Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #68836
| References | (6 earlier) <1395518482.78665.YahooMailNeo@web163804.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <lglg0u$446$1@ger.gmane.org> <1395586700.55921.YahooMailNeo@web163806.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <CAPTjJmpotXCzkB3NMh9xnJfCVGCeAsYpz6F4VaMA0wZKdqyJQQ@mail.gmail.com> <lgo1kp$k75$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-24 13:04 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Question about Source Control |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8431.1395626704.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: > With multiple branches (as with 2.7, 3.4, and default for cpython) and > multiple active developers (20?) commiting to those brances, commits are > definitely not free. I would not exactly call them as cheap as you seem to > imply either. That said, I have occasionally pushed interim changes that put > code in an improved and stable state. > > N. Coughlan has suggested improving the cpython infrastructure and > procedures to reduce the cost of commits to encourage more people to make > more commits (in the sense of more lines changed, not more pieces) and > improve cpython faster. When I call them cheap, what I mean is that there's little difference between a single commit and 2-3 commits as a group. Yes, there's a bit more difference when you're cherry-picking them to other branches, and maybe an infrastructure/procedure change could help with that; but once they're there in history, it doesn't hurt to have three separate commits doing related work, keeping the distinct parts distinct. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Question about Source Control "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-03-18 08:42 +0200
Re: Question about Source Control Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-03-19 10:51 +1300
Re: Question about Source Control Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-03-18 21:38 -0400
Re: Question about Source Control Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-03-18 21:12 -0500
Re: Question about Source Control albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-03-22 17:32 +0000
Re: Question about Source Control Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-03-22 13:49 -0500
Re: Question about Source Control Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-22 13:01 -0700
Re: Question about Source Control Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-03-22 22:18 -0400
Re: Question about Source Control Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-23 07:58 -0700
Re: Question about Source Control Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-24 09:56 +1100
Re: Question about Source Control Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-03-23 21:26 -0400
Re: Question about Source Control Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-24 01:42 +0000
Re: Question about Source Control Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-24 13:04 +1100
Re: Question about Source Control Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-03-24 00:55 -0400
Re: Question about Source Control Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 13:34 +1100
csiph-web