Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.infosystems > #123
| From | Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.infosystems |
| Subject | Re: smolnet |
| Date | 2024-04-02 18:42 +0200 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <uuhcib$3riti$1@i2pn2.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <87h6gk8e06.fsf@tilde.institute> <uuh38v$3r4h2$2@i2pn2.org> <871q7n952m.fsf@tilde.institute> <uuh9p4$3re2h$3@i2pn2.org> <87wmpf7mqf.fsf@tilde.institute> |
yeti wrote: > Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> writes: > > > yeti wrote: > > > > Maybe good old UUCP could be used for email, like in the past, and > > Usenet too. Thus allowing people to run it from home, with the > > help of free services like no-ip.com etc.? > > UUCP isn't really P2P unless you configure each login for every peer. > Classic UUCP relied a lot on other's servers as hops between sender > and recipient. There is a config option for unknown systems, but I > cannot guess how to use it. In contrast to anonymous UUCP one would > need to know whom to reply to and that then again would need to set > up that connection. That still looks like config hell in a P2P case > to me. Ah, understand. So this is then no option, I guess. At least I do not like to fiddle around to much, in order to get batches at evenings. > Plain SMTP over some encrypted mesh would be far easier. That mesh > just has to be found. I remember that when they had a catastrophe in Italy that they set-up Mesh Networks to communicate, because local Internet was down IIRC. I wonder how they communicated over the mesh ... > > Do you know why the Tor devs are swithing to Rust, after all the > > years? > > > > Do they think they will have lesser bugs in the code ...?! > > They declare the C version being unmaintainable and praise Rust now. Ah ja. -- Regards Stefan
Back to comp.infosystems | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-04-02 07:21 +0042
Re: smolnet (was: Small web protocols / alternative protocols) Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-04-02 16:04 +0200
Re: smolnet yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-04-02 15:48 +0042
Re: smolnet Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-04-02 17:55 +0200
Re: smolnet yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-04-02 17:10 +0042
Re: smolnet Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-04-02 18:42 +0200
Re: smolnet Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-04-02 19:54 +0200
Re: smolnet yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-04-02 19:35 +0042
Re: smolnet Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-04-02 21:38 +0200
Re: smolnet yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-04-02 20:38 +0042
Re: smolnet Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-04-03 18:46 +0200
Re: smolnet yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-04-03 19:27 +0042
Re: smolnet Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-04-03 22:14 +0200
Re: smolnet yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2024-04-04 13:33 +0042
Re: smolnet Stefan Claas <pollux@tilde.club> - 2024-04-04 15:44 +0200
csiph-web