Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #62594

Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?

Message-ID <6761e241@news.ausics.net> (permalink)
From not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Subject Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
References (4 earlier) <vj77pi$f8rj$9@dont-email.me> <24ffec92-9486-251d-7a42-d376b88b2c9b@example.net> <20241209135847.00004fb7@gmail.com> <lrpjjpFpep6U1@mid.individual.net> <G5mdnXqNwMsTeMr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Date 2024-12-18 06:42 +1000
Organization Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net

Show all headers | View raw


186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
> On 12/9/24 8:25 PM, rbowman wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:58:47 -0800, John Ames wrote:
>> 
>>> Any chance of this conversation returning to anything even *slightly*
>>> more relevant to *nix, computers in general, or, like, *anything* else?
>>> Maybe I should dig up some old Francis E. Dec rant for a more coherent/
>>> relevant refresher course...
>> 
>> Feel free to start a thread.
> 
>   Ummmmm ... I just TRIED with the "Bit-Slice" topic.
>   Jumped IMMEDIATELY back to 'non-OS/Computer stuff'  :-)
> 
>   Was HOPING for discussion/insight into 'alternative'
>   schemes for 'CPU's and such derived from older solutions.

For which there are far more relevant newsgroups than
comp.os.linux.misc to discuss that in too.

>   Houston, we have a problem .............

That an off-topic discussion went further off-topic doesn't
surprise me much. But I do find it ironic that I lurk in
groups which are relevant to some of the non-computer
discussion here, and they've been dead as a doornail for
years now.

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-18 06:42 +1000

csiph-web