Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #62559
| From | Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? |
| Date | 2024-12-17 04:34 +0000 |
| Organization | none-at-all |
| Message-ID | <slrnvm1vq6.ma7.spamtrap42@one.localnet> (permalink) |
| References | (17 earlier) <vjhnng$3gkob$2@dont-email.me> <kOidnfoq2O4TZMH6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> <ls4m2rFig06U3@mid.individual.net> <JUKdnSwFa9hH_MP6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vjmcbb$hgj4$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2024-12-15, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 15/12/2024 04:57, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> "seems close enough" >> is NOT good enough. Planes, spacecraft, bridges, huge >> buildings, medical implants - GOTTA refine with the >> hard-core/hard-math tools. > > I think you would be aghast at how "seems good enough" guides most > engineering design. > > No-one accurately measures every single component that goes into a design. > > At best they do a full test on the final product. > > There is always room for the black swan unit where all the tolerances > were exactly the wrong way. > > In general it is cheaper to simply scrap that one, or if it escapes into > the wild, give the customer a replacement. > > The development algorithm of the racing Cosworth V8 was "remove metal > till it breaks, then put that bit back again". > > And we can only calculate what we thought of. Some failure modes are > completely unexpected. > > Some of the most durable civil engineering was done by Victorian > engineers who were not able to do the calculations. Their conservative > over-enginering resulted in structures that stand good even to day. > > Admittedly their failures are long gone :-( (Tay bridge, any one?) Don't have chapter and verse on a source, but I understand some sources say the reason Roman civil engineering created such durable structures was because the engineer who designed each arch was required to stand underneath it while the scaffolding was removed. The engineers who didn't over-engineer their arches didn't design many of them. The thought of doing long division in Roman numerals fills me with dread--let along manually doing finite element analysis. -- Robert Riches spamtrap42@jacob21819.net (Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 13:58 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 08:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 00:45 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 06:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 03:50 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 01:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 22:26 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 08:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 04:20 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 12:54 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 02:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-13 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 00:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-13 22:40 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-12 21:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-12 20:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-13 04:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 08:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-13 19:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-13 20:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 00:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-14 05:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 06:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-14 12:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-14 16:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-14 21:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 00:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 01:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 10:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 23:03 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:24 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 08:32 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 16:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-13 22:20 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-14 05:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 06:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 06:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-14 23:57 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 06:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-15 23:47 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 10:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 21:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-15 23:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 12:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-17 04:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 06:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-17 23:40 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-15 22:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 08:43 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 08:44 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 23:14 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 04:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-12 23:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-18 06:42 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:29 +0000
csiph-web