Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #62594
| Message-ID | <6761e241@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) |
| Subject | Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| References | (4 earlier) <vj77pi$f8rj$9@dont-email.me> <24ffec92-9486-251d-7a42-d376b88b2c9b@example.net> <20241209135847.00004fb7@gmail.com> <lrpjjpFpep6U1@mid.individual.net> <G5mdnXqNwMsTeMr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| Date | 2024-12-18 06:42 +1000 |
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > On 12/9/24 8:25 PM, rbowman wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:58:47 -0800, John Ames wrote: >> >>> Any chance of this conversation returning to anything even *slightly* >>> more relevant to *nix, computers in general, or, like, *anything* else? >>> Maybe I should dig up some old Francis E. Dec rant for a more coherent/ >>> relevant refresher course... >> >> Feel free to start a thread. > > Ummmmm ... I just TRIED with the "Bit-Slice" topic. > Jumped IMMEDIATELY back to 'non-OS/Computer stuff' :-) > > Was HOPING for discussion/insight into 'alternative' > schemes for 'CPU's and such derived from older solutions. For which there are far more relevant newsgroups than comp.os.linux.misc to discuss that in too. > Houston, we have a problem ............. That an off-topic discussion went further off-topic doesn't surprise me much. But I do find it ironic that I lurk in groups which are relevant to some of the non-computer discussion here, and they've been dead as a doornail for years now. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-18 06:42 +1000
csiph-web