Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #173299

Re: Background check

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Background check
Date	2013-04-13 19:43 +0000
Organization	ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID	<enf83.3at3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	<ehf884lt.a34@rooftop.invalid> <Okiat.16175$jt2.12408@fx06.fr7>

Show all headers | View raw

7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> wrote:
> owl wrote:

> > h


> Slider troll posting drivel.

> Looks like trolls got badly toasted, or something important has happened.

> Microshaft to loose 20% of its revenue?

> Appile loosing its slide to unlock obvious software patent?

> Appile loosing its case where its MBA's (read non-techies)
> have been ordered not to use the courts as business tools?


> Linux still wins.

"Loosing"?  Don't they teach English in England?

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 18:15 +0000
  Re: Background check 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-13 20:27 +0100
    Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 19:43 +0000
      Re: Background check Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:05 -0700
    Re: Background check chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
      Re: Background check Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2013-04-13 22:15 +0000
        Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 23:25 +0000
      Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 23:21 +0000
    Re: Background check Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-04-13 22:39 +0200
      Re: Background check 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-13 21:51 +0100
        Re: Background check Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-04-13 22:58 +0200
          Re: Background check Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 14:15 -0700
        7 posts bizarre and baseless conspiracy theory aimed at pleasing the herd Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 14:01 -0700
      Re: Background check GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:16 -0600

csiph-web