Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup > #5108
| From | Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup |
| Subject | Re: Spiderman movies |
| Date | 2023-02-28 13:02 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <XnsAFB951C737D22Kamilot@88.198.57.247> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <ttauhn$2940f$8@dont-email.me> <XnsAFB6669BF21A9Kamilot@88.198.57.247> <tte4gk$2m3ub$8@dont-email.me> <XnsAFB7625C2D04CKamilot@88.198.57.247> <ttj37a$3bbuf$8@dont-email.me> |
BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ttj37a$3bbuf$8@dont-email.me:
> On 26.02.2023 15.40, Merlyne wrote:
>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:tte4gk$2m3ub$8@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On 25.02.2023 16.04, Merlyne wrote:
>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:ttauhn$2940f$8@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> On 23.02.2023 13.40, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:tt5stu$1jp5n$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21.02.2023 20.36, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:tt0qlp$sb3n$6@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 19.02.2023 20.59, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:tsrr8s$5qme$7@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/17/23 13:10, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:tsm75h$3c7bk$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15.02.2023 20.34, Merlyne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:tsgpnl$2k1lh$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have now seen all (I think) the Spiderman movies: 3 +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 + 1 (+1 animated), and like a typical old person my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impression is that they get progressively worse with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each reboot. The first set of three has a Peter Parker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who looks and behaves more or less as one would expect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having knowing the original story-line; the third movie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is pretty weak, story-wise. In the second set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ('Amazing') PP looks like a 'Chad' and is altogether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screwing around too much, don't do that hmmm! Not having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kept up with all the different Marvel universes featured
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the comics may colour my bias against this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation of the story... but nah. It's not that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good. The third 'iteration' makes no sense on it's own -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no backstory, presumably because that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presented in an Avengers movie that I haven't seen. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any case, if not for the title, it might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been classified as an Ironman flick.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway - on to the next thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never watch any of those super hero things.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is the next thing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enquiring minds want to know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A french crime series, apparently. 'Alice' in the original
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but for some reason called 'Bright Minds' in danish.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A messy and disorganised policewoman teams up with an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> autistisk archivist with a passion for puzzles.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We'll see how that goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The austistic archivist probably remembers every detail of
>>>>>>>>>>>> every old case or at a minimum knows where the
>>>>>>>>>>>> files/evidence is located with precision. That character
>>>>>>>>>>>> could be annoying...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Of course she does. The neurodivergent aspect is handled
>>>>>>>>>>> reasonably well for the medium... certainly better that what
>>>>>>>>>>> was done in 'Munk', if you remember that one.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I rememeber it being on tv but never watched it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The detectiving was all right, but his compulsive behaviour was
>>>>>>> mostly played as a joke...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Generally, I like the British crime dramas (over the
>>>>>>>>>>>> American ones).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Quite. Although the amount of murders committed in small
>>>>>>>>>>> villages in England is somewhat concerning from a tourist
>>>>>>>>>>> perspective. Also in the old ones (or the period ones) the
>>>>>>>>>>> prime suspect seems to always be a random vagrant until the
>>>>>>>>>>> master detective solves it all.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the person who updates the population sign on the way
>>>>>>>>>> into town is behind all the murders.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't think small villages in England use those population
>>>>>>>>> signs. I've never seen them anywhere but in America - and then
>>>>>>>>> mostly in western fillems.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe they don't use population sign due to the amount of work
>>>>>>>> involved in updating them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or maybe they never know how many residents there are because
>>>>>>> most of the properties have been bought up by rich city-dwellers
>>>>>>> who use it as a holiday home.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then the designated person has to go to the outskirts of town
>>>>>>>> by themselves at dusk <cue suspenseful music>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...and then they don't have an alibi for the murder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What I'm watching now:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Poker Face
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Last of Us
>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't that a computer game?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy Valley
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1923
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't think I've heard of any of those. We usually don't get
>>>>>>>>>>> to see something until it goes into syndication (i.e. a year
>>>>>>>>>>> or so delayed).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I should have added that in the olden days with hard-copy
>>>>>>>>> cinema movies it was the same thing. I have been on plane
>>>>>>>>> rides where I could watch films that hadn't been released if
>>>>>>>>> DK yet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See, then you have no one to discuss the movie with lest you
>>>>>>>> spoil it for them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Quite. Good thing I don't have to take plane rides any more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It must be hard to be surprised when there's a huge plot
>>>>>>>>>> twist on a popular show and the internet blows up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yup. If one engage with the internet where that sort of things
>>>>>>>>> are discussed.
>>>>>>>>> The streaming services usually release their stuff world-wide
>>>>>>>>> simultaneously, so everybody can obsess over Game of Thrones
>>>>>>>>> (or whatever the next thing is) at the same time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See list above for the 'in' thing.
>>>>>>>> Yes, the Last of us is a game. One of my programmers
>>>>>>>> constatntly tells me how much/how little they are following the
>>>>>>>> storyline in the game. I'm polite. I smile and nod.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The only show that recall recently having a big plot twist that
>>>>>>>> blew up the internet is The White Lotus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Never heard about that either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was watching an episode of the Simpsons the other day from
>>>>>> 1993(?) about the Osaka flu. It was pretty much what happened
>>>>>> with covid. I haven't laughed so hard for a long time...
>>>>>
>>>>> The Simpsons have done that a few times over the years -
>>>>> precognited a thing that then happens. I think they had Tr*mp
>>>>> being elected president at some point too.
>>>>> I haven't seen the show in years, so I only know what I see on the
>>>>> internet. (About The Simpsons, I mean. I know stuff from not the
>>>>> internet as well.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I feel like you should be awarded a point for that.
>>>
>>> I heard there were no awarding of points in this newsgroup. Anyway
>>> not watching the Simpsons is hardly points-worthy.
>>>
>>
>> If points were awarded for watching th Simpsons, I would have a
>> gazillion by now.
>> I meant for knowing stuff from not the internet.
>
> Oh, that. It's nothing really. I bet a lot of people knows something
> not from the internet. I'm sure you know something not from the
> internet.
>
OMG! It's troo!
Back to alt.acme.exploding.newsgroup | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-14 21:08 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-15 20:34 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-16 21:28 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-17 12:10 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 01:42 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-19 19:59 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 23:02 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-21 19:36 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 21:11 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-23 12:40 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-24 19:09 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-25 15:04 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 00:10 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-26 14:40 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 21:18 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-02-28 13:02 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-01 10:39 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-01 13:02 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 23:12 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-04 14:28 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-04 19:47 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-06 13:17 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 23:11 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-08 12:18 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 14:03 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-10 13:35 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 22:54 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-11 15:14 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-12 22:03 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-14 11:06 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 23:05 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-15 12:26 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 01:13 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-16 20:30 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-18 18:47 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-19 14:53 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 01:37 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-20 20:11 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 23:29 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-23 11:59 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 00:52 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-25 13:38 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 01:16 +0100
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-28 11:14 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-30 01:03 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-03-30 12:22 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-03-31 16:20 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-01 14:24 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-03 12:19 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-03 20:15 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-05 21:13 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-10 17:26 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-12 10:56 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-13 15:27 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-13 15:29 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-14 00:29 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-14 11:34 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-15 02:48 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-16 13:33 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-17 23:05 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-20 11:00 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 12:49 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-14 11:35 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-15 02:56 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-16 13:33 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-17 23:12 +0200
Re: Spiderman movies Merlyne <kamilot3@aol.com> - 2023-04-20 11:00 +0000
Re: Spiderman movies BeH <beh.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 12:56 +0200
csiph-web