Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #410269
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-04-21 15:46 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yy1vcaa4js98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <210420171013465413%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1t5dmejs98qf@red.lan> <210420171032312950%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1usmdyjs98qf@red.lan> <210420171040573298%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:40:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.yy1usmdyjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > As for making prints look just like those from a 35mm camera, that >> >> >> >> > sort of degradation is easily done with software. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I take it you didn't have a professional SLR 35mm camera. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > film is worse than digital in every metric. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > digital can be downgraded to look like film if the user wants, but >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > would be stupid if quality is the goal. >> >> >> >> >> >> Decent film is as good as digital. >> >> > >> >> > definitely not. >> >> > >> >> >> I mean professional quality low ASA >> >> >> film on a camera with a good lens. >> >> > >> >> > doesn't matter. >> >> >> >> Maybe not nowadays, digital improves all the time. >> > >> > digital has been better than film for well over a decade. >> >> I'd have rated a professional film camera at about 6MP. > > 6 mp cameras were common over a decade ago. Probably, I have a bad concept of time. I once tried to return a 3 year old VCR under a 1 year warranty. I had a £3000 (DSLR with two lenses) that was 6MP. I thought that was about 6 years ago, probably more. > it also depends on the film too. > >> Don't ever get a Fuji digital camera, they LIE about the MP. > > no they don't. Oh they do. I have a compact digital from them which claims 10MP. It's easy to see it's only a quarter of that when you zoom in in Photoshop. They use software interpolation inside the camera, the CCD is not 10MP. It's a Finepix S1000FD if you want to check. > the only company that lies about the number of megapixels is sigma. Only ever used their lenses, which are good. -- I met this gal in a bar and one thing lead to another. I said, "Let's go back to my place." She said, "Oh, do you have cable?" I said, "No, but I have some old ropes that should do just fine."
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:01 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:21 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:35 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:40 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:46 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:04 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 16:11 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:28 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 16:39 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:41 -0400
csiph-web