Re: Spiderman movies

From	BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup
Subject	Re: Spiderman movies
Date	2023-02-27 21:18 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ttj37a$3bbuf$8@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <XnsAFB44E23DCE3AKamilot@88.198.57.247> <ttauhn$2940f$8@dont-email.me> <XnsAFB6669BF21A9Kamilot@88.198.57.247> <tte4gk$2m3ub$8@dont-email.me> <XnsAFB7625C2D04CKamilot@88.198.57.247>

Show all headers | View raw

On 26.02.2023 15.40, Merlyne wrote:
> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:tte4gk$2m3ub$8@dont-email.me: 
> 
>> On 25.02.2023 16.04, Merlyne wrote:
>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:ttauhn$2940f$8@dont-email.me: 
>>>
>>>> On 23.02.2023 13.40, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:tt5stu$1jp5n$1@dont-email.me: 
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21.02.2023 20.36, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:tt0qlp$sb3n$6@dont-email.me: 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 19.02.2023 20.59, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:tsrr8s$5qme$7@dont-email.me: 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/17/23 13:10, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:tsm75h$3c7bk$1@dont-email.me: 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15.02.2023 20.34, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:tsgpnl$2k1lh$1@dont-email.me: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have now seen all (I think) the Spiderman movies: 3 + 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1 (+1 animated), and like a typical old person my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impression is that they get progressively worse with each
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reboot. The first set of three has a Peter Parker who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks and behaves more or less as one would expect having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowing the original story-line; the third movie is pretty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weak, story-wise. In the second set ('Amazing') PP looks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like a 'Chad' and is altogether screwing around too much,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't do that hmmm! Not having kept up with all the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different Marvel universes featured in the comics may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> colour my bias against this interpretation of the story...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but nah. It's not that good. The third 'iteration' makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no sense on it's own - there is no backstory, presumably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because that was presented in an Avengers movie that I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't seen. In any case, if not for the title, it might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been classified as an Ironman flick. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway - on to the next thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never watch any of those super hero things.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is the next thing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enquiring minds want to know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A french crime series, apparently. 'Alice' in the original
>>>>>>>>>>>> but for some reason called 'Bright Minds' in danish.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A messy and disorganised policewoman teams up with an
>>>>>>>>>>>> autistisk archivist with a passion for puzzles.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We'll see how that goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The austistic archivist probably remembers every detail of
>>>>>>>>>>> every old case or at a minimum knows where the files/evidence
>>>>>>>>>>> is located with precision. That character could be
>>>>>>>>>>> annoying... 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course she does. The neurodivergent aspect is handled
>>>>>>>>>> reasonably well for the medium... certainly better that what
>>>>>>>>>> was done in 'Munk', if you remember that one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I rememeber it being on tv but never watched it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The detectiving was all right, but his compulsive behaviour was
>>>>>> mostly played as a joke...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Generally, I like the British crime dramas (over the American
>>>>>>>>>>> ones). 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Quite. Although the amount of murders committed in small
>>>>>>>>>> villages in England is somewhat concerning from a tourist
>>>>>>>>>> perspective. Also in the old ones (or the period ones) the
>>>>>>>>>> prime suspect seems to always be a random vagrant until the
>>>>>>>>>> master detective solves it all. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe the person who updates the population sign on the way
>>>>>>>>> into town is behind all the murders.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't think small villages in England use those population
>>>>>>>> signs. I've never seen them anywhere but in America - and then
>>>>>>>> mostly in western fillems.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe they don't use population sign due to the amount of work
>>>>>>> involved in updating them. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or maybe they never know how many residents there are because most
>>>>>> of the properties have been bought up by rich city-dwellers who
>>>>>> use it as a holiday home.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then the designated person has to go to the outskirts of town by 
>>>>>>> themselves at dusk <cue suspenseful music>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...and then they don't have an alibi for the murder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What I'm watching now:
>>>>>>>>>>> Poker Face
>>>>>>>>>>> The Last of Us
>>>>>>>>>> Isn't that a computer game?
>>>>>>>>>>> Happy Valley
>>>>>>>>>>> 1923
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Don't think I've heard of any of those. We usually don't get
>>>>>>>>>> to see something until it goes into syndication (i.e. a year
>>>>>>>>>> or so delayed). 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I should have added that in the olden days with hard-copy cinema
>>>>>>>> movies it was the same thing. I have been on plane rides where I
>>>>>>>> could watch films that hadn't been released if DK yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See, then you have no one to discuss the movie with lest you
>>>>>>> spoil it for them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quite. Good thing I don't have to take plane rides any more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It must be hard to be surprised when there's a huge plot twist
>>>>>>>>> on a popular show and the internet blows up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yup. If one engage with the internet where that sort of things
>>>>>>>> are discussed.
>>>>>>>> The streaming services usually release their stuff world-wide
>>>>>>>> simultaneously, so everybody can obsess over Game of Thrones (or
>>>>>>>> whatever the next thing is) at the same time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See list above for the 'in' thing.
>>>>>>> Yes, the Last of us is a game. One of my programmers constatntly
>>>>>>> tells me how much/how little they are following the storyline in
>>>>>>> the game. I'm polite. I smile and nod.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only show that recall recently having a big plot twist that
>>>>>>> blew up  the internet is The White Lotus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Never heard about that either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was watching an episode of the Simpsons the other day from
>>>>> 1993(?) about the Osaka flu. It was pretty much what happened with
>>>>> covid. I haven't laughed so hard for a long time...
>>>>
>>>> The Simpsons have done that a few times over the years - precognited
>>>> a thing that then happens. I think they had Tr*mp being elected
>>>> president at some point too.
>>>> I haven't seen the show in years, so I only know what I see on the
>>>> internet. (About The Simpsons, I mean. I know stuff from not the
>>>> internet as well.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I feel like you should be awarded a point for that.
>>
>> I heard there were no awarding of points in this newsgroup. Anyway not
>> watching the Simpsons is hardly points-worthy.
>>
> 
> If points were awarded for watching th Simpsons, I would have a 
> gazillion by now. 
> I meant for knowing stuff from not the internet.

