Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #408602
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: BOOM! |
| Date | 2017-04-15 18:42 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ocu7e4$mo9$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <azv003a.ghuru@rooftop.invalid> <ocrst8$oof$2@dont-email.me> <azx8c902.b@rooftop.invalid> <oct8qh$dlg$3@dont-email.me> <ahjxv03.agu4@rooftop.invalid> |
On 4/15/2017 3:29 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 4/14/2017 9:48 PM, owl wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/14/2017 8:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 4/14/2017 8:14 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/14/2017 1:49 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I may push the column limit up into the millions just for >>>>>>>>> the hell of it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> beat that horse... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Poor dead horse Excel 2016 -- pwnage hand-delivered from >>>>>>> 1982. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you can't reach the cell, does it exist? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can you reach cell XFD1048575 (counting from 0) on your Excel >>>>> 2016? 17 billion 8-byte pointers. Go for it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Done Mar 2007 (10 years ago) in Excel 2007. I was running 1GB or >>>> 2GB of RAM then. >>>> >>>> http://www.angelfire.com/planet/dfs0/XFD1048576.png >>>> >>> >>> How much swap? >> >> >> Whatever the default was. >> >> There were no speed issues, even with low memory. Excel and Access have >> always been exceedingly fast on Windows. Apparently the older versions >> were written in C and assembler. >> >> http://www.lextrait.com/vincent/implementations.html >> >> Access SELECTS and sorts best every db I've ever used. >> > > Obviously Excel is using a different allocation strategy. Microsoft is smarter than sc. > SC allocates for pointers for every cell in the range bounded by A0 and the outermost > vertex cell. It does that allocation just moving to the cell location? That seems wonky. > So the question becomes, if Excel doesn't even allocate > pointers for those cells, do *they* even exist? I showed you they exist. If I can instantly reach the outermost cell in Excel - or any cell in between - and enter data (as shown) and apply all the same functionality to those cells that I can in the range A1:F10, with no discernable difference in speed, there is no question. > I'm going to dedicate > a 1TB usb drive for swap and give it a test run under sc using Excel's > approximate row/column limits. Whip that horse until it foams and drops. > A nearly empty file should come in > at under 150 GB even assuming some reserve allocation. You're talking about saving a file with a little bit of text or formulas in the first few and the outermost few cell(s), right? Why would you expect it to be 150GB? If it is that big, something's way wrong. I would try to save such a file with Excel 2007 but I'm running 2003 and MS makes it a hassle to run 2 versions of Office (you can only have one version of Outlook installed at a time).
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-14 17:07 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-14 13:33 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-14 17:49 +0000
Re: BOOM! fr314159@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 13:00 -0700
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-14 20:26 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-15 10:00 -0400
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-14 19:58 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-15 00:14 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-14 20:23 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-15 00:51 +0000
Re: BOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 18:02 -0700
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-15 01:48 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-15 10:00 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-15 19:29 +0000
Re: BOOM! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-15 16:24 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-15 21:10 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-15 18:42 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-15 23:31 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-15 20:29 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-16 05:25 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-16 19:49 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-17 00:51 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-17 12:54 -0400
Re: BOOM! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 10:06 -0700
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-17 19:28 -0400
Re: BOOM! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 17:21 -0700
Re: BOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 10:26 -0700
Ping DFS! - Re: BOOM! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 10:34 -0700
Re: Ping DFS! - Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-17 19:25 -0400
Re: Ping DFS! - Re: BOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 16:45 -0700
Re: Ping DFS! - Re: BOOM! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 17:29 -0700
Re: Ping DFS! - ReBOOM! Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-17 19:58 -0500
Re: Ping DFS! - ReBOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 18:12 -0700
Re: Ping DFS! - ReBOOM! Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-17 20:25 -0500
Re: Ping DFS! - ReBOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 18:46 -0700
Re: Ping DFS! - ReBOOM! Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-17 21:20 -0500
Re: Ping DFS! - ReBOOM! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 19:00 -0700
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-17 17:29 +0000
Re: BOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 10:34 -0700
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-17 17:49 +0000
Re: BOOM! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-17 19:25 -0400
Re: BOOM! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-18 00:06 +0000
Re: BOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 17:28 -0700
Re: BOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:37 -0700
Re: BOOM! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-15 06:41 -0400
Re: BOOM! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-14 13:34 -0400
Re: BOOM! John McCue <jmccue@jmcnet2.bstnma.east.verizon.net> - 2017-04-15 21:33 +0000
Re: BOOM! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-17 07:09 -0500
Re: BOOM! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:23 -0700
csiph-web