Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #173314

Re: Background check

Show all headers | View raw

In article <Okiat.16175$jt2.12408@fx06.fr7>,
 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> wrote:

> owl wrote:
> 
> > h
> 
> 
> Slider troll posting drivel.
> 
> Looks like trolls got badly toasted, or something important has happened.
> 
> Microshaft to loose 20% of its revenue?
> 
> Appile loosing its slide to unlock obvious software patent?
> 
> Appile loosing its case where its MBA's (read non-techies)
> have been ordered not to use the courts as business tools?
> 
> 
> Linux still wins.

This is curious. Wins what? I mean, I've been a regular in these 
advocacy groups for almost two decades now and Mac advocates, or Mac 
users don't go around claiming that Mac OS X is "winning" something. 
Which makes me wonder just what Linux is winning? Is it all about 
Android? Linux is "winning" web servers and smart phones but losing 
everything else? And if Linux is "winning" smart phones, isn't BSD 
winning it as much? At least when it comes to revenue, right?



-- 
Sandman[.net]

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 18:15 +0000
  Re: Background check 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-13 20:27 +0100
    Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 19:43 +0000
      Re: Background check Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:05 -0700
    Re: Background check chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
      Re: Background check Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2013-04-13 22:15 +0000
        Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 23:25 +0000
      Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 23:21 +0000
    Re: Background check Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-04-13 22:39 +0200
      Re: Background check 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-13 21:51 +0100
        Re: Background check Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-04-13 22:58 +0200
          Re: Background check Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 14:15 -0700
        7 posts bizarre and baseless conspiracy theory aimed at pleasing the herd Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 14:01 -0700
      Re: Background check GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:16 -0600

csiph-web