Oh, that. It's nothing really. I bet a lot of people knows something not
from the internet. I'm sure you know something not from the internet.

-- 
BeH - all that is old is new again

Back to alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-14 21:08 +0100
  Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-15 20:34 +0000
    Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 21:28 +0000
      Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-17 12:10 +0000
        Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 01:42 +0100
          Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-19 19:59 +0000
            Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 23:02 +0100
              Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-21 19:36 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 21:11 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-23 12:40 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-24 19:09 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-25 15:04 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 00:10 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-26 14:40 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 21:18 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-28 13:02 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-01 10:39 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-01 13:02 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 23:12 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-04 14:28 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-04 19:47 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-06 13:17 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 23:11 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-08 12:18 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 14:03 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-10 13:35 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 22:54 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-11 15:14 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-12 22:03 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-14 11:06 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 23:05 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-15 12:26 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 01:13 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-16 20:30 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-18 18:47 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-19 14:53 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 01:37 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-20 20:11 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 23:29 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-23 11:59 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 00:52 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-25 13:38 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 01:16 +0100
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-28 11:14 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-30 01:03 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-30 12:22 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-31 16:20 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-01 14:24 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-03 12:19 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-03 20:15 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-05 21:13 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-10 17:26 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-12 10:56 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-13 15:27 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-13 15:29 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-14 00:29 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-14 11:34 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-15 02:48 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-16 13:33 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-17 23:05 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-20 11:00 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 12:49 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-14 11:35 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-15 02:56 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-16 13:33 +0000
                Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-17 23:12 +0200
                Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-20 11:00 +0000

csiph-web