Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mail.misc > #325
| From | Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.mail.misc, comp.mail.misc, comp.mail.headers |
| Subject | Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? |
| Followup-To | comp.mail.misc |
| Date | 2012-10-27 18:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnk8o8kq.1d3.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <5078AD79.AADEC93F@Man.com> <k6fdi4$o9e$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.mail.misc
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.mail.misc.] On Sat, 2012-10-27, Solbu wrote: > > Mail Man sent the following transmission through subspace: > >> I wanted to know why the firmware programmers would have used this string >> for their ehlo greeting > > They use it because more and more SMTP servers require a HELO/EHLO > greeting before they accept any email. Huh? HELO has been mandatory with SMTP since the 1980s. There may be servers which are "permissive in what they accept" and continue without it, but if you're writing a client, why take the chance? /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
Back to comp.mail.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-12 19:53 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Solbu <solbu@solbu.net.ugyldig> - 2012-10-27 03:31 +0200
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-27 18:06 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-27 20:14 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201210.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-10-28 14:07 +0100
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-10-28 12:35 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-10-28 20:49 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-29 22:08 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Claus Aßmann <ca+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@mine.informatik.uni-kiel.de> - 2012-11-02 02:04 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-11-02 08:53 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Claus Aßmann <ca+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@mine.informatik.uni-kiel.de> - 2012-11-02 22:19 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? "Thor Kottelin" <thor@anta.net> - 2012-11-03 11:52 +0200
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-11-03 09:44 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mail Man <Mail@Man.com> - 2012-11-03 09:56 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) - 2012-11-10 13:07 -0600
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Mike Scott <usenet.14@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2012-11-13 09:45 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-10-28 22:17 -0400
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgroups@bde-arc.ampr.org> - 2014-01-31 13:06 -0800
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2014-02-01 17:45 +0000
Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ??? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2014-02-02 00:48 -0600
Windows Live Mail (Was: Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ???) Tristan Miller <psychonaut@nothingisreal.com> - 2014-02-03 14:58 +0100
Re: Windows Live Mail (Was: Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ???) VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2014-02-03 21:32 -0600
Re: Windows Live Mail (Was: Re: Would your SMTP server accept -> ehlo MAPI1.0 ???) Tristan Miller <psychonaut@nothingisreal.com> - 2014-02-05 17:29 +0100
csiph-web