Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #410263

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution

From	"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution
Date	2017-04-21 15:35 +0100
Organization	~
Message-ID	<op.yy1usmdyjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <150420171445165045%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1nocmojs98qf@red.lan> <210420171013465413%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yy1t5dmejs98qf@red.lan> <210420171032312950%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:32:31 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <op.yy1t5dmejs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword
> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>> >> >> > As for making prints look just like those from a 35mm camera, that
>> >> >> > sort of degradation is easily done with software.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I take it you didn't have a professional SLR 35mm camera.
>> >> >
>> >> > film is worse than digital in every metric.
>> >> >
>> >> > digital can be downgraded to look like film if the user wants, but that
>> >> > would be stupid if quality is the goal.
>> >>
>> >> Decent film is as good as digital.
>> >
>> > definitely not.
>> >
>> >> I mean professional quality low ASA
>> >> film on a camera with a good lens.
>> >
>> > doesn't matter.
>>
>> Maybe not nowadays, digital improves all the time.
>
> digital has been better than film for well over a decade.

I'd have rated a professional film camera at about 6MP.

Don't ever get a Fuji digital camera, they LIE about the MP.  Canon gives you what it says on the tin.

-- 
Barry bit Ben's bum before Betty bumfingered big Bertha's buttocks beside Brian's burning bonfire. -- Ronnie Tompkins, circa 2014.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:01 +0100
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:21 +0100
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
        Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:35 +0100
          Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:40 -0400
            Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 15:46 +0100
              Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:04 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 16:11 +0100
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:28 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 16:39 +0100
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 11:41 -0400

csiph-web