7 posts bizarre and baseless conspiracy theory aimed at pleasing the herd

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	7 posts bizarre and baseless conspiracy theory aimed at pleasing the herd
Date	2013-04-13 14:01 -0700
Message-ID	<CD8F15AF.191C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	<ehf884lt.a34@rooftop.invalid> <Okiat.16175$jt2.12408@fx06.fr7> <mr-95F8CC.22390713042013@News.Individual.NET> <Zzjat.3945$az2.2512@fx08.fr7>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/13/13 1:51 PM, in article Zzjat.3945$az2.2512@fx08.fr7, "7"
<email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> wrote:

> Sandman Snit wrote:
> 
> 
>>>> h
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Slider troll posting drivel.
>>> 
>>> Looks like trolls got badly toasted, or something important has happened.
>>> 
>>> Microshaft to loose 20% of its revenue?
>>> 
>>> Appile loosing its slide to unlock obvious software patent?
>>> 
>>> Appile loosing its case where its MBA's (read non-techies)
>>> have been ordered not to use the courts as business tools?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Linux still wins.
>> 
>> This is curious. Wins what?
> 
> 
> The mere fact that slider trolls are being commissioned to slide
> articles in comp.os.linux.advocacy should tell you that Linux
> and its power has grown to the point where MBA (read non-techies)
> running big crocporations have been forced to send these trolls
> should amaze you, as it also means Linux has won.
> If competitors to Linux had some useful product
> to compete with Linux, they would be trolling with that.
> But they don't. Because they can't. Because they don't have products.
> What they have are worth a laugh.
> Laughing at their crap products they must avoid.
> So they send in the trolls.
> Trolls with long long internet trolling histories.
> 
> 



-- 
"I have never, ever cared about really anything but the Linux desktop."
-- Linus Torvalds

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 18:15 +0000
  Re: Background check 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-13 20:27 +0100
    Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 19:43 +0000
      Re: Background check Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:05 -0700
    Re: Background check chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
      Re: Background check Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2013-04-13 22:15 +0000
        Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 23:25 +0000
      Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 23:21 +0000
    Re: Background check Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-04-13 22:39 +0200
      Re: Background check 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-13 21:51 +0100
        Re: Background check Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-04-13 22:58 +0200
          Re: Background check Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 14:15 -0700
        7 posts bizarre and baseless conspiracy theory aimed at pleasing the herd Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 14:01 -0700
      Re: Background check GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:16 -0600

csiph-web