-10-21 01:17 +0200
Re: 3D Printers Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-19 16:32 +1100
Re: 3D Printers Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2025-10-19 03:41 +0200
Re: 3D Printers Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-18 20:38 -0700
csiph-web