Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #577074

Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions.

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions.
Date	2022-02-14 14:13 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<sudo2t$1lem$3@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<3eb79881-5a8d-41c2-a3ce-b5c3d806505an@googlegroups.com> <sub16f$p8v$4@gioia.aioe.org> <c438a376-654a-4f5e-bf84-d1fa677d441fn@googlegroups.com> <sublli$fta$1@gioia.aioe.org> <2205b61f-52c0-43b0-b8a0-5588cee69f42n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 2:20:22 PM UTC-5, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>>> On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 8:30:59 AM UTC-5, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: 
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>>>>> The paper in the following link describes a new concept of gravity called DTG 
>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf 
>>>>> DTG explains orbital mechanics,; why gravity is able to act on a 
>>>>> distance; there is no need for the gravitons......etc. 
>>>>> 
>>>> Lol. Having an reason for gravity to act over a distance is not “explaining 
>>>> orbital mechanics”. Idiot. 
>>> 
>>> Moron, DTG is composed of two forces: 
>>> 1.The earth and the moon are expanding in the same direction as the 
>>> universe expands. This causes an attractive force between them. This is 
>>> based on the fact experimentally that any two massive objects moving in 
>>> the same direction in the E-Matrix will cause an attractive force between them
>> That’s not explaining orbital mechanics.
> 
> Idiot, that’s part of gravity. 

Still hasn’t got anything to do with orbital mechanics.

> However, if gravity is just attractive then the moon would just crash
> inti=o the earth over time. 

Not true. You fail high school physics again.

> The repulsive CRE is preventing it from crashing into the earth. 
>>> 
>>> 2. In order for the moon to maintain a stable orbit for billions of 
>>> years, there must be a repulsive 
>>> CRE force and this force is derived from the fact that the earth and the 
>>> moon are confined to follow the divergent structure of the E-Matrix.
>> No repulsive force necessary. Nor have you proven it necessary.
> 
> Idiot, without the CRE force the moon is not able to maintain a stable orbit. 

Nope. You fail high school physics again.

> Gee you are so fucking stupid. No wonder you are just a woodworker.
>>> 
>>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the result of these two 
>>> opposing forces acting on the earth and the moon acting on them independently 
>>> 
>>> 4. Read my paper carefully it is a revolutionary concept of gravity. No 
>>> wonder Einstein and physicists failed to come up with a proper theory of 
>>> gravity after 110 years of trying......the reason is that Einstein got 
>>> the wrong model to develop his GRT. 
>>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstractions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-13 03:11 -0800
  Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-13 13:30 +0000
    Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-13 09:13 -0800
      Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-13 19:20 +0000
        Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-14 05:17 -0800
          Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-14 14:13 +0000
            Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 06:16 -0800
              Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 14:44 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 07:08 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-02-15 16:13 +0100
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 07:17 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 07:56 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 16:11 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 16:04 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-16 01:38 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-16 03:37 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-16 13:32 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 08:26 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 17:06 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 09:25 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 10:00 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 18:45 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 06:13 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 14:55 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 07:43 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 16:27 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 08:37 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-19 06:43 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-19 06:58 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-19 15:24 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-19 19:20 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-20 23:09 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-20 21:58 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-21 03:16 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-21 05:18 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-21 09:49 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-21 16:04 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-21 19:23 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-21 23:30 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-22 05:29 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-22 14:58 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-21 05:14 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-21 13:34 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-21 16:07 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-22 00:13 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-22 05:18 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-22 14:42 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-22 10:18 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-23 08:43 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-23 17:05 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-25 04:13 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-25 14:02 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-25 06:10 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 03:58 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 13:55 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-25 16:07 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 04:08 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 13:55 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 06:11 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 06:51 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 15:17 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 09:55 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 18:28 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 10:49 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 19:03 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-27 05:10 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-27 13:52 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-27 05:59 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-27 14:11 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-28 06:02 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-28 16:00 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-28 11:44 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-27 00:11 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-26 22:34 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-27 05:18 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-27 13:52 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-27 14:21 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-28 05:58 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-28 16:00 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-28 11:47 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-28 16:59 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-28 21:15 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-01 12:23 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-03-02 07:03 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-27 00:07 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-23 12:15 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-23 09:49 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-25 04:17 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Vinal Rice <wiw@vncspc.ca> - 2022-02-25 13:14 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-25 05:20 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-25 16:19 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-25 13:47 -0800
              Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-15 10:21 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 15:46 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 08:02 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-15 11:10 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 08:46 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 16:11 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 16:00 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-16 20:38 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 08:17 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-17 13:02 -0500
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Calvin Wood <riew@cmvne.na> - 2022-02-17 18:10 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 10:14 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 10:36 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 18:56 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 06:25 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 14:55 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 07:45 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-18 16:27 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-19 06:53 -0800
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-02-19 15:24 +0000
                Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abst ract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-17 16:14 -0500
      Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstract ions. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 22:15 -0800
        Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-16 03:40 -0800
          Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstract ions. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-02-16 11:26 -0500
            Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstract ions. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-02-16 08:36 -0800
            Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstract ions. Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-02-17 08:21 -0800
        Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstract ions. Bradlee Evers <uuda@cnvwa.ni> - 2022-02-18 14:48 +0000
  Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstractions. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-02-13 16:55 -0800
  Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstractions. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-02-15 11:42 -0800
  Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstractions. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-02-27 20:35 -0800
    Re: Gravity is simple, no need for Einstein’s abstractions. Mitchell Leary <be@nonua.in> - 2022-02-28 19:36 +0000

csiph-web